Rights: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:43, 25 October 2016

The word "right" or "rights" as a noun is defined as "that which is morally correct, just, or honorable."

Natural rights are a thing of nature and therefore are inherited through nature from generation to generation. Slavery or bondage is also inherited. Man may be endowed by his creator with certain rights ut his pro-creators may undermine your access to those natural rights before you are even conceived.

Havin a right is not the same thing as enjoying a right. There many in a hostile world that would deprive you of the enjoyment of your natural rights.

To maintain your rights you must care about your neighbor's rights as much as your own because that is what is considered in Natural Law to be "morally correct, just, or honorable". It is the foundation of The Ten Laws of ancient Israel and other laws such as the Law of the Maat.

Natural Law and legal rights are two types of rights: legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system usually as a result of contracts within a Social contract, while natural rights are those not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable. They are inherent and considered endowed by Nature and Nature's God, the God of creation rather than the gods many spoke of by the apostle Paul.

Description Stossel 2016 09 16 Rights At Risk What are your rights? Progressives claim you have a right to free healthcare, education, food, and more. But, think about that. Those things have costs. If those are rights then the state has the right to force doctors to treat people. They could even force John Stossel to to pay for your education and more! What the founders really had in mind, when they talked about rights, was the right to be left alone; the right to speak freely; the right to practice any religion. Basically, the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Today's politicians are monkeying with that and what will the next supreme court do? Time 41:15

The theory of Natural Law is closely related to the theory of natural rights. During the Age of Enlightenment, Natural Law theory challenged the divine right of kings, and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a Social contract, positive law, and government.

Ultimately if you want your rights back you must take back your responsibilities to your fellow man which brings us to the definition of Religion two hundred years ago.

Property is what is proper. If you invest your labor and life into something you have honestly obtained and altering it increase its value it is proper and right that you get to enjoy the value you have imparted to the object or place with your sweat and blood and effort. If someone comes to take that value away without your consent then you have a proper right to defend your life which is now part of the objector thing attached to the place. If you live among other men who have the same values and virtues they may mutually help defend what is properly yours against those who would seize it by force.

Private property is what is properly possessed by an individual. Without private property in the hands of the individual, which is capitalism, all men are slaves to the bully whether he is an individual, group or society.

The primary means of production is a man's labor which is guided by his own mind and heart within the allotted time of his life. If these things are not exclusive to the individual then he is not free.

Man was given dominion over the planet^[1] and that which lives upon for the purposes of dressing and keeping it.^[2] That is as far as his divine license may reach. He has no right to rule over others or abuse the earth by not dressing and keeping it.

If man was not to rule over his fellowman then the natural state of man was an anarchy. But anarchy is only one small part of the relationship of man and his individual dominion. Anarchy in itself does not guarantee "proper justice" or freedom.

If man is commanded to "keep it" there must be a distinct possibility that he may lose it. Man's right to dominion is shared individually, held individually. For anyone to imagine that men as a collective hold dominion there can be no individual choice. Without choice there is no freedom and man is nothing but an instrument, a thing.

In order for there to be "choice" there must be private property.

Some actually believe that property is theft but in truth the refusal to accept the right to private property is both theft and enslavement. Any right of society in the form of a collective or the state to allocate property or the means of production is slavery and bondage of the mind and body of the individual.

If a seed falls from a tree in the wilderness and someone plants it, cultivates it, protects it until it bears fruit it is proper that he may take the fruit for his own use. Only he would have the power of allocation for without the expenditure of his toil and time there would be no fruit.

That is private property. If a community says it is not proper for him to have property rights to what he has produced then the community is ruling over his means of production, his labor, his toil and time, and that community is not an anarchist community.

Cain and Nimrod created anarchist communities.

Some think that anarchism entails anti-capitalism. Others believe that "If they genuinely wish to eliminate the state, they are anarchists, but they aren’t really capitalists, no matter how much they want to claim they are."^[3]

We might argue that they do not understand capitalism which is understandable since for most people there are no working examples of true capitalism in existence today and hasn't been since 1933 if not 1913. But the real problem is that Anarchism does not mean there is no State but that there are no "rulers".

There are examples of States where there were no rulers except within the individual family. These would be states or governments where the leaders are titular.

There are examples of such governments in history and their success is dependent upon the social virtues of the people.

