Should vaccines be mandatory? If you do not have a right to say "no" then it is not your body and you are not free. If you want to be free then you should repent and stop trying to take away the rights of others. In a recent Peer-Reviewed Study of Vaccinated Children vs Unvaccinated Children the Vaccinated children were 300 to 470% more likely to have been diagnosed with some kind of neurodevelopmental disorders including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) 4.7 fold higher, ADHD was 4.7 fold higher and learning disability 3.7 higher.It is estimated that 5% to 20% of the population get one of many strains of flu each year and show symptoms strong enough to realize that they have the flu and up to 200,000 are hospitalized from flu complications, with about 36,000 dying from those complications annually but that number has doubled in some years. Others get the flu and show no symptoms (asymptomatic) or their symptoms are so mild that they do not know that they were infected by a virus. For many, the symptoms could be so moderate that the individual never goes and gets diagnosed. We do not know how many people get the flu with no symptoms and receive a lifetime of immunity. But, we know that 95% of the people who contracted the Poliovirus never showed symptoms or they were so mild they never knew that it was polio yet became immune.[1] Germ Theory vs Cellular Theory are not actually opposing theories except when it comes to the cause and cure of disease. There are germs and there are cells but most cells only get ill when something interferes with it or it is lacking somewhere in a the multifaceted immune systems. A virus is defined as a submicroscopic infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of an organism. The Exosome Theory and the Virus Theory are not opposing theories either. Viruses are nothing more than exosomes which are protein envelopes of RNA (ribonucleic acid) or DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) material and enzymes which act as catalysts. Living cells produce and shed Exosomes in vast numbers daily for a variety of purposes. We call foreign exosomes that might produce harmful or toxic reactions in cells "viruses". Contact with a virus does not automatically cause disease. Disease occurs only when your cells are susceptible, unguarded, unprotected, or vulnerable. We constantly are exchanging exosomes through close physical contact. Depending on the health of our cells and their immune system we will become ill or healthier with a more robust immune system. If this is true, and it is, you not only can "catch" disease you can "catch" the cure in the form of exosome antibodies.
The gamble seemed to be to shutdown the nation, even thd whole world's economy, indefinitely to suppress a virus that is supposed to be especially deadly to some demographics and experts agree cannot be contained, only slowed seemed to be a mistake from almost all the earliest data.
By the Ides of March, 2020 "More than 99% of Italy’s coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to the country’s national health authority.” Italy is overwhelmed every year and has a large elderly population.
Hospitals were never really overwhelmed. The high death rate never materialized. Much of the accurate predictions were never reported in the media.
Everything most important about COVID in 15 minutes - Professor Denis Rancourt zoom talk to community group Time 18m
What was going on?
This article was written as the pandemic hysteria progressed even though the evidence was showing that there was never the extreme danger that the Media was promoting. Once people bought into the hype it became harder and harder for them to see the truth.
By July some political leaders were still promoting the fear for what must be alternative reasons. There are flu events every year that contribute to the deaths of millions of people. Was this Coronavirus pandemic all that much different than other years where masks were not mandatory, businesses were not destroyed, people were not locked down?
Was the shutdown ever really a good idea to deal with this new flu virus?
We recommend you study the information and listen to the audio files to get to a state of Critical thinking so this never happens again.
Average age of those that died are in their 80's and more than half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses. More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease. 300,000 people die every year from obesity. 647,000 Americans die from heart disease each year.
. People seem to want to believe that if we merely quarantine sick people and those at risk, a “mitigation” strategy being used in Denmark, one computer model projects the U.S. death toll at about 2 million, again half from lack of ventilators, not death of disease. But the Hoover Institution's study and model suggests “the total number of cases worldwide will peak out at well under one million, with the total number of deaths at under 50,000″, which is comparable to the annual death rate due to flu in the United States.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington put together its model. The IHME projections were used by the Trump administration in developing national guidelines to mitigate the outbreak. The chief reason the IHME projections worry some experts like epidemiologist Ruth Etzioni of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center is the fact that “they overshot will be used to suggest that the government response prevented an even greater catastrophe, when in fact the predictions were shaky in the first place.”
These numbers can produce a misplaced confidence in the effectiveness of the social distancing policies and the use of masks. Correlation is not causation. The SEIR model from researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology projected that total U.S. cases but even though their predictions seem right on the money they are often based on skewed if not false data that is coming from numerous states with inflated numbers.
So, what is the truth?
Why did they go with the model that has proven to be false?
The number of 17 to 25 million people making medical visits is certainly not the number of cases because most people do not rush to the doctor when they get the flu. The estimate of 38 to 54 million cases is based on those who will show symptoms of the flu and those who go to the doctor. Coronavirus confirmed cases as of March 25 were 64,765 with 910 deaths (Death rate of 1.4%). Since we know that half the people who get this Covid 19 flu show no symptoms and the half that do show symptoms only have mild to moderate symptoms, the true number of cases of people who have already had this flu and are now immune is likely more than the most conservative number of at least 129,000 people in America (Death rate .7%). Until they can actually test for the RNA of the virus, or better the antigens[2] or antibodies[3] that show you are now immune, there is no way to actually know those already immune or if the numbers have already reached herd immunity. It is very possible a million people have already been exposed which would bring the death rate down to .09% or lower. The sharp drop of new cases in China with over a billion people is evidence this may be occurring. Delaying herd immunity is not good but destroying the economic stability of millions of families may be worse.
50 minutes in she talks about politicians, bureaucrats, and media commuting "malfeasance". I think that is an important word to use in drawing a line of responsibility in the sand.
Also 45 minutes in she talks about alternative banking?
Pathogenic priming
Vaccines have become notorious Pathogenic Primers that are contributing to an epidemic of autoimmunity.
“... epitopes might be responsible for autoimmunological pathogenic priming due to prior infection or following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or relatives following vaccination."
“Autopsies of Chinese citizens who have died from COVID-19 following SARS-CoV-19 infection show evidence of interstitial changes, suggesting the development of pulmonary fibrosis [1]. This suggests, at least partly, an autoimmunology basis of the pathogenesis of COVID-19. A number of causal bases of autoimmunity from exposure to viral epitopes is well established, whether the route of administration be by exposure via infection or vaccination. Systemic respiratory viral infections can have numerous serious health effects, including dyspnea (Difficulty in breathing, often associated with lung or heart disease and resulting in shortness of breath. ), hypoxemia( Insufficient oxygenation of the blood.), dysuria (Painful or difficult urination.), meningitis, low blood pressure, shock and death."
An epitope, also known as antigenic determinant, is the part of an antigen that is recognized by the immune system, specifically by antibodies, B cells, or T cells. For example, the epitope is the specific piece of the antigen to which an antibody binds.
"These epitopes should be excluded from vaccines under development to minimize autoimmunity due to risk of pathogenic priming." Mortality in COVID-19 via Autoimmunity
A new study reveals insights into why doctors and researchers are cautioning against the reckless race for a COVID-19 vaccine.[4]
“Humans and microbes, including viruses, have much in common, including proteins. “
A central study cited by the Children’s Health Defense is a 2019 Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch study that probed the theory that “influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses” — a concept known as “virus interference.”
Greg G. Wolff study stated "Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus..." Others examining this study suggested that flu vaccines may prime you for the corona viruses based on that military study to test vaccines for priming soldiers were evidently 36% more likely to get the corona virus or more severe symptoms if they had been vaccinated for the flu.[5]
Fact checkers will try to cast doubt on the original study because Edward Belongia in his own study got mixed results but the studies were different and were using different. Everyone should read the literature and make educated determinations which is why we include multiple links.
Censored on youtube! Dr Simone Gold The truth about the Experimental Vaccine and the coronavirus from the beginning along with the misrepresentation of therapeutics. https://youtu.be/7g8qfGMQVDg Time 56:
John P.A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine, epidemiology, and statistics at Stanford University and co-director of Stanford’s Meta-Research Innovation Center stated
"If we assume that case fatality rate among individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 is 0.3% in the general population — a mid-range guess from the Diamond Princess analysis — and that 1% of the U.S. population gets infected (about 3.3 million people), this would translate to about 10,000 deaths."
In these interview Dr. John Ioannidis discusses the results of three preliminary studies, which shows a drastically reduced infection fatality rate and the worrisome effects of the lockdown; the Swedish approach; the Italian data; the ups and downs of testing; the feasibility of "contact tracing", and much more.
Professor John Ioannidis's data might have allowed an estimated .3% death rate which contradicts Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson's data[6]which everyone has been pushed to accept as gospel. But many of the studies admit there are data limitations.
Others have suggested about 0.5 percent of COVID-19 infections in China end in death.[7]
"... a total of 634 people including one quarantine officer, one nurse and one administrative officer tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. These individuals were among a total of 3,711 passengers and crew members onboard the vessel."
On the Diamond Princess cruise ship their laboratory tests were primarily PCR tests[8] that were "conducted focusing on symptomatic cases especially at the early phase of the quarantine. If asymptomatic cases were missed as a result of this, it would mean we have underestimated the asymptomatic proportion."[9]
There is a huge difference between calculating death rates using "case" numbers verses "estimate" numbers of a disease. You cannot compare the two without misleading people. If you are a professional and you do then you are lying. "As of February 20, tests of most of the 3,711 people aboard the Diamond Princess confirmed that 634, or 17 percent, had the virus; 328 of them did not have symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Of those with symptoms, the fatality ratio was 1.9 percent, Russell and colleagues calculate. Of all infected, that ratio was 0.91 percent. Those 70 and older were most vulnerable, with an overall fatality ratio of about 7.3 percent."[10] But if you calculate the death rate of the Covid-19 based on actual infections even amongst a population of people over 60 who are the most vulnerable that makes the death rate "in the real world, about 0.5 percent of COVID-19".[10]
The passengers and crew of the Diamond Princes were not a random sample but the passengers were mostly over 60, which may "lead to underestimation"[9] of the natural true asymptomatic portion of society. Even with the high age factor the death rate onboard was only 0.5 percent or less. If anyone factored in that everyone under 40 including small children have generally produced a percentage of .2% The death rate comes closer to the estimate of Professor John Ioannidis.
We cannot forget those pre-existing conditions that account for the vast majority of cases that show symptoms are found generally in the older population.
So, it is reasonable, considering the track record of COVID-19, that the presence of symptoms "may correlate with other factors unrelated to age including prior health conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and/or immunosuppression."[9]
Reports from the Diamond Princess cruise ship should make it clear that the virus is highly contagious[11] under ship conditions. But we also know that many people, though they get the virus, show little or no symptoms. A "substantial fraction of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals are asymptomatic"[9] which had also been verified with higher numbers in a Japanese study.
Dr. Beda M Stadler of Bern Switzerland understood, along with many others, like Professor Knut Wittkowski, that the passengers onboard the Diamond Princes Cruise ship were clearly immune already and would not test positive. Many of the passengers that were examined in detail were the best and earliest source of the infection to enable an accurate assess of the true lethal danger from the Coronavirus. By all standard measure of illness, infection and deaths it was obvious, to an unbiased scientist, that this virus showed an extremely low death rate. These elderly people were heavily exposed but would not test positive with the dubious and misused PCR test used daily on the passengers. Therefore the true exposure and infection rate compared to the actual deaths should have been counted as very low rate.
Far more people than the estimated 50% who showed no symptoms should have been accounted for. Subsequent studies show that at least 28% of Americans were immune before the virus arrived due to T1 and Tll cells that retain an "immunity memory". another study, published in the journal Nature found that 35% of healthy adults in Germany not exposed to the coronavirus, had T cells in their blood that were reactive to the virus. [12]
Antibodies decline over time and different people produce different numbers of antibodies. But 20% to 50% of people in some areas of the US, may have T cells that recognize the novel coronavirus, even if that person has never been infected. Jennifer Gommerman has found that the antibody response to this novel coronavirus is "actually quite durable."[13] Dr. Ian Lipkin, director of the Center for Infection and Immunity at Columbia University stated that "This is an accumulation of more information that allows people to become more comfortable with the idea that we are going to have immunity that's going to be longer in duration,"
If those who became ill were treated with some of the drugs that we have known about since August 22, 2005 because of "The Virology Journal" an official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health announced that “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus infection and spread.”
If they had used hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and zinc along with other immune systems supplements and enhancers to prevent both the spread of or serious infection from a SARS COVID type virus death numbers would have plummeted. Not only HCQ but Ivermectin have been used to slow the progression of the virus along with Asthma inhalers with steriods have relieved labored breathing allowing for recovery without Endotracheal intubation, which was often a death sentence.
The media malpractice, public gullibility, along with false collection and reporting of information and data has allowed a shutdown that devastated economies and will kill millions before its effects have been stopped. Our worst enemy is ignorance and fear and the pride and vanity that maintains them among the people.
Silent Cure
Anywhere from 80 percent of infections in adults to 95 percent of infections in children that are observed or detected appear to be mild to moderate cases overcome in about two weeks with rest at home. [14]
Since death rates are calculated only from those who get severely ill and are tested, we can assume the death rate from this virus is actually much lower. If we take in the high rate of asymptomatic individuals that we see in the Princess analysis and other broader examinations no one knows how many people or the rate they are being infected but recovering. That would infer that no one knows the actual death rate which seems far lower than some of the models.
As fast as it is spreading, we can assume that society is well on its way to "herd immunity" which is the best way to reach maximum protection of society. A vaccine cannot accomplish that and a quarantine of society only delays the natural process of the society obtaining herd immunity.
Many people have likely been exposed, recovered and are now immune. Why are we risking a wrecked economy and welfare expansions beyond FDR’s wildest dreams?
Richard Epstein at the Hoover Institution writes of serious flaws in predictions of 1 million or more Americans dead from coronavirus:
“Clearly, the impact on elderly and immunocompromised individuals is severe, with nearly 90% of total deaths coming from individuals 60 and over. But these data do not call for shutting down all public and private facilities given the extraordinarily low rates of death in the population under 50.”
