The current gamble seems to be to shut down the nation indefinitely to suppress a virus that is supposed to be especially deadly to some demographics and experts agree cannot be contained, only slowed.
The gamble seemed to be to [[shutdown]] the nation, even thd whole world's economy, indefinitely to suppress a virus that is supposed to be especially deadly to some demographics and experts agree cannot be contained, only slowed seemed to be a mistake from almost all the earliest data.
By the Ides of March, 2020 "More than 99% of Italy’s [[coronavirus]] fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to the country’s national health authority.” Italy is overwelmed every year and has alarge elderly population.
----
<blockquote>
{{#ev:youtube|nVK0QKxhzdM|300|right|Everything most important about COVID in 15 minutes - Professor Denis Rancourt [https://youtu.be/nVK0QKxhzdM zoom talk] to community group Time 18m}}
What was going on?
This article was written as the pandemic hysteria progressed even though the evidence was showing that there was never the extreme danger that the Media was promoting. Once people bought into the hype it became harder and harder for them to see the truth.
By July some political leaders were still promoting the fear for what must be alternative reasons. There are flu events every year that contribute to the deaths of millions of people. Was this [[Coronavirus]] pandemic all that much different than other years where masks were not mandatory, businesses were not destroyed, people were not locked down?
Was the [[shutdown]] ever really a good idea to deal with this new flu virus?
We recommend you study the information and listen to the [[Coronavirus#Audio_Podcast|audio files]] to get to a state of [[Critical thinking]] so this never happens again.
</blockquote>
----
By the Ides of March, 2020 "More than 99% of Italy’s [[coronavirus]] fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to the country’s national health authority.”
[[File:Coronavirus-Deaths.jpg|350px|thumb|right|Average age of those that died are in their 80's and more than half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses. More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease. 300,000 people die every year from obesity. 647,000 Americans die from heart disease each year.]]
[[File:Coronavirus-Deaths.jpg|350px|thumb|right|Average age of those that died are in their 80's and more than half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses. More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease. 300,000 people die every year from obesity. 647,000 Americans die from heart disease each year.]]
. People seem to want to believe that if we merely quarantine sick people and those at risk, a “mitigation” strategy being used in Denmark, one computer model projects the U.S. death toll at about 2 million, again half from lack of ventilators, not death of disease. But the Hoover Institution's study and model suggests “the total number of cases worldwide will peak out at well under one million, with the total number of deaths at under 50,000″, which is comparable to the annual death rate due to flu in the United States.
People seem to want to believe that if we merely quarantine sick people and those at risk, a “mitigation” strategy being used in Denmark, one computer model projects the U.S. death toll at about 2 million, again half from lack of ventilators, not death of disease. But the Hoover Institution's study and model suggests “the total number of cases worldwide will peak out at well under one million, with the total number of deaths at under 50,000″, which is comparable to the annual death rate due to flu in the United States.
* So, what is the truth?
* So, what is the truth?
Revision as of 10:23, 6 July 2020
It is estimated that 5% to 20% of the population get one of many strains of flu each year and show symptoms strong enough to realize that they have the flu and up to 200,000 are hospitalized from flu complications, with about 36,000 dying from those complications annually. Others get the flu and show no symptoms (asymptomatic) or their symptoms are so mild that they do not know that they were infected by a virus. For many, the symptoms could be so moderate that the individual never goes and gets diagnosed. We do not know how many people get the flu with no symptoms and receive a lifetime of immunity. But, we know that 95% of the people who contracted the Poliovirus never showed symptoms or they were so mild they never knew that it was polio yet became immune.[1] Germ Theory vs Cellular Theory are not actually opposing theories except when it comes to the cause and cure of disease. There are germs and there are cells but most cells only get ill when something interferes with it or it is lacking somewhere in a the multifaceted immune systems. A virus is defined as a submicroscopic infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of an organism. The Exosome Theory and the Virus Theory are not opposing theories either. Viruses are nothing more than exosomes which are protein envelopes of RNA (ribonucleic acid) or DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) material and enzymes which act as catalysts. Living cells produce and shed Exosomes in vast numbers daily for a variety of purposes. We call foreign exosomes that might produce harmful or toxic reactions in cells "viruses". Contact with a virus does not automatically cause disease. Disease occurs only when your cells are susceptible, unguarded, unprotected, or vulnerable. We constantly are exchanging exosomes through close physical contact. Depending on the health of our cells and their immune system we will become ill or healthier with a more robust immune system. If this is true, and it is, you not only can "catch" disease you can "catch" the cure in the form of exosome antibodies.
The gamble seemed to be to shutdown the nation, even thd whole world's economy, indefinitely to suppress a virus that is supposed to be especially deadly to some demographics and experts agree cannot be contained, only slowed seemed to be a mistake from almost all the earliest data.
By the Ides of March, 2020 "More than 99% of Italy’s coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to the country’s national health authority.” Italy is overwelmed every year and has alarge elderly population.
Everything most important about COVID in 15 minutes - Professor Denis Rancourt zoom talk to community group Time 18m
What was going on?
This article was written as the pandemic hysteria progressed even though the evidence was showing that there was never the extreme danger that the Media was promoting. Once people bought into the hype it became harder and harder for them to see the truth.
By July some political leaders were still promoting the fear for what must be alternative reasons. There are flu events every year that contribute to the deaths of millions of people. Was this Coronavirus pandemic all that much different than other years where masks were not mandatory, businesses were not destroyed, people were not locked down?
Was the shutdown ever really a good idea to deal with this new flu virus?
We recommend you study the information and listen to the audio files to get to a state of Critical thinking so this never happens again.
Average age of those that died are in their 80's and more than half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses. More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease. 300,000 people die every year from obesity. 647,000 Americans die from heart disease each year.
. People seem to want to believe that if we merely quarantine sick people and those at risk, a “mitigation” strategy being used in Denmark, one computer model projects the U.S. death toll at about 2 million, again half from lack of ventilators, not death of disease. But the Hoover Institution's study and model suggests “the total number of cases worldwide will peak out at well under one million, with the total number of deaths at under 50,000″, which is comparable to the annual death rate due to flu in the United States.
So, what is the truth?
Why did they go with the model that has proven to be false?
The number of 17 to 25 million people making medical visits is certainly not the number of cases because most people do not rush to the doctor when they get the flu. The estimate of 38 to 54 million cases is based on those who will show symptoms of the flu and those who go to the doctor. Coronavirus confirmed cases as of March 25 were 64,765 with 910 deaths (Death rate of 1.4%). Since we know that half the people who get this Covid 19 flu show no symptoms and the half that do show symptoms only have mild to moderate symptoms, the true number of cases of people who have already had this flu and are now immune is likely more than the most conservative number of at least 129,000 people in America (Death rate .7%). Until they can actually test for the RNA of the virus, or better the antigens[2] or antibodies[3] that show you are now immune, there is no way to actually know those already immune or if the numbers have already reached herd immunity. It is very possible a million people have already been exposed which would bring the death rate down to .09% or lower. The sharp drop of new cases in China with over a billion people is evidence this may be occurring. Delaying herd immunity is not good but destroying the economic stability of millions of families may be worse.
John P.A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine, epidemiology, and statistics at Stanford University and co-director of Stanford’s Meta-Research Innovation Center stated
"If we assume that case fatality rate among individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 is 0.3% in the general population — a mid-range guess from the Diamond Princess analysis — and that 1% of the U.S. population gets infected (about 3.3 million people), this would translate to about 10,000 deaths."
News from the Princess
Professor John Ioannidis's data might allow an estimated of a .3% death rate which contradicts Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson's data which everyone has been pushed to accept as gospel. But many of the studies admit there are data limitations. Others have suggested in the real world, about 0.5 percent of COVID-19 infections in China end in death.[4]
"... a total of 634 people including one quarantine officer, one nurse and one administrative officer tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. These individuals were among a total of 3,711 passengers and crew members onboard the vessel."
