Collectivism

Load video

YouTube

YouTube might collect personal data. Privacy Policy

Continue Dismiss

Description: G. Edward Griffin - Collectivism and The Collectivist Conspiracy In the exclusive 80 minute video interview, legendary author G. Edward Griffin concerning collectivism explains how his research, which spans no less than 5 decades, has revealed a banking elite obsessed with enforcing a world government under a collectivist model that will crush individualism and eventually institute martial law as a response to the inevitable backlash that will be generated as a result of a fundamental re-shaping of society.another link Time 1:24:54

Collectivism defined

The word collectivism is defined as "the practice or principle of giving a group priority over each individual in it."

Collectivism is also considered "the theory and practice of the ownership of land and the means of production by the people or the state."

Collectivism may refer to a society, a culture, or an economy that values groups over individual interests. Collectivism is often understood in contrast to individualism, which has been said to privilege the individual interests over the group. In truth, by consent it is the individual that privileges the collective to exercise authority over what had at one time been a private choice.

A community is not truly a collective in some sense of the word. For the Community is often bound by individual values producing social bonds but still allowing the exercise of individual choice.

The Collective good and evil

Some will say, Collectivism is neither inherently evil nor good, but rather a neutral framework that can facilitate both good and evil. But is that true?

It says that Collectivism fosters strong interdependence, encouraging members to care for the vulnerable and prioritize the group's welfare. Do collectives merely encourage or coerce members?

A pro Collectivism approach does prioritizes collective goals over those goals of the individual which may be deemed selfish from the point of the view of the collective.

Is it possible for the collectives to prioritizes collective's goals without depriving the individual of the nourishing growth that only comes from personal choice which man was endowed with for a reason.

While promoting cooperation and reducing conflict within the group seems positive it also impairs the ability to resolve conflict in righteously.

While Collectivism may enable large-scale, positive, and coordinated efforts that individuals may not be able to achieve alone, such as in disaster relief or the infrastructure of social progress. It also allows for compelling the collective to form armies of conquest, war, and destruction.

Collectivism can promote social cohesion, community care, and cooperation, but it can also lead to the suppression of individuality, conformity at the expense of individual inspiration, and also hostility toward outsiders or inspired prophets. It is a powerful force that amplifies action.

But it is also said that Collectivism depends on the goals and ethical boundaries set by its members.

But individualism also depends on the goals and ethical boundaries set by its voluntary participants.

Loss of individualism can and must enforce conformity, suppressing personal freedom and by its nature opposes the Perfect law of liberty.

Many philosophers argue that "collective responsibility" is a "moral absurdity" because only an individual can have a pure conscience of choice and moral agency.

The psychiatrists like Carl Jung may claim that humans share a "collective unconsciousness" their observations may only be a result of the chosen blindness of the individual and the mutual actions of "the masses" in the formation of a mass psychosis.

Collectivism actually does not bring mankind together but in fact divides man into a "Us vs. Them" mentality by giving a focus on in-group priorities often leads to prejudice, negativity, or aggression towards all other groups.

Ancient Israel was told to be priest to all nations, exemplified in the sacrifice of the Red heifer which is foreign aid freely given.

The larger groups bigger than the homogenous of the family are bound together can lose the individual practice of accountability, and degenerate, allowing collective actions to become destructive leading to unethical and historical atrocities.

Collectivism has been positively associated with neuroticism, depression, and deregulation of emotions which breeds a nation of narcissists.

Collective pot

Abraham, Moses, Jesus and all the prophets spoke of the same temptation of a one purse collective where the people covet the property and and the flesh and blood of their neighbor and by foolish consent are snared with a yoke of bondage.

Other warnings are heard concerning the city States which were called a cauldron and the people were the flesh in it. Of course the people in the bondage of Egypt also ate of the Flesh pots of Egypt.

Griffin discusses the similarities between the extreme left and the extreme right in the false political paradigm and how this highlights a recurring theme - collectivism.

Collectivism is the opposite of individualism and is a system which believes that the interests of the individual must be sacrificed for the greater good of the greater number, explains Griffin, uniting the doctrines of communism and fascism, also known as socialism and statism and leads to Pathopolitics.