“Of course, every life lost is a tragedy…but those deaths stemming from the coronavirus are not more tragic than others, so that the same social calculus applies here that should apply in other cases... A Depression Will Ruin 330 Million Lives, Not 4 Million.”
Victor Davis Hanson was a professor of classics at California State University, Fresno, and is currently the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004. He suggests that:
“[T]he massive curtailments of the U.S. economy can have as many health consequences as the virus itself—if millions lose income and jobs, become depressed in self-isolation, increase smoking, and drug and alcohol use, and postpone out of fear necessary buying and visits to doctors and hospitals for chronic and serious medical conditions unrelated to the virus...”
Backtracking
By March 26 after the world economy has almost entirely shut down, millions of people ending up unemployed, hundreds of thousands of people losing their business and suffering hardships, an increase in suicides, and the list goes on, suddenly Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson downgrades his original estimates for many of the reasons given by many epidemiologist who the media did not report.
He reduced the number of expected deaths from 2.2 million people in the United States and 500,000 in the U.K. to a fraction of what he originally predicted. Now, this expert epidemiologist tells the British government that hospitals will be just fine taking on COVID-19 patients and he estimates "20,000 or far fewer people will die" from the virus itself or from its agitation of other ailments, as reported by New Scientist the day before.
From the beginning, hundreds of epidemiologists and doctors were saying this flu, while more contagious,[11] would not reach Ferguson's frightening numbers. And many published prediction models have been far closer to the truth. But they were not invited into the media so most people have only heard the hype. Their low number predictions are coming true while Ferguson backpedals. But the damage is done.
What can we learn?
Ferguson would eventually backtrack on his downgraded prediction saying that the new numbers are only the result of social spacing and the shutdown. This, of course, contradicts what he said about the numbers revealing that far more people likely have the virus than his team figured.
When Ferguson lowered his estimates to a fraction of the original panicking numbers, he stated, “What we’ve been seeing, though, in Europe in the last week or two is a rate of growth of the epidemic which was faster than we expected from early data in China. And so we are revising our quotes... we should have been looking at previously.”
The "early data in China" did not factor in the mild symptoms or the numerous asymptotic people that included more than half of the passengers on the cruise ship, the Diamond Princess, nor have they considered the millions of people with symptoms so mild or moderate they never thought they had this particular flu.
Gupta on the Silent Cure
Professor Sanjay Gupta with the research team from the Oxford study suggests that the virus had been invisibly spreading for at least a month earlier than suspected, concluding that as many as half of the people in the United Kingdom have already been infected by COVID-19.
No one is ending this virus. It will still be around when people are let out again.
Remember they said these drastic measures were just to "slow" the spread of the virus.
Experts warned us that slowing the virus could be dangerous but for some reason they chose to cripple the economy. Why?
They kept telling us this was a "novel" virus and no one is immune. What they did not tell you is there are new viruses every year and have been for decades and centuries. Yet, we become immune, or enough of us do to protect society. Our bodies do so naturally if we let them.
Clive Cookson, Science Editor MARCH 24 2020 announced in his story "Coronavirus may have infected half of UK population — Oxford study "where he reveals that a "New epidemiological model suggests the vast majority of people suffer little or no illness."[15] Herd immunity equates to anything over 60%.
The UK population is over 67,530,172 and halving that suggests 33,765,086 people already have or have had the virus.
After Oxford announced on March 17th they believd more than half of the UK already had the virus only there were only 14,543 cases that had been counted with deaths numbering at 759.
That would make the actual death rate only 0.00002% for 33,765,086 million people who had mild cases and possibly showed little or even zero symptoms.
Of course, more deaths will come as those who are seriously ill may succumb. We can now see 15 days later the numbers changed.
The United Kingdom had 38,868 confirmed cases on April 3.
But of course, the actual number of people who have contracted COVID 19 has also been increasing to over the 33,700,000 estimated by Oxford scholars.
Official sources tell us that 208 seriously ill patients have recovered. But that is deceptive because, according to Oxford scientists who have been testing for the actual antibodies, a clearer picture is provided to the public when they are also told that more than 33,700,000 people have recovered with their own antibodies protecting them from getting ill or spreading the virus.
At the same time the number of deaths has reached 3,611. Using that number from April 3 and the Oxford estimate from March 17th for estimated cases of COVID 19 the death rate still calculates out to 0.0001%. The average death rate for the annual seasonal flu is 0.1%.
So, we all need to ask the question of why has almost the whole world economy has been shut down?
We also may want to ask, rather than devastate the lives and the personal economies of millions of Americans and plunging the nation into trillions and trillions of dollars in debt, was there something more practical that could have been done?
Wouldn't it have been simpler to quarantine the people who are most vulnerable? You could have put them all in those private motels we have shut down and brought them room service from all those restaurants we closed. That all could have been done for a fraction of the cost.
If you ponder the facts rather than run behind the media narrative you might be ready to ask more questions. Like is this corruption, conspiracy, or incompetence? Or is their more going on than we know?
The Oxford study
The Oxford study that shows that half the people in the UK may already be immune has been referenced in the news.[16]
The Oxford study contradicts the Imperial College London[17] model used by the UK government to develop policies to halt the crisis using social distancing.
“I am surprised that there has been such unqualified acceptance of the Imperial model,” Sunetra Gupta, professor of theoretical epidemiology, who led the study, told the Financial Times.[18]
Has Britain been allowing the virus to spread, while other countries have closed schools and implemented more drastic measures? The government is trying to build up herd immunity to combat the infection. Oxford and London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) are said to agree with the British approach.[19]
This massive but silent spread of immunity in the UK has certainly been going on in America too. They tell us to listen to the experts, but then they only let you hear from the experts they want.
This "Silent Cure" has been taking society toward the ultimate goal of reaching the safety of herd immunity as nature has done throughout the history of mankind.
For weeks we have been informing people on our network and those who listen to our Podcasts details based on all the reports that were coming out before the government began to shut down the economic lives of the people and the media began to panic the lemmings of society.
So have the governments of the world failed to listen to all the expert analysts that were giving drastically different numbers? Has the media struck fear into the people to cause panic? Is their more to these events than what the people have been told? Did some people seize the opportunity to use this virus to cover the movement of trillions of dollars, the expansion of government powers, the doubling of the national debt, and to test the people's resistance to martial law? Are they done? Or is their more to come?
"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." ~Rahm Emanuel
Perspectives on the Pandemic and immunity in general. China and South Korea had already reached their peak number. Sweden allowed nature to take its course with few death, a stronger immune community, and a good economy. Time 6_:30
Should we be delaying herd immunity by the drastic economic shutdown being imposed by the government?
Experts seem to agree that we should not but are often barred from major media until no one can hear the truth having believed a lie.
Perspectives on the Pandemic Episode 2: This video was censored by Youtube. You can see it at Professor Knut Wittkowski, Episode 2 In this explosive second edition of Perspectives on the Pandemic, Professor Knut Wittkowski, for twenty years head of The Rockefeller University's Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design, says that social distancing and lock-down is the absolutely worst way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus.
Further, he offers data to show that China and South Korea had already reached their peak number of cases when they instituted their containment measures. In other words, nature had already achieved, or nearly achieved, herd immunity. Part 1. Time 41:30
Professor Knut Wittkowski is saying what many other accomplished Epidemiologists have been saying for years and we have been reporting since March. He warns against delaying herd immunity and says there is no need for a vaccine. For most places, the epidemic is over and delaying it further will flatten the curve but will prolong the virus's presence in society and with this shut down will cause more deaths in the long run.
We are guarantying a second wave with social distancing. Most people are probably immune already and the panic is causing shortages and will cause great damage to the whole of society. He says we "should be resisting". Shutting down the schools was the worst thing to do. We should not have isolated the children but only the elderly and vulnerable. Americans are too docile and they need to ask their politicians real questions. "If people do not stand up for their rights their rights will be forgotten."
Immunity deniers
Dr. Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern Switzerland, a biologist and professor emeritus stated in an article:
"Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
"Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus. That’s when I realised that the entire world simply claimed that there was no immunity, but in reality, nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement. That wasn’t science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone. To this day there isn’t a single antibody test that can describe all possible immunological situations..."
Dr. Stadler further stated we should "trust a biological model, namely that of the human organism, which has built a tried and tested, adaptive immune system."
He emphatically states that "common sense seems to have eluded many, let’s call them “immunity deniers”".
He went on to say "This new breed of deniers had to observe that the majority of people who tested positive for this virus, i.e. the virus was present in their throats, did not get sick. The term “silent carriers” was conjured out of a hat and it was claimed that one could be sick without having symptoms." and those "without symptoms could still spread the virus to other people. The “healthy” sick would have so much of the virus in their throats that a normal conversation between two people would be enough for the “healthy one” to infect the other healthy one."
He also pointed out that a "PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Correct: Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected]."
He finishes his tirade against the “immunity deniers” with:
"The virus is gone for now. It will probably come back in winter, but it won’t be a second wave, but just a cold."
"Those young and healthy people who currently walk around with a mask on their faces would be better off wearing a helmet instead, because the risk of something falling on their head is greater than that of getting a serious case of Covid-19."
People who worry about how long natural immunity lasts need to know that many will not get sick at all because their T-cells are robust and as Dr. Beda M Stadler said the virus is not that new and because T cells can maintain a genetic memory. The more natural immunity in society the better off society will be.
[5 COVID-19 Stories the MSM Won’t Report]
Almost no hospital was overwhelmed any more this year than other years except for New York which has been closing city hospitals for years so they can waist money other ways. It is one of the top ten most corrupt cities in the US.
Most of the mobile hospitals were hardly used.
The use of respirators was often a big mistake. Other countries had only a few deaths because they used other treatments, some of which were well known from the last Corona-virus. Between the media and opportunistic politicians te people are being duped.
Saving the herd
Back in February researchers estimated that 85 to 90% would show little or no symptom because the natural immune system will protect most people. Less than 5% will develop severe symptoms from which most will recover.
Where testing for antibodies have been done far more people are already immune and did not even know. Doctors have been using antibodies from immune people who have already had COVID and recovered.
To make the people who are producing antibodies ware masks is foolish because they are literally shedding the cure.
If you know someone who had it already and recovered you should not make them ware face masks.
A virus is defined as a submicroscopic infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of an organism. Viruses are replicated in the cell through the same process that an exosome is replicated because your body recognizes the virus and lets it into the cell by mistake. As your cell begans to replicate the virus other cells may recognize this error and produce other exosomes to attack the viruses you just reproduced. They also may release other exosomes that will turn off the cells that are replicating the virus. If many cells began replicating the exosome/virus before the body begins to turn off those cells symptoms of illness may occur.
The Exosome Theory and the Virus Theory are not opposing theories either. Viruses are nothing more than exosomes which are protein envelops of RNA (ribonucleic acid) or DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) material and enzymes which act as catalysts.
Living cells produce and shed Exosomes in vast numbers daily for a variety of purposes. We call foreign exosomes that might produce harmful or toxic reactions in cells "viruses". Contact with a virus does not automatically cause disease.
Disease occurs only when your cells are susceptible, unguarded, unprotected, or vulnerable and begin to replicate foreign Exosomes because of misidentification. Reproducing a foreign Exosome is like repeating a lie and the more cells that do that in your body the more toxins may be produced when your body fights back. It is your reaction that produces a cytokine storm that manifests symptoms of disease.
Slowing this process may be essential to prevent severe illness or even death. This is why hydroxycloroquine with zinc and Ivermectin and other steroids worked so well as a therapeutic for COVID and so many other diseases.
A cytokine storm
A cytokine storm, also called hypercytokinemia, is a physiological reaction in humans and other animals in which the innate immune system causes an uncontrolled and excessive release of pro-inflammatory signaling molecules called cytokines. Normally, cytokines are part of the body's immune response to infection, but their sudden release in large quantities can cause multisystem organ failure.
The larger the original dose of viral infestation or inoculation there will be a greater possibility of cytokine storm that can produce severe illness or even death to those in poor health.
Masks worn during the first stages of infection will increase the inoculating load of the virus/exosomes you just replicated in your own body. As you breath those replicated viruses/exosomes back into your lungs because you have a mask on you are increasing the inoculation of the virus in your system along with additional debris that will increase the risk of secondary infection during a cytokine storm.
This has likely been a major contributor to the severe cases among healthcare workers.
We constantly are exchanging exosomes through close physical contact. Depending on the health of our cells and their immune system we will become ill or healthier with a more robust immune system.
If this is true, and it is, you not only can "catch" disease you can "catch" the cure in the form of exosome antibodies which your body also produces and can be produced by others. The young healthy body replicate the exosome and antibodies by the billions and they can pas from one to another the same as the virus. This is part of the natural herd immunity which is not just that people will stop the spread but may actually spread their immunity.
Doctors infect sick people with antibodies from someone who recovered which which are reproduced in vast numbers of COVID recovered patience. They are not only in your blood but in saliva and can be expelled when you breath just like viruses. Remember, viruses and antibodies are both just protein envelops of RNA (ribonucleic acid) or DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) material and enzymes. They only have an effect when the host replicates that protein envelops.
Exosomes are replicated all over the body for a variety of reasons and functions. They are in your saliva, and in your blood and on your skin. They are in all your body fluids and you share them all the time with every touch and breath. [20]
There is big money behind vaccinations and pharmaceutical industry but their is only common sense behind real health. Don't be a immunity denier.
Antigens are molecules that stimulate a wide variety of immune responses. Antigens may come in many forms and have a variety of carriers. Antigen is any substance that is capable of stimulating an immune response, specifically activating lymphocytes like white blood cells. They may be foreign antigens (heteroantigens) or autoantigens (self-antigens).
Antigens may include molecules found on invading microorganisms. They may be on the surface of exosomes like viruses, but also bacteria and even protozoans, and fungi but also be on other foreign substances, such as pollen, dust, or transplanted tissue.