On the Diamond Princess cruise ship their laboratory tests were primarily PCR tests[5] that were "conducted focusing on symptomatic cases especially at the early phase of the quarantine. If asymptomatic cases were missed as a result of this, it would mean we have underestimated the asymptomatic proportion."[6]
There is a huge difference between calculating death rates using "case" numbers verses "estimate" numbers of a disease. You cannot compare the two without misleading people. If you are a professional and you do then you are lying. "As of February 20, tests of most of the 3,711 people aboard the Diamond Princess confirmed that 634, or 17 percent, had the virus; 328 of them did not have symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Of those with symptoms, the fatality ratio was 1.9 percent, Russell and colleagues calculate. Of all infected, that ratio was 0.91 percent. Those 70 and older were most vulnerable, with an overall fatality ratio of about 7.3 percent."[7] But if you calculate the death rate of the Covid-19 based on actual infections even amongst a population of people over 60 who are the most vulnerable that makes the death rate "in the real world, about 0.5 percent of COVID-19".[7]
The passengers and crew of the Diamond Princes were not a random sample but the passengers were mostly over 60, which may "lead to underestimation"[6] of the natural true asymptomatic portion of society. Even with the high age factor the death rate onboard was only 0.5 percent or less. If anyone factored in that everyone under 40 including small children have generally produced a percentage of .2% The death rate comes closer to the estimate of Professor John Ioannidis.
We cannot forget those pre-existing conditions that account for the vast majority of cases that show symptoms are found generally in the older population.
So, it is reasonable, considering the track record of COVID-19, that the presence of symptoms "may correlate with other factors unrelated to age including prior health conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and/or immunosuppression."[6]
Reports from the Diamond Princess cruise ship should make it clear that the virus is highly contagious[8] under ship conditions. But we also know that many people, though they get the virus, show little or no symptoms. A "substantial fraction of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals are asymptomatic"[6] which had also been verified with higher numbers in a Japanese study.
Silent Cure
Anywhere from 80 percent of infections in adults to 95 percent of infections in children that are observed or detected appear to be mild to moderate cases overcome in about two weeks with rest at home.
Since death rates are calculated only from those who get severely ill and are tested, we can assume the death rate from this virus is actually much lower. If we take in the high rate of asymptomatic individuals that we see in the Princess analysis and other broader examinations no one knows how many people or the rate they are being infected but recovering. That would infer that no one knows the actual death rate which seems far lower than some of the models.
As fast as it is spreading, we can assume that society is well on its way to "herd immunity" which is the best way to reach maximum protection of society. A vaccine cannot accomplish that and a quarantine of society only delays the natural process of the society obtaining herd immunity.
Many people have likely been exposed, recovered and are now immune. Why are we risking a wrecked economy and welfare expansions beyond FDR’s wildest dreams?
Richard Epstein at the Hoover Institution writes of serious flaws in predictions of 1 million or more Americans dead from coronavirus:
“Clearly, the impact on elderly and immunocompromised individuals is severe, with nearly 90% of total deaths coming from individuals 60 and over. But these data do not call for shutting down all public and private facilities given the extraordinarily low rates of death in the population under 50.”
“Of course, every life lost is a tragedy…but those deaths stemming from the coronavirus are not more tragic than others, so that the same social calculus applies here that should apply in other cases... A Depression Will Ruin 330 Million Lives, Not 4 Million.”
Victor Davis Hanson was a professor of classics at California State University, Fresno, and is currently the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004. He suggests that:
“[T]he massive curtailments of the U.S. economy can have as many health consequences as the virus itself—if millions lose income and jobs, become depressed in self-isolation, increase smoking, and drug and alcohol use, and postpone out of fear necessary buying and visits to doctors and hospitals for chronic and serious medical conditions unrelated to the virus...”
Backtracking
By March 26 after the world economy has almost entirely shut down, millions of people ending up unemployed, hundreds of thousands of people losing their business and suffering hardships, an increase in suicides, and the list goes on. But now Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson is downgrading his original estimates for many of the same reasons we have already shared on our network. He reduced the number of expected deaths from 2.2 million people in the United States and 500,000 in the U.K. to a fraction of what he originally predicted. Now, this expert epidemiologist tells the British government that hospitals will be just fine taking on COVID-19 patients and he estimates "20,000 or far fewer people will die" from the virus itself or from its agitation of other ailments, as reported by New Scientist the day before.
From the beginning, hundreds of epidemiologists and doctors were saying this flu, while more contagious,[8] would not reach Ferguson's frightening numbers. And many published prediction models have been far closer to the truth. But they were not invited into the media so most people have only heard the hype. Their low number predictions are coming true while Ferguson backpedals. But the damage is done.
What can we learn?
Ferguson would eventually backtrack on his downgraded prediction saying that the new numbers are only the result of social spacing and the shutdown. This, of course, contradicts what he said about the numbers revealing that far more people likely have the virus than his team figured.
When Ferguson lowered his estimates to a fraction of the original panicking numbers, he stated, “What we’ve been seeing, though, in Europe in the last week or two is a rate of growth of the epidemic which was faster than we expected from early data in China. And so we are revising our quotes... we should have been looking at previously.”
The "early data in China" did not factor in the mild symptoms or the numerous asymptotic people that included more than half of the passengers on the cruise ship, the Diamond Princess, nor have they considered the millions of people with symptoms so mild or moderate they never thought they had this particular flu.
Gupta on the Silent Cure
Professor Sanjay Gupta with the research team from the Oxford study suggests that the virus had been invisibly spreading for at least a month earlier than suspected, concluding that as many as half of the people in the United Kingdom have already been infected by COVID-19.
No one is ending this virus. It will still be around when people are let out again.
Remember they said these drastic measures were just to "slow" the spread of the virus.
Experts warned us that slowing the virus could be dangerous but for some reason they chose to cripple the economy. Why?
They kept telling us this was a "novel" virus and no one is immune. What they did not tell you is there are new viruses every year and have been for decades and centuries. Yet, we become immune, or enough of us do to protect society. Our bodies do so naturally if we let them.
Clive Cookson, Science Editor MARCH 24 2020 announced in his story "Coronavirus may have infected half of UK population — Oxford study "where he reveals that a "New epidemiological model suggests the vast majority of people suffer little or no illness."[9] Herd immunity equates to anything over 60%.
The UK population is over 67,530,172 and halving that suggests 33,765,086 people already have or have had the virus.
After Oxford announced on March 17th they believd more than half of the UK already had the virus only there were only 14,543 cases that had been counted with deaths numbering at 759.
That would make the actual death rate only 0.00002% for 33,765,086 million people who had mild cases and possibly showed little or even zero symptoms.
Of course, more deaths will come as those who are seriously ill may succumb. We can now see 15 days later the numbers changed.
The United Kingdom had 38,868 confirmed cases on April 3.
But of course, the actual number of people who have contracted COVID 19 has also been increasing to over the 33,700,000 estimated by Oxford scholars.
Official sources tell us that 208 seriously ill patients have recovered. But that is deceptive because, according to Oxford scientists who have been testing for the actual antibodies, a clearer picture is provided to the public when they are also told that more than 33,700,000 people have recovered with their own antibodies protecting them from getting ill or spreading the virus.
At the same time the number of deaths has reached 3,611. Using that number from April 3 and the Oxford estimate from March 17th for estimated cases of COVID 19 the death rate still calculates out to 0.0001%. The average death rate for the annual seasonal flu is 0.1%.
So, we all need to ask the question of why has almost the whole world economy has been shut down?
We also may want to ask, rather than devastate the lives and the personal economies of millions of Americans and plunging the nation into trillions and trillions of dollars in debt, was there something more practical that could have been done?
