White Fragility

From PreparingYou
Revision as of 07:16, 27 July 2022 by Wiki1 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Another view of the claim of white fragility theory. John McWhorter: The FULL Interview on Anti-racism, Victimhood, Testing, and Woke Language. Professor John McWhorter, author of "Woke Racism," argues that condescending leftist ideology hurts black people. He argues that "Woke Racism" hurts black people in many ways: from treating them as incapable of logic, to calling for abolition of tests, to insisting that violent kids stay in schools.He says that all these ideas are propped by a religion-like ideology that "requires that you sequester your brain for illogical thinking." Time 34:18

White Supremacy

White supremacy is generally the belief that white people constitute a superior race and should therefore dominate society, typically to the exclusion or detriment of other racial and ethnic groups, in particular black or Jewish people.

There is a variety of ways in which people imagine their superiority but the truth is there has always been a desire of many to think they are superior to others. Race is often just a convenient factor on which to hang their personal arrogance and bigotry. Their are countries and nationalities that often as a matter of policies, either personal or political or both, and imagine themselves as better than another group, race, or nationality.

Every race has exhibited feelings of superiority over others which is not limited nor exclusive to Whites, Blacks, Indians or any other race. The same desire to imagine a position of superiority over another individual, group, tribe nation or race has been a common occurrences since Cain killed Able or men enslaved their neighbor.

This often leads to forms of genocide. The Armenians and Turks, Japanese and Koreans or Chinese and of course there was the Holocaust where Jews, Gypsies, and dissidents were targeted by the Nazi Party which lead to the death of millions. While there are deniers as to numbers and events what cannot be denied is that some people believe they are better than other people which leads to abuse.

Whether you look at the Soviet "Road of bones", Maoist's "Cultural Revolution" or the Tutsi minority who were systematically slaughtered by a Hutu the inhumanity of man to man is evident throughout history. Anyone who wants to call out and label one group, tribe, nationality or race as the problem is the problem.

Holodomor took place between 1932 and 1933 when millions of Ukrainians were killed in a man-made famine engineered by the Soviet government of Joseph Stalin.

Pride, selfishness, and hate is the problem and that is always born out of a lack of cultivated caring for others which requires humility, sacrifice, and the practice of love.

Social and political constructs lend themselves to one of two ways to maintain society. Social safety nets have been created throughout the centuries to bind the people together into a nation for mutual protection. The use of force, fear, and fealty has been commonly used by rulers to bind nations together. The process begins by forms of legal charity and promises that appeal to pride through patriotism where the ruler becomes a form of Benefactor through the welfare State. Any form of socialism or welfare through the power of the state is a form of structural oppression. But the greatest damage that it does is to the removal of choice from the hand and mind of the individual into some form of power structure, either as a collective through democracy or through representatives who can force compliance.

Another form of social safety net is established through a network of fervent charity by daily consent through faith, hope and charity.

The former leads the people back into the bondage of Egypt weakening the masses and strengthening the power of governments who exercise authority one over the other, while the latter sets the captive free because neighbor no longer covets his neighbors' goods but cultivates care for neighbor through a daily ministration.

When care for one another goes uncultivated in the hearts of the people society may degenerate until the abuse of neglect or rejection of the life of others becomes pervasive. The Holocaust or Holodomor of 60 million aborted children where people were unwilling to allow others to live because of the inconvenience and sacrifice required to do so has taken a heavy toll on the soul of society.

Putting your life, comfort and convenience before the life of another is an act of superiority and supremacy that the law of nature finds unforgivable.

The White Fragility delusion

White Fragility is an unprovable and unfalsifiable theory, deceptively framed to convince readers of their own white guilt and white guilt feeds affirmative action which poisons the soul of society.

Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility acerts that white Americans must be self-critical inwardly for examination to work against racist biases that they barely know they had.

This has been a new social construct that claims to engage in a self-examination but is actually a dehumanizing condescension of hypocritical virtue signaling rooted in false humility and a pompous pride which produces an ideology of destructive self righteousness.

It is dependent upon the irrational approach of nihilism that suggests that the individual who disagrees with their rational is not only without choice but is merely a product, a thing.

