One form of government: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Men often choose to instead to create forms of government for themselves where they live by [[force]], [[fear]], and [[fealty]]. | Men often choose to instead to create forms of government for themselves where they live by [[force]], [[fear]], and [[fealty]]. | ||
==Trans-Form Nations == | |||
Anyone who believes in [[welfare]] or any form of [[legal charity]] by the power of the State "endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.” as we saw defined by [[Frederic Bastiat]]. | |||
Desiring [[benefits]] at the expense of others is the [[covetous practices]] that makes men [[merchandise]], the [[word of God]] to [[Corban|none effect]], and will [[curse children]] according to [[Abraham]], [[Moses]], all the [[Prophets]], and [[Jesus]] the [[Christ]] along with the [[early Christians]]. This moral position led to the [[Christian conflict]] with the [[public religion]] of the government of [[Rome]]. | |||
Originally Rome was a [[Republic]] but over the centuries it morphed into an indirect [[democracy]] and into a despotic [[tyranny]]. | |||
{{Masses}} | |||
{{church defined}} | {{church defined}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:51, 5 November 2024
Forms of government
There are at least two forms of governments.
A government is "the system by which a nation, state, or community is governed."
"... it is proved that Government cannot satisfy one party without adding to the labor of the others, until I can obtain another definition of the word Government I feel authorized to give it my own. Who knows but it may obtain the prize? Here it is: “Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.” -- Frederic Bastiat, essay titled “The State,” written in 1848
But there is one form of government that does the opposite.
Some systems are based on contracts, covenants, and constitutions that centralizes power, an exercising authority of one over the other, and a weakening the social bonds of society through the granting of gifts, gratuities, and benefits. It eventually depends upon force, fear, and fealty.
The other system may be based on fundamental rights of individuals and a common standard of morals and virtue.
The essential elements of governing may also rest with the responsibility of the individual in a society bound by a common faith in those standards with only the hope that others will also cherish your rights as much as you cherish your own and theirs.
In such a form of government the most essential element is love for your neighbor and his rights as you love your own.
That cherishing of rights must be without discrimination and based solely on the content of their character and those common standards of morals and virtue.
Christian did claim another king, one Jesus, providing for their own welfare in a daily ministration of pure Religion separate from the world of Rome. They did this by their mutual dependence upon tables of charity ministered by those called out and appointed by Christ.
"Christians are indistinguishable from other men either by nationality, language or customs. They do not inhabit separate cities of their own, or speak a strange dialect, or follow some outlandish way of life. Their teaching is not based upon reveries inspired by the curiosity of men." From The Epistle to Diognetus
If the Apostles, as the little flock were appointed a kingdom and a kingdom is a government, what was its form?
Abraham, Moses, all the Prophets, and Jesus the Christ taught away to govern yourself and live by faith, hope, and charity.
Men often choose to instead to create forms of government for themselves where they live by force, fear, and fealty.
Trans-Form Nations
Anyone who believes in welfare or any form of legal charity by the power of the State "endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.” as we saw defined by Frederic Bastiat.
Desiring benefits at the expense of others is the covetous practices that makes men merchandise, the word of God to none effect, and will curse children according to Abraham, Moses, all the Prophets, and Jesus the Christ along with the early Christians. This moral position led to the Christian conflict with the public religion of the government of Rome.
Originally Rome was a Republic but over the centuries it morphed into an indirect democracy and into a despotic tyranny.
"The masses continue with an appetite for benefits and the habit of receiving them by way of a rule of force and violence. The people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others... institute the rule of violence; [1] and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder,[2] until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch." [3] [4]
- Polybius saw the downfall of the republic by way of their free bread and welfare a 150 years before the first Emperor of Rome and 175 years before the birth of John the Baptist and Jesus the Christ who opposed these same systems of free bread at your neighbor's expense.
- The authoritarian State often uses force and violence to become the Benefactors of the people if the covet what is their neighbors'. They make a social contract where one class of citizen is forced to provide for another class through "legal charity" which is not true charity. The writings of the Apostles warned along with countless passages of ancient writings of the prophets including Proverbs 23 which warned them about what Christ forbid which was the covetous practices of socialist forms of government.