Wouldn't it have been simpler to quarantine the people who are most vulnerable? You could have put them all in those private motels we have shut down and brought them room service from all those restaurants we closed. That all could have been done for a fraction of the cost.
If you ponder the facts rather than run behind the media narrative you might be ready to ask more questions. Like is this corruption, conspiracy, or incompetence? Or is their more going on than we know?
The Oxford study
The Oxford study that shows that half the people in the UK may already be immune has been referenced in the news.[10]
The Oxford study contradicts the Imperial College London model used by the UK government to develop policies to halt the crisis using social distancing.
“I am surprised that there has been such unqualified acceptance of the Imperial model,” Sunetra Gupta, professor of theoretical epidemiology, who led the study, told the Financial Times.[11]
Has Britain been allowing the virus to spread, while other countries have closed schools and implemented more drastic measures? The government is trying to build up herd immunity to combat the infection. Oxford and London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) are said to agree with the British approach.[12]
This massive but silent spread of immunity in the UK has certainly been going on in America too. They tell us to listen to the experts, but then they only let you hear from the experts they want.
This "Silent Cure" has been taking society toward the ultimate goal of reaching the safety of herd immunity as nature has done throughout the history of mankind.
For weeks we have been informing people on our network and those who listen to our Podcasts details based on all the reports that were coming out before the government began to shut down the economic lives of the people and the media began to panic the lemmings of society.
So have the governments of the world failed to listen to all the expert analysts that were giving drastically different numbers? Has the media struck fear into the people to cause panic? Is their more to these events than what the people have been told? Did some people seize the opportunity to use this virus to cover the movement of trillions of dollars, the expansion of government powers, the doubling of the national debt, and to test the people's resistance to martial law? Are they done? Or is their more to come?
"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." ~Rahm Emanuel
Perspectives on the Pandemic and immunity in general. China and South Korea had already reached their peak number. Sweden allowed nature to take its course with few death, a stronger immune community, and a good economy. Time 6_:30
Should we be delaying herd immunity by the drastic economic shutdown being imposed by the government?
Experts seem to agree that we should not but are often barred from major media until no one can hear the truth having believed a lie.
Perspectives on the Pandemic Episode 2: In this explosive second edition of Perspectives on the Pandemic, Professor Knut Wittkowski, for twenty years head of The Rockefeller University's Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design, says that social distancing and lock-down is the absolutely worst way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus.
Further, he offers data to show that China and South Korea had already reached their peak number of cases when they instituted their containment measures. In other words, nature had already achieved, or nearly achieved, herd immunity. Part 1. Time 41:30
Professor Knut Wittkowski is saying what many other accomplished Epidemiologists have been saying for years and we have been reporting since March. He warns against delaying herd immunity and says there is no need for a vaccine. For most places, the epidemic is over and delaying it further will flatten the curve but will prolong the virus's presence in society and with this shut down will cause more deaths in the long run. We are guarantying a second wave with social distancings. Most people are probably immune already and the panic is causing shortages and will cause great damage to the whole of society. He says we "should be resisting". Shutting down the schools was the worst thing to do. We should not have isolated the children but only the elderly and vulnerable. Americans are too docile and they need to ask their politicians real questions. "If people do not stand up for their rights their rights will be forgotten."
Governor Kristi Noem, “My responsibility is to respect the rights of the people who elected me, and to manage our state operations in a way that reflects the realities of what we have here on the ground here. On the foundation of my principles, commonsense conservative values, and the principles we hold dear in America, the facts, the science, and the data will guide our decision-making here in South Dakota.”
"If people do not stand up for their rights their rights will be forgotten." Professor Knut Wittkowski. Time 4:00
We need to look at real data to know what to ask those who are trying to lead us through the media madness or political agendas of the world. The issue of vaccines was also addressed by Professor Wittkowski. If most of us are immune why should anyone be forced to get vaccinated? If natural immunity for the majority of the population is already present could vaccinations do more harm than good?
Americans need to listen to other qualified experts who are giving us a better and broader perspective to truly understand this virus or any virus. If we are to promote a healthier society we need to understand how society works and what makes us healthy and what seems to make us sick.
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6
Don't be a lemming; be a learner. Study to seek the truth in all things.
The Constitution is the law governing the government. It could only be written after the Declaration of Independence which states, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
The shutdown, according to the experts, is effecting our "Safety and Happiness". Taking away the livelihood of individuals and their right to assemble, or pursue happiness, or even to live, is common in under socialism and communism. But, in the past, it has been considered unAmerican.
What has changed in America? What has been changed in us?
The authoritarian State often uses force and violence to become the Benefactors of the people if the covet what is their neighbors'. They make a social contract where one class of citizen is forced to provide for another class through "legal charity" which is not true charity. The writings of the Apostles warned along with countless passages of ancient writings of the prophets including Proverbs 23 which warned them about what Christ forbid which was the covetous practices of socialist forms of government.
If these quarantine measures are making things worse what should we really be doing?
“Graham Medley from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who chairs a group of scientists who model the spread of infectious diseases and advise the government on pandemic responses, says that the actual goal is the same as that of other countries: flatten the curve by staggering the onset of infections. As a consequence, the nation may achieve herd immunity; it's a side effect, not an aim.”[17]
But according to Thomas House, “The current coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19 [2020-03-14 ]) has raised questions about herd immunity, social distancing measures, and the relationship between these.” “In fact, the later intervention dramatically reduces the burden on the healthcare system, cutting in half the maximum numbers ill and potentially needing treatment at any one time, and significantly reduces the final number infected, which the earlier interventions fail to do.”
“The reason that this happens is that social distancing measures do not lead to herd immunity, so once they are lifted the epidemic starts again.”[18]
There is a need to develop herd immunity rather than shutting down the economic livelihood of society at the devastation of millions of families and cursing our children with eternal debt.
"We think this virus is likely to be one that comes year on year ... like a seasonal virus ... Communities will become immune to it and that's going to be an important part of controlling this longer term." Sir Patrick Vallance, Chief scientific adviser.
Antibodies of the Coronavirus
In one interview with James Walsh, Pulitzer-winning infectious disease reporter Laurie Garrett explained the necessity of antibody tests:
"If we had this antibody test, we can go around randomly selecting people in New York City and find out how many New Yorkers, including right now, have had this virus in their bodies."[19]
Other experts are saying the same thing because they know that natural herd immunity is essential to good societal health:
"Johnson's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, who along with chief medical officer Chris Whitty has been entrusted by the government to manage the spread of virus, says between 60 to 70 per cent of the population would need to be infected to achieve herd immunity." [20]
Vaccines generally only give temporary immunity. If more half the population of the UK is already immune there is little need for a vaccine and reopening the economy can begin immediately. It also means all the projected numbers of vast hospitalization are completely bogus. The other 30 million Brits would only produce at the most 14,000 more cases with far less national deaths numbering at less than 1500 and not the 20,000 revised figure of Ferguson nor his outlandish original of 500,000.
The slowdown of the spread of the virus may not be because of the shutdown and social spacing, but the fact that the people are reaching herd immunity. Remember Correlation is not Causation.
The only way to know for sure is to begin to randomly testing the populations for antibodies of the Coronavirus.[21]
Professor Trudie Lang, of the Global Health Network at the University of Oxford, said that the latest test for COVID-19 works by detecting the vital antibodies which “will demonstrate if your immune system has cleared the infection...It’s very unlikely you can get the virus again.” [22]
Other countries are working on tests for antibodies. We know that the PCR or RT-PCR test[5] is inaccurate by itself for identifying a specific virus or those infected.
Numerous teams in numerous countries have developed the equipment for a test for the Coronavirus and the Antibodies of the Coronavirus in early March and have already been testing in Oxford, UK, and Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital in New York. They can test a patient and have results in six minutes. If people in the governments of the world care about the people and the economy by which they sustain their "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" they will make an antibody test the priority.
