Corporation: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Corporation ==
A Corporation from a statutory point of view is "a company or group of people authorized to act as a single entity (legally a person) and recognized as such in law."
A Corporation from a statutory point of view is "a company or group of people authorized to act as a single entity (legally a person) and recognized as such in law."


Line 8: Line 10:
We see the word ''corporation'' coming from the  Latin ''corporatio''(n-) and from the  Latin ''corporare'' ‘combine in one body’.
We see the word ''corporation'' coming from the  Latin ''corporatio''(n-) and from the  Latin ''corporare'' ‘combine in one body’.


Many terms have a elements of natural definitions of other terms  that can be used within their own  descriptions and that description may depend upon a certain point of view. In all corporations there are elements of a [[Trust|trust]] but a trust in itself is not a corporation. There also elements of [[ Agency vs Trust|agency]] within a corporation.  
Many terms have elements of natural definitions of other terms  that can be used within their own  descriptions and that description may depend upon a certain point of view. In all corporations there are elements of a [[Trust|trust]] but a trust in itself is not a corporation. There also elements of [[ Agency vs Trust|agency]] within a corporation.  
What is entrusted in a corporation may include certain ''unalienable [[Rights]]'' of individuals which are endowed upon or in them by their Creator. We know that that among these rights ''are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness''.  
 
What is entrusted in a corporation may include certain ''unalienable [[Rights]]'' of individuals which are endowed upon or in them by their Creator.  
 
Rights are also responsibilities. If you reject, neglect, or transfer responsibility you may diminish your personal access to a right.<Ref>See "Call no man [[Father]] upon the earth."</Ref>


But men also create and endow some of those individual rights upon their own creations. These creations are often corporate in nature and like the [[Golem]] of ancient folklore  may develop a life of their own and even turn on their creator like the Frankenstein monster with a disastrous vengeance.
<blockquote>
"All States whatever are corporations." Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall.(US) 419, 468, 1 L.Ed. 440.
</blockquote>
 
We know that that among these rights ''are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness''.
 
But men also create and endow some of those individual rights upon their own creations. These creations are often corporate in nature and like the [[Golem]] of ancient folklore  may develop a life of their own and even turn on their creator like the soulless Frankenstein monster with a disastrous vengeance.


See also [[Society_and_community]]
See also [[Society_and_community]]


== Corporation ==
== Modern Corporation ==
 
The modern term corporation is now a civil term while ''Family'' was the term used to describe the union of man and woman as Husband and Wife which was originally a ''natural domestic relationship'', and not ''civil'' in the sense of be ''connected to the administration of government''.<Ref>See [[Citizen]] definition. See also [[Marriage]].</Ref>


The modern term corporation is now a civil term while ''Family'' was the term used to describe the union of man and woman as Husband and Wife which was originally a natural domestic relationship, and not civil. Over the centuries governments have produced a civil relationship often called [[marriage]] that incorporates the natural domestic relationship into the province o the state.
Over the centuries governments have produced a civil relationship often called [[marriage]] that incorporates the natural domestic relationship into the province of the state.


The term corporation before the institution of Civil government was merely the result of natural contracts produced by agreement.
The term corporation before the institution of Civil government was merely the result of natural contracts produced by agreement.


These natural relationships of trust and union by agreement and contract has granted power to the corporate state by uniting on civil contracts or [[social compacts]] under civil authority.
These natural relationships of trust and union by agreement and contract has granted power to the corporate state by uniting through civil contracts or [[social compacts]] under civil authority.


* ''The autonomous  Family in Nature holds a separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them. And  a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should  [Declaration of Independence|declare] the causes and [[consent]] which may create bonds of union or cause separations from other Families or Corporate states, barring the chains of debt.''
* ''The autonomous  Family in Nature holds a separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them. And  a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should  [Declaration of Independence|declare] the causes and [[consent]] which may create bonds of union or cause separations from other Families or Corporate states, barring the chains of debt.''