The word Church
People use the word Church all the time, but it may mean different things to different people and different things at different times.
When you think of a church are you thinking of a place or building as if it was somewhere that Jesus went to?
Was there a place called a church during Jesus' time here on earth?
During the time of Jesus, there was something called a synagogue or a temple. Originally neither a synagogue nor a temple were buildings.
At the first synagogue, Jesus went to, they tried to throw Him over a cliff.
Have you ever thought or considered the fact that the Temples were actually government institutions?
What were the actual purposes of the different temples?
What were the functions and services in society were these temples providing?
What was the Christian conflict with the Temples of Rome and the Church established by Christ?
Why did Jesus drive out the moneychangers from the temple where the Apostles would end up working in daily[5] after appointing a Kingdom to His little flock.
If Jesus took the kingdom away from the Pharisees[6] as he said he would and appointed it to His Little flock as he said he would then were these called out ministers of Christ part of a government and if so what kind of government was it and how did it operate?
What were the apostles doing when they worked daily in the temple?[7]
After the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed how was the early Church still able to provide a daily ministration?
The word Church is often translated from the Greek word ekklesia, which meant "called out". Moses had called out the Church in the wilderness.
Jesus also called men out to be "in the world but not of the world". He appointed those men to be His government, but they were not to be like the governments of the other nations who exercise authority one over the other.
These ministers appointed by Christ worked daily in the temple, providing government services like welfare for the people, by the charity of the people. This was, and still is, the temple of His body ... the body of Christ who continues doing 'greater works than these'.[8] And in Acts 2, it says they went from house to house; they were rightly dividing both bread and the Word in a system of Daily ministration through faith, hope and charity by The Way of the Perfect law of liberty.
The world which these "called out" ministers were "not of" also had ministers, and they called themselves Benefactors, but they exercised authority one over the other. They used force to extract funds from the people to provide another type of welfare that included free bread and provisions. They were able to do this because the state had taken on the role of being the Father of the people in what was called the Roman Imperial cult. Jesus had said that they should call no man Father upon the earth and that the government He appointed was not to operate like the governments of the other nations who exercised authority in their own system of government-provided Corban.
That system used by Rome and the Pharisees was in conflict with Jesus and John the Baptist.
Legal definition
The Church can only be defined by Christ, but a legal definition is available:
- "CHURCH In its most general sense, the religious society founded and established by Jesus Christ, to receive, preserve, and propagate his doctrines and ordinances."
- "A body or community of Christians, united under one form of government by the profession of one faith, and the observance of the same rituals and ceremonies."
Black's Law Dictionary 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th... eds.
The term church may be used in several senses.
While many institutions may call themselves a church, to meet consistent legal definition it must be established by Jesus Christ.
The Church as a body is a corpus or corporate, and it would not include the people, except through charity.
The church as a community does include the people or laity in a communion of that charity.
You cannot get near God without what is sometimes called Sacrifice.
The manner of that sacrifice is where the Christian conflict is seen.
Related definitions
Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition
CHRISTIANITY. The religion established by Jesus Christ.
2. Christianity has been judicially declared to be a part of the common law of Pennsylvania; 11 Serg. & Rawle, 394; 5 Binn. R.555; of New York, 8 Johns. R. 291; of Connecticut, 2 Swift's System, 321; of Massachusetts, Dane's Ab. vol. 7, c. 219, a. 2, 19. To write or speak contemptuously and maliciously against it, is an indictable offence. Vide Cooper on the Law of Libel, 59 and 114, et seq.; and generally, 1 Russ. on Cr. 217; 1 Hawk, c. 5; 1 Vent. 293; 3 Keb. 607; 1 Barn. & Cress. 26. S. C. 8 Eng. Com. Law R. 14; Barnard. 162; Fitzgib. 66; Roscoe, Cr. Ev. 524; 2 Str. 834; 3 Barn. & Ald. 161; S. C. 5 Eng. Com. Law R. 249 Jeff. Rep. Appx. See 1 Cro. Jac. 421 Vent. 293; 3 Keb. 607; Cooke on Def. 74; 2 How. S. C. 11-ep. 127, 197 to 201.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition
CHURCH. In a moral or spiritual sense this word signifies a society of persons who profess the Christian religion; and in a physical or material sense, the place where such persons assemble. The term church is nomen collectivum;[9] it comprehends the chancel,[10] aisles, and body of the church.[11]
2. By the English law, the terms church or chapel, and church-yard, are expressly recognized as in themselves correct and technical descriptions of the building and place, even in criminal proceedings. 8 B. & C. *25; 1 Salk. 256; 11 Co. 25 b; 2 Esp. 5, 28.