Antibodies are produced by B cells of the immune system in response to exposure to antigens. Exosomes are formed when certain endosomes, fuse with the plasma membrane and are released into the extracellular environment and may include what we call antibody markers. Exosomes also act as a source of antigens to activate T and B cells. They are produced in the endosomal compartment of most eukaryotic cells. The multivesicular body (MVB)is an endosome defined by intraluminal vesicles(ILV) that bud inward into the endosomal lumen. When the MVB fuses with the cell surface, these ILV vesicles or envelops are released out of the cells. At the point of release they become exosomes because they have exited the cell.
Exosomes are considered to be vehicles of antigen delivery. The localization of antigen proteins, i.e., whether they lie on the outer surface or inner surface of exosomes, might affect antigen presentation after exosomes are taken up by antigen-presenting cells; however, little is known about the importance of this phenomenon.
Cell signalling
While it is a cytokine reaction that is the source of most illness there is a danger produced by the S1 protein found on the corona virus is also contained in these shots which are trying to get your body to produce the S1-p with the mRNA.
Scientist have known since 2020 there is a cell signalling may cause other dangers to the health of the body by merely touching certain types of cells.
The S1 protein appears to be able to reactions in heart, lung, blood and fertility issues.
The dangers of the S1 protein contained in these injections, by itself, which may cause both long term and short term effects to the heart, liver, lungs, and other organs, is laid out in the NHI funded study produced at Georgetown University by a team of top scientists outlining "The Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines" back in in 2020. Yet, the government, news and, social media have ignored the science and/or have also conspired to keep this vital warning and information from the public while promoting even pressuring young people to take an unnecessary and clearly dangerous vaccine.
Studies show that 28% of Americans had T-cell memory to produce antigens before the virus arrived because of past corona viruses experience. It has been known for over a decade that the most vulnerable could be taking combinations of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and zinc along with other immune systems supplements and enhancers to prevent both the spread of or serious infection from a SARS COVID type virus. HCQ or Ivermectin have been used to slow the progression of the virus and Asthma inhalers with steriods have also been able to relieve labored breathing.
There is a role for exosomes as potential therapeutic agents being used by medicine now. Nature has been doing that from the beginning.
Maybe that is why the early Church kept talking about that "Holy kiss"?[21]
Governor Kristi Noem, “My responsibility is to respect the rights of the people who elected me, and to manage our state operations in a way that reflects the realities of what we have here on the ground here. On the foundation of my principles, commonsense conservative values, and the principles we hold dear in America, the facts, the science, and the data will guide our decision-making here in South Dakota.”
"If people do not stand up for their rights their rights will be forgotten." Professor Knut Wittkowski. Time 4:00
We need to look at real data to know what to ask those who are trying to lead us through the media madness or political agendas of the world. The issue of vaccines was also addressed by Professor Wittkowski. If most of us are immune why should anyone be forced to get vaccinated? If natural immunity for the majority of the population is already present could vaccinations do more harm than good?
Americans need to listen to other qualified experts who are giving us a better and broader perspective to truly understand this virus or any virus. If we are to promote a healthier society we need to understand how society works and what makes us healthy and what seems to make us sick.
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6
Don't be a lemming; be a learner. Study to seek the truth in all things.
The Constitution is the law governing the government. It could only be written after the Declaration of Independence which states, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
The shutdown, according to the experts, is effecting our "Safety and Happiness". Taking away the livelihood of individuals and their right to assemble, or pursue happiness, or even to live, is common in under socialism and communism. But, in the past, it has been considered unAmerican.
What has changed in America? What has been changed in us?
The authoritarian State often uses force and violence to become the Benefactors of the people if the covet what is their neighbors'. They make a social contract where one class of citizen is forced to provide for another class through "legal charity" which is not true charity. The writings of the Apostles warned along with countless passages of ancient writings of the prophets including Proverbs 23 which warned them about what Christ forbid which was the covetous practices of socialist forms of government.
If these quarantine measures are making things worse what should we really be doing?
“Graham Medley from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who chairs a group of scientists who model the spread of infectious diseases and advise the government on pandemic responses, says that the actual goal is the same as that of other countries: flatten the curve by staggering the onset of infections. As a consequence, the nation may achieve herd immunity; it's a side effect, not an aim.”[26]
But according to Thomas House, “The current coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19 [2020-03-14 ]) has raised questions about herd immunity, social distancing measures, and the relationship between these.” “In fact, the later intervention dramatically reduces the burden on the healthcare system, cutting in half the maximum numbers ill and potentially needing treatment at any one time, and significantly reduces the final number infected, which the earlier interventions fail to do.”
“The reason that this happens is that social distancing measures do not lead to herd immunity, so once they are lifted the epidemic starts again.”[27]
There is a need to develop herd immunity rather than shutting down the economic livelihood of society at the devastation of millions of families and cursing our children with eternal debt.
"We think this virus is likely to be one that comes year on year ... like a seasonal virus ... Communities will become immune to it and that's going to be an important part of controlling this longer term." Sir Patrick Vallance, Chief scientific adviser.
Antibodies of the Coronavirus
In one interview with James Walsh, Pulitzer-winning infectious disease reporter Laurie Garrett explained the necessity of antibody tests:
"If we had this antibody test, we can go around randomly selecting people in New York City and find out how many New Yorkers, including right now, have had this virus in their bodies."[28]
Other experts are saying the same thing because they know that natural herd immunity is essential to good societal health:
"Johnson's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, who along with chief medical officer Chris Whitty has been entrusted by the government to manage the spread of virus, says between 60 to 70 per cent of the population would need to be infected to achieve herd immunity." [29]
Vaccines generally only give temporary immunity. If more half the population of the UK is already immune there is little need for a vaccine and reopening the economy can begin immediately. It also means all the projected numbers of vast hospitalization are completely bogus. The other 30 million Brits would only produce at the most 14,000 more cases with far less national deaths numbering at less than 1500 and not the 20,000 revised figure of Ferguson nor his outlandish original of 500,000.
The slowdown of the spread of the virus may not be because of the shutdown and social spacing, but the fact that the people are reaching herd immunity. Remember Correlation is not Causation.
The only way to know for sure is to begin to randomly testing the populations for antibodies of the Coronavirus.[30]
Professor Trudie Lang, of the Global Health Network at the University of Oxford, said that the latest test for COVID-19 works by detecting the vital antibodies which “will demonstrate if your immune system has cleared the infection...It’s very unlikely you can get the virus again.” [31]
Other countries are working on tests for antibodies. We know that the PCR or RT-PCR test[8] is inaccurate by itself for identifying a specific virus or those infected.
Numerous teams in numerous countries have developed the equipment for a test for the Coronavirus and the Antibodies of the Coronavirus in early March and have already been testing in Oxford, UK, and Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital in New York. They can test a patient and have results in six minutes. If people in the governments of the world care about the people and the economy by which they sustain their "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" they will make an antibody test the priority.
There will be a drawback to this commonsense approach. If it is discovered that 60 to 70 percent of the people are immune already or quickly approaching that herd immunity, as Oxfordand LSE agree, then a vaccine will not be as important or needed. This means hundreds of millions of dollars will not be made by pharmaceutical companies, nor will they be able to claim credit for saving the people when in fact the people already saved themselves because of their robust immune systems. Pharmaceutical companies and developers of vaccines have no interest and certainly no financial incentive in finding out that society is again becoming immune without them.
The Test
David Crowe, an expert in global infections such as SARS, Ebola, and flu, sees the coronavirus panic as an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test called “polymerase chain reaction” (PCR).[8]
The PCR test is only testing for RNA debris. It is not reliable for diagnoses or verification for the presence of a particular virus. We have stated for sometime that viruses are nothing more than exosomes which your body produces and sheds in vast numbers daily. We call foreign exosomes that might produce harmful reactions viruses. If this is true, and it is, you not only can "catch" disease you can "catch" the cure in the form of exosome antibodies. 9:04 min
"The coronavirus test is based on PCR,[8] a manufacturing technique. When used as a test, it does not produce a positive/negative [actually this would be better described as "presence or absence" of the amplified gene product] result, but simply the number of cycles required to detect genetic material. The division between positive and negative is an arbitrary number of cycles chosen by the testers. If positive means infected and negative means uninfected, then there are cases of people going from infected to uninfected and back to infected again in a couple of days."
"The world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for RNA is a test for a deadly new virus... but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus. Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present."
Scientists have calculated the false positive rate with the PCR Test[8] for asymptomatic patients at 80%! The data is little more than a guess and the statics tell you nothing since so many people without symptoms or mild cases are never even tested with any test nor counted when estimating death rates.
Comments Dr. Karry Mullis attack Fauci's credibility and competence.
Comments Dr. Karry Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, says they should not be used for a virus test.
Everyone wants to believe testing settles the issue as to being infected or not. An accurate dependable test that is virus-specific was still in development in the early stages of the pandemic. Without purification and characterization of virus particles of the RNA there is no proof that a virus is present. The common PCR[8] test (polymerase chain reaction) gives many false positives and is not RNA specific. If you're sick stay home, avoid contact, treat as most flu infection or call your health provider.
Molecular assays test
The new in-house developed molecular assays test was a new and supposedly improved test but was not that useful either.
Asked how well the new tests work, Mayo Clinic internist and biostatistician Dr. Colin West said: "The most honest answer is, we don't really know."
Most of the 30 or so lab-based rapid-detection tests that detect genetic traces of the virus were validated using 30 “contrived” samples of the novel coronavirus — not a clinical trial. Even less information is available about the tests that look for the presence of antibodies in blood samples. There was little evidence that the tests work well yet decision effecting the well being, including "life, liberty, and the oursuit of happiness" of millions was being decided by politicians.
“Everybody is focused on how many tests will be out there. No one is really focusing on quality. ... We need to have the right data, not just more data.” said Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.
In the Blood
The real test that was needed was a serology which tests the Blood for antigens and, more important antibodies. Such tests were developed by early March. By April results were verifying what was well known back in February, that many more people were already exposed and producing antibodies and slowing the progress of the COVID virus. The dire and miscalculated death tolls were being rolled back and herd immunity was a reachable goal long before a vaccine could be developed.
Couple this new data that was becoming more evident day by day and the success of the use HCQ with a mixture of antibiotics, zinc and other vitamins deaths from the virus was decreasing.
But Dr. Fauci continued to resist, delay, and play down what had already proven to be effective in protecting patience and actually in slowing the spread of the virus.
Political Backpedaling
Governor Cuomo is backtracking on the shutdown policy with his statement, “If you rethought that or had time to analyze that public health strategy, I don’t know that you would say quarantine everyone. I don’t even know that that was the best public health policy."[32]
Why is Cuomo changing his mind? Does he have information that is not yet released the public? Could this change of heart be because of new testing in New York, Oxford, and some locations in Europe? Because they can now test for the antibodies of the Coronavirus will we finally reveal the extent and truth about this professed pandemic?
They asked the question in Science magazine, "How many COVID-19 cases have gone undetected? And are those who had mild cases of the disease—perhaps so mild they dismissed it as a cold or allergies—immune to new infections? If so, they could slow the spread of the burgeoning pandemic."[33]
This new testing being used can identify the DNA of the virus and answer these question which the common PCR test (polymerase chain reaction), which is an RNA-based diagnostic test,[8] cannot answer. This new equipment can test a person’s blood for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2[34]. Such tests can detect active infections, too, but more importantly, they can tell whether a person has been infected in the past because the body retains antibodies against pathogens it has already overcome.
Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital
That is right. The ability to actually make these virus-specific tests was not available until the mid-March announcement. They certainly had to test the equipment locally where, "An expert team of researchers and clinicians in microbiology, virology, pathology, molecular science, and immunology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and The Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) have been working together around the clock to design, validate, and implement an “end-to-end” clinical pathology laboratory solution that will allow for the testing of approximately several hundred people per day in order to rapidly diagnose and help guide the selection of treatment and monitor disease course."[35]
During their validation process they had to be testing both ill patients and healthy people to determine if their new procedures were effective just like was being done in the UK with the Oxford study team.
Cuomo Article
Reading the article and seeing the fact that they have been secretly testing already, could it be that they are already confirming the Oxford study's projection that more than half of the UK is already immune and well on their way to herd immunity? Are they getting similar numbers testing American?
The article quoting Cuomo's shrouded confession talks about "other pieces of evidence", and "the number of people who are infected" being "much larger" "with few exceptions around the world":
"At the same time, we have other pieces of evidence that the number of people who are infected is much larger compared with the number of cases we have documented. In most places, with few exceptions around the world, we are just testing people who have substantial symptoms who have come to seek health care or even to be hospitalized. These are just the tip of the iceberg."[32]
Cuomo went on to say the following:
“Young people then quarantined with older people was probably not the best public health strategy because the younger people could have been exposing the older people to an infection."[32]
Cuomo at this point knows that people, especially young people, can have the virus with no symptoms. Of course, we have been saying this for months which was confirmed by the earliest analysis from the Diamond Princess cruise.
Cuomo further stated that:
“What we did was we closed everything down. That was our public health strategy. Just close everything, all businesses, old workers, young people, old people, short people, tall people. Every school closed, everything.”[32]
The well-written article, worth reading entirely, written by Jeffrey A. Tucker also states,
"It’s true that anyone following the unfolding fiasco and the gradually emerging data behind it knows that Cuomo is right. The response has not been modern and scientific. It has been medieval and mystical. The theory behind the policy has been nothing but a panicked cry of run and hide before the noxious gas gets you. Lacking reliable data – which is the fault of the CDC and FDA – we replaced knowledge with power."[32]
I agree entirely with Jeffrey except for the part about "fault". Blame is not like pie. You do not divide it up in shares. The CDC, FDA, CNN, ABC, Fox and all the media carry their burden of personal blame from 100% of their own lack of perception, integrity, due diligence, and honesty. Every politician and their incompetent advisors must also carry the blame in what has become a fiasco of foolish panic.
But most of all in a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, the people must accept their own blame. They have given the power to their government leaders, to the talking heads of the media and to the puppet masters behind them. They have also given power to men in white coats, and letters after their names. They give power to men by using labels like "expert" paraded by the media across the screens of their electronic devices.