When we bind our self by contract with or to the civil ''[[Fathers]] of the earth'' terms of Nature and [[Natural Law]]  may continue to be used within these new realms of created law. The [[contract]] makes the law.
When we bind our self by contract with or to the civil ''[[Fathers]] of the earth'' terms of Nature and [[Natural Law]]  may continue to be used within these new realms of created law. ''The [[contract]] makes the law.''


It has been suggested by some that "by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the title."
A corporation can be formed under different authorities. Most corporations we see today are formed under the authority of the States but there are others that can be formed under different authorities such as the Church or what might be called the [[Body of Christ|Corpus of Christ]].


They go onto explain that the ''"Founding Fathers"'' wrote ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ noting that neither the words ‘united’ nor ‘states’ began with capital letters. They go on to reason that the 'CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is not the same document.
{{Template:Church}}


They go so far as to say things like this act "ended all our rights of sovereignty [sui juris]." This of course is nonsense and irrational. Since our rights are endowed by our creator their is no act of congress or any other body that can remove those right. It would take some act of consent on our own part to end our access to natural rights.


Since natural rights are passed from generation to generation our parents can do things to bar our natural access to rights.
{{Act of 1871}}


Is the ''United States'' as an entity created by the constitution written '''for''' its creation a corporation?


Those men called ''Founding Fathers'' did write the constitution '''for''' the states to ratify and empower. As it was presented it was for those States to unite in a common vote of ratification.  Many don’t realize that the majority of the people in America were in opposition to the ratification of the Constitution for the United States, at the time of its creation by the individual States. Those States remained “as foreign to each other as Mexico is to Canada”,<Ref>Clarks Summary of American Law, Constitutional Law.</Ref> both before and after the Constitution.


{{Corporatism}}


Yes it does state in Title 28 USC § 3002 - Definitions<Br>
Corporations are almost always a pooling of power of individuals into a collective group and unfortunately, power corrupts.
: (15) “United States” means—
::        (A) a Federal corporation;
::        (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
::        (C) an instrumentality of the United States.


But that is just stated that the Federal corporations created by the acts of the United States are a part of the United States.
If we want governments to change we must change. we must begin to [[repent]] and attend to the {{Weightier matters}}.


What most of these people who say that the act of 1871 created a new corporate United States government that has enslaved the people do not understand is that
== Audio and Video Part 1 on 1871 ==
the people of America were [[Not a party]] to the constitution ''for the united States'' or ''of the United States''.


The United States created by this corporate charter called the Constitution was established in international law by the agreement of the States so that it could act and operate in international law. It was not for profit but it was for purposes listed in that Constitution. It had limited power and again the people were [[Not a party]] to it. But they were guaranteed the natural power of contract. The individual states and the individual people of America have changed their relationship to the United States.
{{#ev:youtube|VOiRCpri9Vw|300|right|Interview with government official concerning the [[Act of 1871]] theory of incorporation. While a [[corporation]] can be used for multiple purpose like the ancient [[Golem]] it is not the real problem. Understand "Contract, Covenants, and Constitution" can eliminate a lot of misunderstanding. Time  }}


It is easier to blame the present status of United States citizens on some group or act of congress rather than take a look at our own actions or sloth in producing the present state of freedom or lack of it in the world. The truth is the present state of things is the result of our own [[Covetous practices]], [[sloth]] and [[wantonness]].
Audio file<Br>
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/20210118video1871e.mp3


That may not be what people want to hear but knowing he truth, the whole truth, and providing for it is the only thing which will break the chains we have already forged for ourselves.
Video link
https://youtu.be/VOiRCpri9Vw
 
 
----


{{Template:HHCBooks}}
{{Template:HHCBooks}}
Line 70: Line 81:


{{Template:Gregory-info‎}}
{{Template:Gregory-info‎}}
[[Category:Definitions]]

Latest revision as of 14:08, 25 July 2023

Corporation

A Corporation from a statutory point of view is "a company or group of people authorized to act as a single entity (legally a person) and recognized as such in law."

