Template:Act of 1871

Consent - Consent not - Contract - Swear not - Native American Confederacy -
Propaganda - Sophistry - Deception - Measured - Article II Section 22 - Numerous scientists -
Oath of Naturalization - Spiritual Contract - The Journey - Withdraw consent -
Titular - Benefactors - Republic - Democracy - Adhocracy - Righteousness -
1 Samuel 8 - David Crockett - Self Defense - Network - CORE Solution -

The US Corporation

This recording includes an introduction to an Oregon House Bill 2238
Download Recording #1 or press play

It has been suggested by some that "by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the title."

They go on to explain that the "Founding Fathers" wrote ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ noting that neither the words ‘united’ nor ‘states’ began with capital letters. They go on to reason that the 'CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is not the same document.

They go so far as to say things like this act "ended all our rights of sovereignty [sui juris]." This of course is nonsense and an irrational approach to why rights seem to have diminished and the powers and influence of big government has increased. The theory is filled with ideas and concepts like The Matrix and the U.S. Constitution which we address in Contracts, Covenants and Constitutions.

The common explanation for the act and what you see in the clauses is much more mundane.

A Brief history

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 passed by the legislature of the 41 congress is an Act of Congress:

It revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia.

But the District of Columbia did not begin in 1871.

September 17, 1787 the Constitution for the United States of America by way of Article 1 Section 8, specifically in the last two clauses authorized congress to "Cession" land from the "States" to "become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State".

On July 16, 1790, in accord with the provisions of those clauses, this was accomplished when “ten mile square” territory was permanently established through the original District of Columbia Act. Under the Act, Congress also made the President the civic leader of the local government in all matters in said Territory.

By February 27, 1801, under the second District of Columbia Act, two counties were formed (incorporated) and their respective officers and district judges were appointed. Further, they established town governments of Alexandria, Georgetown, and Washington.

March 3, 1801, a Supplementary Act added the authority that the Marshals appointed by the respective District Court Judges collectively form a County Commission.

What these basic events we see from July 16, 1790 through 1801 The District of Columbia had become a “municipal corporation” and has been incorporated ever since.

Congress wrote

"That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation"

An “Organic Act” means a Charter Act is already in place which forms a corporation in fact from the First Act of incorporation.

It is true that the government or its officers seem to be exercising a great deal of power and authority not granted in the list of powers specified in the Constitution. We know that it states clearly in Article IX - Unenumerated Rights "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." But retaining rights require some effort and prohibits certain practices like coveting your neighbor's goods. If rights are only "reserved to the States respectively, or to the people" if they maintain the correlative responsibilities to those rights.

Since our rights are endowed by our Creator there is no act of congress or any other body that can remove those right. It would take some act of consent on our own part to end our access to natural rights.

To loose or restrict rights in a legally binding way that creates obligations and power to control agreements must be made which include offers and acceptance that are specific, implied, and consummated by sacrifice or debt.

Pacta servanda sunt

Since natural rights are passed from generation to generation our parents can do things to bar our natural access to rights just like the bondage of Egypt.

Is the United States as an entity created by the constitution written for its creation a corporation?

You only have to examine the basics of what makes an institution a corporation even without .

Those men called Founding Fathers did write the constitution for the states to ratify and empower. As it was presented it was for those States to unite in a common vote of ratification.

Many don’t realize that the majority of the people in America were in opposition to the ratification of the Constitution for the United States, at the time of its creation by the individual States. Those States remained “as foreign to each other as Mexico is to Canada”, both before and after the Constitution.

"We the People" began with the names at the bottom of the page and increased with those who took office. It was well established the people of America were "not a party" to the Constitution.

Yes, it does state in Title 28 USC § 3002 - Definitions

(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

But that is just stating that the Federal corporations created by the acts of the United States are a part of the United States.

Pointing claims

The Act Of 1871; The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation! claims in a variety of videos and websites often go unchallenged because of lack of knowledge.

What most of these people who say that the act of 1871 created a new corporate UNITED STATES government that has enslaved the people do not understand is that the people of America were Not a party to the constitution for the united States or of the United States but they may have become a party to the powers of those institutions through a number of processes and practices.

There are numerous statements contained in the videos that are misleading if not entirely false.

The original United States created by an agreement appears as a corporate charter called the Constitution and was established in international law by the agreement of the States so that it could act and operate in international law. It was not for profit but it was for purposes listed in that Constitution.

It had limited power and again the people were "Not a party to it". But they were guaranteed the natural power of contract with it, its institutions or even foreign institutions. The individual states and the individual people of America have changed their relationship to the United States and its agencies, institutions and creditors through application and acceptance, ergo contracts.

