Template:Welfaregods: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Reading Sumerian literature found in these cuneiform tablets, we find that the people were seeking ''someone'' to save them from their "animal nature". Since that ''animal nature'' often manifested with a lack of one or more socially desirable of virtues, their stories often included characters or [[heroes]] who had an abundance of those virtues. These Sumerians ''gods'' identified in these clay tablets were humans who ate, drank, sleep, marry, and have children but they often excelled in one of these virtues which the Sumerians prized and praised. | Reading Sumerian literature found in these cuneiform tablets, we find that the people were seeking ''someone'' to save them from their "animal nature". Since that ''animal nature'' often manifested with a lack of one or more socially desirable of virtues, their stories often included characters or [[heroes]] who had an abundance of those virtues. These Sumerians ''gods'' identified in these clay tablets were humans who ate, drank, sleep, marry, and have children but they often excelled in one of these virtues which the Sumerians prized and praised. | ||
The Sumerians, Akkadians, and Babylonians in Mesopotamia had "gods many" described in their epics as humans, as wise kings who live lives, are mourned on passing and sometimes immortalized like Ishtar's lament<Ref>"It is I who give birth, these people are mine! And now, like fish, they fill the ocean!” in the great flood of Utnapishtim</Ref> of the people who perished in the great flood of Utnapishtim.<Ref> Utnapishtim (or Utana’ishtim, Atra-Hasis, Ziusudra, Xisuthros) is a character in ancient Mesopotamian mythology. He is tasked by the god Enki to create a giant ship to be called ''Preserver of Life'' in preparation of a giant flood that would wipe out all life. The character appears in the ''Epic of Gilgamesh''. | The Sumerians, Akkadians, and Babylonians in Mesopotamia had "[[gods many]]" described in their epics as humans, as wise kings who live lives, are mourned on passing and sometimes immortalized like Ishtar's lament<Ref>"It is I who give birth, these people are mine! And now, like fish, they fill the ocean!” in the great flood of Utnapishtim</Ref> of the people who perished in the great flood of Utnapishtim.<Ref> Utnapishtim (or Utana’ishtim, Atra-Hasis, Ziusudra, Xisuthros) is a character in ancient Mesopotamian mythology. He is tasked by the god Enki to create a giant ship to be called ''Preserver of Life'' in preparation of a giant flood that would wipe out all life. The character appears in the ''Epic of Gilgamesh''. </Ref> | ||
Gilgamesh, king of Uruk and [[Sumer]]ian hero, is mentioned in a version of ''The Book of Giants'' found at Qumran. As a heroic epic it is not merely literature is a story about the struggle of everyman with his virtuous desires and his animal nature. This same [[conflict]] is at play within every society in the reliance on ''individual'' or ''personal welfare'' versus ''communal welfare'', trusting friendship versus cultural isolation. personal welfare versus communal welfare and about the kind of social actors that American citizens should become. Seen in this way, Social Security reform is probably intractable pending a political consensus about about fundamental moral principles. Hardy and Hazelrigg have written this book, they say, because they want a better debate about Social Security.<Ref>Disorganizing China: Counter-Bureaucracy and the Decline of Socialism by Eddy U. Review by: Wang Feng</Ref> | == King or no King == | ||
Gilgamesh, king of Uruk<Ref>“See how its ramparts glean like copper in the sun. Climb the stone staircase … approach the Eanna Temple, sacred to Ishtar, a temple that no king has equaled in size or beauty, walk on the wall of Uruk, follow its course round the city, inspect its mighty foundations, examine its brickwork, how masterfully it is built, observe the land it encloses, the glorious palaces and temples, the shops and marketplaces, the houses, the public squares.”</Ref> and [[Sumer]]ian hero, is mentioned in a version of ''The Book of Giants'' found at Qumran. As a heroic epic it is not merely literature is a story about the struggle of everyman with his virtuous desires and his animal nature for Gilgamesh did great things for the nation but also to its people as his power made him a despot to the [[masses]].<Ref name="rulesupreme">“Who is like Gilgamesh? What other king has inspired such awe? Who else can say, “I alone rule supreme among mankind”? … The city in his possession, he struts through it, arrogant, his head raised high, trampling its citizens like a wild bull. He is king, he does whatever he wants, takes the son from his father and crushes him, takes the girl from her mothers and uses her … no one dares to oppose him.”</Ref> | |||
The citizens “cried out to heaven” to the ''god of the sky'', Anu, who supposedly suggested a division or balance of power by sending Enkidu to keep Gilgamesh but eventually they become allies which we see with every two party system. The real problem goes much deeper into the [[heart and soul]] of the people. | |||