Now it has been revealed that they ate the cheese and accepted the fake news that the sky was falling, and a plague was going to kill us all when the truth was available to journalists, advisors, politicians and even the people if they had the honesty, fortitude, industry, and spirit to pursue the truth. But isn't that pursuit included in the command to seek the kingdom of God and His righteousness?
If the evidence Cuomo speaks of and suggested by the teams at Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital, the Oxford study, and other research teams around the world is shared with the people, some will begin to realize that society can become immune to new diseases naturally through herd immunity. They may also realize that they should stop putting too much "faith" and "power in the hands of the government and the media.
There are elements of society that would like to keep this information from the people because with the people's ignorance and apathy men are allowed to seek power.
Cuomo says he cannot believe the president just extended the quarantine that shortly before Cuomo thought were a good idea.
“I don’t believe that he could be serious, that any federal administration could be serious about a physical lockdown of states or parts of states across this country,” Cuomo continued. “I don’t believe it is legal. I think it would be economic chaos. I don’t think the American people would stand for it. It’s just a question of time before you see the numbers growing in hot spots across the nation. So, I think it makes absolutely no sense and I don’t believe any serious governmental personality or professional would support it.”[36]
Even though Cuomo and everyone else were saying a few weeks ago shut it down, now he is criticizing Trump for extending the quarantine, even threatening to sue the President.
“I’ve sued the federal government many times by the way over the past few years, we’ve had quite a number of policy decisions,”[36]
Again, why was he so adamant about shutting everything down and now thinks it makes "no sense"?
"So, I think it makes absolutely no sense and I don’t believe any serious governmental personality or professional would support it.” [36]
Is Cuomo sharing Mt Sinai's new evidence and test results from Mt Sinai with the president and his advisors? Or is he baiting the president as a political rival?
“Look, if the president was considering this, I guarantee he would have called me. I mean, we talk about relatively trivial matters when it comes to dealing with this situation,” Cuomo said. This is a civil war kind of — this is civil war kind of discussion.”[36]
I do not care about their politics, only the truth. Because the truth, whatever it is, will set you free. But like Pilate said "What is the truth?"
Where is wisdom?
Why are so many willing to plunge the nation, and even the world, into a depression that kills many businesses and shoves millions onto welfare for what could be the next several generations?
Banks are closing their doors, changing their rules and removing longstanding safeguards and controls. Cash is rejected out of fear because it might carry a virus while the "printing presses" are fired up ushering in a future of inflation and a virtually cashless society.
Millions more will be transformed from productive workers into bitter takers, causing a faster implosion of our already mathematically impossible welfare state. In the subsequent depression, many people may die due to poverty, and despair with suicide rates and crime rising even higher.
Courts can now delay your trial for a year or more and your day in court facing your accuser can be diminished to a mere video link.
People are quarantined in their home by media hype, misinformation and politicians who do not respect the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of the individual, but only their own power. They are so drunk[37] on the power and the vanity of their office they have become blind guides. People may claim to care about their personal loss of freedom but not the loss of their neighbors' liberty. They have given away their rights and power because of their own personal sloth toward the love of righteousness, and the avarice of the people in their personal desire for benefits and security.
The world has come to a place were doctors, bureaucrats and politicians casually talk about going house to house and taking out people who they say are infected and retaining them against their will under the guise of public safety. It seems to have worked quite effectively to shut down the business, jobs, and livelihoods of the people by the millions with words of fear.
I have heard men and women say they would choose to get sick and die rather than take away the livelihoods of their children and the future of their grandchildren. But they are few and far between.
Most of the people, having grown accustomed to feeding at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, are more than willing to institute the rule of violence. This, of course, is because they have had an appetite for benefits and the habit of receiving them by way of a rule of force and violence through the power of men who exercise authority one over the other.
I do not know how this will all end but I know those who are willing to drink the blood of their neighbor or to take a bite of their neighbor will come to poverty.[39]
"Awake, awake, stand up, O Jerusalem, which hast drunk at the hand of the LORD the cup of his fury; thou hast drunken the dregs of the cup of trembling, and wrung them out." Isaiah 51:17
Italy
Italy's problems preexisted this COVID virus.
For months, Italy closed the borders, closed the schools, closed the churches, locked everyone in their houses, closed "non-essential" businesses, limited people's right to travel, freely assemble or even go outside and get fresh air and sun light, without required "permission papers" provided by the "grace" of their government.
We and they were told that their medical system would be overwhelmed if they did not force their whole nation into a economic and social shutdown.
What "they" did not tell you is the Italian socialist medical system is overwhelmed every year during even an average flu seasons.
What they did not tell you is that Italy has one of the largest elderly populations per capita in Europe.
What they did not tell you is that epidemiologists warned if you slowed and delayed the "novel" virus's natural progression in society you would only prolong it's movement and presence in the vulnerable population which is exactly what happened in Italy.
Other countries like Sweden, South Korea, Brazil, Germany, etc. had more open or moderate approach with what appears to be better results.
It also chose poor methods of treating this respiratory flu. Other countries used steroid inhalers to inhibit the activity in the lungs that caused problems with labored breathing.
Intubation
Endotracheal intubation[41], commonly used by some doctors in the treatment of Coronavirus often made the problem in the lungs worse. Ventilators often exacerbated a cytokine storm from bacteria during an immune response. This can lead to clots opening the way to other metabolic problems including morbidity in limbs and/or pneumonia. Many of the complications and deaths were not from the virus but from medical intervention and treatments.
During the Spanish flu unfortunately doctors treated patients with high doses of aspirin which killed thousands of people. Evidence is that the Spanish Flue was not more virulent than other flu viruses. There were numerous factors that contributed to the high death rate including poor diets and public Hygiene which was just beginning to be improved after the rise in the concentration of a large population. One,"surprising factor in the high death toll: the misuse of aspirin" by doctors.[42]
"Therefore, by artificially lowering fever with aspirin, infection multiplied and spread to internal organs. Aspirin also “thins” the blood causing the lungs to develop a dangerous buildup of fluid. Now we have a perfect medium for germ growth. Therefore, autopsies from 1918 flu or Spanish Flu victims did not reveal death from viral infection but from “wet” or “hemorrhagic” lungs and pulmonary edema."[43]
Another major cause of death was bacterial infection in the lungs.
Preparations for diagnosing, treating and preventing bacterial pneumonia should be among highest priorities in influenza pandemic planning, they write. "We are encouraged by the fact that pandemic planners are already considering and implementing some of these actions," says Dr. Fauci.[44]
Countries like Japan appear to have ended up with an extremely low death rate(850 by July 2020) because they used the asthma inhaler rather than rushing to Intubation with ventilators. Taiwan had only 7 deaths with 23 million crowded inhabitants (by July 2020).
Diet remains a major contributor to the death rate in America. The death rate in America seems to have gone down this year despite the Coronavirus. Certainly many causes of death have decreased statistically. This is likely due to the fact many of the people who might have died from infection in the lungs, heart-failure, kidney-failure, pulmonary edema or any of the numerous other previous existing morbidity including problem caused by ill-advised medical intervention they had at the time of death now will only die of Covid on the record.
The high death rate from the coronavirus and COVID does not seem to exist except in the mouth of the media and the people who believe them. The high death numbers beyond normal flu deaths seem to be inflated by false and fraudulent data collection and some times by poor health and medical choices.
The New York parallel
New York doctors used Intubation and incentivized the use of ventilators.
If you have a COVID 19 case Medicare will give you an additional $13,000.00 dollars. If you go on a ventilator you will get $39,000.00 dollars.
This practice killed many people that would not have died with other treatments.
New York, before the outbreak, had closed 12 major hospitals and limited the number of beds per hospital. Again this was due to the introduction of more socialist policies through Medicare.
We must also add another major contribution to the death rate was the Governor's executive order on March 29th requiring convalescent facilities to take COVID infected patients.
This is why so many American deaths from COVID are in only 4 Democratically controlled States who issued similar orders.
Falsification of numbers
And of course there is the falsification of numbers by claiming deaths as COVID if they are merely suspected of having it even though the actual cause of death is unrelated.
The methods and policies used for counting "COVID deaths" by many agencies is fundamentally flawed and dishonest. They have never ever used these methods to count deaths for any other disease. They are designed to create an inflated death rate making statistical analysis both bias and unscientific. This is one of several reason why most so called deaths from COVID are from only 4 Democratically controlled States.
Money in the form of aid and political power may have been driving forces in this combination of deception and gross incompetence.
Why were so many democratically controlled states dragging out the shutdown and spreading the pandemonium with face mask laws? Is it to effect the election in the fall? South Dakota and Sweden and many other states and countries proved that shutdowns do not have a positive effect.
Italy, bankrupt from its socialist economy, was pressured to do the same because it was applying for aid from the European Union.
Travels fast
Respiratory flu often travels fast and Italian community's elderly live intermingled with the whole society.
This rapid spread was taking the population to herd immunity.
Delaying in hope of a vaccine was bad science pushed by "immunity diniers".
The UK delayed their quarantine allowing the virus to spread and now as a result new blood tests that identify the actual presence of the virus and it's antibodies has now revealed that many if not most people are actually immune to COVID 19. That immunity is what slows down infection and will stop it.
They may slow the spread in some limited situations.
At best vaccines might produce 70% immunity and there will be side effects and injuries from vaccines.
The best hope is herd immunity which has stopped far more lethal flu and diseases in the past.
The longer it takes to reach herd immunity the more risk for the elderly and immune compromised people eventually being exposed.
The quicker the virus spread to the healthy members of society the safer the weaker people will be. Those who deny this are "immunity deniers".
Overwhelmed Systems
Most hospitals were not overwhelmed any more than they are during most flu seasons. Italy is overwhelmed every year and has one of the oldest populations in the EU. New York closed a dozen hospitals in the last ten years and reduced bed count in the ones they have... Yes, it moves fast and it is new so there will be a death rate that is higher than some years. But you do not compare death rates to "confirmed cases" for the coronavirus with "estimated cases" and death rates in previous years which the media and CDC have been doing.
Look at the data from the Diamond Princess cruise ship which was full of elderly people.
Far more people have had this virus with little or no symptoms which has allowed it to spread. That is how society develops a robust immune system.
This will become clear if they get good virology tests and we compare outcomes in places like Sweden. But in the meantime, trillions will have been lost and nations will be farther in debt, businesses and lives of millions will be ruined because of fear.
All the dire models were "hypothetical" and are clearly being proved to be wrong but the fear remains.
Hospital closures
The overwhelming of systems is a direct result of socialism. Shutting down the economy is more of the same spirit.
12 Groundbreaking Hospitals in NYC That Have Closed by Noah Sheidlower
New York has thrown away 20,000 hospital beds, complicating coronavirus fight
By Carl Campanile, Julia Marsh, Bernadette Hogan and Nolan HicksMarch 17, 2020
New York has lost a staggering 20,000 hospital beds over the last two decades to budget cuts and insurance overhauls,... The cutbacks helping fuel New York’s hospital deficit came in waves.
In 2006, Gov. George Pataki’s Berger Commission recommended cutting 4,200 hospital beds to trim $1.5 billion from New York’s health care system.
New York’s Ailing Hospitals
"Albany’s low Medicaid payments have caused many to close."
Twenty-some hospitals have closed in New York City alone over the last two decades, most located in low-income communities...
Hospital Closures and Medicaid Shifts Took Toll on NYC’s Health
Comparative Lies
UK’s Boris Johnson claimed to be ‘Furious’ With China’s Coronavirus ‘Disinformation Campaign’[45] But what of the disinformation coming to the people through the government and promoted by the media? Boris went on to pledge a day of “reckoning”. But what of the disinformation right before us if we have eyes to see and ears to hear? It has been steadily fed to the people by governments and the media. Disinformation is a politically polite word for misinformation. Or more precisely, a lie. Certainly, there will be a day of reckoning for those who are to blame for lies.
TRUTH: Seasonal FLU TWICE as Deadly as Coronavirus?Take a look at the numbers from the W.H.O. and in an “apples to apples” comparison, the Coronavirus has HALF the mortality rate of the seasonal flu when it comes to "death to confirmed cases" ratio. Time 11:58
The annual flu, according to the numbers, appears to be as deadly as the Covid-19 and less deadly for young people.
The death rate for the annual seasonal flu[46] is 0.1%. But numbers available to the government bring the Death rate for Covid-19 from 0.09% to as low as 0.002% in the early days. But that is not what was reported.
This is because of the use of "confirmed" numbers, often labeled as "Cases", to calculate the Covid-19 death rate is going to give you a different percent than if you use the total "estimated" numbers normally used to calculate Death Rate.
The video by Ben Swann shows the WHO, the CDC, journalists, and politicians have been comparing "confirmed" numbers or "Cases" to the "estimated" numbers giving an incorrect comparison and advancing the idea that Covid-19 is more dangerous or more deadly than the actual seasonal flu and causing a panic amongst people through an incompetent media void of responsible journalism.
Estimated numbers are available although they may vary because they are estimates. But we know from the Diamond Princes analysis that even among people over 60 there was a large number of cases that were moderate to mild and even asymptomatic of COVID-19. As we have shown earlier in our analysis of the Diamond Princes cruise data:
There is a huge difference between calculating death rates using "case" numbers verses "estimate" numbers of a disease. You cannot compare the two without misleading people.
If you are a professional and you do then you are lying. "As of February 20, tests of most of the 3,711 people aboard the Diamond Princess confirmed that 634, or 17 percent, had the virus; 328 of them did not have symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Of those with symptoms, the fatality ratio was 1.9 percent, Russell and colleagues calculate. Of all infected, that ratio was 0.91 percent. Those 70 and older were most vulnerable, with an overall fatality ratio of about 7.3 percent."[10] But if you calculate the death rate of the Covid-19 based on actual infections even amongst a population of people over 60 who are the most vulnerable that makes the death rate "in the real world, about 0.5 percent of COVID-19".[10]
Many hospitals have developed a policy of accepting and testing only severe cases and testing only those who were suffering difficulty breathing. That policy drives up the number of cases to deaths ratio and percentage.