There will be a drawback to this commonsense approach. If it is discovered that 60 to 70 percent of the people are immune already or quickly approaching that herd immunity, as Oxfordand LSE agree, then a vaccine will not be as important or needed. This means hundreds of millions of dollars will not be made by pharmaceutical companies, nor will they be able to claim credit for saving the people when in fact the people already saved themselves because of their robust immune systems. Pharmaceutical companies and developers of vaccines have no interest and certainly no financial incentive in finding out that society is again becoming immune without them.
The Test
David Crowe, an expert in global infections such as SARS, Ebola, and flu, sees the coronavirus panic as an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test called “polymerase chain reaction” (PCR).[5]
The PCR test is only testing for RNA debris. It is not reliable for diagnoses or verification for the presence of a particular virus. We have stated for sometime that viruses are nothing more than exosomes which your body produces and sheds in vast numbers daily. We call foreign exosomes that might produce harmful reactions viruses. If this is true, and it is, you not only can "catch" disease you can "catch" the cure in the form of exosome antibodies. 9:04 min
Dr. Karry Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, says they should not be used for a virus test.13:59 min
"The coronavirus test is based on PCR,[5] a manufacturing technique. When used as a test, it does not produce a positive/negative [actually this would be better described as "presence or absence" of the amplified gene product] result, but simply the number of cycles required to detect genetic material. The division between positive and negative is an arbitrary number of cycles chosen by the testers. If positive means infected and negative means uninfected, then there are cases of people going from infected to uninfected and back to infected again in a couple of days."
"The world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for RNA is a test for a deadly new virus... but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus. Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present."
Scientists have calculated the false positive rate with the PCR Test[5] for asymptomatic patients at 80%! The data is little more than a guess and the statics tell you nothing since so many people without symptoms or mild cases are never even tested with any test nor counted when estimating death rates.
Everyone wants to believe testing settles the issue as to being infected or not. An accurate dependable test that is virus-specific was still in development in the early stages of the pandemic. Without purification and characterization of virus particles of the RNA there is no proof that a virus is present. The common PCR[5] test (polymerase chain reaction) gives many false positives and is not RNA specific. If you're sick stay home, avoid contact, treat as most flu infection or call your health provider.
Molecular assays test
The new in-house developed molecular assays test was a new and supposedly improved test but was not that useful either.
Asked how well the new tests work, Mayo Clinic internist and biostatistician Dr. Colin West said: "The most honest answer is, we don't really know."
Most of the 30 or so lab-based rapid-detection tests that detect genetic traces of the virus were validated using 30 “contrived” samples of the novel coronavirus — not a clinical trial. Even less information is available about the tests that look for the presence of antibodies in blood samples. There was little evidence that the tests work well yet decision effecting the well being, including "life, liberty, and the oursuit of happiness" of millions was being decided by politicians.
“Everybody is focused on how many tests will be out there. No one is really focusing on quality. ... We need to have the right data, not just more data.” said Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.
In the Blood
The real test that was needed was a serology which tests the Blood for antigens and, more important antibodies. Such tests were developed by early March. By April results were verifying what was well known back in February, that many more people were already exposed and producing antibodies and slowing the progress of the COVID virus. The dire and miscalculated death tolls were being rolled back and herd immunity was a reachable goal long before a vaccine could be developed.
Couple this new data that was becoming more evident day by day and the success of the use HCQ with a mixture of antibiotics, zinc and other vitamins deaths from the virus was decreasing.
But Dr. Fauci continued to resist, delay, and play down what had already proven to be effective in protecting patience and actually in slowing the spread of the virus.
Political Backpedaling
Governor Cuomo is backtracking on the shutdown policy with his statement, “If you rethought that or had time to analyze that public health strategy, I don’t know that you would say quarantine everyone. I don’t even know that that was the best public health policy."[23]
Why is Cuomo changing his mind? Does he have information that is not yet released the public? Could this change of heart be because of new testing in New York, Oxford, and some locations in Europe? Because they can now test for the antibodies of the Coronavirus will we finally reveal the extent and truth about this professed pandemic?
They asked the question in Science magazine, "How many COVID-19 cases have gone undetected? And are those who had mild cases of the disease—perhaps so mild they dismissed it as a cold or allergies—immune to new infections? If so, they could slow the spread of the burgeoning pandemic."[24]
This new testing being used can identify the DNA of the virus and answer these question which the common PCR test (polymerase chain reaction), which is an RNA-based diagnostic test,[5] cannot answer. This new equipment can test a person’s blood for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2[25]. Such tests can detect active infections, too, but more importantly, they can tell whether a person has been infected in the past because the body retains antibodies against pathogens it has already overcome.
Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital
That is right. The ability to actually make these virus-specific tests was not available until the mid-March announcement. They certainly had to test the equipment locally where, "An expert team of researchers and clinicians in microbiology, virology, pathology, molecular science, and immunology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and The Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) have been working together around the clock to design, validate, and implement an “end-to-end” clinical pathology laboratory solution that will allow for the testing of approximately several hundred people per day in order to rapidly diagnose and help guide the selection of treatment and monitor disease course."[26]
During their validation process they had to be testing both ill patients and healthy people to determine if their new procedures were effective just like was being done in the UK with the Oxford study team.
Cuomo Article
Reading the article and seeing the fact that they have been secretly testing already, could it be that they are already confirming the Oxford study's projection that more than half of the UK is already immune and well on their way to herd immunity? Are they getting similar numbers testing American?
The article quoting Cuomo's shrouded confession talks about "other pieces of evidence", and "the number of people who are infected" being "much larger" "with few exceptions around the world":
"At the same time, we have other pieces of evidence that the number of people who are infected is much larger compared with the number of cases we have documented. In most places, with few exceptions around the world, we are just testing people who have substantial symptoms who have come to seek health care or even to be hospitalized. These are just the tip of the iceberg."[23]
Cuomo went on to say the following:
“Young people then quarantined with older people was probably not the best public health strategy because the younger people could have been exposing the older people to an infection."[23]
Cuomo at this point knows that people, especially young people, can have the virus with no symptoms. Of course, we have been saying this for months which was confirmed by the earliest analysis from the Diamond Princess cruise.
Cuomo further stated that:
“What we did was we closed everything down. That was our public health strategy. Just close everything, all businesses, old workers, young people, old people, short people, tall people. Every school closed, everything.”[23]
The well-written article, worth reading entirely, written by Jeffrey A. Tucker also states,
"It’s true that anyone following the unfolding fiasco and the gradually emerging data behind it knows that Cuomo is right. The response has not been modern and scientific. It has been medieval and mystical. The theory behind the policy has been nothing but a panicked cry of run and hide before the noxious gas gets you. Lacking reliable data – which is the fault of the CDC and FDA – we replaced knowledge with power."[23]
I agree entirely with Jeffrey except for the part about "fault". Blame is not like pie. You do not divide it up in shares. The CDC, FDA, CNN, ABC, Fox and all the media carry their burden of personal blame from 100% of their own lack of perception, integrity, due diligence, and honesty. Every politician and their incompetent advisors must also carry the blame in what has become a fiasco of foolish panic.
But most of all in a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, the people must accept their own blame. They have given the power to their government leaders, to the talking heads of the media and to the puppet masters behind them. They have also given power to men in white coats, and letters after their names. They give power to men by using labels like "expert" paraded by the media across the screens of their electronic devices.
Now it has been revealed that they ate the cheese and accepted the fake news that the sky was falling, and a plague was going to kill us all when the truth was available to journalists, advisors, politicians and even the people if they had the honesty, fortitude, industry, and spirit to pursue the truth. But isn't that pursuit included in the command to seek the kingdom of God and His righteousness?
If the evidence Cuomo speaks of and suggested by the teams at Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital, the Oxford study, and other research teams around the world is shared with the people, some will begin to realize that society can become immune to new diseases naturally through herd immunity. They may also realize that they should stop putting too much "faith" and "power in the hands of the government and the media.