A corporation can be defined more basically and in the simplest of terms as:

  • "Two or more people gathered together for a particular purpose as if they were one person under a preexisting authority."

By that definition a Husband and Wife who are married as one person[1], and their off spring, the fruit of that natural union, are the original form of a corporation but we do not call them a corporation but a Family.

We see the word corporation coming from the Latin corporatio(n-) and from the Latin corporare ‘combine in one body’.

Many terms have elements of natural definitions of other terms that can be used within their own descriptions and that description may depend upon a certain point of view. In all corporations there are elements of a trust but a trust in itself is not a corporation. There also elements of agency within a corporation.

What is entrusted in a corporation may include certain unalienable Rights of individuals which are endowed upon or in them by their Creator.

Rights are also responsibilities. If you reject, neglect, or transfer responsibility you may diminish your personal access to a right.[2]

"All States whatever are corporations." Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall.(US) 419, 468, 1 L.Ed. 440.

We know that that among these rights are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

But men also create and endow some of those individual rights upon their own creations. These creations are often corporate in nature and like the Golem of ancient folklore may develop a life of their own and even turn on their creator like the soulless Frankenstein monster with a disastrous vengeance.

See also Society_and_community

Modern Corporation

The modern term corporation is now a civil term while Family was the term used to describe the union of man and woman as Husband and Wife which was originally a natural domestic relationship, and not civil in the sense of be connected to the administration of government.[3]

Over the centuries governments have produced a civil relationship often called marriage that incorporates the natural domestic relationship into the province of the state.

The term corporation before the institution of Civil government was merely the result of natural contracts produced by agreement.

These natural relationships of trust and union by agreement and contract has granted power to the corporate state by uniting through civil contracts or social compacts under civil authority.

  • The autonomous Family in Nature holds a separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them. And a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should [Declaration of Independence|declare] the causes and consent which may create bonds of union or cause separations from other Families or Corporate states, barring the chains of debt.

When we bind our self by contract with or to the civil Fathers of the earth terms of Nature and Natural Law may continue to be used within these new realms of created law. The contract makes the law.

A corporation can be formed under different authorities. Most corporations we see today are formed under the authority of the States but there are others that can be formed under different authorities such as the Church or what might be called the Corpus of Christ.

Church | Churches | Ekklesia | Called out | Church legally defined |
Priests | Minister | Deacon | Bishop | Elder | Clergy | Laity | Home church |
Early Church | Religion | Corban | Storehouse | Daily ministration |
The Way | Rituals and ceremonies | The Blessed Strategy |
Minister of the world | Welfare types | Socialism | Public religion |
The Church chained | Body of Christ | Kingdom of God | Levites |
The Free Church Report | Church Study course online | Unchurched |
Ministers | Christians | Modern Christians | Christians check list |
Theology | Lady Godiva | Whosoever believeth | Worship | Salvation |
Creed of the Apostles | Benefactors | Cain | Nimrod | Constantine |
Christian conflict | Fathers | Patristic | Ambrose | Jerome |



Consent - Consent not - Contract - Swear not - Native American Confederacy -
Propaganda - Sophistry - Deception - Measured - Article II Section 22 - Numerous scientists -
Oath of Naturalization - Spiritual Contract - The Journey - Withdraw consent -
Titular - Benefactors - Republic - Democracy - Adhocracy - Righteousness -
1 Samuel 8 - David Crockett - Self Defense - Network - CORE Solution -

The US Corporation

This recording includes an introduction to an Oregon House Bill 2238
Download Recording #1 or press play

It has been suggested by some that "by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the title."

They go on to explain that the "Founding Fathers" wrote ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ noting that neither the words ‘united’ nor ‘states’ began with capital letters. They go on to reason that the 'CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is not the same document.