We are constantly being told that that COVID-19 is an unprecedented, life-threatening virus to the whole of society, when in fact it appears that it was quite the opposite.
Many of the facts were available if we looked closely and the truth was attainable as a simple grade-school math problem.
But the media worked its magic on the minds of the people who, through the power of fear and suggestion, fell pray to the Lemming Effect and mass hysteria. This allowed the governments of the world to lock down the people of the planet with little or no resistance and crash the personal economy of workers and small businesses by the billions.
We know CEO's and people in the know, like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, sold off huge blocks of stocks shortly before this all began, reaping huge profits with more to come if they buy back before things returned.
We also know that members of the US legislature sold off millions of dollars in stocks shortly before the shutdown and the subsequent stock market crash. They and their friend positioned to themselves to make more profit if they start buying just before the governments choose to turn the economy back on.
Meanwhile, the people suffer and are drained of their own resources in one of the largest wealth transfer in history.
This has all been made possible by the irresponsible acts of the health institutions who should have known better than to announce to the public skewed numbers and false comparisons of the available data they are paid to analyze. There is certainly plenty of blame to be placed directly on the shoulders of the media who published and promoted this false, erroneous narrative.
Their relentless repetition has demonstrated the most incompetent journalism of this century.
And then there are the politicians who sought private profit, and those who voted themselves a raise while taking away the right of the people to their own lives, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
Instead of letting the people make their own choices as to how best to quarantine themselves when necessary or deal with the dangers and responsibility of providing for their own health and wellbeing, they chose, with apparent impunity, to seize the lives and liberty of every American and squeeze. There, of course, is someone to blame for this tragic state of affairs, the people themselves.
But there is more because this has never really been about a flu virus but lies and why they were originally told.
What is going on
We have placed a compilation of experts and news stories here so you can begin to understand that there is something else going on and that fear is not the answer. The original 50 minute Briefing video of Dr. Erickson COVID-19 was censored by YouTube. He stated "Something else is going on." The revealing 50 minute video is now linked from another site. His honest explanation that will let you see a better picture. Bringing the light where people sat in darkness. This video is Time 51:55
The original video of Dr. Erickson on COVID-19 was a 50 minute Briefing. It was censored by YouTube so we put this short one where he stated "Something else is going on" The full Briefing revealing truth is linked from another website in the frame above. Dr. Erickson honest explanation will let you see a better picture. Bringing the light where people sat in darkness. This video is Time 9:36
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge... seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6
Tucker Carlson tells it like he sees it. The eight U.S. states that have still not issued statewide shelter-in-place ordinances are below the national average in coronavirus cases and deaths, per capita. Time 7:38
Dr. Eric Berg DC. COVID-19: Is It as Deadly as They Say? " It has been found that a lot more people had the infection, overcame it, and developed antibodies without ending up in the hospital or having any significant problems. This new information creates a completely different picture of the infection fatality rate." Diamond Princes cruise ship was only 0.5% amongst an elderly populations. Other estimates are coming in even much lower. The specific formula is Deaths/infection x100, not infection/deaths.Time 4:38
The media has provided an unrelenting diet of alarming news about the coronavirus. Get a realistic and balanced perspective of the threat or lack thereof based on the analysis of government data. Time 29:30
Resisting the truth
What did they know and when did they know it?
What were they telling us and how was it differ from what they knew?
Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., lead member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force addressing the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in the United States, evidently was aware back in February that, "If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%."[47]
There was no need to "assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases" bscause it was well known by all the data that this was the case like the Diamond Princes cruiseship analysys verified.
The Best Argument against Govt Mandated COVID 19 Lockdowns were available through the reporting of Liz Wheeler and well-sourced back in her report April 21, 2020, on OAN. These questions are not addressed by most of the media nor the officials of government. Time 3:17
When did they know that Chloroquine was an inhibitor of coronavirus infection and could actual prevent the spread of the virus by preparing the immune system?
In The Virology Journal August 22, 2005, an official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health - published the article announcing, “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.”
The researchers reported that, "that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
Note they said it appeared to have both a "both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage" 15 years ago in National Institutes of Health own publication.
Since, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 are genetically related sharing almost 80% of their genome sequences with the same host cell receptors it should have been common knowledge before the outbreak.
This means that it has been known for over a decade that the most vulnerable could be taking combinations of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and zinc along with other immune systems supplements and enhancers to prevent both the spread of or serious infection from a SARS COVID type virus.
So, the National Institutes of Health, of which Fauci is the director has known since at least 2005 that, “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread."
Researchers did "confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine
(HCQ) associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.” But we are only being told it is a remedy for those who are ill and that our only hope is a vaccine. Sweden, of course is proving this to not be true.
HCQ and zinc do not actually cure COVID. They relieve the dangerous symptoms and side effects while your body develops natural immunity. There are many things that can help deal with a variety of problem that arise from infection.
There has already been studies that have demonstrated that HCQ administered without azithromycin and zinc or delaying treatment until the patient has become severely ill is ineffective.
Yet, we had Democrat Governors of New York, Nevada, and Michigan banning the use of HCQ. Early in March before the long lock-down.
It was not until late March when, first the President and then the results of Dr. Zelenko who announced that he had been saving hundreds and hundreds of patience without a single fatality, the FDA again promoted HCQ. There are thousands of examples where lives were clearly saved coming from doctors like Zelenko and Dr. Robin Armstrong at a Nursing home in Texas City, Texas where patience and staff were stricken but used HCQ with miraculous results. But the HCQ cocktail was still only mentioned for sever cases and not as a preventative.
Plan for power
Judy Anne Mikovits is not an anti-vaccination activist but has been an acclaimed medical researcher. She did discover a deadly virus material delivered through vaccines and she is not the only scientist to have done so. There is well documented cases of viruses spreading to humans by vaccines. This is not about being antivax but about the drive for unscrupulous profit, power, and the subsequent cover-up by the vaccine industry.
Power corrupts and money is power.
Dr Fauci has been around for a long time.
Why is Fauci missing some of what would and should be obvious solutions to the pandemic.
As part of the establishment for years, has he become a part of the "swamp"?
Is there a plan that we have not been told?
Power corrupts!
Dr. Fauci continued to ignore the HCQ data available since 2005 and the uptodate results from doctors in the field getting results. Even after the announcement of Dr. Didier Raoult, of the spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 in France as early as February 25 saying, “it’s game over” for the coronavirus.
But it would be months later on April 9, when Fauci finally allowed the clinical trials of Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases since 1934. The truth is that the HCQ cocktails have been found to not only be extremely ueful in treating the virus as soon as it is present but has been effective in inhibiting the infection and therefore the spread of SARS CoV.
It is bad enough when the media allows governors to dictate the quarantine of millions of healthy Americans but when they allow them to deprive the people of medically sound treatments including those known to be both a cure and preventtive agent they become complicit in a crime.
Why was Dr. Fauci not relating this known treatment to doctors and the people?
Why was he repeating that only vaccine can save us?
Why have the people looked to the press and politicians for health advice?
Doctors often have differen opinions. If Dr. Massihi was right when he said that Fauci has not treated a patient in 20 years, he is not sharing the research data that is published by his own National Health organiation which has cost lies and has actually let false information be forced on the people, then why is he allowed to control the treatment of millions?
Maybe a bigger question is, if rights are responsibilities, then why are the American people not taking back their responsibility for their own health?
Get the latest information from the CDC about COVID-19. May 5, 2020 Finally we reach a point where everything becomes remarkably clear, again - and not just because reviewing the Imperial College report has reignited my anger at the initial fraud. No, their own data reveals an astonishing and simple fact: the best treatment for the Covid-19 pandemic (or political games) is to move your country away from one of the three western power centres: NY City, London and Brussels. Practical? Sadly not... in which case, watch this, share the heck out of it, and stock up on pitchforks. "The point is that the medical situation is real, but the scale of the crisis is... entirely manufactured." "... nothing more than a sales pitch for vaccines... biggest instance of Stockholm Syndrome in history." "Politicians playing with people’s lives and manipulating the facts."
Time 16:23
The Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted List of authors. Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Robert R. Redfield, M.D. "If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively."
This virus is likely less of or at least a similar threat to that of the annual flu and he knew it at least back in February. Fauci was in a position to calm the panic, provide information about known treatments, and preventative remedies that would actually prepare the people's natural immune system including the most vulnerable but instead he chose to promote panic by encouraging lies and misinformation to be spread in the media. He was suggesting the virus was far more deadly than the evidence showed by comparing death rates of "estimated flu/deaths" to "severe cases of Covid/deaths" rates (See Ben Swann).
Why?
The Oxford study team in the UK and the medical team at Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital in New York had developed serology blood tests for people and could determine in March not only that many people have the virus but if they have ever had it in the past and were now producing antibodies.
It appears from the reports coming from their earliest testing and because people under 40 are far less symptomatic that the death rate of actual infections can be proven to be far less than the 0.5% seen on the Diamond Princes cruiseship, but more like 0.05% or even far lower. But the shutdown continues and has been extended even though this information is and has been readily available.
Even into April the media and the White House and the governors are not informing the people that the death tolls predicted originally were way out of line. April 25TH, 2020 Florida Antibody Testing Suggests Coronavirus Death Rate Far Lower Than Reported with conservative estimates of a death rate hovers around .17%. Similar figures are being collected around the world but governments are resisting relinquishing their control.
Opening your minds
Why are they not opening up the economy?
What is going on?
Is it just about power and control?
Is there a massive conspiracy and corruption or just a lot of greed, pride and incompetence?
If it is the latter or the former or a cocktail of all of the above then the only solution is the people need to think differently, act differently, be different. The people can no longer afford to be slothful in the exercise of their individual responsibilities if they wish to have their rights back. They must come together for righteousness and attend to the weightier matters.
By March 27th the president chose to continue to expand the authority of the government, which often diminishes the choices of the people,[48] and even call up troops for the emergency.[49]
Dr. Fauci also said in his office in Bethesda. “The only way you can completely suppress an emerging infectious disease is with a vaccine." Sweden has proved him wrong besides vaccines are seldom more than 70% effective and are known to have serious side effects including death and a weakened immune system. Sweden resisted a lock down, and its capital Stockholm is expected to reach ‘herd immunity’ in the first weeks of May according to top epidemiologists.
Is there something else going on that few people are seeing, that the media is not telling us about?
What will happen when things open back up?
Will we be ready to go back to the way it was or have we learned something?
A bigger spike will be expected amongst the vulnerable age classes within society for those who postponed the natural progression. Add in the suicides, the abuse, the anxiety, the bankruptcy, and economic hardships caused by the shutdown, and the price of these social experiments rises. The UN predicts hundreds of thousands of children will suffer and die because of this shutdown and economic downturn.
If they knew from the beginning that it was not the virus, then what was it?
Is there something more destructive than the virus coming?
Of course, the answer has always been what Christ taught and commanded and that is to repent (think differently) and seek the Kingdom of God (ruled by God not men) and His righteousness (not self-righteousness and fear).
That means we should be doers of the word and abide in Christ according to what He Commanded in love and hope and not fear and force.
Convalescent Plasma
Those who contract the novel coronavirus emit high amounts of the virus very early on in their infection, which explains the rapid and efficient way in which the virus has spread. But while they may test positive by throat swabs for days and even weeks after their illness, if they are only mildly sick are likely not still infectious after 10 to 14 days of the first symptoms.
Shedding from the upper airways Early in infection the Covid-19 may emit more than 1,000 times more virus than other SARS infections. But they also begin to develop antibodies within six to 12 days. The rapid development and increase of antibodies may explain why about 80% to 90% of people infected do not develop severe symptoms. This is also why PCR is not very effective much beyond the infection period.
By mid-March, Mount Sinai Hospital announced that antibodies detected in blood from recovered patients would be used to treat current patients with convalescent-plasma.
According to the Mayo Clinic "People who've recovered from COVID-19 have antibodies to the disease in their blood. Doctors call this convalescent plasma. Researchers hope that convalescent plasma can be given to people with severe COVID-19 to boost their ability to fight the virus."
Since the FDA has issued guidance to provide recommendations to health care providers and investigators on the administration and study of investigational convalescent plasma there has been a need to find people who have tested positive for COVID-19 and have recovered symptoms and fever-free for at least 14 days, are over 17, weigh 110 pounds or more, and are in generally good health. They can donate blood to the Red Cross. They should have a serology test to determine if they are producing antibodies. They can donate their blood to patients not producing antibodies quickly enough in their own body.
"Your immune system responds by producing antibodies in response to the virus. This period is known as seroconversion. Antibodies appear within one to two weeks and will continue to increase in the months after infection. Seroconversion takes place within three weeks in the majority of infected individuals."
During seroconversion, a person may also experience flu-like symptoms, such as a fever and body aches. What we are feeling is that we are infected but also the process has begone to become well. The body is designed to correct an infection through your natural immune system and the more robust that system the healthier the individual and the society becomes.
Louis Pasteur originally discovered that milkmaids did not get Small Pox because they obtained immunity from cows that had had a similar infection of Cow Pox. It is from those cows he developed his first vaccine serums.
Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) are considered widespread among cattle in Norway and worldwide. While cattle are first infected they may be shedding the virus, as the status of a herd progresses the "animals shed antibodies for years after infection. Those antibodies may play a significant role in herd immunity and literally be keeping the herd immune.
A question arises, can humans pass on immunity to the Coronavirus by shedding Covid-19 antibodies and spreading human herd immunity without infecting others with the disease itself?
First vaccines
If an mRNA vaccine was approved for coronavirus, it would be the first of its type.
"It's a very unique way of making a vaccine and, so far, no (such) vaccine has been licenced for infectious disease," said Prof. Isabelle Bekeredjian-Ding.
The first patients injected in the vaccine trial with the new RNA vaccine in the UK at Oxford was publicized on April 23, 2020. Of more than 800 people recruited volunteers half will receive the Covid-19 vaccine, and the other half a control vaccine that protects against meningitis but not coronavirus. That means there is no actual placebo group.
