Was Jesus rich

Many scholars suggest that the family of Jesus was actually wealthy. Both Joseph and Mary were descendants from the Royal House of David. Joseph of Arimathea Jesus' Great uncle on his mother's side was the Minister of Mines of the Roman Empire and one of the richest men in the Empire. If his family was wealthy where did we get the idea that he was poor and who has continued to passionately promote that idea and why?

Rich Relations

Jesus appears to have known some very wealthy people. The wedding at Cana does not appear to be a poor family's wedding and there is evidence Jesus knew many other rich as well as influential people.

According to the Talmud, Joseph of Arimathea was the younger brother of Joachim the father of Mary and therefore Jesus' Great uncle.Joseph of Arimathea, son of Matthat (Mathat) ben Levi of Arimathea, was also the "Nobilis Decurio" (Minister of Mines) of the Roman Empire, among other titles, as stated by Jerome and earlier sources. As nobilis decurio, Joseph of Arimathea was charged with overseeing the mining operations of the Roman Empire.

Occupation

Furthermore, the Greek word tektón used for the occupation of Joseph, the father of Jesus, more likely should be translated as an architect or at the very least a skilled craftsman like an engineer rather than a mere carpenter or worker with wood or stone masonry.

So are we to believe that Mary's uncle could never push any work Joseph's way?

Was the word tektón more than a craftsman in wood or stone?

Some suggest that tektón was used in place of the Aramaic term naggara (or the Hebrew naggar נגר). According to Geza Vermes suggested in 1983 the term naggar used in the Talmud can mean a "very learned man". This could indicate that Joseph was considered "wise and literate" in the Torah and in his craft.

• "The term (tektón) translated into English as 'carpenter' represents the much wider sense of the ancient Greek, ho tekton, which is a rendition of the Semitic word naggar.5 As pointed out by the Semitic scholar Dr. Geza Vermes, this descriptive word [naggar] could perhaps be applied to a trade craftsman, but could equally well define a scholar."

A great deal of what we think the Bible is saying is the result of reconsieved view put into the text or teachings about the text that are not really the result of the text but rather private interpretation of scholar which com in all shapes and sizes.

Born Poor

Everyone knew that a king was to be born. Herod knew it, the Magi, angels, and shepherds knew it. At Jesus’ triumphant entry into Jerusalem, thousands of people hailed him as the highest son of David, the Messiah, the King, the Anointed, the Christ. Jesus said that it was for this cause that he came into the world and even the Procurator of Rome admitted that this was the King, and officially proclaimed it so on the epigraph nailed to the cross. The only ones who do not understand His appointed government is the Modern Christians.

Jesus was born to be King but that was a dangerous job considering all the different factions seeking power. His birth was in Bethlehem where there was no room at the inn. Poor people would not even go to the Inn. So they were in a place where there was livestock that was underground or somewhere sheltered.

Only rich people would own a cave or barn for their animals and they would have lived right in with their animals in those days. Large homes would often keep animals on the first floor but not the poor.

The poor would be lucky to have something as nice as a lean-to like people see under Christmas trees.

The Greek word phatn is defined as a " a crib, a manger" and appear four times in the Bible and only in Luke but it is not always translated manger but also crib.

Plato used the term in relationship to the soul and the creation of the human body.

• "The part of the soul that has appetites for food and drink (τὸ... σίτων τε καὶ ποτῶν ἐπιθυµητικὸν τῆς ψυχῆς) and whatever else it feels a need for, given the body’s nature, they settled in the area between the midriff (φρήν) and the boundary toward the navel (πρὸς τὸν ὀµφαλόν). In the whole of this region, they constructed something like a trough (φάτνη) for the body’s nourishment." 9 Plato, Timaeus. 69c-d, 70a

• "Philo even invoked Plato’s imagery of the belly as ‘a manger’ (φάτνη) from which ‘the irrational animal’ (ἄλογος θρέµµα) of desire eats." Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria Loren Kerns, George Fox University.

The fact is the term phatn can refer to any kind of container. The word for manger did not have to mean it was for feeding animals but was something built like a chest, box, cradle or crib in which to lay the child.

