Citizen: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#ev:youtube|Isf7LjQTcOQ|300|right|Civil Rights connected to government? Pure Republics dependent on faith, hope and charity compared to the governments of Cain, [http://www.hisholychurch.org/news/articles/hunter.php Nimrod], Pharaoh, Saul, Caesar and others., SSSeries 2-10 5:00}}
{{#ev:youtube|Isf7LjQTcOQ|300|right|There are [[Civil Rights]] endowed by God though [[Natural Law|natural rights]] and "not connected to the organization or the administration of government" and then there are those civil rights that are connected and regulated through the "the organization or the administration of government". They were  not connected by legislators or rulers but by the way of application for, participation by, and the [[consent]] of the people engaged in [[covetous practices]] which Paul said was [[idolatry]].<Ref name="Isidolatry">{{Isidolatry}}</Ref><Br>[[Abraham]], [[Moses]], [[Polybius]], [[John the Baptist]], [[Jesus]], all the [[Apostles]] [[warnings|warned us]]. Even [[Plutarch]] knew
“The real destroyers of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations, and benefits.” <Br>Pure [[Republic]]s dependent on [[faith]], [[hope]], and [[charity]] have no need for [[benefactors]] "who [[exercise authority]] one over the other" like the governments of [[Cain]], [[Nimrod]], [[Pharaoh]], [[Saul]], [[Caesar]] and of course [[FDR]] who used [[force]]d contribution, compelled by [[fear]] which [[merchandise|legally bind]] the [[masses]] in a perpetual [[fealty]] of [[bondage]] and debt. "[[Legal charity]]" of the [[welfare]] state weakens the people and empowers despotism working as both a [[snare|snare and a trap]]. SSSeries 2-10 5:00}}
 
The [[Bible]] talks about ''rights'' all the time. ''Rights'' can be one of two kinds "a moral or legal entitlement to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way."
 
God gave man dominion which is the right to choose to exercise authority including to dress it and keep it. That allegiance to God includes an allegiance to the land He gave us to both ''dress and keep it''.  But that authority was not over other men.
 
Even [[Romans 13]] is talking about the ''higher right to choose''.
 
Many places in the [[Bible]] you see the Greek word ''exousia''. It is referring to the ''right to choose''... and even translated ''right'' and ''liberty'' meaning ''the power to choose''.
 
In [[Philippians 3]]:20 we are told "For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ:"
 
The word "conversation" is from the Greek word ''politeuma'' <Ref name="politeuma">{{4175}}</Ref> meaning "the administration of civil affairs" derived from the word '' polites''<Ref>{{4177}} </Ref> meaning "citizen".
As far as civil rights there are also two kinds.
 
# “[[Civil rights]] are such as belong to every citizen of the state or country, or, in a wider sense to all its inhabitants, and are not connected with the organization or the administration of government. They include the rights of property, marriage, protection by laws, freedom of contract, trial by jury, etc.” <Ref>Right. In Constitutional Law. Black’s 3rd p. 1559.</Ref>
# An individual, who becomes a member or person in a political society, also has civil rights, but the origin of those rights, being political, are rights “pertaining or relating to the policy or administration of government.” <Ref>Political. Black’s 3rd p. 1375.</Ref> So, “as otherwise defined, civil rights are rights appertaining to a person in virtue of his citizenship in a state or community. Rights capable of being enforced or redressed in civil action. Also a term applied to certain rights secured to citizens of the United States by the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments to the Constitution, and by various acts of Congress made in pursuance thereof.” <Ref>Right. In Constitutional Law. Black’s 3rd p. 1559.</Ref>
 
 
[[File:Jesusfeeds.jpg|right|300px|thumb|[[Abraham]], [[Moses]], [[John the Baptist]], [[Jesus]] and the [[early Church]] advocated a [[Daily ministration]] for the needy of the Christian community that was dependent on [[Charity]] only and it was not like the system of [[Corban]] of the [[Pharisees]] nor the [[Bread and circuses|free bread]] of [[Rome]]. It was their practice of [[Pure Religion]] that brought them into a [[Christian conflict]] with  [[Public religion]] and the [[Covetous Practices]] of the [[World]] of [[Rome]].]]
 
The reason Christ [[appoint]]ed the kingdom to His [[little flock]] and ''[[commanded]] them to make the people sit down in the [[Tens]]'' was so that their ''"conversation"<Ref name="politeuma">{{4175}}</Ref> could be in the [[Kingdom of heaven]].''
 