There are elements of society that would like to keep this information from the people because with the people's ignorance and apathy men are allowed to seek power.
Cuomo says he cannot believe the president just extended the quarantine that shortly before Cuomo thought were a good idea.
“I don’t believe that he could be serious, that any federal administration could be serious about a physical lockdown of states or parts of states across this country,” Cuomo continued. “I don’t believe it is legal. I think it would be economic chaos. I don’t think the American people would stand for it. It’s just a question of time before you see the numbers growing in hot spots across the nation. So, I think it makes absolutely no sense and I don’t believe any serious governmental personality or professional would support it.”[27]
Even though Cuomo and everyone else were saying a few weeks ago shut it down, now he is criticizing Trump for extending the quarantine, even threatening to sue the President.
“I’ve sued the federal government many times by the way over the past few years, we’ve had quite a number of policy decisions,”[27]
Again, why was he so adamant about shutting everything down and now thinks it makes "no sense"?
"So, I think it makes absolutely no sense and I don’t believe any serious governmental personality or professional would support it.” [27]
Is Cuomo sharing Mt Sinai's new evidence and test results from Mt Sinai with the president and his advisors? Or is he baiting the president as a political rival?
“Look, if the president was considering this, I guarantee he would have called me. I mean, we talk about relatively trivial matters when it comes to dealing with this situation,” Cuomo said. This is a civil war kind of — this is civil war kind of discussion.”[27]
I do not care about their politics, only the truth. Because the truth, whatever it is, will set you free. But like Pilate said "What is the truth?"
Where is wisdom?
Why are so many willing to plunge the nation, and even the world, into a depression that kills many businesses and shoves millions onto welfare for what could be the next several generations?
Banks are closing their doors, changing their rules and removing longstanding safeguards and controls. Cash is rejected out of fear because it might carry a virus while the "printing presses" are fired up ushering in a future of inflation and a virtually cashless society.
Millions more will be transformed from productive workers into bitter takers, causing a faster implosion of our already mathematically impossible welfare state. In the subsequent depression, many people may die due to poverty, and despair with suicide rates and crime rising even higher.
Courts can now delay your trial for a year or more and your day in court facing your accuser can be diminished to a mere video link.
People are quarantined in their home by media hype, misinformation and politicians who do not respect the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of the individual, but only their own power. They are so drunk[28] on the power and the vanity of their office they have become blind guides. People may claim to care about their personal loss of freedom but not the loss of their neighbors' liberty. They have given away their rights and power because of their own personal sloth toward the love of righteousness, and the avarice of the people in their personal desire for benefits and security.
The world has come to a place were doctors, bureaucrats and politicians casually talk about going house to house and taking out people who they say are infected and retaining them against their will under the guise of public safety. It seems to have worked quite effectively to shut down the business, jobs, and livelihoods of the people by the millions with words of fear.
I have heard men and women say they would choose to get sick and die rather than take away the livelihoods of their children and the future of their grandchildren. But they are few and far between.
Most of the people, having grown accustomed to feeding at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, are more than willing to institute the rule of violence. This, of course, is because they have had an appetite for benefits and the habit of receiving them by way of a rule of force and violence through the power of men who exercise authority one over the other.
I do not know how this will all end but I know those who are willing to drink the blood of their neighbor or to take a bite of their neighbor will come to poverty.[30]
"Awake, awake, stand up, O Jerusalem, which hast drunk at the hand of the LORD the cup of his fury; thou hast drunken the dregs of the cup of trembling, and wrung them out." Isaiah 51:17
Italy
For months, Italy closed the borders, closed the schools, closed the churches, locked everyone in their houses, closed "non-essential" businesses, limited people's right to travel, freely assemble or even go outside and get fresh air and sunlight, without required permission papers provided by the grace of their government.
We and they were told that their medical system would be overwhelmed if the did not force their whole nation into an economic and social shutdown. What they did not tell you is the Italian socialist medical system is overwhelmed every year during average flu seasons. What they did not tell you is that Italy has one of the largest elderly populations per capita in Europe. What they did not tell you is that epidemiologists warned if you slowed and delayed the novel virus's natural progression in society you would only prolong its movement and presence in the population which is exactly what has happened in Italy.
Other countries like Sweden, South Korea, Brazil, Germany, etc. had a more open or moderate approach with what appears to be better results.
The UK delayed their quarantine allowing the virus to spread and now, as a result, new blood tests that identify the actual presence of the virus and its antibodies have now revealed that most people are actually immune to COVID 19.
Overwhelmed Systems
Most hospitals are not overwhelmed any more than they are during most flu seasons. Italy is overwhelmed every year and has one of the oldest populations in the EU. New York closed a dozen hospitals in the last ten years and reduced bed count in the ones they have... Yes, it moves fast and it is new so there will be a death rate that is higher than some years. But you do not compare death rates to "confirmed cases" for the coronavirus with "estimated cases" and death rates in previous years which the media and CDC have been doing.
Look at the data from the Diamond Princess cruise ship which was full of elderly people.
Far more people have had this virus with little or no symptoms which has allowed it to spread. That is how society develops a robust immune system.
This will become clear if they get good virology tests and we compare outcomes in places like Sweden. But in the meantime, trillions will have been lost and nations will be farther in debt, businesses and lives of millions will be ruined because of fear.
All the dire models were "hypothetical " and are clearly being proved to be wong but the fear remains.
Hospital closures
The overwhelming of systems is a direct result of socialism. Shutting down the economy is more of the same spirit.
12 Groundbreaking Hospitals in NYC That Have Closed by Noah Sheidlower
New York has thrown away 20,000 hospital beds, complicating coronavirus fight
By Carl Campanile, Julia Marsh, Bernadette Hogan and Nolan HicksMarch 17, 2020
New York has lost a staggering 20,000 hospital beds over the last two decades to budget cuts and insurance overhauls,... The cutbacks helping fuel New York’s hospital deficit came in waves.
In 2006, Gov. George Pataki’s Berger Commission recommended cutting 4,200 hospital beds to trim $1.5 billion from New York’s health care system.
New York’s Ailing Hospitals
"Albany’s low Medicaid payments have caused many to close."
Twenty-some hospitals have closed in New York City alone over the last two decades, most located in low-income communities...
Hospital Closures and Medicaid Shifts Took Toll on NYC’s Health
Comparative Lies
UK’s Boris Johnson claimed to be ‘Furious’ With China’s Coronavirus ‘Disinformation Campaign’[32] But what of the disinformation coming to the people through the government and promoted by the media? Boris went on to pledge a day of “reckoning”. But what of the disinformation right before us if we have eyes to see and ears to hear? It has been steadily fed to the people by governments and the media. Disinformation is a politically polite word for misinformation. Or more precisely, a lie. Certainly, there will be a day of reckoning for those who are to blame for lies.
TRUTH: Seasonal FLU TWICE as Deadly as Coronavirus?Take a look at the numbers from the W.H.O. and in an “apples to apples” comparison, the Coronavirus has HALF the mortality rate of the seasonal flu when it comes to "death to confirmed cases" ratio. Time 11:58
The annual flu, according to the numbers, appears to be twice as deadly as the Covid-19. The death rate for the annual seasonal flu[33] is 0.1%. But numbers available to the government bring the Death rate for Covid-19 from 0.09% to as low as 0.002%.
This is because of the use of "confirmed" numbers, often labeled as "Cases", to calculate the Covid-19 death rate is going to give you a different percent than if you use the total "estimated" numbers.
The video by Ben Swann shows the WHO, the CDC, journalists, and politicians have been comparing "confirmed" numbers or "Cases" to the "estimated" numbers giving an incorrect comparison and advancing the idea that Covid-19 is more dangerous or deadly than the actual seasonal flu and causing a panic amongst people through an incompetent media void of responsible journalism.
