Moslem
Islam, Muslim, Moslem
Muslims are people who adhere to Islam, a monotheistic religion claiming to belong to the Abrahamic tradition. They consider the Quran (Koran), the foundational religious text of Islam, to be the verbatim word of the God of Abraham.
Modern Islamic followers and institutions betray the God of Abraham and Moses through their political agenda. Their political goals and ideological tactics are often interpreted more as those of Nimrod and Babylon.
The meaning of MOSLEM is formerly a common term but often considered old-fashioned, increasingly rare, and by some it may be considered offensive variant of Muslim.
Islamic teachings on violence are said to be "complex and multifaceted, emphasizing that violence is not inherent to the religion but is permitted" "primarily for self-defense and justice." This claim does not appear to be supported by its historical record.
Conflict within Religion
Any attempt to force your religion on others which has been common during the history of Islam by threat of death or taxation of non-Muslim citizens would be an attack on the fundamental right of freedom of religion.
Tens of thousands of religious people are being murdered by Moslems who are a political movement which accepts Force and violence to spread their agenda to the masses.
They, like many modern Christians do not practice pure religion unspotted by the world. This often is because they are more concerned about their rites and rituals of the doctrines of men than the endowed Rights and righteousness of God
This political movement is often disguised as a religion that allows many practices not practiced by Abraham and forbidden by Moses, but who are both proclaimed as prophets.
While, every Moslem does not murder and some may be very fine people they often do not contain the murderous extremist who also claim that faith/allegiance based political movement.
Freedom of Religion
The U.S. Constitution does not grant a right to violently overthrow the government and prohibits the establishment of a state religion, which is the goal of many Moslems.
The Declaration of Independence states that when a government becomes destructive of the people's rights, it is their right and duty to alter or abolish it. If a religion wants to take away the right of the people we may abolish it, not because it is a religion but it departs from a religion and becomes something else that is violence against the rights of the people. Title 18 U.S.C. § 2383 makes it a crime to incite, assist with, or participate in a rebellion or insurrection against U.S. laws and authority and 18 U.S.C. § 2385 criminalizes advocating, abetting, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing the U.S. government by force or violence, or organizing groups that promote such overthrow.
Any religion that prohibits freedom of speech would be fundamentally opposed to the Constitution of the United States.
Call to prayer
An online poll asked the question:
"IF A BILL WERE INTRODUCED TO BAN THE MUSLIM CALL TO PRAYER FROM PUBLIC SPACES, HOW STRONGLY WOULD YOU SUPPORT IT?"
There is freedom of Religion in America just like there is freedom of Speech. Both have limits.
Promoting in word or deed the violent overthrow of of a national government is crime. In the U.S. government as a serious federal crime under laws like 18 U.S.C. § 2385 (Advocating overthrow of Government) and 18 U.S.C. § 2383 (Rebellion or Insurrection), it punishable by fines and imprisonment, including "incitement" – Legally, incitement involves encouraging, urging, or persuading someone to commit a crime, acting as an inchoate offense (a crime that can be punished even if the intended crime doesn't happen). In the U.S., especially under the Brandenburg v. Ohio standard, punishable speech requires advocacy of imminent lawless action with a high likelihood it will occur, not just abstract ideas or beliefs, though specific laws target inciting riots or violence.
Then there is Seditious Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 2384): If two or more people conspire to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy war against it, or to oppose its authority by force, they commit seditious conspiracy. This crime carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison.
18 U.S.C. § 2385 (Advocating overthrow of Government): Makes it illegal to knowingly or willfully advocate for overthrowing the government by force or violence, or to print/publish such advocacy.
No one should limit a call to prayer and freedom of religion bot no religion should advocate the overthrow of a legitimate national Government if it does they are making call to crime not to prayer.
Daniel Haqiqatjou
Some one thought Daniel Haqiqatjou could shed light on the real problems of the world. So I looked him up.
Daniel Reza Haghighat Jou has fallen into the classic blunder of misidentifying the movement of history by looking at the personalty of the actors.
Daniel Reza has a very poor understanding of history based on the articles published at his website.
His books premise of modernism being the religion of the colonizer would be funny except for the imperialistic tactiMuslim the Muslim colonizers over the centuries.
He complains about the imperialists who bomb and occupy the Muslim world when the Muslims world would not even exist without the Islamic imperialism which used the swords and scimitars by which they spread their religion and politics creating what Daniel calls the Muslim world.
The vast block of Islamic nations were not born from the logos of Mohamed but the conquest and brutality of his blood thirsty armies.
From Medina to Badr Mohamed used force to compell his converts while Jesus used love, the word of God and a network of service.
Jesus came to set the captive free while Mohamed came to subjugate, enslave and kill.
Their armies were supported by the spoils of those they murdered, robbed, and enslaved by the millions. And they collected the burdensome Jizya which forced the lukewarm to convert. Those who converted who would serve as His militant missionaries would often pay the Jizya if they did not serve.
From the beginning the ir governments were by heavy tribute taxes like iltizam. That was replaced by more modern systems like income tax and corporate profit taxes. They also have a Wealth Tax (Zakat) on everything you own. This included property tax. These taxes came through the spirit of Nimrod. Gavin Newsom and the California legislature has been recently advocating such a tax. While none of these taxes were found in the Israel of Moses they do exist in in some form in almost every "principality" where the Spirit of Nimrod thrives including all Muslim countries and modern governments including modern Israel.
So, Modernism is not just the religion of secularists subjugating Muslims around the world it is actually "Nimrodism". The Spirit of Nimrod creeps into every society that is slothful in the ways of righteousness and the people are willing to engage in covetous practices to obtain their security from fear. They do this at the expense of their fellowman and their own soul.
Fortunately we have to witnessed as to the way of God the saves souls and sets the captive free.
But in their pride they have become blind to the meaning of the text and abandoned the means of God's government so they have become blind and follow the blind.
Muhammad or Machmad was inspired by a being that appeared as an angel of light in a dark cave. Later scribe would write down his teachings.
Unfortunately I have not found the Song of Moses nor the Song of the Lamb in the text of the Koran, nor the perfect law of liberty.
What I do find is the rituals and ceremonies that allow those who find pride in their doctrines of men which allows them to bow to the principalities of the world and serve them. While they will continue to justify their own sloth, selfishness and sin.