Nationalism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Bretwood.jpg|right|px300|thumb|[[Bretton Woods Institutions|The Bretton Woods Institutions]]—the IMF and World Bank—have a role to play in making globalization of [[world]] power a reality. Promoting international economic cooperation among [[rulers]] the liberty of [[choice]] by individuals must be sacrificed along with that corresponding [[freedom]].<Ref name="archy">{{Archy}}</Ref> This would not have been possible without the [[Federal Reserve]], the [[New Deal]], which was the old deal of [[legal charity]] through the power of the state. <Br>The social scheme of [[FDR]] was the same plan as [[Nimrod]], [[Pharaoh]], [[Caesar]], [[Herod]], and the [[Corban]] of the [[Pharisees]]. It would not be good for the people but would lead to the destruction of liberty<Ref name="desliberty">{{desliberty}}</Ref> and open the door to [[tyranny]].<Ref name="massesnf">{{massesnf}}</Ref> ]] | |||
== Nationalism == | |||
Nationalism is said to be a "patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts." | Nationalism is said to be a "patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts." | ||
And has been defined as "an extreme form of this, especially marked by a feeling of superiority over other countries." | And has been defined as "an extreme form of this, especially marked by a feeling of superiority over other countries." | ||
| Line 4: | Line 11: | ||
Nationalism can simply be the "advocacy of political independence for a particular country." | Nationalism can simply be the "advocacy of political independence for a particular country." | ||
The word nationalism came from the word nation and from the Latin ''natio'' which was a native with a common ancestry or place of birth. | === Nation defined === | ||
The word nationalism came from the word nation and from the Latin ''natio'' which was a native with a common ancestry or place of birth. It can be both the aggregate of the inhabitants of a place or geographical area or a government with a common collective identity from a mutual history, a common system of laws and traditions, a single language, common values or [[social virtues]], political interaction, and system of [[welfare]]. | |||
A country may contain several nations. | A country may contain several nations that may occupy the same country. | ||
Bouvier's Law Dictionary | Bouvier's Law Dictionary, the 1856 Edition does not have an entry for nationalism but it defines NATIONS: | ||
the 1856 Edition does not have an entry for nationalism but it defines NATIONS: | |||
# Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength. | # Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength. | ||
#. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights. Vattel, Prelim. §1, 2; 5 Pet. S. C. R. 52. | |||
# It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged. 1 Johns. Ch. R. 543; 13 John. 141, 561; see 5 Pet. S. C. R. 1; 1 Kent, Com 21; and Body Politic; State. | |||
#. | === Nationalism verses Globalism === | ||
{{#ev:youtube|Yr1SBMbK5Aw|320|right|Judges 10:14 "Go and cry unto the gods which ye have chosen; let them deliver you in the time of your tribulation." Most people, including [[modern Christians]] pray to the [[gods]] they have chosen for themselves for their [[free bread|daily bread]] which is the [[wages of unrighteousness]]. The Greek and Hebrew words commonly translated "gods" all mean "ruling judge". Who tells you what is good and evil? And do you have any covenants, contracts, or agreements with these gods? Part 9: Gods Many ~10 min min<Br>* When Paul said "there be gods many, and lords many" the term "gods" is from "theos" which means "ruling judges" and used to address ''judges'' in courts of law. Even the Hebrew word "elohym" often translated "[[gods]]" was used to reference men who had the power to judge the people. The term he used translated "lords" is from "kurios" meaning "''he whom a person or thing belongs''". This ''belonging'' is most often the result of "[[covetous practices]]" that makes men "[[merchandise]]" and "[[cursed children]]" with debt. What gives men the power of these "gods many" to be "ruling judges" over the people is often the result of a constructive [[social contract]] that allows the [[masses]] to eat at the [[tables]] of [[welfare]] provided through "[[legal charity]]". The warnings about this reach back to antiquity and found throughout the scriptures:<Br>[[Exodus 34]]:14 "For thou shalt [[worship]] no other [[gods|god]]: for the [[LORD]], whose name [is] Jealous, [is] a jealous God: 15 Lest thou make a [[social contract|covenant]] with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a [[whordom|whoring]] after their [[gods]], and do [[sacrifice]] unto their [[gods]], and [one] call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice;"<Br> To eat of those sacrifices would be to consume the [[benefits]], [[dainties]] or [[free bread|daily bread]] which is the [[wages of unrighteousness]] of men who [[exercise authority]] but call themselves [[benefactors]] like [[Caesar]] who was the [[Patronus]] of the people and proclaimed to be the [[Son of God]]. }} | |||