The ultimate goal of the spirit that has authored this taunting tome is the reduction and subjection of humanity

While the nihilist believes that life is meaningless and the only known truth is the existence of the self, and an existentialist believes that life is meaningless too, but assumes that meaning can be created by their own knowledge of good and evil.

Unfortunately this is the beginning of all errors and after their deconstruction process they commonly reconstruct their personal "meaning" void of the "moral meanings" of life handed down to us by the wise men of the past.

In order to support these "New Memes of Meanings" they must rewrite the record, often destroying the Hurculean Heroes of our History to disguise their own degeneration and that of the masses they appeal too.


Their personal blindness required for "wokism" to exist must be defended at all cost against any opinion that contradicts "their truth".

They systematically deny that "their truth" is nothing more than "their opinion".

When they idolize "their truth" any hint that there is an actual "Truth" becomes the enemy along with anyone who questions or suggests that "their truth" may be or is in error.

With the belief that the world has no objective meaning they imagine that we may create our own subjective meaning in life. This is "Absurdism".

Any fact or fancy that contradicts their "Absurdism" is considered and treated as an "existential threat".

As the self proclaimed gods of their own "truth" their "equity* becomes injustice and their "inclusion" becomes division.

While they choose to walk in darkness like all faithfully zombies their dedication to destroy all nom-zombies becomes their marauding mission of malfeasance.

Deep down they know their claim of pervasive preponderance of "white privilege" is a fraud and a denial of all achievements of mankind and personal sacrifices of the individual heroes of history with their passive aggressive accusation of "white fragility" is a lie.

The fallacious faith of fragility

Their claims of American struggles, sacrifices, and synergy as motivated by an invisible "white supremacy" and their accusation of anyone who argues this point is obviously a racist is a part of this Satanic strategy.

"The problem is that White Fragility is the prayer book for what can only be described as a cult."[1]

Their faith in their philosophy takes on the character of cultist religion of blind superstition void of reason and often contradicting itself.

"Too much of White Fragility has the problem of elevating rhetorical texture over common sense."[1]

These studies in racism like those of their sisters of gender studies and the "new humanities" requires miles of convoluted unpacking by "dizzying intellects" where even an expression of a "sense of urgency"[2] or "perfectionism"[3] become evidence of "white supremacy" as if Blacks would never entertain such "whitisms".

"DiAngelo’s ... answer to white fragility... entails an elaborate and pitilessly dehumanizing condescension toward Black people. The sad truth is that anyone falling under the sway of this blinkered, self-satisfied, punitive stunt of a primer has been taught, by a well-intentioned but tragically misguided pastor, how to be racist in a whole new way."[1]

I am not sure of DiAngelo’s "well intentioned" approach. Ultimately at the core of all such reconstructed cultic orthodoxy is a faith in the socialist welfare state which makes her little more than a "white slaver".

The Ludicrous List

Those people driven by hate and addicted to unforgiveness group vast areas of population condemning them collectively so they do not have to actually examine themselves. they make a list of Characteristics they say are White Supremist characteristics.[2]

  1. perfectionism,
  2. a sense of urgency,
  3. defensiveness ..,
  4. quantity over quality,
  5. worship of the written word,
  6. the belief in one “right” way,
  7. paternalism, either/or binary thinking,
  8. power hoarding,
  9. fear of open conflict,
  10. individualism,
  11. progress defined as more,
  12. the right to profit,
  13. objectivity, and
  14. the right to comfort."

Factual oppression

As you judge so shall ye be judged.

Walter Williams has shown by facts, history, and data that it is the welfare state that has done to black Americans what slavery and Jim Crow laws could never do: destroy the black family. "The most damage done to black Americans is inflicted by those politicians, civil rights leaders and academics who assert that every problem confronting blacks is a result of a legacy of slavery and discrimination that guarantees perpetuity for the problems."