They go so far as to say things like this act "ended all our rights of sovereignty [sui juris]." This of course is nonsense and an irrational approach to why rights seem to have diminished and the powers and influence of big government has increased. The theory is filled with ideas and concepts like The Matrix and the U.S. Constitution which we address in Contracts, Covenants and Constitutions.

The common explanation for the act and what you see in the clauses is much more mundane.

A Brief history

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 passed by the legislature of the 41 congress is an Act of Congress:

It revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia.

But the District of Columbia did not begin in 1871.

September 17, 1787 the Constitution for the United States of America by way of Article 1 Section 8, specifically in the last two clauses authorized congress to "Cession" land from the "States" to "become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State".

On July 16, 1790, in accord with the provisions of those clauses, this was accomplished when “ten mile square” territory was permanently established through the original District of Columbia Act. Under the Act, Congress also made the President the civic leader of the local government in all matters in said Territory.

By February 27, 1801, under the second District of Columbia Act, two counties were formed (incorporated) and their respective officers and district judges were appointed. Further, they established town governments of Alexandria, Georgetown, and Washington.

March 3, 1801, a Supplementary Act added the authority that the Marshals appointed by the respective District Court Judges collectively form a County Commission.

What these basic events we see from July 16, 1790 through 1801 The District of Columbia had become a “municipal corporation” and has been incorporated ever since.


Congress wrote

"That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation"

An “Organic Act” means a Charter Act is already in place which forms a corporation in fact from the First Act of incorporation.

It is true that the government or its officers seem to be exercising a great deal of power and authority not granted in the list of powers specified in the Constitution. We know that it states clearly in Article IX - Unenumerated Rights "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." But retaining rights require some effort and prohibits certain practices like coveting your neighbor's goods. If rights are only "reserved to the States respectively, or to the people" if they maintain the correlative responsibilities to those rights.


Since our rights are endowed by our Creator there is no act of congress or any other body that can remove those right. It would take some act of consent on our own part to end our access to natural rights.

To loose or restrict rights in a legally binding way that creates obligations and power to control agreements must be made which include offers and acceptance that are specific, implied, and consummated by sacrifice or debt.

Pacta servanda sunt

Since natural rights are passed from generation to generation our parents can do things to bar our natural access to rights just like the bondage of Egypt.

Is the United States as an entity created by the constitution written for its creation a corporation?

You only have to examine the basics of what makes an institution a corporation even without .

Those men called Founding Fathers did write the constitution for the states to ratify and empower. As it was presented it was for those States to unite in a common vote of ratification.

Many don’t realize that the majority of the people in America were in opposition to the ratification of the Constitution for the United States, at the time of its creation by the individual States. Those States remained “as foreign to each other as Mexico is to Canada”,[4] both before and after the Constitution.

"We the People" began with the names at the bottom of the page and increased with those who took office. It was well established the people of America were "not a party" to the Constitution.

Yes, it does state in Title 28 USC § 3002 - Definitions

(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

But that is just stating that the Federal corporations created by the acts of the United States are a part of the United States.

Pointing claims

The Act Of 1871; The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation! claims in a variety of videos and websites often go unchallenged because of lack of knowledge.

What most of these people who say that the act of 1871 created a new corporate UNITED STATES government that has enslaved the people do not understand is that the people of America were Not a party to the constitution for the united States or of the United States but they may have become a party to the powers of those institutions through a number of processes and practices.

There are numerous statements contained in the videos[5] that are misleading if not entirely false.

The original United States created by an agreement appears as a corporate charter called the Constitution and was established in international law by the agreement of the States so that it could act and operate in international law. It was not for profit but it was for purposes listed in that Constitution.

It had limited power and again the people were "Not a party to it". But they were guaranteed the natural power of contract with it, its institutions or even foreign institutions. The individual states and the individual people of America have changed their relationship to the United States and its agencies, institutions and creditors through application and acceptance, ergo contracts.