Made Himself Poor

Do these men who were poor but made themselves rich actually preach the Jesus who "though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor"? Are they doing what the early Church did? Where is their Daily ministration? Are they teaching what the Christian conflict was or what the Corban of the Pharisees was and how it made the word of God to none effect? Are they tickling the ears of the Modern Christians who have become workers of iniquity? "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;" 2 Timothy 4:3

It has become popular to believe Jesus was poor. It certainly makes the poor feel better. Some how being poor is suppose to make you humble. Would it destroy some vast eternal plan if he were a wealthy man? If we knew Jesus was rich but "made himself poor" according to the purpose of God would it give us a deeper insight into exactly where Jesus was trying to take us and the ministers of His Church.

What if we take this following statement literally?...

• 2 Corinthians 8:9 For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich.

That is a pretty direct statement that he was rich but decided to give up his wealthy estate. People are ready to discount this as a metaphor that means he was rich in heaven but came down here to be poor.

Then there is:

• Luke 1:53 He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away.

Does this mean he lived rich - or like a rich man - but gave up his wealth as it appears to be said in 2 Corinthians?

How many ministers want to hear that they need to give up their wealth?

Jesus was clearly telling that to his disciples who were seeking to be ministers.

• Luke 14:33 So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.

The word "hath" there means possessions, goods, wealth, property. Jesus was adamant about this giving up of property as an inheritance for his ministers.

This was repeated over and over for those who wanted to be of greater service and we see men like Joses who became Barnabas doing likewise and Ananias failing to do so and dropping dead.

This was the same thing that Moses required of the Levites but modern ministers do not want to hear that either. The Levites actually supplied a system of social welfare by way of their Altars which provided a Daily ministration through the Freewill offerings which were called Corban as a part of their exercise of Pure Religion. But the Levites had no personal estate, they belonged to God.

Why poor preachers?

2 Timothy 4:2 "Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables."

• Why did Jesus give up His wealth?
• Why did he require his disciples to give up their personal estates?
• Why had God through Moses require the Levites to do the same?
• Was it because the early Church had a job to do that the modern Church is failing to do?
• Why have these modern Christians look to the benefaction of the Fathers of the earth?
• Is it because these are living the good life tickling the ears of the people who think they are following Christ but are also under a strong delusion?

Christ warns the wealthy that it is not easy for them to get into the kingdom and wealthy ministers seem to imagine they are immune to this directive of Christ.

Even when Jesus said Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head (Matthew 8:20) does not contradict the idea that he was rich but gave that wealth up.

I have wondered if his reference to foxes is not related to to Luke 13:32:

• And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to day and to morrow, and the third [day] I shall be perfected.

That fox, Herod Antipas, had his den, his throne but the son of man came as a servant and gave all to serve all and would soon be hailed as the highest son of David and the rightful heir of his throne.

But again Jesus would choose to stay in the Garden of Gethsemane rather than in some million dollar mansion.

It is no sin to be wealthy but it may be an opportunity to sin. But a true minister of Christ should not. He made many other statements about giving up your personal wealth or estate under his personal philosophical carpet.

Wealth is power and too much wealth corrupts. It is sometimes best to give as much of it away as possible or at least as practical.

• "I know not why any one but a schoolboy in his declamation should whine over the Commonwealth of Rome, which grew great only by the misery of the rest of mankind. The Romans, like others, as soon as they grew rich, grew corrupt; and in their corruption sold the lives and freedoms of themselves, and of one another."

― Samuel Johnson

Doing the Christ thing

Who is with Christ and wishes to follow his instructions?

Who has the faith of Christ?

• John 8:31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, [then] are ye my disciples indeed;

So who is doing what Jesus said to do?
And who is telling you that it is not important to do what he said as long as you believe He is God?

Who supported Jesus' ministry?

Everybody had to help support and when they organized into congregations of ten—as we see throughout Christianity for centuries—what was given was called tithe because it came from ten elders.

We know prominent people also supported his ministry which was caring for the needy through a network of ministers.

• Luke 8:3 And Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod’s steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto him of their substance.

So why would we not think Jesus was not rich as a member of his family?

Do we follow Christ because like Peter the Father revealed it to us to follow Him through the holy spirit?

This of course needs to become our answer.

Often our own motivation is clouded because while we may seek the truth we may not have found it entirely. We may need to see some of our selfish motivations.

One reason I pursued this topic is to challenge us to think beyond what we were taught, to see how our own image of the truth can be affected by what we accept early in our personal learning process.