Estimated numbers are available although they may vary because they are estimates. But we know from the Diamond Princes analysis that even among people over 60 there was a large number of cases that were moderate to mild and even asymptomatic of COVID-19. As we have shown earlier in our analysis of the Diamond Princes cruise data:
There is a huge difference between calculating death rates using "case" numbers verses "estimate" numbers of a disease. You cannot compare the two without misleading people. If you are a professional and you do then you are lying. "As of February 20, tests of most of the 3,711 people aboard the Diamond Princess confirmed that 634, or 17 percent, had the virus; 328 of them did not have symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Of those with symptoms, the fatality ratio was 1.9 percent, Russell and colleagues calculate. Of all infected, that ratio was 0.91 percent. Those 70 and older were most vulnerable, with an overall fatality ratio of about 7.3 percent."[7] But if you calculate the death rate of the Covid-19 based on actual infections even amongst a population of people over 60 who are the most vulnerable that makes the death rate "in the real world, about 0.5 percent of COVID-19".[7]
Many hospitals have developed a policy of accepting and testing only severe cases and testing only those who were suffering difficulty breathing. That policy drives up the number of cases to deaths ratio and percentage.
We are constantly being told that that COVID-19 is an unprecedented, life-threatening virus to the whole of society, when in fact it appears that it was the quite the opposite. Many of the facts were available if we looked closely and the truth was attainable as a simple grade-school math problem.
But the media worked its magic on the minds of the people who, through the power of fear and suggestion, fell pray to the Lemming Effect and mass hysteria. This allowed the governments of the world to lock down the people of the planet with little or no resistance and crash the personal economy of workers and small businesses by the billions.
We know CEO's and people in the know, like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, sold off huge blocks of stocks shortly before this all began, reaping huge profits with more to come.
We also know that members of the US legislature sold off millions of dollars in stocks shortly before the shutdown and the subsequent stock market crash. They and their friend are positioned to make more profit if they start buying just before the governments choose to turn the economy back on. Meanwhile, the people suffer and are drained of their own resources in one of the largest wealth transfer in history.
This has all been made possible by the irresponsible acts of the health institutions who should have known better than to announce to the public skewed numbers and false comparisons of the available data they are paid to analyze. There is certainly plenty of blame to be placed directly on the shoulders of the media who published and promoted this false, erroneous narrative. Their relentless repetition has demonstrated the most incompetent journalism of this century and probably the last. And then there are the politicians who sought private profit, and those who voted themselves a raise while taking away the right of the people to their own lives, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
Instead of letting the people make their own choices as to how best to quarantine themselves when necessary or deal with the dangers and responsibility of providing for their own health and wellbeing, they chose, with apparent impunity, to seize the lives and liberty of every American and squeeze. There, of course, is someone to blame for this tragic state of affairs, the people themselves.
But there is more because this has never really been about a flu virus but lies and why they were originally told.
What is going on
We have placed a compilation of experts and news stories here so you can begin to understand that there is something else going on and that fear is not the answer. The original 50 minute Briefing video of Dr. Erickson COVID-19 was censored by YouTube. He stated "Something else is going on." The revealing 50 minute video is now linked from another site. His honest explanation that will let you see a better picture. Bringing the light where people sat in darkness. This video is Time 51:55
The original video of Dr. Erickson on COVID-19 was a 50 minute Briefing. It was censored by YouTube so we put this short one where he stated "Something else is going on" The full Briefing revealing truth is linked from another website in the frame above. Dr. Erickson honest explanation will let you see a better picture. Bringing the light where people sat in darkness. This video is Time 9:36
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge... seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6
Tucker Carlson tells it like he sees it. The eight U.S. states that have still not issued statewide shelter-in-place ordinances are below the national average in coronavirus cases and deaths, per capita. Time 7:38
Dr. Eric Berg DC. COVID-19: Is It as Deadly as They Say? " It has been found that a lot more people had the infection, overcame it, and developed antibodies without ending up in the hospital or having any significant problems. This new information creates a completely different picture of the infection fatality rate." Diamond Princes cruise ship was only 0.5% amongst an elderly populations. Other estimates are coming in even much lower. The specific formula is Deaths/infection x100, not infection/deaths.Time 4:38
The media has provided an unrelenting diet of alarming news about the coronavirus. Get a realistic and balanced perspective of the threat or lack thereof based on the analysis of government data. Time 29:30
Resisting the truth
What did they know and when did they know it?
What were they telling us and how was it differ from what they knew?
Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., lead member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force addressing the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in the United States, evidently was aware back in February that, "If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%."[34]
There was no need to "assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases" bscause it was well known by all the data that this was the case like the Diamond Princes cruiseship analysys verified.
The Best Argument against Govt Mandated COVID 19 Lockdowns were available through the reporting of Liz Wheeler and well-sourced back in her report April 21, 2020, on OAN. These questions are not addressed by most of the media nor the officials of government. Time 3:17
When did they know that Chloroquine was an inhibitor of coronavirus infection and could actual prevent the spread of the virus by preparing the immune system?
In The Virology Journal August 22, 2005, an official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health - published the article announcing, “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.”
The researchers reported that, "that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
Note they said it appeared to have both a "both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage" 15 years ago in National Institutes of Health own publication.
Since, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 are genetically related sharing almost 80% of their genome sequences with the same host cell receptors it should have been common knowledge before the outbreak.
This means that it has been known for over a decade that the most vulnerable could be taking combinations of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and zinc along with other immune systems supplements and enhancers to prevent both the spread of or serious infection from a SARS COVID type virus.
So, the National Institutes of Health, of which Fauci is the director has known since at least 2005 that, “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread."
Researchers did "confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.” But we are only being told it is a remedy for those who are I'll and that our only hope is a a vaccine. Sweden, of course is proving this to not be true.
There has already been studies that have demonstrated that HCQ administered without azithromycin and zinc or delaying treatment until the patient has become severely ill is ineffective.
Yet, we had Democrat Governors of New York, Nevada, and Michigan banning the use of HCQ. Early in March before the long lock-down.
It was not until late March when, first the President and then the results of Dr. Zelenko announce that he had been saving hundreds and hundreds of patience without a single fatality, the FDA again promoted HCQ. There are thousands of examples where lives were clearly saved coming from doctors like Zelenko and Dr. Robin Armstrong at a Nursing home in Texas City, Texas where patience and staff were stricken but used HCQ with miraculous results. But the HCQ cocktail was still only mentioned for sever cases and not as a preventative.
Plan for power
Judy Anne Mikovits is not an anti-vaccination activist but has been an acclaimed medical researcher. She did discover a deadly virus material delivered through vaccines and she is not the only scientist to have done so. There is well documented cases of viruses spreading to humans by vaccines. This is not about being antivax but about the drive for unscrupulous profit, power, and the subsequent cover-up by the vaccine industry.
Power corrupts and money is power.
Dr Fauci has been around for a long time.
Why is Fauci missing some of what would and should be obvious solutions to the pandemic.
As part of the establishment for years, has he become a part of the "swamp"?
Is there a plan that we have not been told?
Power corrupts!
Dr. Fauci continued to ignore the HCQ data available since 2005 and the uptodate results from doctors in the field getting results. Even after the announcement of Dr. Didier Raoult, of the spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 in France as early as February 25 saying, “it’s game over” for the coronavirus.
But it would be months later on April 9, when Fauci finally allowed the clinical trials of Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases since 1934. The truth is that the HCQ cocktails have been found to not only be extremely ueful in treating the virus as soon as it is present but has been effective in inhibiting the infection and therefore the spread of SARS CoV.
It is bad enough when the media allows governors to dictate the quarantine of millions of healthy Americans but when they allow them to deprive the people of medically sound treatments including those known to be both a cure and preventtive agent they become complicit in a crime.