It is easier to blame the present status of United States citizens on some group or act of congress rather than to take an honest and objective look at our own actions or sloth in producing the present state of freedom or lack of liberty in the world. The truth is the present state of things is the result of our own Covetous Practices, sloth and wantonness if not our blind ignorance.



Numerous points of facts

.

  • The constitution was not created by the people nor by their consent.
  • It was an agreement between the states.
  • It did not grant sovereignty to the people.
  • The people are not a sovereign[6] government in a republic. They make no law for themselves.
  • Sovereign citizen is often a misnomer and loss of sovereignty as an individual free from things public is usually by consent.

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Sovereign


  • Most of the time we are not dealing with admiralty law but rather simple equity.

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Equity

“Civil Law, Roman Law, and Roman Civil Law are convertible phrases, meaning the same system of jurisprudence.” Black’s 3rd p 332.

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Civil_law

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Natural_law

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Common_Law

Constitutional law is often dependent on Natural Law or Jus Naturale what we call the Law of Nations or Ius gentium but the individual citizens were subject to administrative laws.

It is true there was [[Common Law|common law early in America but also civil la as well as equity. The Judiciary Act of 1789, officially titled "An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States," Speaks of admiralty and civil law as well as equity. http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Judiciary_Act_of_1789

Is the corporate government reaching beyond its jurisdiction or has the public granted a far reaching jurisdiction by entering into agreement with the state institutions.

The departments of the corporate government provided gifts, gratuities and benefits to the people which gives those departments a far greater reach than was originally intended be the organic constitution because nowhere was a welfare state a part of the scope of the original constitution... Certainly not for the private benefit of the individual at the expense of his neighbor through covetous practices.

"That the man who first ruined the Roman people twas he who first gave them treats and gratuities" Plutarch's Life of Coriolanus (c. 100 AD.)

Maxim of Law

  • He who has the risk has the dominion or advantage.
Ejus est periculum cujus est dominium aut commodum.

Yes this is not by accident. And were certainly warned by Polybius, Plutarch, David, Paul and Peter among others.

It may be convenient to blame our present state on some secret conspiracy foisted on the public but it is more honest to take our own responsibility for both the sloth and avarice that has accompanied the covetous practices of the people.

If you have become a slave how did this come about? http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Employ

Have been made a human resource like merchandise who has this happened? http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Merchandise

  • Was it through deception or misinformation or a blind eye to covetous practices?
  • If ignorance of the law is no excuse can anyone say they did not know that coveting your neighbor’s goods is not lawful?

You are snared by your own choices. http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Snare

  • Proverbs 12:24 The hand of the diligent shall bear rule: but the slothful shall be under tribute.
  • Psalms 69:22 Let their table become a snare before them: and [that which should have been] for [their] welfare, [let it become] a trap.
  • Romans 11:9 And David saith, Let their table be made a snare <3803>, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them:
  • Proverbs 23:1 ¶ When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what [is] before thee: 2 And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite. 3 Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat.

Maxim

  • He who derives a benefit from a thing, ought to feel the disadvantages attending it.
2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1433. Que sentit commodum, sentire debet et onus.
  • He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.
Qui tacet consentire videtur.

Honest and moral men would not have desired benefits at their neighbor’s expense nor prayed to men who exercise authority one over the other just because they desired benefits.

12:30 in the video mentioned earlier

  • You betrayed one another is the cause not the government who made the offer.
  • you deceived yourselves.
  • You still blaming others for your error.

12:40 in the video

  • We do need to change our thinking… it is called repentance.

Nothing more revolutionary than Christ.


The Blame Game

The enemy is us.

Stop blaming others for what we have brought about. We have been cursing our children and biting one another for over a century in an ever growing socialist state. There is no wonder we have become Merchandise and a surety for debt.

That may not be what people want to hear but knowing the truth, the whole truth, and providing for it is the only thing which will break the chains we have already forged for ourselves through covetous practices.