The first question that came to mind since more than a month earlier Oxford studies testing for antibodies was suggesting that half of the UK may have already had the virus, "Did they test these volunteers for the antibodies?"
If most of the people are already immune like Sweden who did not lock down the people, then why would they want to take vaccines. Vaccines have not curred as many diseases that people and the pharmaceutical industry would like to think.
More and more evidence is regularly being produced that brings the dangers and efficacy of vaccines into the light. Of course, with millions and billions of dollars at stake there will be a great effort to put out that light. Couple that greed with the power of fear controlling the minds and emotions of the people there is a serious cause for concern. During the coronavirus shutdown, we have seen that the power of fear posses the people where facts and reasons have little or no influence. Whole nations have been shut down, billions of people were locked in their homes, trillions of dollars in debt were increased with almost no effort on the part of those would be tyrants seizing power for the common good. The promotion of mass vaccinations and even forced vaccinations of whole nations may be just around the corner.
It is important to be brave enough, wise enough, and humble enough to hear and receive the truth. but it is even more important to come together in a network of charity and love to act upon that truth.
Again, the answer has always been what Christ taught and commanded for those who would follow The Way has been the answer. We must be willing to repent (think differently) and seek the Kingdom of God (ruled by God not men) and His righteousness (not self-righteousness and fear).
That means we should be doers of the word and abide in Christ according to what He Commanded gathering in His name which means in love and hope and not fear and force.
Bill Gates says we need to manufacture and distribute at least 7 billion doses of the vaccine but he writes in his own notes,
“That’s why I’m particularly excited by two new approaches that some of the candidates are taking: RNA and DNA vaccines. If one of these new approaches pans out, we’ll likely be able to get vaccines out to the whole world much faster. (For the sake of simplicity, I’m only going to explain RNA vaccines. DNA vaccines are similar, just with a different type of genetic material and method of administration."
“Here’s how an RNA vaccine works: rather than injecting a pathogen’s antigen into your body, you instead give the body the genetic code needed to produce that antigen itself. When the antigens appear on the outside of your cells, your immune system attacks them—and learns how to defeat future intruders in the process. You essentially turn your body into its own vaccine manufacturing unit."
Vaccines work by training the body to recognize proteins produced by a virus or bacteria. In contrast mRNA vaccines trick the body into producing some of the viral proteins itself. The RNA-vaccine approach has the great advantage of speed in production.
Because mRNA COVID 19 vaccines have not been used on humans there are many unknowns which could lead to the rapid and irreversible contamination of the human bio population. No one even knows if this new type of vaccine can "mount a sufficiently protective immune response in the human and to understand, for example, which quantities of mRNA will be needed to do this," said Prof. Bekeredjian-Ding.
"Other outstanding questions include whether the proteins that have been chosen for the vaccine are the right ones to prevent a coronavirus infection in the body, how targeted the immune response is to this particular coronavirus, how long any immunity would last, and whether it causes side-effects such as increased inflammatory responses like redness and swelling or, in the worst case, aggravates disease."[50]
Consequences
The United Nations World Food Program warned this week that as a result of the novel coronavirus pandemic but the starvation will not be caused by the COVID virus but by the government shutdown based on false modeling of the threat and a refusal to admit that they were wrong.
Judicial action by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich seeks to find a remedy but you will need the whole truth which is Christ and provide for it by becoming a doer of the word.
Comments Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on The Corona Fraud Scandal - International Network of Lawyers Will Argue the Biggest Tort Case in World History. The Corona crises and Crimes against Humanity Time 49: Censored on YouTube watch on Bitchute if Rumble is censors the truth (we may link it below https://www.bitchute.com/video/zarFW3hwuyBc/
The shutdown of the world economy will not only financially devastate people around the world it will kill millions for many causes, including starvation but like the government controls that have harmed the people far more than the virus the people will be drained and divided until there is little hope.
We know the death toll has been exaggerated by changing the way deaths are counted just as they changed the way they calculated the death rate. There is a huge difference between calculating death rates using Severe "case" numbers verses "estimate" numbers of a disease. You cannot compare the two without misleading people. The survival rate is extremely high and herd immunity should have been quickly reached saving lives in the long run.
This all has nothing to do with Coronavirus that is no more dangerous than the flu. They planned and positioned this plan-demic for a reason of a Great Reset and you have little or no defense because You are being herded toward destruction because you are not doing what Christ commanded. You are a scattered flock. You do not understand the Gospel of the kingdom nor the way of righteousness you are suppose to be seeking. The ministers of the Modern Church have allowed you to be delivered into bondage and to become human resource and to curse children as surety for an unpayble debt.
The people have followed blind guides and because they say they see sight is taken from those who live in the error of the Nicolaitan. God will not hear them when they cry out because they would not hear the whole truth nor do what Christ commanded.
Natural vaccination
Nature has been naturally vaccinating society through a variety of bioimmune processes for eons. As individuals develop natural immunity they not only provide a wall of protection from the spread of disease they can also pass on that immunity to others through a variety on natural mechanisms.
If Sweden has reached herd immunity is there a need for mass vaccinations?
If herd immunity makes for a more robust immunity across the whole society then why would we pursue vaccinations which often lower the ability and capacity of the immune system to respond?
If it is true that the cure cannot be more deadly than the disease then are vaccines the salvation of mankind?
Back when the early Polio vaccines were introduced to the public we did not have the ability to test for Polio antibodies in mass. It was not until later when it was discovered "Up to 95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic. Approximately 5% of polio infections consist of a minor, nonspecific illness consisting of an upper respiratory tract infection."[51]
This means that "95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic" producing or showing no symptoms. Since 95 people out of a hundred will never even know they were infected with polio and were now immune they also did not know they had no need for the vaccine. They may continue to fear infection but are actually safe and immune.
Unfortunately, because they did not know they did not need the vaccines their health was endangered by the monkey virus called SV40 which contaminated millions of doses of oral polio vaccine in the 1940s and 1950s. Between 10 and 30 million people in the United States were inoculated with the contaminated polio vaccine.
SV40 monkey virus contains a protein, known as a T antigen, that binds to p53 and deactivates it. Researchers also discovered that other cells made only when p53 is active were missing from the cells. This discovery suggests that the tumor suppressant had been shut down allowing storms of tumors.[52]
Natural immunity. The ability to resist infection that does not depend on prior experience of the invading organism and the resultant production of antibodies or amendment or selection of LYMPHOCYTES. Natural immunity is a general and non-specific resistance to infection possessed by all healthy individuals.
If you get a disease, like measles or rubella, you typically have life-long immunity and won’t get it again. You are also stimulating your immune system to protect against the next infection.
Definition of Immunity
Immunity; 1. Protection against infectious disease by either specific or non-specific mechanisms. 2. Pertaining to the immune system or immune response [Ingelfinger, F. Dorland’s Medical Dictionary Saunders Press, 1999.]
Innate immunity
Innate immunity is the resistance manifested by a species (or by races, families, and individuals in a species) that has not been immunized (sensitized, allergized) by previous infection or vaccination; much of it results from body mechanisms that are poorly understood but differ from those responsible for the altered reactivity associated with the specific nature of acquired immunity; in general, innate immunity is nonspecific and is not stimulated by specific antigens.
"Our body’s immune response is a multifaceted interaction between molecules, cells, and organs. " [53]
Did a Vaccine Eradicate Polio
While we know Correlation is not Causation the time frame for the eradication of polio and other diseases does not actually correlate with the actual decrease in infections. It actually appears that true herd immunity was reached through the natural process and not by way of vaccines.
People imagine that they know the dangers of Polio and actually believe that vaccines eradicated polio because after the vaccines were given to thousands of people Polio seemed to disappear.
Albert Everyman believed the only thing that saved kids during these polio outbreaks was the vaccines. So when he is told that we should not make vaccines mandatory he disagrees. He thinks we need to keep people safe and the only way to do that is to vaccinate everyone. Is he right or is it possible that mandatory vaccinations may actually create an environment conducive to creating more harmful viruses in the future to say nothing of the injuries often caused by vaccination?
Albert is hoping people will "listen to reason" based on what he believes are the facts about polio and argues:
"you are too young so you don't know what it was like. It was scary because you didn't know who could give you some terrible sickness that would harm or kill you! Did you ever hear about "polio pond"? Swimming was a risk! Vaccinations & shots almost put an end to many of the diseases & to most of the fear we had faced. But too many forgot or just never faced these illnesses & didn't bother to get the vaccinations & shots so now some of these diseases are coming back! I hope you don't find out the hard way with a sick or dead child. Look at history. People used to have lots of children because often some died! The issue is keeping all these killing diseases at bay!"
Is Albert right?
The truth seems to be something quite different from what people want to believe and it will often take an objective examination, patience and some humility to receive and understand the whole truth.
“Polioviruses are transient inhabitants of the gastrointestinal tract. Up to 95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic. Approximately 5% of polio infections consist of a minor, nonspecific illness consisting of an upper respiratory tract infection (sore throat and fever) and gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea). This influenza-like illness, clinically indistinguishable from the myriad of other viral illnesses, is characterized by complete recovery in less than a week with resultant life time immunity. Less than 1% of all polio infections result in paralysis. Most importantly, the vast majority of individuals who contract paralytic poliomyelitis recover with complete—or near complete—return of muscle function. Any weakness that is still present 12 months after onset of paralysis is usually considered permanent.“[54]
What does this mean?
Since “Polioviruses" will likely pass into and through the gastrointestinal tract, your stomach and guts, if you go swimming in Albert's "polio pond" and ingest some of the water.
How will he know if you have been infected with the “Polioviruses"?
Up to "95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic" meaning if he is infected with the scary and deadly Polioviruses Albert will likely be "producing or showing no symptoms. That is because 95 people out of a hundred will never even know they were infected with polio and yet they are likely immune. They may continue to fear infection but are actually safe and immune.
That 5% with a polio infection could manifest as a minor, nonspecific illness that might appear as an upper respiratory infection with a sore throat and fever. That means 5 people out of a hundred may show some symptoms which may just appear as a common cold or flu. They might show a gastrointestinal disturbance like nausea or vomiting. They may experience some abdominal pain and diarrhea resulting in complete recovery in a few days or less than a week walking away with lifetime immunity.
He may not have any idea that he now has a lifetime of immunity to most strains of Polioviruses and his immune system will be better equipped to fight any new strains of a multitude of other viruses.
Less than one in a hundred people coming out of the "polio pond" would experience a polio infection that would result in paralysis and "the vast majority of those individuals who contract paralytic poliomyelitis recover with complete—or near complete—return of muscle function."
What does this mean?
Many of the people who received the vaccinations were possibly already immune. Those that got intermuscular shots but were not immune already may have been able to carry and even spread polio because they did not have gastrointestinal immunity. People can actually be infected with polio through "mandatory vaccinations" as we see in the Congressional_Record and according to the testimony in 1977 of Dr. Jonas Salk, who "with other scientists" stated that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961.[55]
Herd immunity
Herd immunity is said to be "the resistance to the spread of a contagious disease within a population that results if a sufficiently high proportion of individuals are immune to the disease, especially through vaccination." Can you truly obtain herd immunity through vaccination? The original formulation of the herd immunity theory by Dr. Arthur W. Hedrich, a health officer in Chicago, Illinois, was based on unvaccinated populations. A vaccine-induced immunity is not only more “temporary” it also has allowed the disease to be carried, spread and even mutate. We have also seen were vaccinations have increased cases by infecting the population with the disease both in the past and at the present time.[56] True and natural herd immunity exists only if immunity can be passed from "generation to generation" which is a product of naturally obtained immunity and is not common among vaccinated populations because of low efficacy and temporary nature of vaccine immunity requiring regular boosters.
The only effective way to obtain Herd immunity is through promotion of good health in the 5 main structures of the immune system and hygienic practices on individual and social levels. It is clear from the record 95% of the people who contracted polio showed no symptoms and the larger percentage of those who did develop visible symptoms never manifested any lasting paralysis. That means that society developed natural herd immunity even without vaccination. Many of those who did develop polio symptoms and paralysis may have been able to gain immunity without physical injury had they known about and practiced better immune system health.
Herd immunity should be a concept by which an infectious agent can no longer spread across a population because a sufficiently large percentage of individuals have immunity and are passing that immunity on to the next generation.
An acquired immunity from vaccination not only does not usually pass from one generation to the next but vaccination often allows an individual to continue to carry a disease even though they are not manifesting full-blown symptoms.[57] We see this with Whooping cough where the vaccinated individual has no lung immunity but is internally immune. Only a natural immunity will include both internal and lung immunity.
Reinfection appears to be uncommon but does occur. Studies show[58] that "on average, whooping cough immunity lasts at least 30 years and perhaps as long as 70 years after natural infection... And when people whose immunity has waned are re-exposed to whooping cough, they rarely become infected. In fact, their immunity to the disease may be boosted by re-exposure, the study suggests."
Studies[59] have also shown that the transfer of maternal immunity can protect the newborn against infection with Bordetella pertussis if the infant is allowed to suckle colostrum and milk for 4 to 5 days from a mother who has previously obtained a natural immunity to pertussis. Yes, mothers pass on protective antibodies to their babies during breastfeeding for a variety of infectious diseases, including the flu. Antibodies are a type of protein made by the immune system when a person is exposed to a disease.
Teens have very little protection just a few years after vaccination and studies have shown that boosters only add as little as a year to internal immunity. Teenagers are accounting for a growing proportion of pertussis cases in the US because of the short life of vaccine-acquired immunity. The Tdap booster shot routinely given to preteen children has a poor "safety profile" because it can "cause high fevers and seizures in young children" according to Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and a professor of infectious diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
True herd immunity must afford protection to the next generation.
People imagine that they know the dangers of Polio and actually believe that vaccines eradicated polio because after the vaccines were given to thousands of people Polio seemed to disappear.
Correlation is not Causation
Vaccines do not cure disease.
At best they can only stimulate a part of your immune system to prepare that part to fight the viral infection. Has the introduction of vaccines actually lowered the occurrence of infectious diseases over the last century? Are there other factors which have contributed even more to the health of the community?
