Social exclusion: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Social exclusion was defined in France in 1974 as a rupture of social bonds. But Social exclusion will be experienced in "the lack or denial of resources, rights,...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Social exclusion]] was defined in France in 1974 as a rupture of [[social bonds]]. But Social exclusion will be experienced in "the lack or denial of resources, [[rights]], goods and services, and the inability to participate in the normal relationships and activities, available to the majority of people in a society, whether in economic, social, cultural, or political arenas."
[[Social exclusion]] was defined in France in 1974 as a rupture of [[social bonds]]. But [[Social exclusion]] will be experienced in "the lack or denial of resources, [[rights]], goods and services, and the inability to participate in the normal relationships and activities, available to the majority of people in a society, whether in economic, social, cultural, or political arenas."


We already see this in ''social credit scores'' controlled by central governments like China but also in Europe. Many things will produce a bad score and create [[Social exclusion]]. This is where the [[Mark of the Beast]] will develop its sting for those who have not already taken it.
We already see this in ''social credit scores'' controlled by central governments like China but also in Europe. Many things will produce a bad score and create [[Social exclusion]]. This is where the [[Mark of the Beast]] will develop its sting for those who have not already taken it.
Line 27: Line 27:


"Exclusion, or the perception of exclusion, may cause certain groups to opt out of markets, services, and spaces, with costs to both individuals and the economy." <Ref name="worldbank"></Ref>
"Exclusion, or the perception of exclusion, may cause certain groups to opt out of markets, services, and spaces, with costs to both individuals and the economy." <Ref name="worldbank"></Ref>
== Social Exclusion consequences ==
1. It may produce economic deprivations.
2. It may impoverishment the quality of human life undermining hope.
3. It may produce inequality through poverty and opportunities for employment forcing migration.
4. It may lead to stigmatization and division.
5. It may reduce trust and increase fear toward the excluded.
6. It will restrict the participation of the excluded  in the economic, cultural and socio-political activities.
7. It encourages an intense negative impact on the quality of life.


  {{Template:Network}}
  {{Template:Network}}

Revision as of 19:40, 6 January 2022

Social exclusion was defined in France in 1974 as a rupture of social bonds. But Social exclusion will be experienced in "the lack or denial of resources, rights, goods and services, and the inability to participate in the normal relationships and activities, available to the majority of people in a society, whether in economic, social, cultural, or political arenas."

We already see this in social credit scores controlled by central governments like China but also in Europe. Many things will produce a bad score and create Social exclusion. This is where the Mark of the Beast will develop its sting for those who have not already taken it.

Social exclusion will include the inability to obtain food and services when there are any type of shortage. Anyone not having the proper numbers, identification or vaccine passport will be excluded from the market place and even jobs, banking,or even the grocery stores.

Social exclusion will be identified with cultural caste systems or systemic racism creates bias exclusions. Suggesting also the poor live only in poor surroundings with other poor people and are excluded from enjoying social equality with better-off people in better surroundings.

Poverty, inequality, lack of decent and accessible public services, inadequate public transport, the welfare and benefits system and lack of good housing are believed by some to be the major contributors to social exclusion. But unless these are the result of oppression they are not social exclusions but natural exclusions.

It is natural that all life struggle to live just as it is natural that all men have a right to pursue happiness. This is as true for the individual as it is for the society in which they live. Any attempt to remove the striving required in the pursuit of happiness will result in a weakening of the individual and therefore society.[1]

One does not strive without the need to strive in the pursuit of something they may desire. In nature hunger makes the cheetah run faster. Without the need to strive and the possibility of failure all life will become weaker. Every weightlifter will tell you "no pain, no gain". We see this in the "beautiful rats" of John Calhoun's Rat Paradise.

The socialist will try to remedy this with a claim they are fighting for equality and social justice. They will prescribe civil legislation and "legal charity" to create a utopia of equality. Their Paradise policies will erode the very foundation of society.

Since, there is Social exclusion there is also Social inclusion. Social inclusion is supposed to be "the process of improving the terms on which individuals and groups take part in society—improving the ability, opportunity, and dignity of those disadvantaged on the basis of their identity."[2]

According to The World Bank, "In every country, some groups confront barriers that prevent them from fully participating in political, economic, and social life. These groups may be excluded not only through legal systems, land, and labor markets, but also discriminatory or stigmatizing attitudes, beliefs, or perceptions."

"Disadvantage is often based on social identity, which may be across dimensions of gender, age, location, occupation, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenship status, disability, and sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), among other factors."

"Social inclusion is the right thing to do, and it also makes good economic sense."

"Exclusion, or the perception of exclusion, may cause certain groups to opt out of markets, services, and spaces, with costs to both individuals and the economy." [2]


Social Exclusion consequences

1. It may produce economic deprivations.

2. It may impoverishment the quality of human life undermining hope.

3. It may produce inequality through poverty and opportunities for employment forcing migration.

4. It may lead to stigmatization and division.

5. It may reduce trust and increase fear toward the excluded.

6. It will restrict the participation of the excluded in the economic, cultural and socio-political activities.

7. It encourages an intense negative impact on the quality of life.


If you need help:

Or want to help others:

Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network | Join Local group | About | Purpose | Guidelines | Network Removal
Contact Minister | Fractal Network | Audacity of Hope | Network Links

Footnotes

  1. Genesis 18:20 And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous;
    Isaiah 3:9 The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide [it] not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.
    Ezekiel 16:49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.
    Lamentations 4:6 For the punishment of the iniquity of the daughter of my people is greater than the punishment of the sin of Sodom, that was overthrown as in a moment, and no hands stayed on her.
  2. 2.0 2.1 The World Bank January 6, 2022