Template:Lost Monks

Lost Monks

Monks, Priests or Rabbis are terms of religions. These men were to minister religiously to the people. If Pure Religion was the performance of our duty to God and our fellowman then Monks, Priests or Rabbis were to serve the people in the performance of that duty. That is what the Apostles were doing with their Daily ministration. It was not just the care of the needy and poor or widows and orphans but the way in which those benefits were provided. Some government provided those benefits by forced offerings and they were called Benefactors and Fathers.

The Church established by Jesus Christ and the Church in the Wilderness established by Moses both depended upon Freewill offerings. was to provide them by Charity.

The Pharisees were making the word of God to none effect with their Corban and many Monks, Priests were and are doing the same.

Turning Away

Where did they go wrong and how did they get so lost?

Abbey of Cambron

The story of a Cistercian Abbey founded in 1148 by Saint Bernard. Its monks served the poor for the first several-hundred year.

In appreciative local landowners gave the abbey many tracts of fertile land that by the 1600’s it extended over more than 6000 hectares (nearly 15,000 acres).

Austerity vanished until their monks were known more for their wealth than service. :‘Riche comme un moine de Cambron’.

‘As rich as a monk from Cambron’.

In England there was a period called the ‘Dissolution of the Monasteries’. Henry VIII had become king in 1509. At that time there was nearly 900 religious houses in England and Wales consisting of abbeys, and smaller houses often called priories or nunneries with term friary used to describe the smallest of these religious houses.

Some were open and some were closed . The members of an open house worked with the local sick and poor in the local community. They also provided teachers for the young. Their practice of compassion and service for the welfare of the people often kept them poor and loved by the people. Closed religious houses were closed to all those outside of those who lived in that religious house and many were very wealthy.

There had been many factors that had contributed to the wealth and therefor the corruption of monasteries. There was a centralization of power with the rise of kings in the world. Those kings could take and take and take and could confiscate the wealth of families. This often caused families to pledge land to religious orders. Often at the same times members of their families would enter those orders to secure some interest in their property id not influence. Wherever there was a concentration of wealth corruption would fester.

The Church was established by Christ to be the social welfare of the people through faith hope and charity. Only people who loved one another could remain free souls under God. The covering of the Church comes from the service to the people by the free will offerings of the people which provides for the people fulfilling the duty to God and our fellowman. With out the practice of that in pure religion there is no covering for the Church

The 14th Century was a period of monastic decline with few willing to become a member of a religious community. It was the Black Death emptied most of the great monastic houses. In Norfolk 527 died out of less than 800 priests from the plague.

Many unqualified people were given positions of responsibility and many of the large religious houses had become very wealthy. This was due to the wool trade or other monastery activities that became lucrative.

Many senior monks found themselves having to devote their time to earthly business matters instead of to God. They should have flowed the businesses of the church back to the people according to the faith an wisdom of Peter in Acts_6.

Besides the health of the people, the care of the poor, the education o the young, the arbitration of disputes there was hospitality to the travelers. The hospitality an health care provide by the monks and nuns may have led to the high death toll but celibacy contributed to the low enrollment.

The same duties of monks past to the nunneries which were useful as inns for ladies on their travels. Had they worked together as married couples as God intended and the monks did years before this work could have been shared.

There was haphazard distribution of charity as the caliber of entry monks and nuns dropped an the purpose of the Church waned with ritual and rite taking precedent over purpose and principle. Many were the product of illegitimate children of the rich who need a place to put their bastard children.

Henry VIII had spent a great deal of this inheritance by the 1530. Some of the monasteries were wealthy. Men like Thomas Cromwell falsely spread the idea that a great deal of their annual wealth went to the Vatican. Some of that wealth certainly did go to the Vatican and with that churches influence all over Europe so that the Vatican was made rich or richer. But the greatest wealth was in the influence local controlled wealth could exercise over the political environment within each nation.

Wealthy and powerful men could win popular support of the people by donating to the open priories, nunneries and friars. But corruption of centuries under the influence of kings and not so noble Nobles had taken its toll on what should have been His Church.

Where is the spirit of Christ in the modern Church?

What minister will make himself poor to provide the benefaction of Christ?

If we look back at the history of the Church where is the history of repentance?

Before Henry Cardinal Wolsey and eventually Thomas Cromwell had shut down religious houses in England because they were no longer effective. Property had been confiscated and sold by the cardinal to provide for charitable purposes such as a school in Ipswich.