There was also an attempt to subdue or shackle the Leviathan of a [[bureaucracy]] that has developed a life and tyranny of its own. In the American colonies it was not the old King George the III who' ate out the substance of the people' but the "swarms of offices", who like [[locust]] are their own plague. Like Justice William O. Douglas said the new King George that makes a government despotic by its vast [[bureaucracy]].<Ref>“We must realize that today’s Establishment is the new George III. Whether it will continue to adhere to his tactics, we do not know. If it does, the redress, honored in tradition, is also revolution… the truth is that the vast bureaucracy now runs this country, irrespective of what party is in power.” Justice William O. Douglas, in his book Points of Rebellion, 1969 (page 95, page 54).</Ref> | |||
As we examine the true story of Moses and certainly Jesus Christ and The way]] there are elements of their world we do not find in what has come down as the ''Epic of Gilgamesh''. | |||
== Covenants and constitutions == | |||
Of course the Bible of Moses tells us in [[Deuteronomy 17]]: what we should put in a constitution to keep any king in check. But before that he gave you [[12 Rules for Life]]. | |||
In [[1 Samuel 8]] we are warned what manner of king any man will become<Ref name="mannerking">[[1 Samuel 8]]11 And he said, This will be the manner of the king that shall reign over you: He will take your sons, and appoint [them] for himself, for his chariots, and [to be] his horsemen; and [some] shall run before his chariots. | |||
12 And he will appoint him captains over thousands, and captains over fifties; and [will set them] to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instruments of war, and instruments of his chariots. | |||
13 And he will take your daughters [to be] confectionaries, and [to be] cooks, and [to be] bakers. | |||
14 And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your oliveyards, [even] the best [of them], and give [them] to his servants. | |||
15 And he will take the tenth of your seed, and of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his servants. | |||
16 And he will take your menservants, and your maidservants, and your goodliest young men, and your asses, and put [them] to his work. | |||
17 He will take the tenth of your sheep: and ye shall be his servants. | |||
18 And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day. | |||
19 Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us;</Ref> any man will become with such power from the people. What would happen if the people even desired a king who offer protection which is what we see with [[King Saul]] who immediately [[foolish]]ly chooses to [[force]] a [[sacrifice]] and certainly see with King Gilgamesh.<Ref name="rulesupreme"></Ref> | |||
But if we also sit the [[tables]] of plenty the [[dainties]] these rulers serve will become a "[[snare]] and a trap" and a [[stumblingblock]] of recompence according to Paul and David. | |||
Moses was setting up a different system of [[social welfare]] through living altars of stone without the civil law regulations of the social welfare states of Ur or [[Sumer]] but more in the traditions of [[Abraham]] and Able. This system included a division of power for all the [[social welfare]] was provided by [[freewill offerings]], or the [[charity]] and [[love]] as [[commanded]] by Jesus Christ. This was contrary to the covetous practices seen in the [[Corban]] of the [[Pharisees]] set up by the civil government of [[Herod]]. | |||
[[Abraham]], [[Moses]], and the [[prophets]], as well as John the Baptist, Jesus and the [[warnings]] of the [[Apostles]] all agree and are contrary to the way of [[Cain]], [[Nimrod]], [[Sodom]], [[Pharaoh]], [[Caesar]], and [[socialists]] like [[FDR]] and and opportunists seeking power like [[LBJ]], or even [[communism|communists]] like [[Cloward and Piven]] or [[Marxism|Marx and Mao]]. | |||
This same [[conflict]] is at play within every society in the reliance on ''individual'' or ''personal welfare'' versus ''communal welfare'', trusting friendship versus cultural isolation. personal welfare versus communal welfare and about the kind of social actors that American citizens should become. Seen in this way, [[Social Security]] reform is probably intractable pending a political consensus about about fundamental moral principles. Hardy and Hazelrigg have written this book, they say, because they want a better debate about Social Security.<Ref>Disorganizing China: Counter-Bureaucracy and the Decline of Socialism by Eddy U. Review by: Wang Feng</Ref> | |||
== The Goddess of welfare == | == The Goddess of welfare == | ||
Revision as of 02:39, 24 February 2023
Sumerian gods
Worshiping the ancient gods of Sumer has been promoted by the New York Times[1] where they praise the "the welfare city-state" claiming that in that civil society "Work was a duty, but social security was an entitlement. It was personified by the Goddess Nanshe, the first real welfare queen immortalized in hymn as a benefactor who "brings the refugee to her lap, finds shelter for the weak.""
The Sumerian cuneiform system of writing as early as 3000 B.C. allowed for the direct outgrowth of the invention and development of a civil society. The earliest documents found in a Sumerian city of Erech recorded administrative accounting of a civil bureaucracy along with more and more civil laws required to regulate that growing bureaucracy and those citizens dependent upon it.