Had we been taught from childhood that Jesus came from a rich family who gave up his wealth to serve the people as a minister and taught a way of sacrifice and love we would readily accept that He required all his disciples who sought to be his appointed ministers to give up their personal estates and become the public servants of a network of believers who lived by charity instead of force. We would all be familiar with 2 Corinthians 8:9:

• "For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich."

And it would be easy to accept the idea he was rich and gave up his wealth for a life of service.

The only real problem would be the fact that Mary supposedly sacrificed turtledoves and pigeons in Luke 2:24 These are supposed to be the offerings for people who cannot afford a lamb or cannot bring one.

But since we know there was a large religious group at the time which had many ideas and teaching that paralleled what Jesus taught and they did not participate in the animal sacrifice of the Pharisees though they read the same Torah then we should ask ourselves did the original text mean that Mary brought turtledoves and pigeons to be slaughtered?

Have we been deceived and misguided by ministers who crept in and taught us damnable heresies?

And when someone comes and tells us the truth we immediately imagine him to be a lunatic and a fool?

To realize that faith in God and His ways means to care for one another by charity and not coveting your neighbors' goods for your personal benefit or gain. And then their are the ministers who have become rich preaching a do-nothing Gospel of false belief that has brought the whole world back into the bondage of Egypt where it is worse than it was then.

• Mark 12:33 "And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love [his] neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices."

Turtledoves and Estates

Is a turtledove a bird or a turtle or is it part of your personal estate?

• Luke 2:24 And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.

Some believe that the offering of birds reveals that they must have been poor.

Many believe that John the Baptist was an Essene and Jesus was to come after him as his successor.

For centuries, both ancient writers and modern scholars read reports about the Essenes from writers such as Josephus, Philo, Pliny, Porphyry, and Jerome — the “classical sources” on the Essenes.

Philo suggests that they were a pacifist group while others carried swords and even trained but were counted as being willing to take a personal blow without retaliation. He also describes the group in a way that suggests Pythagoreanism because of their rejection of taking oaths, and the keeping of slaves.

Philo claims that the Essenes abstained from animal sacrifices altogether.

Josephus agrees with Philo on most of these points. Josephus reports that, because of their unique views, they were excluded from the temple courts and their system of Corban [sacrifice]. For this reason they had their own system of sacrifice based on charity as we see John and Jesus preaching and preaching against the Pharisee's system of Corban that made the word of God to non effect.

We see the teachings of those we call the Essenes in the gospel yet the modern Church barely addresses them and modern preachers, though they sometimes start poor, often make themselves rich. Why shouldn't they? Almost everything else they do is contrary to what Christ said.

So if the Essenes rejected animal sacrifice because they believed that the pharisees had mistranslated the Torah and distorted the message of Moses, something Jesus also projected about them, then maybe Mary and Joseph did not follow their interpretation of Leviticus 12:6 And when the days of her purifying are fulfilled, for a son, or for a daughter, she shall bring a lamb of the first year for a burnt offering, and a young pigeon, or a turtledove, for a sin offering, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, unto the priest:

Young Pigeons

Remember that the letters of words in Hebrew mean something and they are put together to define the word itself. Many words in Hebrew have more than one meaning. They often have an abstract meaning and a physical counter part. We talk about this in the pamphlet Adventures of Artifice in Languageland The sophistry of words has deceived man and led him from God. Sacrifice was meant to bring us closer to Him again. Where has the sophistry of our sacrifice led us?

The first mention of "young Pigeons" in the Bible is Genesis 15:9

• "And he said unto him, Take me an heifer of three years old, and a she goat of three years old, and a ram of three years old, and a turtledove, and a young pigeon."

The words "young pigeon" is translated from 01469 לזוג gowzal from לזג gozal meaning "to tear away, seize, plunder, tear off, pull off..." It only appears twice in the bible. Here and in Deuteronomy 32:11 and is translated young pigeon or just young and is said to mean a nestling, young (of birds).

In Leviticus we see two words translated young pigeons.

• "And if the burnt sacrifice for his offering to the LORD [be] of fowls, then he shall bring his offering of turtledoves, or of young pigeons." Leviticus 1:14

What we see as young is the Hebrew word ben. There are other words used to describe a young animal like na‘ar. and baqar.

Another word translated young is bachuwr.

What we see as pigeon here is yownah. From yayin meaning wine.

We see these words all mentioned in Leviticus 12:6

The word lamb is kebes.