Globalism defined as "the operation or planning of economic and foreign policy on a global basis" seems like a rather benign definition. | |||
Making a comparison of nationalism a globalist will imagine that nationalism is "more likely to show extreme ... tendency" with globalists being "more objective and scientific".<Ref>Nationalists are social groups with a strong ideology and value orientation; they are more likely to show extreme nationalism tendency. However, globalists are more objective and scientific than social groups are and advocate internationalization and global subjectivity in the study of scientific issues. Nov 23, 2020. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7682131/#:~:text=Nationalists%20are%20social%20groups%20with,the%20study%20of%20scientific%20issues NIH.gov].</Ref> | |||
=== The corruption of globalism === | |||
During a recent world wide pandemic the greatest amount of misinformation came from global institution and those society which fared the best in outcomes did not head the advise of the globalists. | |||
Nationalism allows for the free market of ideas, plans, and agendas but under globalism all ideas, plans, and agendas are centralized on the hands of the elite. The preach diversity but censor it when it is contrary to their desires. | |||
They idea that they are [[gods]] and can decide [[good and evil]] is an original mistake which leads to death. When these [[gods]] make a mistake those errors are by nature "global" and therefore extreme. | |||
: '''We know from history that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. ''' | |||
Globalism will provide the greatest opportunity for corruption and abominations. | |||
When nationalist ideology or power becomes extreme, unproductive, or oppressive other nationalist institution may become a refuge from their tyranny. But under globalism there is no place to flee. | |||
=== Susceptible meaning === | |||
So, in the first definition we see nations may simply be "societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength." | |||
Under that definition, the [[early Church|early Christian church]] and the [[early Christians]] were virtually a nation.<Ref>[[Romans 10]]:12 ¶ For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. | |||
: [[Galatians 3]]:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. | |||
: [[Colossians 3]]:11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.</Ref> Even by a modern [[Church legally defined|Legal definition the Church]] could qualify as a nation with "one form of government". | |||
: ''"[http://www.hisholychurch.org/about.php CHURCH] In its most general sense, the religious society founded and established by Jesus Christ, to receive, preserve, and propagate his doctrines and ordinances." '' | |||
: ''"A body or community of Christians, united under one form of government by the profession of one faith, and the observance of the same rituals and ceremonies."'' | |||
:: Black's Law Dictionary 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th... eds. | |||
We also see in those definitions of a ''nation'' that while there ''may be more than one nation in the same country'' "... every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation;" | |||
They must also "respect other nations", As a "society" must have a body that deliberates their "affairs" and "interests" publishing "resolutions in common". By these actions there must be a body that expresses itself as "a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar" and "susceptible<Ref>"likely or liable to be influenced or harmed by a particular thing"; "capable or admitting of".</Ref> of obligations and rights". | |||
Duties of obligations and the responsibility of rights include the necessity of and an access to freedom of [[religion]]. | |||
=== Nation of Christ === | |||
Christ repeatedly talked about the [[gentiles]] which literally means "other nation". He even appointed a kingdom to His [[little flock]]. | |||
This is why the [[Apostles]] or [[called out]] Church established by Christ was [[appoint]]ed a [[Kingdom of God|kingdom]] with [[Pure Religion|duties and directives]] which they had to fulfill according to the [[perfect law of liberty]] without [[exercises authority|exercising authority]] one over the other. They could be in the [[world]] but not of the [[world]]. | This is why the [[Apostles]] or [[called out]] Church established by Christ was [[appoint]]ed a [[Kingdom of God|kingdom]] with [[Pure Religion|duties and directives]] which they had to fulfill according to the [[perfect law of liberty]] without [[exercises authority|exercising authority]] one over the other. They could be in the [[world]] but not of the [[world]]. | ||