Christ's appointed Church provided a [[daily ministration]] of [[daily bread]] to provide for the needy of the [[Early Christians|early Christian community]] through [[pure Religion]] unspotted by the [[world]] who provided [[free bread]] through the governments of men who [[exercise authority]] one over the other even though Christ said we were not to be that way. The [[modern Church]] sends their members to those governments to obtain their [[daily bread]] at the [[welfare]] [[tables]] of [[Caesar]] which Paul and David said was a [[snare|snare and a trap]] and Peter said was a [[covetous practices|covetous practice]] that was going to make the people [[merchandise]] and [[curse children]] entangling all back in the [[bondage of Egypt]].


Chapter 3. of the book The Covenants of the gods<Br>
Chapter 3. of the book The Covenants of the gods<Br>
Line 41: Line 66:
{{Template:Benefactors}}  
{{Template:Benefactors}}  


In the book [[COg|The Covenants of the gods]] we examine the idea of [[types of citizen]] in the [[world]] and of the [[world]].


== Footnotes == <references />
 
 
 
== Footnotes ==
 
<references />


{{Template:Gregory-info‎}}
{{Template:Gregory-info‎}}
[[Category:Articles]]
[[Category:Topics]]
[[Category:Words]]

Latest revision as of 10:04, 31 January 2024

There are Civil Rights endowed by God though natural rights and "not connected to the organization or the administration of government" and then there are those civil rights that are connected and regulated through the "the organization or the administration of government". They were not connected by legislators or rulers but by the way of application for, participation by, and the consent of the people engaged in covetous practices which Paul said was idolatry.[1]Abraham, Moses, Polybius, John the Baptist, Jesus, all the Apostles warned us. Even Plutarch knew

“The real destroyers of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations, and benefits.” Pure Republics dependent on faith, hope, and charity have no need for benefactors "who exercise authority one over the other" like the governments of Cain, Nimrod, Pharaoh, Saul, Caesar and of course FDR who used forced contribution, compelled by fear which legally bind the masses in a perpetual fealty of bondage and debt. "Legal charity" of the welfare state weakens the people and empowers despotism working as both a snare and a trap. SSSeries 2-10 5:00

The Bible talks about rights all the time. Rights can be one of two kinds "a moral or legal entitlement to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way."

God gave man dominion which is the right to choose to exercise authority including to dress it and keep it. That allegiance to God includes an allegiance to the land He gave us to both dress and keep it. But that authority was not over other men.

Even Romans 13 is talking about the higher right to choose.

Many places in the Bible you see the Greek word exousia. It is referring to the right to choose... and even translated right and liberty meaning the power to choose.

In Philippians 3:20 we are told "For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ:"

The word "conversation" is from the Greek word politeuma [2] meaning "the administration of civil affairs" derived from the word polites[3] meaning "citizen".

As far as civil rights there are also two kinds.

  1. Civil rights are such as belong to every citizen of the state or country, or, in a wider sense to all its inhabitants, and are not connected with the organization or the administration of government. They include the rights of property, marriage, protection by laws, freedom of contract, trial by jury, etc.” [4]
  2. An individual, who becomes a member or person in a political society, also has civil rights, but the origin of those rights, being political, are rights “pertaining or relating to the policy or administration of government.” [5] So, “as otherwise defined, civil rights are rights appertaining to a person in virtue of his citizenship in a state or community. Rights capable of being enforced or redressed in civil action. Also a term applied to certain rights secured to citizens of the United States by the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments to the Constitution, and by various acts of Congress made in pursuance thereof.” [6]


Abraham, Moses, John the Baptist, Jesus and the early Church advocated a Daily ministration for the needy of the Christian community that was dependent on Charity only and it was not like the system of Corban of the Pharisees nor the free bread of Rome. It was their practice of Pure Religion that brought them into a Christian conflict with Public religion and the Covetous Practices of the World of Rome.

The reason Christ appointed the kingdom to His little flock and commanded them to make the people sit down in the Tens was so that their "conversation"[2] could be in the Kingdom of heaven.

Christ's appointed Church provided a daily ministration of daily bread to provide for the needy of the early Christian community through pure Religion unspotted by the world who provided free bread through the governments of men who exercise authority one over the other even though Christ said we were not to be that way. The modern Church sends their members to those governments to obtain their daily bread at the welfare tables of Caesar which Paul and David said was a snare and a trap and Peter said was a covetous practice that was going to make the people merchandise and curse children entangling all back in the bondage of Egypt.