• "And when the days of her purifying are fulfilled, for a son, or for a daughter, she shall bring a lamb of the first year for a burnt offering, and a young pigeon, or a turtledove, for a sin offering, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, unto the priest:"

The Hebrew letters for a lamb are ShemBeitKuf.

The same letters ShemBeitKuf are used to produce other words like kabash meaning to subdue, and kebesh translated footstool in 2 Chronicles 9:18

• "And [there were] six steps to the throne, with a footstool of gold, [which were] fastened to the throne, and stays on each side of the sitting place, and two lions standing by the stays:"

All the other places you see the word footstool in the Old Testament it is translated from different words that mean stamp or put under your feet.

What does this all mean?

It means that just as words are symbols of ideas so are the word descriptions of events like sacrificing sheep or lambs. They are ways of expressing an intent to follow a precept described in a pictorial metaphor.

Once we realize that the purpose of religion is to fulfill our duty to God and our fellow man and that the altars of stone back in the days of Abraham and Moses were also to be living stones then we can begin to understand that God never wanted men to slay and burn up sheep, turtles, turtledoves or young pigeons but wanted us to give freely to care for one another in faith, hope and charity according to the perfect law of liberty.

And if we sin against these precepts we should make amends through sacrifice to others by giving up something of value for the good of the community we have wronged. There was no call for mindless blood rituals of killing birds and mammals because you did wrong. These damnable heresies crept onto the ancient church just as there has been many false teachings creeping into modern Christendom. And it was done through sophistry.

To love one another, willingly sacrificing for the good of your neighbor rather than taking from them is the Gospel of the kingdom at hand that sets you free. This is the simplicity of the Gospel of the kingdom of God and the righteousness we are to seek. Coveting your neighbors' goods through men who exercise authority makes you merchandise, entangles you in bondage and curses your children with debt.

Sacrifice

Were they doing something quite different?

Were they sacrificing a turtledove at all or is that a quirk of mistranslating the original Hebrew?

Were Mary and Joseph members of an Essene religious order? Not likely. But John certainly could have been.

What do those ministers of an Essene order who took on the duties of the Levites do?

They serve the people. People as elders of their Essene congregations, like Mary and Joseph, could have been very well off and simply made a sacrifice "according to their estate." The other meaning for the word turtledove (TavVavReish) in the old testament when given the Strong's number 08448 is translated "according to the estate" in 1 Chronicles 17:17. "And [yet] this was a small thing in thine eyes, O God; for thou hast [also] spoken of thy servant’s house for a great while to come, and hast regarded me according to the estate of a man of high degree, O LORD God."

Altars of Blood

Take the word often translated dove, or in the Hebrew, "הנוי yownah," which is numbered 03123 in Strong's Concordance, and probably is from "ןיי yayin" meaning wine.

The word turtledove is "Reish Vav Tav" (towr),  numbered 08449. It is said to probably be from "Reish Vav Tav towr" or "rt tor" but numbered 08447 defined "circlet, plait, turn...  succession, order” and is translated "turn, row, border." The word numbered 08447 is said to be from a primitive root numbered 08446 "Reish Vav Tav tuwr" defined "to seek, search out, spy out, explore."

The Hebrew word that is translated "turtledove" nine times is simply translated as "turtle" five times. The same three-letter word in 1 Chronicles 17:17, when given the Strong's number 08448, is translated "according to the estate." 

We have to be in an almost hypnotic state to imagine that God wanted people to kill turtledoves and burn them up every time we sinned. Once we accept an idea, it is often difficult to change our thinking. The more bizarre, fantastic, or absurd an idea, the tighter its hold on our minds.

This is why the world is in subjection, often defending that bondage with their very lives. One of the great tools of creating this state of confusion is the use of doctrines built around mysteries that are irrational, or are beyond natural comprehension or common sense.

If God never wanted us to kill animals in bloody mutilations, then Christ did not initiate the end of that animal blood sacrifice with His own innocent blood. Can Jewish and Christian scholars be so wrong? The prevarication about animal sacrifice is more pervasive today than it was at the time of Christ. That delusion blocks our understanding of Christ's message to us because of Sophistry.

Doves in a Cage

Writings of the time show an attitude toward dove killing as false interpretation of the Torah and not at all what God really intended.