Why was Dr. Fauci not relating this known treatment to doctors and the people?
Why was he repeating that only vaccine can save us?
Why have the people looked to the press and politicians for health advice?
Doctors often have differen opinions. If Dr. Massihi was right when he said that Fauci has not treated a patient in 20 years, he is not sharing the research data that is published by his own National Health organiation which has cost lies and has actually let false information be forced on the people, then why is he allowed to control the treatment of millions?
Maybe a bigger question is, if rights are responsibilities, then why are the American people not taking back their responsibility for their own health?
Get the latest information from the CDC about COVID-19. May 5, 2020 Finally we reach a point where everything becomes remarkably clear, again - and not just because reviewing the Imperial College report has reignited my anger at the initial fraud. No, their own data reveals an astonishing and simple fact: the best treatment for the Covid-19 pandemic (or political games) is to move your country away from one of the three western power centres: NY City, London and Brussels. Practical? Sadly not... in which case, watch this, share the heck out of it, and stock up on pitchforks. "The point is that the medical situation is real, but the scale of the crisis is... entirely manufactured." "... nothing more than a sales pitch for vaccines... biggest instance of Stockholm Syndrome in history." "Politicians playing with people’s lives and manipulating the facts."
Time 16:23
The Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted List of authors. Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Robert R. Redfield, M.D. "If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively."
This virus is likely less of or at least a similar threat to that of the annual flu and he knew it at least back in February. Fauci was in a position to calm the panic, provide information about known treatments, and preventative remedies that would actually prepare the people's natural immune system including the most vulnerable but instead he chose to promote panic by encouraging lies and misinformation to be spread in the media. He was suggesting the virus was far more deadly than the evidence showed by comparing death rates of "estimated flu/deaths" to "severe cases of Covid/deaths" rates (See Ben Swann).
Why?
The Oxford study team in the UK and the medical team at Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital in New York had developed serology blood tests for people and could determine in March not only that many people have the virus but if they have ever had it in the past and were now producing antibodies.
It appears from the reports coming from their earliest testing and because people under 40 are far less symptomatic that the death rate of actual infections can be proven to be far less than the 0.5% seen on the Diamond Princes cruiseship, but more like 0.05% or even far lower. But the shutdown continues and has been extended even though this information is and has been readily available.
Even into April the media and the White House and the governors are not informing the people that the death tolls predicted originally were way out of line. April 25TH, 2020 Florida Antibody Testing Suggests Coronavirus Death Rate Far Lower Than Reported with conservative estimates of a death rate hovers around .17%. Similar figures are being collected around the world but governments are resisting relinquishing their control.
Opening your minds
Why are they not opening up the economy?
What is going on?
Is it just about power and control?
Is there a massive conspiracy and corruption or just a lot of greed, pride and incompetence?
If it is the latter or the former or a cocktail of all of the above then the only solution is the people need to think differently, act differently, be different. The people can no longer afford to be slothful in the exercise of their individual responsibilities if they wish to have their rights back. They must come together for righteousness and attend to the weightier matters.
By March 27th the president chose to continue to expand the authority of the government, which often diminishes the choices of the people,[35] and even call up troops for the emergency.[36]
Dr. Fauci also said in his office in Bethesda. “The only way you can completely suppress an emerging infectious disease is with a vaccine." Sweden has proved him wrong besides vaccines are seldom more than 70% effective and are known to have serious side effects including death and a weakened immune system. Sweden resisted a lock down, and its capital Stockholm is expected to reach ‘herd immunity’ in the first weeks of May according to top epidemiologists.
Is there something else going on that few people are seeing, that the media is not telling us about?
What will happen when things open back up?
Will we be ready to go back to the way it was or have we learned something?
A bigger spike will be expected amongst the vulnerable age classes within society for those who postponed the natural progression. Add in the suicides, the abuse, the anxiety, the bankruptcy, and economic hardships caused by the shutdown, and the price of these social experiments rises. The UN predicts hundreds of thousands of children will suffer and die because of this shutdown and economic downturn.
If they knew from the beginning that it was not the virus, then what was it?
Is there something more destructive than the virus coming?
Of course, the answer has always been what Christ taught and commanded and that is to repent (think differently) and seek the Kingdom of God (ruled by God not men) and His righteousness (not self-righteousness and fear).
That means we should be doers of the word and abide in Christ according to what He Commanded in love and hope and not fear and force.
Convalescent Plasma
Those who contract the novel coronavirus emit high amounts of the virus very early on in their infection, which explains the rapid and efficient way in which the virus has spread. But while they may test positive by throat swabs for days and even weeks after their illness, if they are only mildly sick are likely not still infectious after 10 to 14 days of the first symptoms.
Shedding from the upper airways Early in infection the Covid-19 may emit more than 1,000 times more virus than other SARS infections. But they also begin to develop antibodies within six to 12 days. The rapid development and increase of antibodies may explain why about 80% to 90% of people infected do not develop severe symptoms. This is also why PCR is not very effective much beyond the infection period.
By mid-March, Mount Sinai Hospital announced that antibodies detected in blood from recovered patients would be used to treat current patients with convalescent-plasma.
According to the Mayo Clinic "People who've recovered from COVID-19 have antibodies to the disease in their blood. Doctors call this convalescent plasma. Researchers hope that convalescent plasma can be given to people with severe COVID-19 to boost their ability to fight the virus."
Since the FDA has issued guidance to provide recommendations to health care providers and investigators on the administration and study of investigational convalescent plasma there has been a need to find people who have tested positive for COVID-19 and have recovered symptoms and fever-free for at least 14 days, are over 17, weigh 110 pounds or more, and are in generally good health. They can donate blood to the Red Cross. They should have a serology test to determine if they are producing antibodies. They can donate their blood to patients not producing antibodies quickly enough in their own body.
"Your immune system responds by producing antibodies in response to the virus. This period is known as seroconversion. Antibodies appear within one to two weeks and will continue to increase in the months after infection. Seroconversion takes place within three weeks in the majority of infected individuals."
During seroconversion, a person may also experience flu-like symptoms, such as a fever and body aches. What we are feeling is that we are infected but also the process has begone to become well. The body is designed to correct an infection through your natural immune system and the more robust that system the healthier the individual and the society becomes.
Louis Pasteur originally discovered that milkmaids did not get Small Pox because they obtained immunity from cows that had had a similar infection of Cow Pox. It is from those cows he developed his first vaccine serums.
Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) are considered widespread among cattle in Norway and worldwide. While cattle are first infected they may be shedding the virus, as the status of a herd progresses the "animals shed antibodies for years after infection. Those antibodies may play a significant role in herd immunity and literally be keeping the herd immune.
A question arises, can humans pass on immunity to the Coronavirus by shedding Covid-19 antibodies and spreading human herd immunity without infecting others with the disease itself?
First vaccines
The first patients injected in the vaccine trial in the UK at Oxford was publicized on April 23, 2020. Of more than 800 people recruited volunteers half will receive the Covid-19 vaccine, and the other half a control vaccine that protects against meningitis but not coronavirus. That means there is no actual placebo group.
The first question that came to mind since more than a month earlier Oxford studies testing for antibodies was suggesting that half of the UK may have already had the virus, "Did they test these volunteers for the antibodies?"
If most of the people ae already immune like Sweden who did not lock down the people, then why would they want to take vaccines. Vaccines have not curred as many diseases that people and the pharmaceutical industry would like to think.
More and more evidence is regularly being produced that brings the dangers and efficacy of vaccines into the light. Of course, with millions and billions of dollars at stake there will be a great effort to put out that light. Couple that greed with the power of fear controlling the minds and emotions of the people there is a serious cause for concern. During the coronavirus shutdown, we have seen that the power of fear posses the people where facts and reasons have little or no influence. Whole nations have been shut down, billions of people were locked in their homes, trillions of dollars in debt were increased with almost no effort on the part of those would be tyrants seizing power for the common good. The promotion of mass vaccinations and even forced vaccinations of whole nations may be just around the corner.