3. It is not within the plan of this work to give an account of the different local regulations in the United States respecting churches. References are here given to enable the inquirer to ascertain what they are, where such regulations are known to exist. 2 Mass. 500; 3 Mass. 166; 8 Mass. 96; 9 Mass. 277; Id. 254; 10 Mass. 323; 15 Mass. 296 16 Mass. 488; 6 Mass. 401; 10 Pick. 172 4 Day, C. 361; 1 Root 3, 440; Kirby, 45; 2 Caines' Cas. 336; 10 John. 217; 6 John. 85; 7 John. 112; 8 John. 464; 9 John. 147; 4 Desaus. 578; 5 Serg. & Rawle, 510; 11 Serg. & Rawle, 35; Metc. & Perk. Dig. h. t.; 4 Whart. 531.
The Church Defined in the World
The acceptable definition of the Church offered in the world is found in Black’s Law Dictionary:
- “In its most general sense the religious society founded and established by Jesus Christ, to receive, preserve, and propagate His doctrines and ordinances.”
- “A body or community of Christians, united under one form of government by the profession of one faith, and the observance of the same rituals and ceremonies.”[12]
This “one form of government” has been a predominant form of government for society. It is a unique form of government in that it maintains freedom of the individual by placing the responsibilities upon the people and ministers as individuals, and recognizes offices of service only, dependent on the way of Christ.
The Church can only be as generous as the hearts and minds of the people in the exercise of the charity of the people. This is the thanksgiving[13] of Christ. This is done by the practice of charity in the granting of the substance needed for maintaining the daily ministration. This is a system based on hope not entitlements. This giving to Christ through ministers of the Church creates sacred purpose trust between the People and God. The gift given upon the living altars literally belongs to God. It is important that the overseers of such trust also belong to God to maintain its exclusive nature. Of the Levites, who could own no property in their own name, God said they are mine. Also, the apostles and other ordained ministers were called bondservants. They were also required to sell all they have as a personal estate and own all things in common. This is called today a vow of poverty.
The Church is “not of the world” although it is “in the world”. The ordained ministers cannot be “citizens entitled” (to social benefits) of any other government. The Church is one form of government and it is separate from other forms of government, especially authoritarian benefactors. It is literally separate, even foreign, to other forms of authoritarian benefactors. This doctrine is magnified in the statement by our founder, Jesus the Christ, that we are to be in the world but not of it.[14]
The ordained Church is established by Christ the king and not by any other power of incorporation.[15] As an example, according to the Oregon Department of Justice, “All corporations organized under the laws of the state of Oregon for charitable purposes must register. This includes, but is not limited to, any corporation registered with the Oregon Secretary of State as a nonprofit, public benefit corporation.” [16]
This clearly allows for the presumption that a body corporate organized under the laws of God and the authority of Jesus Christ and not of the State, as a nonprofit, public benefit corporation, does not have this same registration requirement.
The same source goes onto say, “Charities operating in Oregon will likely maintain relationships with at least three government entities: the Internal Revenue Service, the Corporation Division of the Oregon Secretary of State’s Office, and the Charitable Activities Section of the Oregon Department of Justice. The Internal Revenue Service will provide an initial determination of tax exemption, and require the filing of informational returns each year.”
Many Churches assume that this is the case with them because they are to be charitable institutions but the question arises who may determine who the Church is, or is not?