Bible, the ancient prophets, philosophers, and poets have warned us from the beginning that as we judge so shall we be judged. If we become accustomed to forcing and oppressing our neighbor they will have both the right and inclination to do the same to us.



Corporatism is not capitalism but a political system which may be more inline with fascism. Corporatism gives a bad name to capitalism which was only an economic system where the people control the capital. In corporatism, like socialism or communism the people are often the capital,[7] "merchandise". Without social virtues virtue the people will degenerate and lose the social bonds need to keep corporation, either public or private, from gaining to much control.

Corporatism

Corporatism is not the same as Capitalism because it involves a political system and Capitalism does not.


  • corporatism: is a Political / Economic system in which power is exercised through large organizations (businesses, trade unions, their associated lobbying efforts, etc.) working in concert or conflict with each other; usually with the goal of influencing or subsuming the direction of the corporate state and generally only to benefit their own socioeconomic agendas at the expense of the will of the individual and the people in general, and to the detriment of the common good and the rights of the individual.

In the last half of the 1800's people in Europe who had accumulated vast areas of land held by some form of a corporation sole -- decided to protect their position and status through a process of syndication.

They formulate an alternative to socialism which would emphasize social justice without the radical solution of the abolition of private property. The result was called Corporatism, which was "the control of a state or organization by large interest groups". The basic idea of corporatism is that the society, its political system, and economy of a country should be organized into major interest groups (sometimes called corporations), and representatives of those interest groups settle any problems through negotiation and joint agreement. Variations of corporatism can lead to fascism.

The evil effects of corporatism can only flourish under the sloth of people in their pursuit of righteousness for all members of society.[7]

If the people fail to actively come together in defense of the individual rights and property of, for and by one another then corporations, which are organized by a contractual agreement, will develop undue power and excessive influence.

The secondary problem, although no less important, is the nature of the government created by the people.

There is often a corporate nature or identity created by societies with the establishment of a "State". There are limitations and duties, checks and balances you want to establish whenever you begin the process of the formation of a "State" through Covenants, Contracts, and Constitutions.

There are five of these limitations and the duty to read them every day to the government in Deuteronomy 17 less they and we forget.

The problems today with inequality of outcome which are not the result of nature, personal ability and application are not the fault of capitalism.

Those who think capitalism is the problem often do not understand that capitalism is not a political system nor does it prescribe moral limitation.

Those characteristics are the added effects of society and must be established by the individual property owners. This limited scope of capitalism puts the responsibility of the defects arising out of capitalism where they belong, with the people.

The People as the Masses

The People become divide when they dissolve the social bonds of a free society through the covetous practices of the world.

They degenerate into the Masses becoming subject to tyrants and their morals.

The command to love of one another and love thy neighbor as thy self along with the golden rule should compel all within society to come together in practical ways for the protection of all. Failing to do so or to do so in diligent service to righteousness will undoubtedly empower corporatism to fill the vacuum created by such sloth and avarice of the people.

Corporations are almost always a pooling of power of individuals into a collective group and unfortunately, power corrupts.

If we want governments to change we must change. we must begin to repent and attend to the Weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith which include caring for the needs of our neighbors and the widows and orphans of our society through Pure Religion in matters of health, education, and welfare. We are NOT to provide for the needy of society through the Covetous Practices and the men who call themselves benefactors but who exercise authority one over the other like the socialists do.

The Way of Christ was like neither the way of the world of Rome nor the governments of the gentiles who depend on those fathers of the earth through force, fear and fealty who deliver the people back in bondage again like they were in Egypt. Christ's ministers and true Christians do not depend upon systems of social welfare that force the contributions of the people like the corban of the Pharisees which made the word of God to none effect. Many people have been deceived to go the way of Balaam and the Nicolaitan and out of The Way of Christ and have become workers of iniquity.