THE GOSPEL OF THE HOLY TWELVE

A.K.A. The Gospel of the Perfect Life

Translated from the original Aramaic and edited by the Rev. Gideon Jasper Richard Ouseley

Lection XLI
Iesus Setteth Free The Caged Birds

1. AND as Jesus was going to Jericho there met him a man with a cage full of birds which he had caught and some young doves. And he saw how they were in misery having lost their liberty, and moreover being tormented with hunger and thirst.

2. And he said unto the man, What doest thou with these? And the man answered, I go to make my living by selling these birds which I have taken.

3. And Jesus said, What thinkest thou, if another, stronger than thou or with greater craft, were to catch thee and bind thee, or thy wife, or thy children, and cast thee into a prison, in order to sell thee into captivity for his own profit, and to make a living?

4. Are not these thy fellow creatures, only weaker than thou? And doth not the same God our Father-Mother care for them as for thee? Let these thy little brethren and sisters go forth into freedom and see that thou do this thing no more, but provide honestly for thy living.

5. And the man marvelled at these words and at his authority, and he let the birds go free. So when the birds came forth they flew unto Jesus and stood on his shoulder and sang unto him.

6. And the man inquired further of his doctrine, and he went his way, and learnt the craft of making baskets, and by this craft he earned his bread, and afterwards he brake his cages and his traps, and became a disciple of Jesus.

Rich Robes and Rags

According to John 19:23-24

• "Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also [his] coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout.24 They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did."

Where did the robe come from? There are lots of legends about it but very little biblical evidence...

There was a robe put on Jesus and we have different pictures of what that robe was and what it looked like depending on the movie you see.

In Luke 23:8 we see "And when Herod saw Jesus, he was exceeding glad: for he was desirous to see him of a long [season], because he had heard many things of him; and he hoped to have seen some miracle done by him."

Herod was trying to get Jesus' favor and appears to have put a fine robe on him that may have been of great value.

• Luke 23:11 "And Herod with his men of war set him at nought, and mocked [him], and arrayed him in a gorgeous robe, and sent him again to Pilate."

Is this the gorgeous robe they cast lots for???

Joseph the widower

The Eastern Orthodox Church holds that Joseph was a widower and was merely betrothed to Mary, but never married her. They name Joseph's first wife as Salome. There was a Salome but they are identified several ways and could be more than one. Although there is some Biblical support to this position.

They go on to believe that the references to Jesus' "brothers" are to children of Joseph and Salome. This is also derived from the writings of Jerome.

One of the purposes of the Church is to feed the flock as Benefactors who do not exercise authority and to attend to the Weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith which include caring for the needs of our neighbors and the widows and orphans of our society through Pure Religion in matters of health, education, and welfare. We are NOT to provide for the needy of society through the Covetous Practices and the men who call themselves benefactors but who exercise authority one over the other like the socialists do.

The Way of Christ was like neither the way of the world of Rome nor the governments of the gentiles who depend on those fathers of the earth through force, fear and fealty who deliver the people back in bondage again like they were in Egypt. Christ's ministers and true Christians do not depend upon systems of social welfare that force the contributions of the people like the corban of the Pharisees which made the word of God to none effect. Many people have been deceived to go the way of Balaam and the Nicolaitan and out of The Way of Christ and have become workers of iniquity.

The Christian conflict with Rome in the first century Church appointed by Christ was because they would not apply to the fathers of the earth for their free bread but instead relied upon a voluntary network providing a daily ministration to the needy of society through Faith, Hope, and Charity by way of freewill offerings of the people, for the people, and by the people through the perfect law of liberty in Free Assemblies according to the ancient pattern of Tuns or Tens as He commanded.

The modern Christians are in need of repentance.

---

"Follow me!" —Jesus the Christ.

• One of the most important things to do is to become involved in a network of Charitable Practices. Everyone should want to join a Living Network of Love and Charity.

• If you think you have a calling to be a Minister of God or you might want to dedicate your life to Christ as an Ordained Minister of His Holy Church, contact us to start the process of discipleship and become the benefactors who exercise only love, NOT authority.

---

.

Titular Servants | Minister
Elder | Deacon | Bishop | Overseer |
ordain | appoint | Orders | Monks |
Levites | Priests | Breeches | Tithe
Liturgy | Eucharist | Daily ministration |
The Blessed Strategy | Orders | The Way |
Christian conflict | Churches | Modern Christians |
All things common | Vow of poverty |
Was Jesus a socialist | Was Jesus rich |