Both the Republican and Democrat parties in the United States are committed to advancing collectivism and this is why the same policies are followed no matter who is voted in to the White House.

"All collectivist systems eventually deteriorate into a police state because that's the only way you can hold it together," warns Griffin.

Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former president Bill Clinton, explained in his books Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment, how the elite maintained a silent dictatorship while fooling people into thinking they had political freedom, by creating squabbles between the two parties in terms of slogans and leadership, while all the time controlling both from the top down and each pursuing the same agenda. Griffin documents how the Tea Party, after its beginnings as a grass roots movement, was later hijacked by the Republicans supposedly through the likes of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck.

Pointing out how Republicans and Democrats agree on the most important topics, such as US foreign policy, endless wars in the Middle East, and the dominance of the private banking system over the economy, Griffin lays out how the left-right hoax is used to steer the destiny of America.

Griffin also talks at length on a myriad of other important subjects, such as the move towards a Chinese-style censored internet, the demonization of the John Birch Society as a racist extremist group, the Hegelian dialectic, the power of tax-exempt foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations, the movement towards world government, and the question of whether the elite are really worried about the growing awareness of their agenda amongst Americans.

The collective of blood

Blood lines and tribal clans provide a form of collective supposedly by their common seed from generation to generation.

The kingdom of God was supposedly from generation to generation.

Melchizedek, Abraham, Israel, Moses, and Jesus seem to be some form of a collective where there was leadership and sharing But they also seemed to be quite different than Cain, Nimrod, Abimelech, Pharaoh and Caesar.

What is the difference between these two groups?

Melchizedek, Moses, and Jesus spoke and received freewill offerings or charity for the support of the needy in a network of servant ministers in the form of what has also been called the way of tithes, while the latter group of rulers who exercised authority clearly received taxes through a top down network of public servants.

The former allowed for the latter as long as they did not usurp their authority allowed by consent.

But what was the seed of Abraham and who is his generation?

Collective narcissism

Collective narcissism is the investment of an individual's self-worth into the inflated belief that their group (nation, political party, religion, fan base) is superior, yet misunderstood. It requires constant external validation, fostering "us vs. them" mentalities, aggressive defenses, and shared delusions of grandeur, similar to individual narcissism.

The collective of demons

Are demonic spirits in the bible equated with a collective?

The demonic spirits in the Bible are often depicted as a collective entity, working under a hierarchical structure, although they are also shown to be individual fallen angels. They are frequently described using plural terms and collective nouns that emphasize their number, unity in purpose, and submission to a single leader, Satan.

Here is how the Bible equates demons with a collective:

"Legion" (A Multitude): In Mark 5:9 and Luke 8:30, a demonized man in Gerasene is possessed by many spirits who identify themselves as "Legion" because "we are many". This demonstrates a collective force operating within one individual.

Hierarchical Structures of Demonic forces are described in terms of a collective, organized army, with Satan as the head leader or "prince". They are referred to as "principalities," "powers of darkness," and "authorities," indicating a structured, collective hierarchy (Ephesians 6:12).

"Unclean Spirits" were plural which is why the Bible frequently refers to them in the plural as "evil spirits" or "unclean spirits" that can swarm or work together to torment, corrupt, or oppose God's work.

Associated with Pagan Gods/Idols: Leviticus 17:7 and Deuteronomy 32:17 connect idol worship to the sacrifice to "demons" (often translated as "goat demons" or "Shedim"), suggesting a collective, idolatrous spiritual force. "The Devil and His Angels": Revelation 12:7-9 describes a collective group—the devil and his angels—who were cast out of heaven. While they function as a collective unit with a shared mission to oppose God, the Bible also implies they are individual, fallen angelic beings with distinct abilities (e.g., "this kind" in Mark 9:29).

Desire of the soul

What do you want?

Do you know what you should not want?

There are other interviews with Yuri Bezmenov and Norman Dodd, and artic.es about the ideology of Karl Marx.

Freedom force international

Creed of freedom

Ultimately Christ had the real answer if we ask the right questions.