The Christian conflict with Rome in the first century Church appointed by Christ was because they would not apply to the fathers of the earth for their free bread but instead relied upon a voluntary network providing a daily ministration to the needy of society through Faith, Hope, and Charity by way of freewill offerings of the people, for the people, and by the people through the perfect law of liberty in Free Assemblies according to the ancient pattern of Tuns or Tens as He commanded.

The modern Christians are in need of repentance.


"Follow me!" —Jesus the Christ.


.

Audio and Video Part 1 on 1871

Interview with government official concerning the Act of 1871 theory of incorporation. While a corporation can be used for multiple purpose like the ancient Golem it is not the real problem. Understand "Contract, Covenants, and Constitution" can eliminate a lot of misunderstanding. Time

Audio file
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/20210118video1871e.mp3

Video link https://youtu.be/VOiRCpri9Vw



HHC Books
are all online for free in numerous formats with audio support and hundreds of articles along with study series and audio explanations and podcasts. What has been freely shared with the author is freely shared with you and that is an essential element to the true keys of the kingdom. Covenants of the gods | Thy Kingdom Comes | The Free Church Report |
The Higher Liberty | Contracts, Covenants and Constitutions | List | ORDER

Law
Law | Natural Law | Legal title | Common Law |
Fiction of law | Stare decisis | Jury | Voir dire |
Consent | Contract | Parental contract | Government |
Civil law | Civil Rights | Civil Government | Governments |
No Kings | Canon law | Cities of refuge | Levites |
Citizen | Equity | The Ten Laws | Law of the Maat |
Bastiat's The Law and Two Trees | Trees |
The Occupy Refuge Movement | Clive Bundy | Hammond |
Barcroft | Benefactors | Gods | Jury | Sanhedrin |
Protection | Weightier matters | Social contract | Community Law |
Perfect law of liberty | Power to change | Covet | Rights |
Anarchist | Agorism | Live as if the state does not exist |


Trust | Sacred Purpose Trusts
Auxiliary | Ex officio |
Trusting in the Kingdom
Friends_of_His_Church |
COM | CORE | Elders
Family trusts | Creature
Trustees Delegates and Agents
Agency vs Trust |
Unincorporated association
Corporation Sole
Corporation
LLC | Golem
Tithing | Why Congregate | Slothful |
Study | Kingdom Business | FEMA |

Navigational_Templates

== Footnotes ==

  1. Matthew 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
  2. See "Call no man Father upon the earth."
  3. See Citizen definition. See also Marriage.
  4. Clarks Summary of American Law, Constitutional Law.
  5. https://youtu.be/46DTUbQ0mmI
  6. Sovereign 1. a supreme ruler, especially a monarch. “Law maker”
  7. 7.0 7.1 "Freedom is the Right to Choose, the Right to create for oneself the alternatives of Choice. Without the possibility of Choice, and the exercise of Choice, a man is not a man but a member, an instrument, a thing.” Archibald MacLeish
  8. Matthew 20:25-26 But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;
    Mark 10:42-43 But Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them. But so shall it not be among you: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister:
    Luke 22:25-26 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.


About the author





Subscribe

HELP US at His Holy Church spread the word by SUBSCRIBING to many of our CHANNELS and the Network.
The more subscribers will give us more opportunity to reach out to others and build the network as Christ commanded.

Join the network.
Most important is to become a part of the Living Network which is not dependent upon the internet but seeks to form The bands of a free society.
You can do this by joining the local email group on the network and helping one another in a network of Tens.

His Holy Church - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/user/hisholychurch

Bitchute channel will often include material that would be censored.
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/o6xa17ZTh2KG/

Rumble Channel gregory144
https://rumble.com/user/gregory144

To read more go to "His Holy Church" (HHC) https://www.hisholychurch.org/

Brother Gregory in the wilderness.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJSw6O7_-vA4dweVpMPEXRA

About the author, Brother Gregory
https://hisholychurch.org/author.php

PreparingU - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9hTUK8R89ElcXVgUjWoOXQ

Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/HisHolyChurch