Chapter 3. of the book The Covenants of the gods
Citizenship vs Citizenship
http://www.hisholychurch.org/study/gods/cog3cvc.php

Audio http://keysofthekingdom.info/COG-03.mp3

Citizen vs Citizen from the book "The Covenants of the gods"
Citizens of the world and in the world?
http://www.hisholychurch.org/study/bklt/citizen.pdf
Printable 5" X 8 1/2" Pamphlets, or http://www.hisholychurch.org/study/bklt/citizenst.pdf
Standard 8 1/2"X 11" Print Friendly


Democracy, SSSeries 5-10 4:12


There were different types of citizens in the original republic. There were freeman who were free from most civil authority unless he entered into relationship with those authorities or institutions who depended upon them for their existence. They were religiously allowed to accept or reject God as his King. The word “[[Republic|republic]” was used because those early pilgrims and separatists knew its origins. It is a shortened form of the Latin idiom “Libera res Publica”, meaning “free from things public.” The heads of the government were “titular” in authority, meaning that they held authority “in name only.” In an indirect democracy, the mob elects those that govern the whole and even make laws for the individual who is subject to them, while, in the republic, you only elected representatives with a limited authority.

Republics SSSeries 6-10 8:01
Not My Tea Party, SS Video Series 4-10 7:11

“Before the Norman conquest of England in 1066, the people were the fountainhead of justice. The Angloe-Saxon courts were composed of large numbers of freemen and the law which they administered, was that which had been handed down by oral tradition from generation to generation. In competition with these popular, nonprofessional courts the Norman king, who insisted that he was the fountainhead of justice, set up his own tribunals… The angloe-Saxon tribunals had been open to all; every freeman could appeal to them for justice.”[7]

Was Paul a Roman?
Was Paul a Roman Citizen or was he Free?
http://www.hisholychurch.org/sermon/paulroman.php

Civil Rights, SS Video Series 2-10 5:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isf7LjQTcOQ

Sovereign States, SS Video Series 3-10 5:12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW5P_qSsq3g

Not My Tea Party, SS Video Series 4-10 7:11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQKDrx9KQ0k


Benefactors | Fathers | Conscripted fathers | Pater Patriae‎ | Patronus |
Rome vs US | Gods | Imperial Cult of Rome | Apotheos | Supreme being |
Corvee | Employ | Corban | Christian conflict | Merchandise | Bondage |
Citizen | Protection | Birth registration | Mark of the Beast | Undocumented |
Religion | Public religion | Pure Religion | False religion | Cult | Tesserae |
Covetous Practices | If I were the devil | Biting one another | Cry out

In the book The Covenants of the gods we examine the idea of types of citizen in the world and of the world.



Footnotes

  1. Covetousness is idolatry
    Colossians 3:5 "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: 6 For which things’ sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience:"
    Ephesians 5:5 "For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God."
    1 Corinthians 5:10 "Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. 11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat."
  2. 2.0 2.1 4175 ~πολίτευμα~ politeuma \@pol-it’-yoo-mah\@ from 4176; n n AV-conversation 1; 1
    1) the administration of civil affairs or of a commonwealth
    2) the constitution of a commonwealth, form of government and the laws by which it is administered
    3) a state, commonwealth 3a) the commonwealth of citizens
  3. 4177 ~πολίτης~ polites \@pol-ee’-tace\@ from 4172; n m AV-citizen 3; 3
    1) a citizen
    1a) the inhabitant of any city or country
    1b) the association of another in citizenship
    1b1) a fellow citizen, fellow countryman
  4. Right. In Constitutional Law. Black’s 3rd p. 1559.
  5. Political. Black’s 3rd p. 1375.
  6. Right. In Constitutional Law. Black’s 3rd p. 1559.
  7. Clark’s Summary of American law. Common Law Chat 1 pp.530.


About the author





Subscribe

HELP US at His Holy Church spread the word by SUBSCRIBING to many of our CHANNELS and the Network.
The more subscribers will give us more opportunity to reach out to others and build the network as Christ commanded.

Join the network.
Most important is to become a part of the Living Network which is not dependent upon the internet but seeks to form The bands of a free society.
You can do this by joining the local email group on the network and helping one another in a network of Tens.

His Holy Church - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/user/hisholychurch

Bitchute channel will often include material that would be censored.
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/o6xa17ZTh2KG/

Rumble Channel gregory144
https://rumble.com/user/gregory144

To read more go to "His Holy Church" (HHC) https://www.hisholychurch.org/

Brother Gregory in the wilderness.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJSw6O7_-vA4dweVpMPEXRA

About the author, Brother Gregory
https://hisholychurch.org/author.php

PreparingU - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9hTUK8R89ElcXVgUjWoOXQ

Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/HisHolyChurch