It is important to be brave enough, wise enough, and humble enough to hear and receive the truth. but it is even more important to come together in a network of charity and love to act upon that truth.
Again, the answer has always been what Christ taught and commanded for those who would follow The Way has been the answer. We must be willing to repent (think differently) and seek the Kingdom of God (ruled by God not men) and His righteousness (not self-righteousness and fear).
That means we should be doers of the word and abide in Christ according to what He Commanded gathering in His name which means in love and hope and not fear and force.
Consequences
The United Nations World Food Program warned this week that as a result of the novel coronavirus pandemic but the starvation will not be caused by the Chovid virus but by the government shutdown based on false modeling of the yhreat and a refusal to admit that they were wrong.
The shutting down of the word economy will not Only financial devastate people around the world it will kill millions for a bit with of cause including starvation.
Natural vaccination
Nature has been naturally vaccinating society through a variety of bioimmune processes for eons. As individuals develop natural immunity they not only provide a wall of protection from the spread of disease they can also pass on that immunity to others through a variety on natural mechanisms.
If Sweden has reached herd immunity is there a need for mass vaccinations?
If herd immunity makes for a more robust immunity across the whole society then why would we pursue vaccinations which often lower the ability and capacity of the immune system to respond?
If it is true that the cure cannot be more deadly than the disease then are vaccines the salvation of mankind?
Back when the early Polio vaccines were introduced to the public we did not have the ability to test for Polio antibodies in mass. It was not until later when it was discovered "Up to 95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic. Approximately 5% of polio infections consist of a minor, nonspecific illness consisting of an upper respiratory tract infection."[37]
This means that "95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic" producing or showing no symptoms. Since 95 people out of a hundred will never even know they were infected with polio and were now immune they also did not know they had no need for the vaccine. They may continue to fear infection but are actually safe and immune.
Unfortunately, because they did not know they did not need the vaccines their health was endangered by the monkey virus called SV40 wich contaminated millions of doses of oral polio vaccine in the 1940s and 1950s. Between 10 and 30 million people in the United States were inoculated with the contaminated polio vaccine.
SV40 monkey virus contains a protein, known as a T antigen, that binds to p53 and deactivates it. Researchers also discovered that other cells made only when p53 is active were missing from the cells. This discovery suggests that the tumor suppressant had been shut down allowing storms of tumors.[38]
↑"children who contract polio generally suffer only mild symptoms, but as a result they become permanently immune to the disease." Yin-Murphy M, Almond JW (1996). et al. (eds.). Picornaviruses: The Enteroviruses: Polioviruses in: Baron's Medical Microbiology (4th ed.). Univ of Texas Medical Branch. ISBN 0-9631172-1-1.
↑An antigen is a toxin or other foreign substance which induces an immune response in the body, especially the production of antibodies. Antigens are molecules capable of stimulating an immune response. Each antigen has distinct surface features, or epitopes, resulting in specific responses. Antibodies (immunoglobins) are Y-shaped proteins produced by B cells of the immune system in response to exposure to antigens.
↑An antibody is a blood protein produced in response to and counteracting a specific antigen. Antibodies combine chemically with substances which the body recognizes as alien, such as bacteria, viruses, and foreign substances in the blood.
↑ 5.05.15.25.35.45.55.6PCR or RT-PCR test is only measuring the presence of the [ribonucleic acid, or RNA] of a virus or fungus or bacteria in the host of the human sample. It is not virus-specific. RT-PCR or "Reverse Transcription-PCR, is RNA genetic material transcribed in reverse as a cDNA complement(DNA has introns, cDNA doesn't). This is amplified using the PCR which should result as "presence or absence" of the amplified gene product. RT-PCR is used to amplify whereas the Quantitative polymerase chain reaction(QPCR or PCR) measures the amplification. It is used as a diagnostic tool for detecting infectious agents such as the avian flu virus and 2019-nCoV.
↑ 8.08.1Factors used in calculating contagious spread are R0 and SI. R0 is pronounced “R naught.” The formal definition of a disease's R0 is the number of cases, on average, an infected person will cause during their infectious period. R0 value only applies when everyone in a population is completely vulnerable to the disease. The new coronavirus has an estimated R0 of roughly 2 to 2.5 with Fergison estimating 3.1 and some as high as 3.58 with an 8-fold to 2-fold increase in the reporting rate. This number will immediately decrease as society moves toward herd immunity until this disease can no longer spread through the population. The serial interval (SI) of an infectious disease represents the duration between symptom onset of a primary case and symptom onset of its secondary cases. Estimates for coronavirus have ranged from 4.4 days to 7.6. The estimated serial intervals as an example have been calculated for influenza A(H3N2) (2.2 days), pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (2.8 days), respiratory syncytial virus (7.5 days), measles (11.7 days), varicella (14.0 days), smallpox (17.7 days), mumps (18.0 days), rubella (18.3 days), and pertussis (22.8 days).
↑Matthew 11:12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
↑Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
↑"But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. 6 So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. 7 And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. 8 For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; 9 and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch." Polybius: The Histories (composed at Rome around 130 BC)Fragments of Book VI, p289 See also Loeb Classical Library edition, 1922 thru 1927
↑An alternate translation in context, "9. For no sooner had the knowledge of the jealousy and hatred existing in the citizens against them which is replaced by democracy, emboldened some one to oppose the government by word or deed, than he was sure to find the whole people ready and prepared to take his side. Having then got rid of these rulers by assassination or exile, they do not venture to set up a king again, being still in terror of the injustice to which this led before; nor dare they intrust the common interests again to more than one, considering the recent example of their misconduct: and therefore, as the only sound hope left them is that which depends upon themselves, they are driven to take refuge in that; and so changed the constitution from an oligarchy to a democracy, and took upon themselves the superintendence and charge of the state. And as long as any survive who have had experience of oligarchical supremacy and domination, they regard their present constitution as a blessing, and hold equality and freedom as of the utmost value. But as soon as a new generation has arisen, and the democracy has descended to their children’s children, long association weakens their value for equality and freedom, and some seek to become more powerful than the ordinary citizens; and the most liable to this temptation are the rich. (which degenerates into rule of corruption and violence, only to be stopped by a return to despotism.) So when they begin to be fond of office, and find themselves unable to obtain it by their own unassisted efforts and their own merits, they ruin their estates, while enticing and corrupting the common people in every possible way. By which means when, in their senseless mania for reputation, they have made the populace ready and greedy to receive bribes, the virtue of democracy is destroyed, and it is transformed into a government of violence and the strong hand. For the mob, habituated to feed at the expense of others, and to have its hopes of a livelihood in the property of its neighbours, as soon as it has got a leader sufficiently ambitious and daring, being excluded by poverty from the sweets of civil honours, produces a reign of mere violence. Then come tumultuous assemblies, massacres, banishments, redivisions of land; until, after losing all trace of civilisation, it has once more found a master and a despot." Translator: Evelyn Shirley Shuckburgh, Release Date: November 8, 2013 [EBook #44126]
↑Isaiah 51:21 Therefore hear now this, thou afflicted, and drunken, but not with wine:
↑Revelation 16:13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
Revelation 19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night forever and ever.
↑Proverbs 23:21 For the drunkard and the glutton shall come to poverty: and drowsiness shall clothe [a man] with rags.
↑Proverbs 4:17 For they eat the bread of wickedness, and drink the wine of violence.
↑Every year there are a variety of flu viruses circulating through populations where people who have not come into contact with that flu may become ill for a few days. Because we can now test for antibodies there is scientific evidence many people become immune to disease and never appear to have been ill. Those who sho symptoms and those who are asymptomatic both become immune adding to the herd immunity of society.