Loathing Legal Charity

"[I]ndividual alms-giving established valuable ties between the rich and the poor.[4] The deed itself involves the giver in the fate of the one whose poverty he has undertaken to alleviate. The latter, supported by aid which he had no right to demand and which he had no hope to getting, feels inspired by gratitude. A moral tie is established between those two classes whose interests and passions so often conspire to separate them from each other, and although divided by circumstance they are willingly reconciled. This is not the case with legal charity. The latter allows the alms to persist but removes its morality. The law strips the man of wealth of a part of his surplus without consulting him, and he sees the poor man only as a greedy stranger invited by the legislator to share his wealth. The poor man, on the other hand, feels no gratitude for a benefit that no one can refuse him and that could not satisfy him in any case. Public alms guarantee life but do not make it happier or more comfortable than individual alms-giving; legal charity does not thereby eliminate wealth or poverty in society. One class still views the world with fear and loathing while the other regards its misfortune with despair and envy. Far from uniting these two rival nations, who have existed since the beginning of the world and who are called the rich and poor, into a single people, it breaks the only link which could be established between them. It ranges each one under a banner, tallies them, and, bringing them face to face, prepares them for combat."

Tocqueville prophetically perceived that the social suffocating weight of a cradle to grave welfare systems. His Memoir on Pauperism warned the industrialized world is threatened by legal charity that is not true charity and as the counter effect are detrimental to the social virtues required in a free and healthy society:

"I am deeply convinced that any permanent, regular administrative system whose aim will be to provide for the needs of the poor will breed more miseries than it can cure, will deprave the population that it wants to help and comfort, will in time reduce the rich to being no more than the tenant-farmers of the poor, will dry up the sources of savings, will stop the accumulation of capital, will retard the development of trade, will benumb human industry and activity, and will culminate by bringing about a violent revolution in the State..."


Audio podcasts

http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/20200718fragile.mp3

http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/20200718fragile2.mp3

Age of Reason | Reason | Right Reason |
Critical theory | Logic | Mind | Critical thinking |
Crowd psychology | Hue and cry |
Social structure | Social bonds | Abortion |
Race | Riots | Supremacy | Statues |
Addiction | Coronavirus | Shutdown |
Welfare types | Legal charity | Oppress |


Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 The Dehumanizing Condescension of White Fragility by John McWhorter a teacher of linguistics at Columbia University and host of the podcast Lexicon Valley.
  2. 2.0 2.1 "The white supremacy culture likes to engender a culture of urgency in those of us who are working to dismantle it because it knows that living with a constant sense that everything is urgent is a recipe for the abuse of power and burnout." https://www.whitesupremacyculture.info/urgency.html
  3. WHITE SUPREMACY CULTURE CHARACTERISTICS, "characteristics of white supremacy culture that show up in our organizations and communities and homes... perfectionism, a sense of urgency, defensiveness .., quantity over quality, worship of the written word, the belief in one “right” way, paternalism, either/or binary thinking, power hoarding, fear of open conflict, individualism, progress defined as more, the right to profit, objectivity, and the right to comfort."
  4. Some suggest that the "covenant of brethren" mentioned in Amos 1 was the league made between Hiram and David, and afterwards between Hiram and Solomon (2 Samuel 5:11; 1 Kings 5:1; 1 Kings 5:12 )but the true brotherly covenant dates back when there was no king in Israel and the people were bound together by the practice of pure religion. Ezekiel 16:49 "Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy." This was an indictment of Israel because it failed to abide by Leviticus 25:35 "And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee; then thou shalt relieve him: [yea, though he be] a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee." when the people turned to the legal charity offered by men who exercise authority like Cain, Nimrod, and FDR rather that the freewill offerings provided by the fervent charity of The Way.


About the author





Subscribe

HELP US at His Holy Church spread the word by SUBSCRIBING to many of our CHANNELS and the Network.
The more subscribers will give us more opportunity to reach out to others and build the network as Christ commanded.

Join the network.
Most important is to become a part of the Living Network which is not dependent upon the internet but seeks to form The bands of a free society.
You can do this by joining the local email group on the network and helping one another in a network of Tens.

His Holy Church - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/user/hisholychurch

Bitchute channel will often include material that would be censored.
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/o6xa17ZTh2KG/

Rumble Channel gregory144
https://rumble.com/user/gregory144

To read more go to "His Holy Church" (HHC) https://www.hisholychurch.org/

Brother Gregory in the wilderness.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJSw6O7_-vA4dweVpMPEXRA

About the author, Brother Gregory
https://hisholychurch.org/author.php

PreparingU - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9hTUK8R89ElcXVgUjWoOXQ

Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/HisHolyChurch