We can see an attempt at change in religious houses around 1535. Cromwell as vicegerent oversaw the running of the Church not merely from the top of the Church hierarchy but by the State through his Valor Ecclesiasticus. That power now corrupted the state because it could muffle and even control the Church through its centralized top down authority.

Should there have been a Church hierarchy or a king to take its place?

The highest in the Church should be the best servant of the church not a ruler. This means that the people must keep the church pure by their wise and benevolent offerings given to those they see serving the true needs of the people and serving to strengthen the poor.

When elders of families are slothful in their duty to God and their fellow man the kings and fathers of the earth will take power until the people "cry out" but "the LORD will not hear you in that day."

The protection of the Church is the virtue of Christ dwelling in the hearts and minds of the people.

You would think with top down authority of the state over the Church that the most corrupt abbeys would be rooted out first. But power corrupts and the reverse took place.

Suppression of Religious Houses 1535

The Suppression of Religious Houses Act of 1535 stated that any monastery with an income of less than £200 a year, which was assessed by the Valor Ecclesiasticus, was to be dissolved. Their property would pass to the Crown.

The heads of the houses were to be offered a pension. Eventually many accepted these offers knowing that those who rebelled were summarily executed. Some 5000 monks, 1600 friars, and 2000 nuns, were given pensions. They often amounted to no more than 5 to 6 pounds per annum but it was better than nothing,

Many of the monks and friars who did the work of the Church were forced to enter larger religious houses. They could also choose to abandon their vows of poverty and loyalty to the leaders of their orders and go live in some other society but still keeping their vow of chastity.

Land grab

Forty percent of the religious houses fell within this category of having little income. Most were closed but at least 60 or 70 were given royal permission by Henry to remain open if they would pay the king what often amounted to their entire year’s income. This meant an increase in revenue for the king from £13,500 to £15,500 per year and a devastation of the better part of the Church.

Those commissioned by the king set upon the small monasteries quickly so that valuable metal including gold, silver, bronze and lead could be taken by the government and melted down. Tenants were often removed if they did not swear allegiance to the king or were expected to have loyalty to the Church and the land was rented out.

Some locals would complain but the government was sure to auction off to the local population or allowed them to be looted with impunity. Many monasteries became dismantled ruins. The farther from London you went the more virtue you found in the people. In the North were one of the causes of the [Pilgrimage of Grace and the Lincolnshire Rising] along with the Bigod's Rebellion, some of the most serious Tudor rebellions.

But their efforts were doomed and they were indicted of high treason against the King, and that day condemned by a jury of knights and esquires for the same, whereupon they had sentence to be drawn, hanged and quartered, others were " hanged, bowelled and quartered, and their heads set on London Bridge and divers gates in London"

The people as a whole did not support their courage as they had to long been weakened by serfdom and servitude. If people are to be free the Church must always strive to give power and liberty to the people. The purpose of Christ was to aid everyman in becoming head of his house and priest to his family. The higher Liberty is the original right to choose the distribution of your time, labor and wealth.

The visitation of the kings ministers sought to rally support for the cause of robbing the Church.

Cancel culture

The king sent "railers", who accused all religious households as "hypocrites, sorcerers, and idle drones, etc.".

Others jumped at the chance to be "preachers" against anything catholic claiming all monks "made the land unprofitable".

Then there were those who sought political appointments or avor who told the people that, "if the abbeys went down, the King would never want any taxes again".

Of course the reverse would be true. The consolidation of power and wealth led to further destruction of society's ability to stand against tyranny.

In Austria

Through the 18th century corruption and decadence were rife. In 1789 the Austrian emperor, Joseph II, withdrew financial support, alleging that it had become ‘useless’ as a religious order. Joseph II was the brother of Marie Antoinette but also a proponent of enlightened absolutism which was supposed to be a form of "benevolent despotism". His reforms were in his mind an attempt to establish a system for the good of all. Like his mother he sought the emancipation of the peasantry and promoted education and the secularization of church lands along with the reduction of the religious orders and the clergy in general.

Since the inquisition the term "Church" had officially come to mean the Roman Church but now with the Patent of Tolerance (1781) providing limited guarantee of religious freedom to non-Catholic Christians living in Habsburg lands, including Lutherans, Calvinists, and the Greek Orthodox. Replacing Latin appeared "reasonable" but it did not stop there. The influence of the state grew due to the apostasy and corruption of the Church but now it leaped forward.