5. "But the followers of Carpocrates and Epiphanes think that wives should be common property. Through them the worst calumny has become current against the Christian name. This fellow Epiphanes, whose writings I have at hand, was a son of Carpocrates and his mother was named Alexandria." Clement of Alexandria "On Marriage" Miscellanies, Book III, CHAPTER II, 5,

"This is what he [Epiphanes] says, then, in the book Concerning Righteousness: .... But the laws, by pre-supposing the existence of private property, cut up and destroyed the universal equality decreed by the divine law." CHAPTER II, 6,

more to come

No State shall

Article I, section 10, clause 1. It states:

"No State shall... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any ... Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts"

By that the government would have to treat all property purchased with anything other than gold and silver as not actually purchased and the courts would be cognizable of that fact. That would leave every citizen of the United States who thinks he has property rights with only a "legal title".

Anyone with only a legal title has no right to the "beneficial interest" or use of the property and therefore is not the true owner of the property. So when you think the government is violating your property rights they are actually not. They are protecting the rights of the "true owner" which is not the citizen of the United States holding "legal title".

In other words if you want to know why you think you have no actual property rights to the beneficial interest of your property it is because you don't.

The government is not usually violating your property rights when you think they are. They cannot give you back your property rights either because they can make no law impairing the Obligation of Contracts.

The following chapter will explain the obligation of contracts that bars your access to rights you wish to enjoy. There are people on your side but you have to seek to know the whole truth and provide for it. There are other contracts that bind you but we should start with this concerning property rights.

Chapter 2. of the book The Covenants of the gods
Law vs Legal
Audio http://keysofthekingdom.info/COG-02.mp3
Text http://www.hisholychurch.org/study/gods/cog2lvl.php

The above stimulated a conversation on a Facebook group after it was posted to their web forum.

A Conversation with Mosheh has been recorded at http://www.preparingyou.com/wiki/Conversation_with_Mosheh in the hope of helping other people see the truth that will set them free if they seek it with all their heart in true love and faith.

==Footnotes==

↑ Genesis 1:26 ¶ And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
↑ Genesis 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
↑ Anarcho-“Capitalism” is Impossible. Center for a Stateless Society

[1] Genesis 1:26 ¶ And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

[2] Genesis 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

[3] Anarcho-“Capitalism” is Impossible. Center for a Stateless Society

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 The word "right" or "rights" as a noun is defined as "that which is morally correct, just, or honorable."
+[[File:angelcls.jpg|right]]
+Natural rights are  a thing of nature and therefore are inherited through nature from generation to generation. Slavery or [[bondage]] is also inherited. Man may be endowed by his creator with certain rights ut his pro-creators may undermine your access to those natural rights before you are even conceived.
+Havin a right is not the same thing as enjoying a right. There many in a hostile [[world]] that would deprive you of the enjoyment of your natural rights.
 To maintain your rights you must care about your neighbor's rights as much as your own because that is what is considered in [[Natural Law]] to be "morally correct, just, or honorable". It is the foundation of [[The Ten Laws]] of ancient Israel and other laws such as the [[ Law of the Maat]].
-Natural and legal rights are two types of rights: legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system usually as a result of contracts within a [[Social contract]], while natural rights are those not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable. They are inherent and considered endowed by Nature and Nature's God, the God of creation rather than the [[Gods|gods]] many spoke of by the apostle Paul.
+[[Natural Law]] and legal rights are two types of rights: legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system usually as a result of contracts within a [[Social contract]], while natural rights are those not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable. They are inherent and considered endowed by Nature and Nature's God, the God of creation rather than the [[Gods|gods]] many spoke of by the apostle Paul.
 {{#ev:youtube|1QqLd51frVU|300|right|Description Stossel 2016 09 16 Rights At Risk What are your rights? Progressives claim you have a right to free healthcare, education, food, and more. But, think about that. Those things have costs. If those are rights then the state has the right to force doctors to treat people. They could even force John Stossel to to pay for your education and more! What the founders really had in mind, when they talked about rights, was the right to be left alone; the right to speak freely; the right to practice any religion. Basically, the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Today's politicians are monkeying with that and what will the next supreme court do? Time  41:15}}

Rights: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:43, 25 October 2016

No State shall

Navigation menu

Search