There was a rise in education evidenced by school books unearthed in Shuruppak dated around 2500 B.C.. Early on there was evidence of a wide variety of topics taught including architecture, medicine, metallurgy, mathematics, botanical, zoological, geographical, and mineralogical, as well as literature. This literary output in the Mesopotamian civilization was not the first attempt of a human to express life, its values, and its meaning using fiction and art but it was simply one of the earliest written records that has survived and we have found. They were often just recording the culture and sense of virtuous social bonds of their predecessors which they praised and the clay tablets were more survivable than other media.
Individual rights were born with the Natural Law which is why Genesis starts with a Creator and the creation of mankind. Civil law is the law that men make for themselves and has often presented a conflict between those civil laws and Freedom of Religion. This is where and often where we see a "bitter struggle for power between the temple and the palace---the “church” and the “state”--- with the citizens ... taking the side of the temple" because of their dependence upon the civil tables and dainties of rulers through their systems of legal charity.
During the reign of Urukagina[2] there was opposition to "the wealth and criminality of the tamkarum [merchant-moneylenders]" who had enslaved the people. It is in the historical cuneiform "document that we find the word “freedom” used for the first time in man's recorded history; the word is amargi..." which may literally be translated "return to the mother" or her womb[3] an idea that suggest the born again comments of Jesus.
The term ama-argi or ama-gi in the cuneiform writing produced the idea of "freedom", as well as "manumission", "exemption from debts or obligations", "reversion to a previous state" Akk. anduraāru.[4] That liberty was only found in the kingdom of God and His righteousness.
Reading Sumerian literature found in these cuneiform tablets, we find that the people were seeking someone to save them from their "animal nature". Since that animal nature often manifested with a lack of one or more socially desirable of virtues, their stories often included characters or heroes who had an abundance of those virtues. These Sumerians gods identified in these clay tablets were humans who ate, drank, sleep, marry, and have children but they often excelled in one of these virtues which the Sumerians prized and praised.
The Sumerians, Akkadians, and Babylonians in Mesopotamia had "gods many" described in their epics as humans, as wise kings who live lives, are mourned on passing and sometimes immortalized like Ishtar's lament[5] of the people who perished in the great flood of Utnapishtim.[6]
King or no King
Gilgamesh, king of Uruk[7] and Sumerian hero, is mentioned in a version of The Book of Giants found at Qumran. As a heroic epic it is not merely literature is a story about the struggle of everyman with his virtuous desires and his animal nature for Gilgamesh did great things for the nation but also to its people as his power made him a despot to the masses.[8]
The citizens “cried out to heaven” to the god of the sky, Anu, who supposedly suggested a division or balance of power by sending Enkidu to keep Gilgamesh but eventually they become allies which we see with every two party system. The real problem goes much deeper into the heart and soul of the people.
There was also an attempt to subdue or shackle the Leviathan of a bureaucracy that has developed a life and tyranny of its own. In the American colonies it was not the old King George the III who' ate out the substance of the people' but the "swarms of offices", who like locust are their own plague. Like Justice William O. Douglas said the new King George that makes a government despotic by its vast bureaucracy.[9]
As we examine the true story of Moses and certainly Jesus Christ and The way]] there are elements of their world we do not find in what has come down as the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Covenants and constitutions
Of course the Bible of Moses tells us in Deuteronomy 17: what we should put in a constitution to keep any king in check. But before that he gave you 12 Rules for Life.
In 1 Samuel 8 we are warned what manner of king any man will become[10] any man will become with such power from the people. What would happen if the people even desired a king who offer protection which is what we see with King Saul who immediately foolishly chooses to force a sacrifice and certainly see with King Gilgamesh.[8]
But if we also sit the tables of plenty the dainties these rulers serve will become a "snare and a trap" and a stumblingblock of recompence according to Paul and David.
Moses was setting up a different system of social welfare through living altars of stone without the civil law regulations of the social welfare states of Ur or Sumer but more in the traditions of Abraham and Able. This system included a division of power for all the social welfare was provided by freewill offerings, or the charity and love as commanded by Jesus Christ. This was contrary to the covetous practices seen in the Corban of the Pharisees set up by the civil government of Herod.
Abraham, Moses, and the prophets, as well as John the Baptist, Jesus and the warnings of the Apostles all agree and are contrary to the way of Cain, Nimrod, Sodom, Pharaoh, Caesar, and socialists like FDR and and opportunists seeking power like LBJ, or even communists like Cloward and Piven or Marx and Mao.
This same conflict is at play within every society in the reliance on individual or personal welfare versus communal welfare, trusting friendship versus cultural isolation. personal welfare versus communal welfare and about the kind of social actors that American citizens should become. Seen in this way, Social Security reform is probably intractable pending a political consensus about about fundamental moral principles. Hardy and Hazelrigg have written this book, they say, because they want a better debate about Social Security.[11]
The Goddess of welfare
Sumer did establish a welfare city-state where the right to social welfare was an an entitlement in a civil system symbolized by the Goddess Nanshe (see also Nanse, Nassi, Nazi) who was immortalized in their literature and in an ancient hymn as a benefactor.