Some Questions

• What was the bondage of Egypt, and why were we to never go back there again?
• Have people given consent to a social compact that might enslave them, like in the days of Egypt?
• Why would the slothful be under tribute?
• Why did the Corban of the Pharisees make the word of God to none effect?
• Why did Jesus say "Call no man Father upon the earth"?
• Why did Jesus say not to be like the rulers who called themselves Benefactors?
• Why did Peter say covetous practices would make us Merchandise and curse children?
• What did Jesus list off as the Weightier matters?
• Why did Jesus command that the people sit down in Tens?
• What is Religion and what is Pure Religion?
• What was Public religion and the imperial Cult of Rome? How did it differ from Pure Religion practiced by early Christians?
• Why did the Church have a Daily ministration?
• How do the Modern Christians differ from the early Church who followed The Way of Christ?
• What were the deeds of the Nicolaitans, and why did God hate those deeds?
• What was the Christian conflict with Rome?
• Are modern Christians actually workers of iniquity?
• Do people today make covenants with the gods of this world because they love the wages of unrighteousness?
• What is the difference between the Baptism of John the Baptist and the Baptism of Herod or Constantine or Rabbinical Baptism?
• Israel was not to have a golden calf but what did that mean?
• What were the altars of earth and stone?
• What are lively stones?
• Was the Sabbath a way or a day?

More Questions

• Were those rituals of ancient societies merely mindless acts of superstition, or were they metaphors?
• What are the rituals of the Church, and do they point to The Way of Christ and God?
• Could Welfare systems of the world be Snares and Traps?
• And what does this all have to do with Nimrod, Cain and Caesar who called themselves Benefactors but exercise authority one over the other?
• What was the Mark of Cain and the Mark of God and even the Mark of the Beast?
• Did Constantine start a different Church not of Christ?
• Why did the people have to sew Breeches for the Levites?
• What was early Israel like before the Voice of the people rejected God?
• Why were they organized by Tens?
• How was the Early Church funded, and what did they use the funds for?
• Did it operate by force or Freewill offerings?
• Do all governments of the world operate according to the ways of God?
• Or do they operate according to the ways of Cain and Nimrod?
• Who were the Nicolaitans, and what did they do that included the error of Balaam, and why does God hate their deeds?
• What was Christ trying to tell us about the Fathers of the earth and who are they?
• And who is The Beloved Anarchist?
• What do you want to do about all this?

To find the answers, we must seek and strive to do what Jesus said the way He said to do it... Including attending to the Weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith which include caring for the needs of our neighbors and the widows and orphans of our society through Pure Religion in matters of health, education, and welfare. We are NOT to provide for the needy of society through the Covetous Practices and the men who call themselves benefactors but who exercise authority one over the other like the socialists do.

The Way of Christ was like neither the way of the world of Rome nor the governments of the gentiles who depend on those fathers of the earth through force, fear and fealty who deliver the people back in bondage again like they were in Egypt. Christ's ministers and true Christians do not depend upon systems of social welfare that force the contributions of the people like the corban of the Pharisees which made the word of God to none effect. Many people have been deceived to go the way of Balaam and the Nicolaitan and out of The Way of Christ and have become workers of iniquity.

The Christian conflict with Rome in the first century Church appointed by Christ was because they would not apply to the fathers of the earth for their free bread but instead relied upon a voluntary network providing a daily ministration to the needy of society through Faith, Hope, and Charity by way of freewill offerings of the people, for the people, and by the people through the perfect law of liberty in Free Assemblies according to the ancient pattern of Tuns or Tens as He commanded.

The modern Christians are in need of repentance.

---

"Follow me!" —Jesus the Christ.

• One of the most important things to do is to become involved in a network of Charitable Practices. Everyone should want to join a Living Network of Love and Charity.

• If you think you have a calling to be a Minister of God or you might want to dedicate your life to Christ as an Ordained Minister of His Holy Church, contact us to start the process of discipleship and become the benefactors who exercise only love, NOT authority.

---

And are we or you willing to hear the answers?

If you need help:

Or want to help others:

Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network | Join Local group | About | Purpose | Guidelines | Network Removal
Contact Minister | Fractal Network | Audacity of Hope | Network Links