If you need help:
- Or want to help others:
Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network |
Join Local group |
About |
Purpose |
Guidelines |
Network Removal
Contact Minister |
Fractal Network |
Audacity of Hope |
Network Links
Church |
Churches |
Ekklesia |
Called out |
Church legally defined |
Priests |
Minister |
Deacon |
Bishop |
Elder |
Clergy |
Laity |
Home church |
Early Church |
Religion |
Corban |
Storehouse |
Daily ministration |
The Way |
Rituals and ceremonies |
The Blessed Strategy |
Minister of the world |
Welfare types |
Socialism |
Public religion |
The Church chained |
Body of Christ |
Kingdom of God |
Levites |
The Free Church Report |
Church Study course online |
Unchurched |
Ministers |
Christians |
Modern Christians |
Christians check list |
Theology |
Lady Godiva |
Whosoever believeth |
Worship |
Salvation |
Creed of the Apostles |
Benefactors |
Cain |
Nimrod |
Constantine |
Christian conflict |
Fathers |
Patristic |
Ambrose |
Jerome |
- ↑ Matthew 11:12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
- ↑ Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
- ↑ "But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. 6 So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. 7 And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. 8 For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; 9 and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch." Polybius: The Histories (composed at Rome around 130 BC)Fragments of Book VI, p289 See also Loeb Classical Library edition, 1922 thru 1927
- ↑ An alternate translation in context, "9. For no sooner had the knowledge of the jealousy and hatred existing in the citizens against them which is replaced by democracy, emboldened some one to oppose the government by word or deed, than he was sure to find the whole people ready and prepared to take his side. Having then got rid of these rulers by assassination or exile, they do not venture to set up a king again, being still in terror of the injustice to which this led before; nor dare they intrust the common interests again to more than one, considering the recent example of their misconduct: and therefore, as the only sound hope left them is that which depends upon themselves, they are driven to take refuge in that; and so changed the constitution from an oligarchy to a democracy, and took upon themselves the superintendence and charge of the state. And as long as any survive who have had experience of oligarchical supremacy and domination, they regard their present constitution as a blessing, and hold equality and freedom as of the utmost value. But as soon as a new generation has arisen, and the democracy has descended to their children’s children, long association weakens their value for equality and freedom, and some seek to become more powerful than the ordinary citizens; and the most liable to this temptation are the rich. (which degenerates into rule of corruption and violence, only to be stopped by a return to despotism.) So when they begin to be fond of office, and find themselves unable to obtain it by their own unassisted efforts and their own merits, they ruin their estates, while enticing and corrupting the common people in every possible way. By which means when, in their senseless mania for reputation, they have made the populace ready and greedy to receive bribes, the virtue of democracy is destroyed, and it is transformed into a government of violence and the strong hand. For the mob, habituated to feed at the expense of others, and to have its hopes of a livelihood in the property of its neighbours, as soon as it has got a leader sufficiently ambitious and daring, being excluded by poverty from the sweets of civil honours, produces a reign of mere violence. Then come tumultuous assemblies, massacres, banishments, redivisions of land; until, after losing all trace of civilisation, it has once more found a master and a despot." Translator: Evelyn Shirley Shuckburgh, Release Date: November 8, 2013 [EBook #44126]
- ↑ Acts 2:46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,
- ↑ Matthew 21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
- ↑ Luke 22:53 When I was daily with you in the temple, ye stretched forth no hands against me: but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.
- Acts 5:42 And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.
- ↑ John 14:12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
- ↑ NOMEN COLLECTIVUM. This expression is used to signify that a word in the singular number is to be understood in the plural in certain cases.
- ↑ the part of a church near the altar, reserved for the clergy and choir, and typically separated from the nave by steps or a screen.
The term nave is from navis, the Latin word for ship, an early Christian symbol of the Church as a whole, with a possible connection to the "ship of St. Peter" or the Ark of Noah.] - ↑ Ham. N. P. 204.
- ↑ Black's Law Dictionary 3rd ed. Page 325. also 4th, 5th 6th Ed.
- ↑ The Greek word for thanksgiving is Eucharist http://www.hisholychurch.net/sermon/eucharist3.PDF
- ↑ John 17:15 I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
- ↑ John 15:19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
- ↑ http://www.doj.state.or.us/charigroup/howtobe.shtml