"Krause wrote “before the introduction of modern sanitation, polio infection was acquired during infancy, at which time it seldom caused paralysis but provided lifelong immunity against polio infection and paralysis later in life” [60]" [61]
"According to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, childhood diseases decreased 90% between 1850 and 1940, paralleling improved sanitation and hygienic practices, well before mandatory vaccination programs. The Medical Sentinel recently reported, “from 1911 to 1935, the four leading causes of childhood deaths from infectious diseases in the U.S. were diphtheria, pertussis, scarlet fever, and measles. However, by 1945 the combined death rates from these causes had declined by 95 percent, before the implementation of mass immunization programs.”[62]"[63]
It should be clear that because a particular disease seems to disappear at the same time that a vaccine is administered to a population does not mean that the vaccine is the critical cause that reduced the infection.
The Forgotten Pandemic
Spanish Flu, a H1N1 influenza virus sometimes called the "forgotten pandemic", infected 500 million people around the world killing up to 5% of the world population. It contributed to the death of more people in a year than the Black Death killed in a century, making it one of the deadliest natural disasters in human history. We are told that "In the U.S., about 28% of the population became infected, and 500,000 to 675,000 died."[64]
Could it be possible, as we have seen with polio, that only "500,000 to 675,000" showed visible signs of being infected? In fact, far more people who ingested the virus, were likely infected but developed natural immunity asymptomatically?
We know that when an infected person sneezes or coughs, more than half a million virus particles can be spread to anyone near them. There were also several strains of the same virus caused by mutations that commonly occur when a large population is infected.
It is far more likely that more than half of the population was infected but became immune naturally, eventually establishing herd immunity without the introduction of any vaccines ending the epidemic.
It is believed that circumstances of World War I troop movements, malnourishment, overcrowded medical camps and hospitals, poor hygiene promoted a bacterial superinfection that accompanied the virus and killed most of the victims.
Besides exposure, because of the movement of large infected groups during the war, the simultaneous improvement in "hygiene" and sewage disposal and fresh water probably contributed far more to the survivability of a disease like Spanish Flu. Other factors like "malnourishment", were also being improved as diet improved among the general population. Another factor was that people could be cared for in the home rather than send them to "overcrowded medical camps and hospitals" where other infections can add to the problems.
Since no vaccine was created we know that Spanish Flu was no eradicated by it but it went away none the less. Knowing this why would people jump to the conclusion that the people were saved from polio by a vaccine?
While we know that "Correlation is not Causation" we can see “before the introduction of modern sanitation, polio infection was acquired during infancy, at which time it seldom caused paralysis but provided lifelong immunity against polio infection and paralysis later in life” [65]. [61]
The idea that vaccines are ending epidemics that come and go throughout history without the introduction of vaccines is wishful thinking that borders on superstition.
People want to have faith in the medical industry hoping that it can save them from the unknown invisible threats lurking in the world. Once they have accepted this way of faith in medicine and vaccines it is hard to let go of that faith.
But doctors are not God and we should not expect them to be gods nor infallible. They make mistakes and those mistakes can cost lives.
Karen Starko proposed in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, that aspirin poisoning contributed substantially to the fatalities of Spanish Flu. Both the Surgeon General of the United States Army and the Journal of the American Medical Association recommended very large doses of 8 to 31 grams of aspirin per day as part of treatment. These levels will produce hyperventilation in 33% of patients, as well as lung edema in 3% of patients. Bayer's patent on aspirin expired, and many companies rushed in to make a profit and greatly increased the supply worldwide. Were there other practices and treatments that contributed to the high mortality rate?
Under Reporting
Can Under Reporting or change in the way you collect data create a strong delusion?
"The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC, a grassroots organization founded by parents of vaccine-injured and killed children) has conducted its own investigations.[66] It reported: “In New York, only one out of 40 doctor's offices confirmed that they report a death or injury following vaccination.” In other words, 97.5% of vaccine related deaths and disabilities go unreported there. Implications about medical ethics aside (federal law directs doctors to report serious adverse events [67]), these findings suggest that vaccine deaths and serious injuries actually occurring may be from 10 to 100 times greater than the number reported."[63]
"These observations were especially important in the tropics, as Spalding emphasized in discussing poliomyelitis: “the disease is endemic and the virus is ubiquitous. Children who are exposed to it at a very early age rarely suffer permanent damage and acquire immunity” [68] (p. 800)" [61]
The Congressional Record
The Congressional Record (among other sources) records these facts from both Sabin and Salk:
"Six New England states reported increases in polio one year after the Salk vaccine was introduced, ranging from more than doubling in Vermont to Massachusetts’ astounding increase of 642%; other states reported increases as well. The incidence in Wisconsin increased by a factor of five. Idaho and Utah actually halted vaccination due to the increased incidence and death rate. In 1959, 77.5% of Massachusetts’ paralytic cases had received 3 doses of IPV (injected polio vaccine). During 1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, Dr. Bernard Greenberg, head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, testified that not only did the cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations—a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958, and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959—but that the statistics were deliberately manipulated by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.([69]) It is important to understand that the polio vaccine was not universally accepted, at least initially. Despite this, polio declined both in European countries that refused mass vaccination as well as in those that employed it." [70]
Why did some people's immune system fail to protect them?
Was it the consumption of sugar through eating to much ice cream?
Could proper diet make that much difference to your innate immunity during times of outbreak?
Cultivating Plague
Can more Vaccinations reintroduce a plagues more immune to medical cures?
Individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as Polio, MMR, rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles, and influenza can infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease by shedding the virus for weeks or months.[71]
As a recent example the U.S. Navy warship Fort McHenry while deployed to the Persian Gulf, was quarantined at sea because of a Viral Mumps Outbreak which spread through the sailors and Marines despite the fact that they had all been vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. The vaccine for mumps is said to be only 88% effective. Since the ship spent 160 days at sea due to war-time operations and the incubation period for the mumps is 25 days then where did the original infection come from?
As was testified in the Congressional_Record by Dr. Jonas Salk many people have actually been infected with polio through vaccinations.[55] We see the same CDC data concerning vaccinations showing increased cases by infecting the population Syria and the Congo through vaccinations and not the wild virus.[56]
Vaccinated people can put others at risk including unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals. Vaccines will sometimes fail to provide immunity. Vaccine-induced immunity is has been temporary with recent outbreaks of whooping cough, mumps and measles have occurred in fully vaccinated populations.[72]
Regular Flu Vaccination increase Risk of a more serious Pandemic.
"Researchers, led by Vancouver's Dr. Danuta Skowronski, an influenza expert at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, noticed in the early weeks of the [2009 H1N1] pandemic that people who got a flu shot for the 2008-09 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn't received a flu shot. Five studies done in several provinces showed the same unsettling results."[73]
Not only can a vaccinated community still spread the infection the vaccine itself may endanger society to greater infections. Dr. Jonas Salk himself testified in 1977 was the 'principal if not sole cause' of all reported polio cases in the U.S. since 1961.[55] The CDC admitted the same thing in 1992."[74]
"The above statement(of Dr. Salk}[55] states the truth of the vaccine in a nutshell. The Polio vaccine only increased the amount of cases of Polio when it was introduced and it had no part in actually creating a decline in the disease. The decline was happening naturally and the vaccine was introduced on a down turn of Polio cases. While the introduction of the vaccine created a spike in cases, overall the disease continued to decline. Especially in countries that did not introduce the vaccine. This is strong evidence showing that the Polio vaccine is not responsible for the decline and should negate the belief and statement that the Polio vaccine demonstrates vaccine success." [70]
Vaccination in the third world are actually spreading the poliovirus cVDPV2 strain and creating a worldwide "risk of international spread" threat because their vaccines are actually causing people to be infected with polio.[75]
"At present, as a result of the WHO initiative, the wild virus is now confined to a few countries, but naturally acquired immunity has been lost, and the whole of the developing world is now vulnerable to epidemics of poliomyelitis, which could lead to severe paralysis and increased mortality. "[61]
Any vaccines given as intramuscular injection does not give full gastrointestinal immunity and allows people to carry the virus and spread it to others.[57] It is a well-admitted fact that "the virus can continue circulating for years, accumulating mutations until it reverts to its dangerous form. The vast majority of cVDPVs are caused by serotype 2, one of three variants of the virus."[76]
"Because no vaccination is 100% effective, some vaccinated individuals will get the disease as well. In fact, during an outbreak, the number of vaccinated individuals who get sick will often outnumber the unvaccinated people who get sick."[77]
Vaccines inject foreign DNA into your body. Those who get sick anyway may facilitate mutations of the existing virus producing a new, even superbug.
Finally
Besides the known toxins in vaccines, long term effects are unclear.
"Finally, the agent in the vaccine should be free of contaminating substances. It is also recognized, however, that vaccine transmissibility can be helpful—e.g., in the case of live polio vaccine, which can be spread from vaccinated children to others who have not been vaccinated." [78]
Yes, vaccines can have tremendous side effects that span over your entire life. See Polio Vaccine and Cancer
Former Merck Rep Says Mandatory Vaccination Is For Profit and Not Public Health. Stop Mandatory Vaccination Time 9:45
Brandy Vaughan is a former sales rep for Merck & Co. - a vaccine maker - and she details how vaccine companies are using vaccines as a vehicle for massive profit and not public health. Brandy researched the safety of vaccines and found that not only do vaccines contain known toxins that can cause neurological damage, but that vaccine makers do not create the same safety studies for vaccines as they do for other drugs. This lack of true safety research of vaccines combined with the known adverse reactions to vaccination has helped Brandy to decide to never vaccinate her own child. Brandy says giving children a vaccine is like playing Russian roulette with our children and that mandatory vaccination is simply a way for vaccine makers to profit off of our children. Don’t be fooled: we do not need mandatory vaccination.
Ben Swann's Truth in Media and producer of the investigative film exposing a CDC cover-up in "Truth in Media: CDC, Vaccines and Autism". The exponential growth in the incidence of autism among our youth has become a national concern, but unfortunately, subject to much debate. As a result of the investigative work by Truth In Media, we now have a video to help clarify the issue.
Protecting your children is your responsibility and the responsibility of everyone in your society.
We would like to think that Vaccines are saving lives.
We would like to think that there is an answer we can purchase to protect against invisible enemy that causes disease and death.
But are vaccines actually doing more harm than good?
Are vaccines actually slowly poisoning and weakening the population of our world?
Has a billion dollar industry covered up the truth and do your public officials cater to those big money powers?
Mercury
Vaccines often contain mercury commonly in the form of Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative that breaks down to ethylmercury and thiosalicylate in the body.
Some people spread false information that ethylmercury is not harmful like methylmercury and leaves the body in 7 to 10 days. Like much of the pro-vaccination rhetoric this is also false. The test did make reference to ethylmercury leaving the "blood" with a half life of 6.9 days but also tested for inorganic mercury distributed in other tissue and remaining in the brain.
While a study testing injected monkeys has stated that in the "thimerosal group, the half-life of total mercury in blood was 6.9 days, compared to 19.1 days for the methylmercury group" they went on to state that "the proportion of inorganic mercury in the brain was much higher in the thimerosal group (21–86% of total mercury) compared to the methylmercury group (6–10%). Brain concentrations of inorganic mercury were approximately twice as high in the thimerosal group compared to the methylmercury group. Inorganic mercury remains in the brain much longer than organic mercury, with an estimated half-life of more than a year."[79] They also admitted that "It’s not currently known whether inorganic mercury presents any risk to the developing brain."[79]
The study further "caution that risk assessments for thimerosal based on studies using blood mercury measurements may not be valid"[79] and emphasized "the risks associated with low-level exposures to inorganic mercury in the developing brain are unknown, and they describe other research linking persistent inorganic mercury exposure with increased activation of microglia in the brain, an effect recently reported in children with autism."[79]
"The results of this study suggest that ethylmercury is a mitochondrial toxin in human astrocytes. We believe that this finding is important, particularly since the number of diseases in which mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated are rapidly increasing."
Silent Epidemic
Published on Oct 3, 2013
Silent Epidemic, by award-winning film director Gary Null, is the first documentary to investigate thoroughly the true medical record and the historical evidence about vaccine marvels. Conventional medicine has heralded the invention of vaccines as a miracle of modern science. It claims that vaccines have been proven to prevent and eradicate infectious diseases. We are told that vaccines are safe and effective, and that "herd immunity" can be achieved if a high percentage of a population is vaccinated. However, does the science support these claims and what are the untold consequences?
Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a serpent: they are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear;
The Vaccine Hoax is Over
Published 29Sep2012
By coto2admin
Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have:
1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies
Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US.
Vaccines are the worst medical travesty that has ever been visited upon the human race.
These greedy profit mongers have preyed upon the love parents have for their children and upon the fear that the industry has actually created.
They have picked on the most vulnerable among us, first our babies and children and more recently, our mothers and fathers.
They have stolen their minds, compromised their health and shortened their lives.
They have bought off politicians who have made laws "mandating" vaccines to guarantee their profits.
They have stolen your tax dollars to donate to the industry for "researching" more poison to inject into the arms of an unsuspecting public.
When will people at least look at the information, stop believing the lies and stop the insanity of vaccines?
Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US. for more, look here:
This picture was presented as proof that Amish get vaccines which no one is denying. These are not Amish but Mennonite. They are not infant but much older children and they are only being offered the MMR not a dozen or more vaccines. There had been a measles outbreak which came back from the missions. This picture is actually proof the soup of vaccination of infants is not nearly as common among these communities as it is in the private sectors. Listen to the videos and do your own research.
The term Amish anomaly was coined by Dan Olmsted, who asserted that he could only find three Amish autistics after searching in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania and that two of them were vaccinated. Olmsted had quoted Dr. Frank Noonan as saying, "You'll find all the other stuff, but we don't find the autism. We're right in the heart of Amish country and seeing none, and that's just the way it is."
