Template:Measured: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:apostle_paul sword.jpg|right|thumb|250px|This conversation about [[Measure 114]] is to take measure of the people who claim to serve the public, or at least the people. <Br>Do they love their neighbor and his right as much as they love themselves?  <Br>Do they [[Bite]] one another or [[love]] one another? <Br>Are they [[seek]]ing a city on the hill or a [[city of blood]]?<Br>
[[File:apostle_paul sword.jpg|right|thumb|250px|This conversation about [[Measure 114]] is to take measure of the people who claim to serve the public, or at least the people. <Br>Do they love their neighbor and their rights as much as they love their own?  <Br>Or do they [[Bite]] one anotherintil the are devoured?<Ref>Galatians 5:15  But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.</Ref> <Br>Are they [[seek]]ing a city of [[righteousness]] or a [[city of blood]] and self-righteous [[wantonness]]?<Br>Has the [[appetite]] of the [[masses]] degenerated them until tyrants rule?<Br>The [[kingdom of God]] is in the moment and our guide is the [[Holy Spirit]]. <Br>We cannot be free if we will not set others free? <Br>We are [[Corbin|drawn near]] that ''HOLY''  spirit through [[sacrifice]] of "self". So when we say we have a right to [[Self Defense|self defense]] we do not mean the egotistical "self" but only the self that serves others in [[righteousness]].<Br>The more you are filled with the [[Holy Spirit]] the less you will have to draw your sword.<Br>''A sword on the side of the righteous keeps the swords of the unrighteous in their sheath.''<Br> [[Freedom of speech]] and a [[Conversation]] that is [[Pure Religion|unspotted by the world]] is also a part of that right of [[self defense]] that is both the [[Law of Nature]] and [[Divine will]].]]
<Br>The [[kingdom of God]] is in the moment and our guide is the [[Holy Spirit]]. We drawCzn we be free if we will not set others free? near that ''HOLY''  spirit through sacrifice of "self". So when we say we have a right to [[Self Defense|self defense]] we do not mean the egotistical "self" but only the self that serves others in [[righteousness]].<Br>The more you are filled with the [[Holy Spirit]] the less you will have to draw your sword.<Br>''A sword on the side of the righteous keeps the swords of the unrighteous in their sheath.''<Br> [[Freedom of speech]] is also a part of that right of self defense that is both the [[Law of Nature]] and [[Divine will]].]]


== Measured ==
== Measured ==

Revision as of 23:43, 12 November 2022

This conversation about Measure 114 is to take measure of the people who claim to serve the public, or at least the people.
Do they love their neighbor and their rights as much as they love their own?
Or do they Bite one anotherintil the are devoured?[1]
Are they seeking a city of righteousness or a city of blood and self-righteous wantonness?
Has the appetite of the masses degenerated them until tyrants rule?
The kingdom of God is in the moment and our guide is the Holy Spirit.
We cannot be free if we will not set others free?
We are drawn near that HOLY spirit through sacrifice of "self". So when we say we have a right to self defense we do not mean the egotistical "self" but only the self that serves others in righteousness.
The more you are filled with the Holy Spirit the less you will have to draw your sword.
A sword on the side of the righteous keeps the swords of the unrighteous in their sheath.
Freedom of speech and a Conversation that is unspotted by the world is also a part of that right of self defense that is both the Law of Nature and Divine will.

Measured

Oregon Measure 114, Changes to Firearm Ownership and Purchase Requirements Initiative (2022) will make hundreds of thousands of Oregonians law breakers if they try to exercise their natural rights.

Besides being a clear infringement upon natural rights and a violation of the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights found amending the Constitution of the United States it will shut down gun businesses state wide and infringe upon individuals rights to obtain and keep and bear arms.

This Measure 114 which supposedly passed in Oregon according to those people entrusted with counting the vote but it does clearly infringe upon the natural right to bear arms which is inclusive within the Law of Nature and Right Reason and what has been called Divine will. Every life form has a right to protect itself, its progeny, and its herd or community against unwarranted usurpation.


More violations

This measure and what was done to make it legal was also a violation of the single subject Ballot rule, and a (See law: Oregon Constitution, Article IV, Section 1 (1d)[2] and Article XVII, Section 1 Amendments and Revisions) and was designed to deceive millions of voters.

This measure will make tens of thousands of Oregonians law breakers and subject them to arbitrary police actions and fines.


Prohibition

The right to bear arms is not a "constitutional right" granted by the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment is prohibiting the Congress ("shall make no law").


"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

No member of the government subject to that constitution has the authority to infringe upon that preexisting natural right.

Infested

Oregonians are not only ignorant (Lack knowledge)[3] of their rights and responsibility and the limits of their power of legislation but they are infested with the spirit of tyranny and desire to rule over their neighbor.

The citizen of the United States have their own rights to appeal these measures but they would be far better off to repent and seek the Kingdom of God and His righteousness as their personal priority.

Despite the obvious evil embodied in the terms and presentation of this measure an insult is added to injury because it was the Reverend Mark Knutson who was the chief petitioner to create and push this bill forward with his inclusive interfaith church.

