- 1 Merck Whistleblower
- 2 Truth behind the CDC, Vaccines and Autism
- 3 Silent Epidemic
- 4 The Vaccine Hoax is Over
- 5 Amish Anomaly
- 6 Wakefield
- 7 Healthier Children
- 8 30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts
- 9 Flu deaths False Scare Tactics
- 10 Natural Immunity
- 11 Health Links
- 12 Disclaimer
- 13 Footnotes
Brandy Vaughan is a former sales rep for Merck & Co. - a vaccine maker - and she details how vaccine companies are using vaccines as a vehicle for massive profit and not public health. Brandy researched the safety of vaccines and found that not only do vaccines contain known toxins that can cause neurological damage, but that vaccine makers do not create the same safety studies for vaccines as they do for other drugs. This lack of true safety research of vaccines combined with the known adverse reactions to vaccination has helped Brandy to decide to never vaccinate her own child. Brandy says giving children a vaccine is like playing Russian roulette with our children and that mandatory vaccination is simply a way for vaccine makers to profit off of our children. Don’t be fooled: we do not need mandatory vaccination.
Truth behind the CDC, Vaccines and Autism
Ben Swann's Truth in Media and producer of the investigative film exposing a CDC cover-up in "Truth in Media: CDC, Vaccines and Autism". The exponential growth in the incidence of autism among our youth has become a national concern, but unfortunately, subject to much debate. As a result of the investigative work by Truth In Media, we now have a video to help clarify the issue.
Protecting your children is your responsibility and the responsibility of everyone in your society.
We would like to think that Vaccines are saving lives.
We would like to think that there is an answer we can purchase to protect against invisible enemy that causes disease and death.
But are vaccines actually doing more harm than good?
Are vaccines actually slowly poisoning and weakening the population of our world?
Has a billion dollar industry covered up the truth and do your public officials cater to those big money powers?
Published on Oct 3, 2013
Silent Epidemic, by award winning film director Gary Null, is the first documentary to investigate thoroughly the true medical record and the historical evidence about vaccine marvels. Conventional medicine has herald the invention of vaccines as a miracle of modern science. It claims that vaccines have been proven to prevent and eradicate infectious diseases. We are told that vaccines are safe and effective, and that "herd immunity" can be achieved if a high percentage of a population is vaccinated. However, does the science support these claims and what are the untold consequences?
- Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a serpent: they are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear;
The Vaccine Hoax is Over
Published 29Sep2012 By coto2admin
Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have
1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies
Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US.
Vaccines are the worst medical travesty that has ever been visited upon the human race.
These greedy profit mongers have preyed upon the love parents have for their children and upon the fear that the industry has actually created.
They have picked on the most vulnerable among us, first our babies and children and more recently, our mothers and fathers.
They have stolen their minds, compromised their health and shortened their lives.
They have bought off politicians who have made laws "mandating" vaccines to guarantee their profits.
They have stolen your tax dollars to donate to the industry for "researching" more poison to inject into the arms of an unsuspecting public.
When will people at least look at the information, stop believing the lies and stop the insanity of vaccines?
Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US. for more, look here:
The term Amish anomaly was coined by Dan Olmsted, who asserted that he could only find three Amish autistics after searching in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania and that two of them were vaccinated. Olmsted had quoted Dr. Frank Noonan as saying, "You'll find all the other stuff, but we don't find the autism. We're right in the heart of Amish country and seeing none, and that's just the way it is."
There is a great effort to discredit the Amish anomaly which has clear statistical evidence that the less vaccines a group gets the less likely there is to be less occurrences of autism. The statistics clearly demonstrate that.
Immediately people will try to discredit anyone that brings vaccine safety or effectiveness into question. Instead of looking at alarming statistics with concerns many jumped to contradict these observations with the fact that there are Amish who vaccinate their children.
Some Amish do vaccinate their children but at a far less rate than the general public and many not at all. The paper used by some to prove this shows that Amish had lower rate of vaccinations because only a small percentage had "one child" vaccinated with "one vaccination".
And the sampling was only about one third of those contacted because the Amish who do not vaccinate would not fill out the paper being very private people and fearing persecution.
I know Amish people all over the country and that is they way it works. Vaccinations among some Amish is almost non existent. They are not all the same and the ones who are very against vaccinations don't tell strangers.
Many of the scientific studies are also playing with words and are funded by companies making huge profits from vaccinations.
"In March 2006, Drs. Kevin Strauss, Holmes Morton and others documented 9 autistic Amish children, which could raise the autism rate of the Lancaster Amish community Olmsted supposedly investigated to almost 1/5,000 which is still a fraction of the US average of 1/68." Strauss, K. A.; Puffenberger, E. G.; Huentelman, M. J.; Gottlieb, S.; Dobrin, S. E.; Parod, J. M.; Stephan, D. A.; Morton, D. H. (2006). "Recessive Symptomatic Focal Epilepsy and Mutant Contactin-Associated Protein-like 2". New England Journal of Medicine. 354 (13): 1370–1377. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052773. PMID 16571880.