With passing of the Edict of Tolerance in 1782 even Jews were free to pursue all branches of commerce. With that privilege Jews were required to create German-language primary schools or send their children to Christian schools. With these laws the autonomy of the Jewish communities diminished. Previously they had their own court, charity, internal taxation and school systems. The State replaced the religious leaders in matters of education and moral law.

Joseph II suppressed a third of the monasteries closing 700 of them. He reduced the number of monks and nuns from 65,000 to 27,000. This was a huge boon to his own wealth and power as he attempted to replace the position of the Church with his own "benevolent despotism". The Church's ecclesiastical tribunals, which had become authoritarian and corrupt, were abolished and marriage was defined as a civil contract outside the jurisdiction of the Church.

The wealth of the Church had come from the kings they had crowned over the people since the days of Charlemagne. Now the kings either withdrew their favor or took back their wealth. The complaint of the people was minimal since what was posing as the church had long abandoned the ways of love and the Perfect law of liberty. As austerity of sacrifice and service was replaced by opulence and indulgence the care of the needy and sick diminished along with the love of the people. The new monk was drawn by greed and avarice which drew men of power and greed to the treasures of abbeys like the Cistercian of Cambron. Pushed by that greed and a resentment of its political power Louis XIV attacked it with 12,000 men and 18 cannon. Today the ruins of this abbey have been converted into one of the largest bird sanctuaries in Europe.

The failing and cause of the destruction of monastic society was due to an abandonment of the ways of Christ and the early Church. The Church gave power to men and became dependent upon their benefits. Those Benefactors who exercise authority turned on the Church who had crowned them kings over men in exchange for financial support.

This idea of a church supported by compelled taxes or men who ruled has been one of the great temptations that face those who would dare to follow Christ. From Cain to Constantine men have sat and ate with kings to their detriment. Before 1776 Congregationalists and Anglicans had received public financial support. They called their state benefactors "nursing fathers" in opposition to the very instructions of Christ concerning calling men Fathers and even prayer. This false justification for this possessive political policy comes from Isaiah 49:23.

These apostate Churches taking the name of Christ in vain and claiming to be His Church attempted to continue this false religious practice of applying to the Nimrods of the world for benefits. In Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire passed "general assessment schemes". The imposed what they called religious taxes upon all citizens, who then had the option of designating their share to the church of his choice.

There was opposition to this Covetous practice by men like Isaac Backus.

Today the "general assessment schemes" have simply cut the Church out all together providing social welfare through the State almost exclusively. Churches are not centers of welfare, education, depositories of information serving society. They have become places of entertainment and delusion where your ears can be tickled for a price of sacrificing the righteousness of God.

The Church needs to Repent and seek the Kingdom of God and His righteousness and began to attend to the Weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith which include caring for the needs of our neighbors and the widows and orphans of our society through Pure Religion in matters of health, education, and welfare. We are NOT to provide for the needy of society through the Covetous Practices and the men who call themselves benefactors but who exercise authority one over the other like the socialists do.

The Way of Christ was like neither the way of the world of Rome nor the governments of the gentiles who depend on those fathers of the earth through force, fear and fealty who deliver the people back in bondage again like they were in Egypt. Christ's ministers and true Christians do not depend upon systems of social welfare that force the contributions of the people like the corban of the Pharisees which made the word of God to none effect. Many people have been deceived to go the way of Balaam and the Nicolaitan and out of The Way of Christ and have become workers of iniquity.

The Christian conflict with Rome in the first century Church appointed by Christ was because they would not apply to the fathers of the earth for their free bread but instead relied upon a voluntary network providing a daily ministration to the needy of society through Faith, Hope, and Charity by way of freewill offerings of the people, for the people, and by the people through the perfect law of liberty in Free Assemblies according to the ancient pattern of Tuns or Tens as He commanded.

The modern Christians are in need of repentance.

---

"Follow me!" —Jesus the Christ.

• One of the most important things to do is to become involved in a network of Charitable Practices. Everyone should want to join a Living Network of Love and Charity.

• If you think you have a calling to be a Minister of God or you might want to dedicate your life to Christ as an Ordained Minister of His Holy Church, contact us to start the process of discipleship and become the benefactors who exercise only love, NOT authority.

---