  • “Loss of life is pure tragedy,” Knutson said.
  • Mark Knutson went on to say “When people die on the streets, that is somebody’s child... We have to remember that. That’s not some abstract number. That’s a human being. We need to rise up. When my neighbor bleeds, we all bleed.”

These words are true but in what manner do we "rise up"?

There are hundreds of situations where people stopped mass murder because they were armed. When evil came they were able to rise up and stop evil. Mark wishes to take that right and ability from the people.

“A good guy with a gun is an effective way to stop a bad guy with a gun.”

Hundreds of thousands of times crimes have been prevented or halted by the clear presence of firearms. But there is no doubt that millions of times crimes are never committed because criminal elements of society are concerned that a firearm might be present which creates an environment of criminal hesitancy that cannot be denied. Mark Knutson seems unconcerned about the reduction of that criminal hesitancy by his measure that infringes upon the right to be armed. Thhe people that may be injured may also "bleed".


Appeal to force

With his appeal to the rulers who exercise authority one over the other to take away the rights of his neighbor to defend themselves and others he goes against Christ who actually directed his disciples to arm themselves.

Luke 22:36 "Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take [it], and likewise [his] scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one."

He certainly does not have the same mind of Christ.

As a pastor of what is called the Augustana Lutheran Church in Portland, he clearly does not know the Gospel of Christ and because of his appeals to the rulers who exercise authority one over the other to take from neighbors is like the appeal to persecute Christians by Ambrose who was servant of the Fathers of the earth and a member of the of the Church of Constantine".

False prophets

Reverend Mark Knutson is not a minister of Jesus the Christ and the Gospel of the Kingdom but is a false prophet as a political activist in and of the world.

Revelation 16:13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs [come] out of the mouth of the dragon,[4] and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
Revelation 19:20 "And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone."
Revelation 20:10 "And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever."


1 Peter 4:1 "Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin;"

Embryonic republics

Long before the founders of the American Republic voiced their objections to democracy Plato postulated “Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy...”

And long after Adams and Ralph Waldo Emerson said “Democracy is morose, and runs to anarchy.”

While Reverend Mark Knutson is a self proclaimed social justice warrior and socialist.

It is absolutely clear that Jesus was not a socialist.

How anyone could even suggest that Jesus preached socialism is an indictment of the Modern Church.

Christ came to preach against socialism.

Socialism was one of the major reasons He took the kingdom from the Pharisees[5] and appointed it to the Apostles with the instructions not to be like the other governments of the world who called themselves Benefactors but exercised authority one over the other.

It was the Corban of the Pharisees which made the word of God to none effect. That Corban which was started by Herod the Great and the Pharisees who held political power at that time was a socialist scheme. Herod's temples, like the Temples of Rome, operated a social welfare system of free bread through taxation instead of freewill offerings as Moses said to do.


Winston Churchill wrote that: “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” He went on to say that “The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Democracy


Legal definition of the Church

The Church can only be defined by Christ, but a legal definition is available:

The Church as "A body or community of Christians, united under one form of government..." Anyone claiming to be a Christian should be sitting down in free assemblies with ministers who are servants of the people, taking care of one another through charity or else they are not really seeking the kingdom of God nor His righteousness. That was the conflict between the kingdoms of the world and the early Church. Nimrod to Now Series: Part 10: The Church] ~8 min
"CHURCH In its most general sense, the religious society founded and established by Jesus Christ, to receive, preserve, and propagate his doctrines and ordinances."
"A body or community of Christians, united under one form of government by the profession of one faith, and the observance of the same rituals and ceremonies."

Black's Law Dictionary 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th... eds.

The term church may be used in several senses.

While many institutions may call themselves a church, to meet consistent legal definition it must be established by Jesus Christ.

The Church as a body is a corpus or corporate, and it would not include the people, except through practices of charity. This would not include Legal charity if the State that degenerates the masses and ushers in tyranny and was forbidden by Christ.[6]

The church as a community does include the people or laity in a communion of that charity.

You cannot get near God without what is sometimes called Sacrifice.

The manner of that sacrifice is where the Christian conflict is seen.

Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition
CHURCH. In a moral or spiritual sense this word signifies a society of persons who profess the Christian religion; and in a physical or material sense, the place where such persons assemble. The term church is nomen collectivum;[7] it comprehends the chancel,[8] aisles, and body of the church.[9]

  1. Galatians 5:15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.
  2. (d) An initiative petition shall include the full text of the proposed law or amendment to the Constitution. A proposed law or amendment to the Constitution shall embrace one subject only and matters properly connected therewith.
  3. Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
  4. Draco of 7th century BC, also called Drako or Drakon meaning dragon or serpent.
  5. Matthew 21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
  6. See Benefactors, Covetous practices.
  7. NOMEN COLLECTIVUM. This expression is used to signify that a word in the singular number is to be understood in the plural in certain cases.
  8. the part of a church near the altar, reserved for the clergy and choir, and typically separated from the nave by steps or a screen.
    The term nave is from navis, the Latin word for ship, an early Christian symbol of the Church as a whole, with a possible connection to the "ship of St. Peter" or the Ark of Noah.]
  9. Ham. N. P. 204.