That is an alarming spread but it does not show cause. Statistics do not show "cause" in the relationship but statistics never show cause. That is not what statistics do.
But it should motivate grave concerns and compassionate from humble and unbiased people. Show me one pharmaceutical company that is going to shell out the money for a study that is going to cut into their billion dollar profits.
- In February 1998, the Lancet published Dr. Andrew Wakefield's case series of a group of autistic children with gastric problems, which has become one of the most controversial studies in medicine because part of the patients' story included regression after receiving the MMR vaccine.
- The debate is a heated one, as the study suggests there may be a link between the MMR vaccine, bowel disease and autism.
- Writing in the BMJ, research microbiologist David Lewis, of the National Whistleblowers Center, explains that he reviewed histopathological grading sheets by two of Dr. Wakefield's coauthors, pathologists Amar Dhillon and Andrew Anthony, and concluded there was no fraud committed by Dr. Wakefield:
- "As a research microbiologist involved with the collection and examination of colonic biopsy samples, I do not believe that Dr. Wakefield intentionally misinterpreted the grading sheets as evidence of "non-specific colitis." Dhillon indicated "non-specific" in a box associated, in some cases, with other forms of colitis. In addition, if Anthony's grading sheets are similar to ones he completed for the Lancet article, they suggest that he diagnosed "colitis" in a number of the children."
- In a press release, Lewis continued:
- "The grading sheets and other evidence in Wakefield's files clearly show that it is unreasonable to conclude, based on a comparison of the histological records, that Andrew Wakefield 'faked' a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
- "Now that these records have seen the light of day, it is time for others to stop using them for this purpose as well. False allegations of research misconduct can destroy the careers of even the most accomplished and reputable scientists overnight. It may take years for them to prove their innocence; and even then the damages are often irreparable. In cases where mistakes are made, every effort should be taken to fully restore the reputations and careers of scientists who are falsely accused of research misconduct."
Says Wakefield concerning those who replicated his work:
“… it’s been replicated in Canada, in the U.S., in Venezuela, in Italy… [but] they never get mentioned. All you ever hear is that no one else has ever been able to replicate the findings.
I’m afraid that is false.”
For those of you who have swallowed this type of reporting hook line and sinker, here is a list of 28 studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s controversial findings: see list of study and papers
Instead of a deep concern for vaccine safety and pressure on those who profit from their use to produce a safe vaccine we get law that give companies immunity. Instead we see whistle-blower and studies that bring the safety and efficacy of vaccines into question viciously attacked.
"Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier"
According to Christina England:
"A study from the 1990s has come to light, proving that compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children were more likely to suffer from asthma, eczema, ear infections, hyperactivity and many other chronic conditions. - See more:
30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts
Secret Official Transcripts Show UK Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine Hazards To Sell More Vaccines And Harm Your Kids Posted on March 14, 2012 by ChildHealthSafety
"An extraordinary new paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.
If you want to get an idea of who is responsible for your child’s condition resulting from a vaccine adverse reaction then this is the paper to read."
Flu deaths False Scare Tactics
Bayer and Death: 1918 and Aspirin Posted on July 9, 2011 by geobear7 | 35 Comments Part 1 of 5
By J. Holcombe, D. Jacobson, and T. Ruhl What killed people during the Spanish Flu outbreak of 1918? It may not have been the flu at all???
Mysteries of the Universe |
Spiritual DNA and Gene Expression |
Dendritic tree | Mysteries | Mystery Babylon | Meditation |
Cognitive dissonance | Bipolar | Capgras | Cotard | Trolls
Schizophrenia | Are you crazy | Autism | Depression |
Insane | Trauma | Narcissists | Repentance | Recovery |
Drugged | Vaccines | Health | Aid Addicts | Saul Syndrome |
Natural immunity. The ability to resist infection that does not depend on prior experience of the invading organism and the resultant production of antibodies or amendment or selection of LYMPHOCYTES. Natural immunity is a general and non-specific resistance to infection possessed by all healthy individuals.
If you get a disease, like measles or rubella, you typically have life-long immunity and won’t get it again. You are also stimulating your immune system to protect against the next infection.
Definition of Immunity
Immunity; 1. Protection against infectious disease by either specific or non-specific mechanisms. 2. Pertaining to the immune system or immune response [Ingelfinger, F. Dorland’s Medical Dictionary Saunders Press, 1999.]
Innate immunity is the resistance manifested by a species (or by races, families, and individuals in a species) that has not been immunized (sensitized, allergized) by previous infection or vaccination; much of it results from body mechanisms that are poorly understood but differ from those responsible for the altered reactivity associated with the specific nature of acquired immunity; in general, innate immunity is nonspecific and is not stimulated by specific antigens.