There is a great effort to discredit the Amish anomaly which has clear statistical evidence that the less vaccines a group gets the less likely there is to be less occurrences of autism. The statistics clearly demonstrate that.
Immediately people will try to discredit anyone that brings vaccine safety or effectiveness into question. Instead of looking at alarming statistics with concerns many jumped to contradict these observations with the fact that there are Amish who vaccinate their children.
Some Amish do vaccinate their children but at a far less rate than the general public and many not at all. The paper used by some to prove this shows that Amish had lower rate of vaccinations because only a small percentage had "one child" vaccinated with "one vaccination".
And the sampling was only about one third of those contacted because the Amish who do not vaccinate would not fill out the paper being very private people and fearing persecution.
I know Amish people all over the country and that is they way it works. Vaccinations among some Amish is almost non existent. They are not all the same and the ones who are very against vaccinations don't tell strangers.
Many of the scientific studies are also playing with words and are funded by companies making huge profits from vaccinations.
"In March 2006, Drs. Kevin Strauss, Holmes Morton and others documented 9 autistic Amish children, which could raise the autism rate of the Lancaster Amish community Olmsted supposedly investigated to almost 1/5,000 which is still a fraction of the US average of 1/68." Strauss, K. A.; Puffenberger, E. G.; Huentelman, M. J.; Gottlieb, S.; Dobrin, S. E.; Parod, J. M.; Stephan, D. A.; Morton, D. H. (2006). "Recessive Symptomatic Focal Epilepsy and Mutant Contactin-Associated Protein-like 2". New England Journal of Medicine. 354 (13): 1370–1377. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052773. PMID 16571880.
That is an alarming spread but it does not show cause. Statistics do not show "cause" in the relationship but statistics never show cause. That is not what statistics do.
But it should motivate grave concerns and compassionate from humble and unbiased people. Show me one pharmaceutical company that is going to shell out the money for a study that is going to cut into their billion dollar profits.
In February 1998, the Lancet published Dr. Andrew Wakefield's case series of a group of autistic children with gastric problems, which has become one of the most controversial studies in medicine because part of the patients' story included regression after receiving the MMR vaccine.
The debate is a heated one, as the study suggests there may be a link between the MMR vaccine, bowel disease and autism.
Dr. Wakefield, who has published over 140 original scientific papers, reviews, and book chapters, explained his findings in the paper, which has become one of the most misrepresented in medical history.[80]
Brian Deer, published accusations of falsified data and fraud which were subsequently shown to be false in the English High Court. All of Wakefield’s colleagues including Professor John Walker-Smith were reinstated and exonerated.[81]
Writing in the BMJ, research microbiologist David Lewis, of the National Whistleblowers Center, explains that he reviewed histopathological grading sheets by two of Dr. Wakefield's coauthors, pathologists Amar Dhillon and Andrew Anthony, and concluded there was no fraud committed by Dr. Wakefield:
"As a research microbiologist involved with the collection and examination of colonic biopsy samples, I do not believe that Dr. Wakefield intentionally misinterpreted the grading sheets as evidence of "non-specific colitis." Dhillon indicated "non-specific" in a box associated, in some cases, with other forms of colitis. In addition, if Anthony's grading sheets are similar to ones he completed for the Lancet article, they suggest that he diagnosed "colitis" in a number of the children."
In a press release, Lewis continued:
"The grading sheets and other evidence in Wakefield's files clearly show that it is unreasonable to conclude, based on a comparison of the histological records, that Andrew Wakefield 'faked' a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
"Now that these records have seen the light of day, it is time for others to stop using them for this purpose as well. False allegations of research misconduct can destroy the careers of even the most accomplished and reputable scientists overnight. It may take years for them to prove their innocence; and even then the damages are often irreparable. In cases where mistakes are made, every effort should be taken to fully restore the reputations and careers of scientists who are falsely accused of research misconduct."
Says Wakefield concerning those who replicated his work:
“… it’s been replicated in Canada, in the U.S., in Venezuela, in Italy… [but] they never get mentioned. All you ever hear is that no one else has ever been able to replicate the findings.
I’m afraid that is false.”
Lancet did retract the Wakefield et al paper in February 2010, because some elements in the paper were contrary to the findings of the earlier investigation. This is a consistent practice with any peer-reviewed general medical journal. That does not mean the Wakefield paper was wrong but only that there is a need for more evidence and review to resolve conflicting data. The reasons for the retraction were subsequently shown to be false in the English High Court.
Lancet exonerated Wakefield and his colleagues from charges of ethical violations and scientific misconduct.
The Dr. Wakefield study has “been replicated in Canada, in the U.S., in Venezuela, in Italy" You can read a list of 28 studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s controversial findings with links to most of them here: see list of study and papers
Instead of a deep concern for vaccine safety and pressure on those who profit from their use to produce a safe vaccine we get law that give companies immunity.
Instead, we see whistle-blower and studies that bring the safety and efficacy of vaccines into question viciously attacked.
"A study from the 1990s has come to light, proving that compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children were more likely to suffer from asthma, eczema, ear infections, hyperactivity and many other chronic conditions. - See more:
More links:
30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts
Secret Official Transcripts Show UK Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine Hazards To Sell More Vaccines And Harm Your Kids
Posted on March 14, 2012 by ChildHealthSafety
"An extraordinary new paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.
If you want to get an idea of who is responsible for your child’s condition resulting from a vaccine adverse reaction then this is the paper to read."
Should vaccines be mandatory? If you do not have a right to say "no" then it is not your body and you are not free. If you want to be free then you should repent and stop trying to take away the rights of others.
There is no offer of any "effective treatment or cure." This information is based on personal experiences, what people have learned, as well as what is available on web sites. It is not meant or offered as medical advice or diagnosis and the information provided does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners of PreparingYOU.com or the site itself, but is offered for educational purposes only.
Footnotes
↑"children who contract polio generally suffer only mild symptoms, but as a result they become permanently immune to the disease." Yin-Murphy M, Almond JW (1996). et al. (eds.). Picornaviruses: The Enteroviruses: Polioviruses in: Baron's Medical Microbiology (4th ed.). Univ of Texas Medical Branch. ISBN 0-9631172-1-1.
↑An antigen is a toxin or other foreign substance which induces an immune response in the body, especially the production of antibodies. Antigens are molecules capable of stimulating an immune response. Each antigen has distinct surface features, or epitopes, resulting in specific responses. Antibodies (immunoglobins) are Y-shaped proteins produced by B cells of the immune system in response to exposure to antigens.
↑An antibody is a blood protein produced in response to and counteracting a specific antigen. Antibodies combine chemically with substances which the body recognizes as alien, such as bacteria, viruses, and foreign substances in the blood.
Receipt of influenza vaccination was not associated with virus interference among our population. Examining virus interference by specific respiratory viruses showed mixed results. Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however, significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126676/
↑Imperial College epidemiologist Neil Ferguson during the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease predicted 150,000 people could die. There were fewer than 200 deaths.
2002, predicted that from 50 to 50,000 people would likely die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef - only 177 deaths from BSE. (media often only mentioned the up to 50,000 deaths numbers.)
2005, predicted up to 150 million people die from bird flu - 282 people died worldwide between 2003 and 2009.
2009, predicted a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would kill 65,000 British people in the UK - 457 died.
510,000 would die in the UK and 2.2 million in the US from Covid-19
Numbers were rolled back and reported numbers have been falsified due to liberal and dishonest counting methods.
↑ 8.08.18.28.38.48.58.6PCR or RT-PCR test is only measuring the presence of the [ribonucleic acid, or RNA] of a virus or fungus or bacteria in the host of the human sample. It is not virus-specific. RT-PCR or "Reverse Transcription-PCR, is RNA genetic material transcribed in reverse as a cDNA complement(DNA has introns, cDNA doesn't). This is amplified using the PCR which should result as "presence or absence" of the amplified gene product. RT-PCR is used to amplify whereas the Quantitative polymerase chain reaction(QPCR or PCR) measures the amplification. It is used as a diagnostic tool for detecting infectious agents such as the avian flu virus and 2019-nCoV. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "pcr" defined multiple times with different content
↑ 11.011.1Factors used in calculating contagious spread are R0 and SI. R0 is pronounced “R naught.” The formal definition of a disease's R0 is the number of cases, on average, an infected person will cause during their infectious period. R0 value only applies when everyone in a population is completely vulnerable to the disease. The new coronavirus has an estimated R0 of roughly 2 to 2.5 with Fergison estimating 3.1 and some as high as 3.58 with an 8-fold to 2-fold increase in the reporting rate. This number will immediately decrease as society moves toward herd immunity until this disease can no longer spread through the population. The serial interval (SI) of an infectious disease represents the duration between symptom onset of a primary case and symptom onset of its secondary cases. Estimates for coronavirus have ranged from 4.4 days to 7.6. The estimated serial intervals as an example have been calculated for influenza A(H3N2) (2.2 days), pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (2.8 days), respiratory syncytial virus (7.5 days), measles (11.7 days), varicella (14.0 days), smallpox (17.7 days), mumps (18.0 days), rubella (18.3 days), and pertussis (22.8 days).
↑ The Imperial College London and Professor Neil Ferguson's computer model which gave the UK and other governments a pretext for the 'lockdown' was funded by 'The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation' with millions in contributions.
↑John 20:22 And when he had said this, he breathed on [them], and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
↑Romans 16:16 Salute one another with an holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you.
1 Corinthians 16:20 All the brethren greet you. Greet ye one another with an holy kiss.
2 Corinthians 13:12 Greet one another with an holy kiss.
1 Thessalonians 5:26 Greet all the brethren with an holy kiss.
↑Matthew 11:12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
↑Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
↑"But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. 6 So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. 7 And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. 8 For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; 9 and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch." Polybius: The Histories (composed at Rome around 130 BC)Fragments of Book VI, p289 See also Loeb Classical Library edition, 1922 thru 1927
↑An alternate translation in context, "9. For no sooner had the knowledge of the jealousy and hatred existing in the citizens against them which is replaced by democracy, emboldened some one to oppose the government by word or deed, than he was sure to find the whole people ready and prepared to take his side. Having then got rid of these rulers by assassination or exile, they do not venture to set up a king again, being still in terror of the injustice to which this led before; nor dare they intrust the common interests again to more than one, considering the recent example of their misconduct: and therefore, as the only sound hope left them is that which depends upon themselves, they are driven to take refuge in that; and so changed the constitution from an oligarchy to a democracy, and took upon themselves the superintendence and charge of the state. And as long as any survive who have had experience of oligarchical supremacy and domination, they regard their present constitution as a blessing, and hold equality and freedom as of the utmost value. But as soon as a new generation has arisen, and the democracy has descended to their children’s children, long association weakens their value for equality and freedom, and some seek to become more powerful than the ordinary citizens; and the most liable to this temptation are the rich. (which degenerates into rule of corruption and violence, only to be stopped by a return to despotism.) So when they begin to be fond of office, and find themselves unable to obtain it by their own unassisted efforts and their own merits, they ruin their estates, while enticing and corrupting the common people in every possible way. By which means when, in their senseless mania for reputation, they have made the populace ready and greedy to receive bribes, the virtue of democracy is destroyed, and it is transformed into a government of violence and the strong hand. For the mob, habituated to feed at the expense of others, and to have its hopes of a livelihood in the property of its neighbours, as soon as it has got a leader sufficiently ambitious and daring, being excluded by poverty from the sweets of civil honours, produces a reign of mere violence. Then come tumultuous assemblies, massacres, banishments, redivisions of land; until, after losing all trace of civilisation, it has once more found a master and a despot." Translator: Evelyn Shirley Shuckburgh, Release Date: November 8, 2013 [EBook #44126]
↑Isaiah 51:21 Therefore hear now this, thou afflicted, and drunken, but not with wine:
↑Revelation 16:13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
Revelation 19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night forever and ever.
↑Proverbs 23:21 For the drunkard and the glutton shall come to poverty: and drowsiness shall clothe [a man] with rags.
↑Proverbs 4:17 For they eat the bread of wickedness, and drink the wine of violence.
↑Intubation is a medical procedure involving the insertion of a tube into the body. Patients are generally anesthetized beforehand. Examples include tracheal intubation, and the balloon tamponade with a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube. Many COVID-19 patients are requiring tracheal intubation, and there have been growing concerns about personal protective equipment and safety. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intubation
↑Every year there are a variety of flu viruses circulating through populations where people who have not come into contact with that flu may become ill for a few days. Because we can now test for antibodies there is scientific evidence many people become immune to disease and never appear to have been ill. Those who sho symptoms and those who are asymptomatic both become immune adding to the herd immunity of society.
↑ 55.055.155.255.3"In 1977, Dr. Jonas Salk, who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts” )"
↑ 57.057.1"The route by which an antigen is administered frequently determines the type and duration of antibody response. For example, intramuscular injection of inactivated poliomyelitis virus (Salk vaccine) generates less production of serum antibody and induces only a temporary systemic immunity; it may not produce substantial local gastrointestinal immunity and, therefore, may not prevent the carrying of the virus in the gastrointestinal tract." Natural and acquired immunity
↑Krause RM. The origin of plagues: old and new, Science, 1992, vol. 257 (pg. 1073-8)
↑ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), 512 Maple Ave. W. #206, Vienna, VA 22180, 703-938-0342; "Investigative Report on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System."
↑Spalding JMK. Swash M, Oxbury J. Poliomyelitis, Clinical neurology , 1991EdinburghChurchill Livingstone(pg. 800-3)
↑ Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, 87th Congress, Second Session on H.R. 10541, May 1962, at 94.
3. Comparison of the Safety, Vaccine Virus Shedding and Immunogenicity of Influenza Virus Vaccine, Trivalent, Types A and B, Live Cold-Adapted, Administered to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected and Non-HIV Infected Adults http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/181/2/725.full
↑“We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described. Virological studies are underway that may help to resolve the issues. If there is a causal link between measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and this syndrome, a rising incidence might be anticipated after the introduction of this vaccine in the UK in 1988. Published evidence is inadequate to show whether there is a change…”
