Template:Premillennialism

Distorting the simplicity of the gospel of the kingdom.

Premillennialism

Premillennialism (among some Christian Protestants) the doctrine that the prophesied millennium of blessedness will begin with the imminent Second Coming of Christ.

Premillennialism, in Christian eschatology, is the belief that Jesus will physically return to the earth to gather His saints before the Millennium, a literal thousand-year golden age of peace. This return is referred to as the Second Coming. The doctrine is called "premillennialism" because it holds that Jesus' physical return to earth will occur prior to the inauguration of the Millennium. It is distinct from the other forms of Christian eschatology such as postmillennialism or amillennialism, which view the millennial rule as occurring either before the second coming, or as being figurative and non-temporal. For the last century, the belief has been common in Evangelicalism according to surveys on this topic.

Some think that this idea was promoted by Justin Martyr in the 2nd century who was one of the first Christian writers to describe the “Jewish” belief of a temporary messianic kingdom prior to the eternal state.

Justin did write in chapter 80 of his work Dialogue with Trypho, “I and others who are right-minded Christians on all points are assured that there will be a resurrection of the dead, and a thousand years in Jerusalem, which will then be built... For Isaiah spoke in that manner concerning this period of a thousand years.”

The truth is he conceded earlier in the same chapter that his view was not universal by saying that he “and many who belong to the pure and pious faith, and are not "true Christians”.

One problem today is that many Modern Christians do not "belong to the pure and pious faith" because they do not live by faith, but by force. They have little or no daily ministration, which Justin also writes about, except through those men who call themselves Benefactors but who exercise authority, and who are the fathers of the earth who are the socialists of the world -- to whom Jesus did not want us to pray to at all.

Some think that Irenaeus of the late 2nd century and bishop of Lyon was a premillennialist. He wrote Against Heresies in the 2nd century, opposing the Gnostic, and he considered them a threat. Irenaeus did write, “The promise remains steadfast... God promised him (Abraham) the inheritance of the land. Yet, Abraham did not receive it during all the time of his journey there. Accordingly, it must be that Abraham, together with his seed (that is, those who fear God and believe in Him), will receive it at the resurrection of the just.”

Irenaeus had lots of ideas that premillennialists might object to, but creating eschatological views by picking quotes here and there can bring big money for ministers who tell the people what they want to hear. Irenaeus also held to the idea that the end of human history will occur after the 6,000th year. (5.28.3).

Amillennialism

Origen challenged the doctrine of the few premillennialists. Some think he was a proponent of amillennialism. Dionysius of Alexandria among others stood against premillennialism.

So is there a premillennial, or a postmillennial, or is amillennialism correct?

Classic Premillennialism is distinctively non-dispensational, meaning there was no theological distinction between Israel and the Church. Dispensational premillennialism generally holds that Israel and the Church are distinct entities.

Yet, thousands of Jews, including Peter himself, accepted Christ as king, and the Apostles worked daily in the government temple providing a eucharistic welfare by charity, rather than taxes, after Christ appointed them a kingdom.

Jerome clearly believed that the Church was appointed the kingdom as Jesus said he would. and that the "Bishops, presbyters (Elder) and deacons occupy in the church the same positions as those which were occupied by Aaron, his sons, and the Levites in the temple."

The Kingdom of God was taken away from the Jews who followed the Pharisees by the words of their own mouth recorded by John 19:15 "But they cried out, Away with [him], away with [him], crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar." The Jews who cried out "Hosanna to the Son of David" accepted Jesus as the anointed king and the Christ. That Kingdom of God called Israel belonged to Jesus who was the Christ for those Jews who received the Baptism of the Apostles by the thousands on Pentecost and in the years to come, all over the world.

Dispensationalism traces its roots to the 1830s and John Nelson Darby. C.I. Scofield popularized dispensational premillennialism through the Scofield Reference Bible. The popularity of their ideas grew as the Church moved away from being the main social support for Christians, and they let governments that exercise authority become the chief source of welfare for the Modern Christians. It was also during this time that the definition of Religion changed, and Pure Religion all but disappeared from the modern Church.

People equate all these prophecies with a Second coming. The phrase "Second coming" does not appear in the Bible. Many of these references, like coming in the clouds, are specific statements to certain people, like what Jesus told Caiaphas that he would "see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.".

Some of these references are possibly different events.

But more important, there is a question as to what the reign of Christ would look like.

People have lots of preconceived notions about different interpretations of books like Revelation, and these notions produce a variety of eschatological doctrines, but many people seem to have trouble with the basics like thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's goods.

You cannot be a socialist and Christian, from what Christ said, since socialism requires that men exercise authority over your neighbor to give you benefits at the expense of your neighbor.

All of this depends on how people think the kingdom of God looks and operates.

What would His reign look like?

Israel was not a geographical location, but rather a person in whom God prevailed. Those who let God into their hearts and minds are grafted into the kingdom of Israel.

---