Understanding the term "[[world]]" as Christ used is essential to understanding Christ and His doctrines. | |||
The Church and it's [[clergy]] set up their own [[daily ministration]] for the benefit of the people; they respected other nations; the Church itself was a body that deliberated their "affairs" and "interests" publishing "resolutions in common". Although it did not exercise authority over the people it did exercise authority over that which the people gave it. | |||
The Church even sued the Roman government for property confiscated during persecution before [[Constantine]]. | |||
== Patriotism == | |||
There is a difference between nationalism and patriotism in that Nationalism means to give more importance to unity by way of culture, language, and heritage while Patriotism pertains to loyalty with an emphasis on those common values or [[social virtues]]. | |||
Read more: Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism | Difference Between http://www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-nationalism-and-patriotism/#ixzz6BsDdjWnQ | |||
{{Template:Network}} | {{Template:Network}} | ||
| Line 35: | Line 92: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Articles]] | |||
[[Category:Definitions]] | |||
[[Category:Topics]] | |||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 16 January 2024
The social scheme of FDR was the same plan as Nimrod, Pharaoh, Caesar, Herod, and the Corban of the Pharisees. It would not be good for the people but would lead to the destruction of liberty[2] and open the door to tyranny.[3]
Nationalism
Nationalism is said to be a "patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts." And has been defined as "an extreme form of this, especially marked by a feeling of superiority over other countries."
Nationalism can simply be the "advocacy of political independence for a particular country."
Nation defined
The word nationalism came from the word nation and from the Latin natio which was a native with a common ancestry or place of birth. It can be both the aggregate of the inhabitants of a place or geographical area or a government with a common collective identity from a mutual history, a common system of laws and traditions, a single language, common values or social virtues, political interaction, and system of welfare.
A country may contain several nations that may occupy the same country.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary, the 1856 Edition does not have an entry for nationalism but it defines NATIONS:
- Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength.
- . But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights. Vattel, Prelim. §1, 2; 5 Pet. S. C. R. 52.
- It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged. 1 Johns. Ch. R. 543; 13 John. 141, 561; see 5 Pet. S. C. R. 1; 1 Kent, Com 21; and Body Politic; State.
Nationalism verses Globalism
Globalism defined as "the operation or planning of economic and foreign policy on a global basis" seems like a rather benign definition.
Making a comparison of nationalism a globalist will imagine that nationalism is "more likely to show extreme ... tendency" with globalists being "more objective and scientific".[4]
The corruption of globalism
During a recent world wide pandemic the greatest amount of misinformation came from global institution and those society which fared the best in outcomes did not head the advise of the globalists.
Nationalism allows for the free market of ideas, plans, and agendas but under globalism all ideas, plans, and agendas are centralized on the hands of the elite. The preach diversity but censor it when it is contrary to their desires.
They idea that they are gods and can decide good and evil is an original mistake which leads to death. When these gods make a mistake those errors are by nature "global" and therefore extreme.
- We know from history that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Globalism will provide the greatest opportunity for corruption and abominations.
When nationalist ideology or power becomes extreme, unproductive, or oppressive other nationalist institution may become a refuge from their tyranny. But under globalism there is no place to flee.
Susceptible meaning
So, in the first definition we see nations may simply be "societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength."
Under that definition, the early Christian church and the early Christians were virtually a nation.[5] Even by a modern Legal definition the Church could qualify as a nation with "one form of government".