It is easier to blame the present status of United States citizens on some group or act of congress rather than to take an honest and objective look at our own actions or sloth in producing the present state of freedom or lack of liberty in the world. The truth is the present state of things is the result of our own Covetous Practices, sloth and wantonness if not our blind ignorance.

---

Numerous points of facts

.

• The constitution was not created by the people nor by their consent.
• It was an agreement between the states.
• It did not grant sovereignty to the people.
• The people are not a sovereign government in a republic. They make no law for themselves.
• Sovereign citizen is often a misnomer and loss of sovereignty as an individual free from things public is usually by consent.

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Sovereign

• Numerous people like Judge Anna and the unknown authors of a Matrix of misinformation or people calling themselves The Informer have perpetuated the misdirection of admiralty law or other guru theories instead of showing people the simple truth concerning their own error and practices that has brought the loss of freedom throughout the ages.

• Most of the time we are not dealing with admiralty law but rather simple equity.

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Equity

• Nor Civil law Or legal systems

“Civil Law, Roman Law, and Roman Civil Law are convertible phrases, meaning the same system of jurisprudence.” Black’s 3rd p 332.

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Civil_law

• Originally there was natural law.

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Natural_law

• Upon which common law is heavily dependent …

http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Common_Law

Constitutional law is often dependent on Natural Law or Jus Naturale what we call the Law of Nations or Ius gentium but the individual citizens were subject to administrative laws.

It is true there was [[Common Law|common law early in America but also civil la as well as equity. The Judiciary Act of 1789, officially titled "An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States," Speaks of admiralty and civil law as well as equity. http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Judiciary_Act_of_1789

Is the corporate government reaching beyond its jurisdiction or has the public granted a far reaching jurisdiction by entering into agreement with the state institutions.

The departments of the corporate government provided gifts, gratuities and benefits to the people which gives those departments a far greater reach than was originally intended be the organic constitution because nowhere was a welfare state a part of the scope of the original constitution... Certainly not for the private benefit of the individual at the expense of his neighbor through covetous practices.

"That the man who first ruined the Roman people twas he who first gave them treats and gratuities" Plutarch's Life of Coriolanus (c. 100 AD.)

Maxim of Law

• He who has the risk has the dominion or advantage.

Ejus est periculum cujus est dominium aut commodum.

Yes this is not by accident. And were certainly warned by Polybius, Plutarch, David, Paul and Peter among others.

It may be convenient to blame our present state on some secret conspiracy foisted on the public but it is more honest to take our own responsibility for both the sloth and avarice that has accompanied the covetous practices of the people.

If you have become a slave how did this come about? http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Employ

Have been made a human resource like merchandise who has this happened? http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Merchandise

• Was it through deception or misinformation or a blind eye to covetous practices?
• If ignorance of the law is no excuse can anyone say they did not know that coveting your neighbor’s goods is not lawful?

You are snared by your own choices. http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Snare

• Proverbs 12:24 The hand of the diligent shall bear rule: but the slothful shall be under tribute.
• Psalms 69:22 Let their table become a snare before them: and [that which should have been] for [their] welfare, [let it become] a trap.
• Romans 11:9 And David saith, Let their table be made a snare <3803>, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them:
• Proverbs 23:1 ¶ When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what [is] before thee: 2 And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite. 3 Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat.

• Does the corporate government or its creditors own all your property?
• Your labor?
• Your Children are a surety for debt?
• If so why?

Maxim

• He who derives a benefit from a thing, ought to feel the disadvantages attending it.

2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1433. Que sentit commodum, sentire debet et onus.

• He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.

Qui tacet consentire videtur.

Honest and moral men would not have desired benefits at their neighbor’s expense nor prayed to men who exercise authority one over the other just because they desired benefits.

12:30 in the video mentioned earlier

• You betrayed one another is the cause not the government who made the offer.
• you deceived yourselves.
• You still blaming others for your error.

12:40 in the video

• We do need to change our thinking… it is called repentance.

Nothing more revolutionary than Christ.

The Blame Game

The enemy is us.

Stop blaming others for what we have brought about. We have been cursing our children and biting one another for over a century in an ever growing socialist state. There is no wonder we have become Merchandise and a surety for debt.

That may not be what people want to hear but knowing the truth, the whole truth, and providing for it is the only thing which will break the chains we have already forged for ourselves through covetous practices.

Bible, the ancient prophets, philosophers, and poets have warned us from the beginning that as we judge so shall we be judged. If we become accustomed to forcing and oppressing our neighbor they will have both the right and inclination to do the same to us.