Praise of the god Nanshe[12]
Who knows the orphan, who knows the widow,
Knows the oppression of man over man, is the orphan's mother,
Nanshe, who cares for the widow,
Who seeks out ... justice ... for the poorest
The queen brings the refugee to her lap,
Finds shelter for the weak[13]
Nanshe[12] was considered a "tutelary deity" of social justice and social welfare. Nanshe was one of the oldest known tutelary goddesses of Mesopotamian cities, along with Nisaba, Ezina, Inanna of Uruk and Inanna of Zabalam. An essential civil power to operate those social welfare systems came from her father, Enki who granted her tutelary powers under his civil authority.
As a protector and benefactor of various disadvantaged groups, such as orphans, widows or people belonging to indebted households. and through the civil bureaucracy in the Mesopotamian city, an administrative text lists grain rations for a widow alongside that grain meant for Nanshe's clergy who administered to these needy.[14]
Secularism seized the mind of the people when we changed the definition of religion and the masses sat down to eat at a table of legal charity.
- ↑ On Welfare in Sumer; No Society Rejoices At Helping Its Poor By Sam Roberts July 5, 1992.
- ↑ Urukagina was King of the city-states of Lagash and Girsu in Mesopotamia (a Sumerian city), and the last ruler of the 1st Dynasty of Lagash. He assumed the title of king, claiming to have been divinely appointed, upon the downfall of his corrupt predecessor, Lugalanda.
- ↑ The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character By Samuel Noah Kramer documents of 2350 in the reign of Urukagina
- ↑ http://psd.meum.upenn.edu/epsd/e324.html
- ↑ "It is I who give birth, these people are mine! And now, like fish, they fill the ocean!” in the great flood of Utnapishtim
- ↑ Utnapishtim (or Utana’ishtim, Atra-Hasis, Ziusudra, Xisuthros) is a character in ancient Mesopotamian mythology. He is tasked by the god Enki to create a giant ship to be called Preserver of Life in preparation of a giant flood that would wipe out all life. The character appears in the Epic of Gilgamesh.
- ↑ “See how its ramparts glean like copper in the sun. Climb the stone staircase … approach the Eanna Temple, sacred to Ishtar, a temple that no king has equaled in size or beauty, walk on the wall of Uruk, follow its course round the city, inspect its mighty foundations, examine its brickwork, how masterfully it is built, observe the land it encloses, the glorious palaces and temples, the shops and marketplaces, the houses, the public squares.”
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 “Who is like Gilgamesh? What other king has inspired such awe? Who else can say, “I alone rule supreme among mankind”? … The city in his possession, he struts through it, arrogant, his head raised high, trampling its citizens like a wild bull. He is king, he does whatever he wants, takes the son from his father and crushes him, takes the girl from her mothers and uses her … no one dares to oppose him.”
- ↑ “We must realize that today’s Establishment is the new George III. Whether it will continue to adhere to his tactics, we do not know. If it does, the redress, honored in tradition, is also revolution… the truth is that the vast bureaucracy now runs this country, irrespective of what party is in power.” Justice William O. Douglas, in his book Points of Rebellion, 1969 (page 95, page 54).
- ↑ 1 Samuel 811 And he said, This will be the manner of the king that shall reign over you: He will take your sons, and appoint [them] for himself, for his chariots, and [to be] his horsemen; and [some] shall run before his chariots. 12 And he will appoint him captains over thousands, and captains over fifties; and [will set them] to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instruments of war, and instruments of his chariots. 13 And he will take your daughters [to be] confectionaries, and [to be] cooks, and [to be] bakers. 14 And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your oliveyards, [even] the best [of them], and give [them] to his servants. 15 And he will take the tenth of your seed, and of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his servants. 16 And he will take your menservants, and your maidservants, and your goodliest young men, and your asses, and put [them] to his work. 17 He will take the tenth of your sheep: and ye shall be his servants. 18 And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day. 19 Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us;
- ↑ Disorganizing China: Counter-Bureaucracy and the Decline of Socialism by Eddy U. Review by: Wang Feng
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Nanshe was a Mesopotamian goddess in various contexts associated with the sea, marshlands, the animals inhabiting these biomes, namely bird and fish, as well as divination, dream interpretation, justice, social welfare, and certain administrative tasks.
- ↑ This is a text translated from Sumerian documents describing the god- dess Nanshe: Kramer 1981, 104.
- ↑ The Nanshe Hymn by W Heimpel · 1981 · Cited — The oracle priest brings the first fruit offerings, the chef gets the oven going. Meat, liquor and water are brought. Nanshe makes administrative appointments. As a result, daily offerings can be drawn from the center granary."