- "CHURCH In its most general sense, the religious society founded and established by Jesus Christ, to receive, preserve, and propagate his doctrines and ordinances."
- "A body or community of Christians, united under one form of government by the profession of one faith, and the observance of the same rituals and ceremonies."
- Black's Law Dictionary 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th... eds.
We also see in those definitions of a nation that while there may be more than one nation in the same country "... every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation;"
They must also "respect other nations", As a "society" must have a body that deliberates their "affairs" and "interests" publishing "resolutions in common". By these actions there must be a body that expresses itself as "a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar" and "susceptible[6] of obligations and rights".
Duties of obligations and the responsibility of rights include the necessity of and an access to freedom of religion.
Nation of Christ
Christ repeatedly talked about the gentiles which literally means "other nation". He even appointed a kingdom to His little flock.
This is why the Apostles or called out Church established by Christ was appointed a kingdom with duties and directives which they had to fulfill according to the perfect law of liberty without exercising authority one over the other. They could be in the world but not of the world.
Understanding the term "world" as Christ used is essential to understanding Christ and His doctrines.
The Church and it's clergy set up their own daily ministration for the benefit of the people; they respected other nations; the Church itself was a body that deliberated their "affairs" and "interests" publishing "resolutions in common". Although it did not exercise authority over the people it did exercise authority over that which the people gave it.
The Church even sued the Roman government for property confiscated during persecution before Constantine.
Patriotism
There is a difference between nationalism and patriotism in that Nationalism means to give more importance to unity by way of culture, language, and heritage while Patriotism pertains to loyalty with an emphasis on those common values or social virtues.
Read more: Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism | Difference Between http://www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-nationalism-and-patriotism/#ixzz6BsDdjWnQ
If you need help:
- Or want to help others:
Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network |
Join Local group |
About |
Purpose |
Guidelines |
Network Removal
Contact Minister |
Fractal Network |
Audacity of Hope |
Network Links
Footnotes
- ↑ "Freedom is the Right to Choose, the Right to create for oneself the alternatives of Choice. Without the possibility of Choice, and the exercise of Choice, a man is not a man but a member, an instrument, a thing.” Archibald MacLeish
- ↑ Destroyers of liberty
- "That the man who first ruined the Roman people twas he who first gave them treats and gratuities. But this mischief crept secretly and gradually in, and did not openly make it's appearance in Rome for a considerable time." Plutarch's Life of Coriolanus (c. 100 AD.) This would include Julius Caesar and eventually Augustus Caesar which is why Plutarch also reported, “The real destroyers of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations, and benefits.” This was a major theme of the Bible:
- There were tables of welfare which were both snares and a traps as David and Paul stated and Peter warned would make us merchandise and curse children. Proverbs 23 told us not to not eat the "dainties" offered at those tables of Rulers and Paul says in 1 Corinthians 10 we cannot eat of those tables and the table of the Lord. We are not to consent to their covetous systems of One purse or Corban which makes the word of God to none effect.
- We know when the masses become accustomed to those benefits of legal charity which are the rewards of unrighteousness provided by benefactors who exercise authority and the Fathers of the earth through the covetous practices that makes men merchandise and curse children as a surety for debt.
- ↑ "The masses continue with an appetite for benefits and the habit of receiving them by way of a rule of force and violence. The people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others... institute the rule of violence; and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch." Polybius 150 years before Christ.
- ↑ Nationalists are social groups with a strong ideology and value orientation; they are more likely to show extreme nationalism tendency. However, globalists are more objective and scientific than social groups are and advocate internationalization and global subjectivity in the study of scientific issues. Nov 23, 2020. NIH.gov.
- ↑ Romans 10:12 ¶ For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
- Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
- Colossians 3:11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
- ↑ "likely or liable to be influenced or harmed by a particular thing"; "capable or admitting of".