- "Our body’s immune response is a multifaceted interaction between molecules, cells, and organs. " 
Krause wrote “before the introduction of modern sanitation, polio infection was acquired during infancy, at which time it seldom caused paralysis but provided lifelong immunity against polio infection and paralysis later in life”  
"These observations were especially important in the tropics, as Spalding emphasized in discussing poliomyelitis: “the disease is endemic and the virus is ubiquitous. Children who are exposed to it at a very early age rarely suffer permanent damage and acquire immunity” (p. 800)"  
Did a Vaccine Eradicate Polio
- “Polioviruses are transient inhabitants of the gastrointestinal tract. Up to 95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic. Approximately 5% of polio infections consist of a minor, nonspecific illness consisting of an upper respiratory tract infection (sore throat and fever) and gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea). This influenza-like illness, clinically indistinguishable from the myriad of other viral illnesses, is characterized by complete recovery in less than a week with resultant life time immunity. Less than 1% of all polio infections result in paralysis. Most importantly, the vast majority of individuals who contract paralytic poliomyelitis recover with complete—or near complete—return of muscle function. Any weakness that is still present 12 months after onset of paralysis is usually considered permanent.“
- "Jonas Salk testified in 1976 was the 'principal if not sole cause' of all reported polio cases in the U.S. since 1961. The CDC admitted the same thing in 1992."
- "In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk, who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts” )"
- "The above statement states the truth of the vaccine in a nutshell. The Polio vaccine only increased the amount of cases of Polio when it was introduced and it had no part in actually creating a decline in the disease. The decline was happening naturally and the vaccine was introduced on a down turn of Polio cases. While the introduction of the vaccine created a spike in cases, overall the disease continued to decline. Especially in countries that did not introduce the vaccine. This is strong evidence showing that the Polio vaccine is not responsible for the decline and should negate the belief and statement that the Polio vaccine demonstrates vaccine success." 
The Congressional Record (among other sources) records these facts from both Sabin and Salk:
- "Six New England states reported increases in polio one year after the Salk vaccine was introduced, ranging from more than doubling in Vermont to Massachusetts’ astounding increase of 642%; other states reported increases as well. The incidence in Wisconsin increased by a factor of five. Idaho and Utah actually halted vaccination due to the increased incidence and death rate. In 1959, 77.5% of Massachusetts’ paralytic cases had received 3 doses of IPV (injected polio vaccine). During 1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, Dr. Bernard Greenberg, head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, testified that not only did the cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations—a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958, and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959—but that the statistics were deliberately manipulated by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.() It is important to understand that the polio vaccine was not universally accepted, at least initially. Despite this, polio declined both in European countries that refused mass vaccination as well as in those that employed it." 
- "At present, as a result of the WHO initiative, the wild virus is now confined to a few countries, but naturally acquired immunity has been lost, and the whole of the developing world is now vulnerable to epidemics of poliomyelitis, which could lead to severe paralysis and increased mortality. "
- "The route by which an antigen is administered frequently determines the type and duration of antibody response. For example, intramuscular injection of inactivated poliomyelitis virus (Salk vaccine) generates less production of serum antibody and induces only a temporary systemic immunity; it may not produce substantial local gastrointestinal immunity and, therefore, may not prevent the carrying of the virus in the gastrointestinal tract." 
- "Finally, the agent in the vaccine should be free of contaminating substances. It is also recognized, however, that vaccine transmissibility can be helpful—e.g., in the case of live polio vaccine, which can be spread from vaccinated children to others who have not been vaccinated." 
- " Because no vaccination is 100% effective, some vaccinated individuals will get the disease as well. In fact, during an outbreak, the number of vaccinated individuals who get sick will often outnumber the unvaccinated people who get sick."
Health Problems |
Health Solutions |
Health Share |
Health Websites |
Politics of Health | Breast | Cancer | Polio Vaccine and Cancer | Fungus | Lyme | Frequency of Disease |
Mind | Recovery | Bioacoustic | Drugged | Are you crazy | Insomnia | Dendritic tree | Aid Addicts |
Negotiating Health Care Costs | Exempt from Health Care | Recommended Health Sites |
Healing Information From Doctors Past and Present | Surviving Without Health Insurance |
There is no offer of any "effective treatment or cure." This information is based on personal experiences, what people have learned, as well as what is available on web sites. It is not meant or offered as medical advice or diagnosis and the information provided does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners of PreparingYOU.com or the site itself, but is offered for educational purposes only.
Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network | Join Local group | About | Purpose | Guidelines | Network Removal
Contact Minister | Fractal Network | Audacity of Hope | Network Links
- Natural Immunity VS. Artificial Immunity
- Krause RM. The origin of plagues: old and new, Science , 1992, vol. 257 (pg. 1073-8)
- Naturally Acquired Immunity to Poliovirus: Historical Observations Have Been Ignored, Colin L. Crawford
- Spalding JMK. Swash M, Oxbury J. Poliomyelitis, Clinical neurology , 1991EdinburghChurchill Livingstone(pg. 800-3)
- Stated in a paper written by Dr. Sheri Tenpenny The Polio Vaccine Myth: “The Vaccine Stopped Polio”Published February 18, 2012 By Joe Martino
- Natural Immunity Superior to Vaccination Matthews and Associates
- The Polio Vaccine Myth: “The Vaccine Stopped Polio”Published February 18, 2012 By Joe Martino
- Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, 87th Congress, Second Session on H.R. 10541, May 1962, at 94.
- Natural and acquired immunity
- Natural and acquired immunity