Template:Real Destroyers: Difference between revisions
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== The Real Destroyers == | == The Real Destroyers == | ||
[[File:plutarchdestroyer.jpg|300px|thumb|The [[covetous practices]] and an [[appetite]] for the [[wages of unrighteousness]] degrades society and its members paving the road to despotism. [[Plutarch]] and [[Polybius]] knew it and [[John the Baptist]], [[Christ]] and the [[early Church]] preached it.]] | |||
<blockquote>''"'''The real destroyers''' of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits."'' —[[Plutarch]].</blockquote> | <blockquote>''"'''The real destroyers''' of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits."'' —[[Plutarch]].</blockquote> | ||
These two overlapping processes brought about a vast consolidation of power, wealth and control. By the law of the Twelve Tables of Rome, which were the constitutional foundation of their government, if a freedman died intestate, without sui heredes, the patronus was the heir. This meant the property would go back to the Father or civil substitute father if they died with out an heir. This right was viewed as a right of Agnation<Ref>Consanguinity by a line of males only, as distinguished from cognation. --Bouvier. cognation. Relationship by blood; descent from the same original; kindred. (Law) That tie of consanguinity which exists between persons descended from the same mother; </Ref> which created an ever increasing corporation sole of power and possession within the unholy Roman empire. | These two overlapping processes brought about a vast consolidation of power, wealth and control. By the law of the Twelve Tables of Rome, which were the constitutional foundation of their government, if a freedman died intestate, without sui heredes, the patronus was the heir. This meant the property would go back to the Father or civil substitute father if they died with out an heir. This right was viewed as a right of Agnation<Ref>Consanguinity by a line of males only, as distinguished from cognation. --Bouvier. cognation. Relationship by blood; descent from the same original; kindred. (Law) That tie of consanguinity which exists between persons descended from the same mother; </Ref> which created an ever-increasing corporation sole of power and possession within the unholy Roman empire. | ||
The manumitted slave was cleverly called ''Libertus'' and he owed more than respect and gratitude to his patron. The patron might punish him with a summary judgment for neglecting his duties. He appeared to be free but was in fact a subject citizen under his substitute father. | The manumitted slave was cleverly called ''Libertus'' and he owed more than respect and gratitude to his patron. The patron might punish him with a summary judgment for neglecting his duties. He appeared to be free but was in fact a subject citizen under his substitute [[father]]. | ||
During the process of manumission of a son or daughter the patron could gain a sovereign position of influence and power and even become the heir to the corporeal and incorporeal hereditaments of the son or daughter being manumitted. | During the process of manumission of a son or daughter the patron could gain a sovereign position of influence and power and even become the heir to the corporeal and incorporeal hereditaments of the son or daughter being manumitted. | ||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
If an individual being emancipated required a tutor or curator, the rights which would have belonged to the father, if he had not emancipated the child, were secured to the patron as a kind of patronal right and the status of sui juris is not completed. It was upon these precepts of law that the [[Emperator]]/[[Apotheos]] of Rome forged its greatest power over the people. | If an individual being emancipated required a tutor or curator, the rights which would have belonged to the father, if he had not emancipated the child, were secured to the patron as a kind of patronal right and the status of sui juris is not completed. It was upon these precepts of law that the [[Emperator]]/[[Apotheos]] of Rome forged its greatest power over the people. | ||
<blockquote>'' "When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what [is] before thee: And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite. Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat." ([[Proverbs 23]]:1, 3)''</blockquote> | <blockquote>'' "When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what [is] before thee: And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite. Be not desirous of his [[dainties]]: for they are deceitful meat." ([[Proverbs 23]]:1, 3)''</blockquote> | ||
<blockquote>'' "And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them:"'' (Romans 11:9)</blockquote> | <blockquote>'' "And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them:"'' (Romans 11:9)</blockquote> | ||
Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
The [[Roots_of_the_Welfare_State|rise of the welfare state]] long before the first Emperor in the [[world]] was undermining the character and minds of the people of [[Rome]] according to [[Polybius]]. [[Polybius]] saw the downfall of the [[republic]] a 150 years before the first [[Emperator|Emperor]] of [[Rome]] and 175 years before the birth of [[Jesus]] [[Christ]] and [[John the Baptist]]. | The [[Roots_of_the_Welfare_State|rise of the welfare state]] long before the first Emperor in the [[world]] was undermining the character and minds of the people of [[Rome]] according to [[Polybius]]. [[Polybius]] saw the downfall of the [[republic]] a 150 years before the first [[Emperator|Emperor]] of [[Rome]] and 175 years before the birth of [[Jesus]] [[Christ]] and [[John the Baptist]]. | ||
<blockquote>'' "The masses continue with an [[appetite]] for [[benefits]] and the habit of receiving them by way of a rule of force and violence. The people, having grown accustomed to [[Bite|feed at the expense of others]] and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others... institute the rule of violence; <Ref>[[Matthew 11]]:12 And from the days of [[John the Baptist]] until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the '''violent''' take it by [[force]]. </Ref> and now uniting their [[force]]s massacre, banish, and plunder,<Ref>[[Luke 16]]:16 The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the [[kingdom of God]] is preached, and every man presseth into it.</Ref> until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch."''<Ref>"But when a new generation arises and the [[democracy]] falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. 6 So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. 7 And hence when by their [[foolish]] thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, [[democracy]] in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. 8 For the people, having grown accustomed to [[Covetous practices|feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others]], as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; 9 and now uniting their [[force]]s massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch" [[Polybius]]: The Histories (composed at Rome around 130 BC)[https://factystaff.richmond.edu/~wstevens/FYStexts/Polybius6.pdf Fragments of Book VI], p289 </Ref></blockquote> | <blockquote>'' "The masses continue with an [[appetite]] for [[benefits]] and the habit of receiving them by way of a rule of force and violence. The people, having grown accustomed to [[Bite|feed at the expense of others]] and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others... institute the rule of violence; <Ref>[[Matthew 11]]:12 And from the days of [[John the Baptist]] until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the '''violent''' take it by [[force]]. </Ref> and now uniting their [[force]]s massacre, banish, and plunder,<Ref>[[Luke 16]]:16 The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the [[kingdom of God]] is preached, and every man presseth into it.</Ref> until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch."''<Ref>"But when a new generation arises and the [[democracy]] falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. 6 So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. 7 And hence when by their [[foolish]] thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an [[appetite]] for gifts and the habit of receiving them, [[democracy]] in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. 8 For the people, having grown accustomed to [[Covetous practices|feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others]], as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; 9 and now uniting their [[force]]s massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch" [[Polybius]]: The Histories (composed at Rome around 130 BC)[https://factystaff.richmond.edu/~wstevens/FYStexts/Polybius6.pdf Fragments of Book VI], p289 </Ref></blockquote> | ||
If we knew history and were willing to see how a socialist approach to politics can alter the mind of society and can even degenerate the [[soul]] of the individual. Repentance is changing the way we think so that we are willing to seek the [[kingdom of God]] and his righteousness through [[charity]] rather than [[taxation]], [[faith]] rather than [[force]], [[hope]] rather than the [[Not so Secure Socialism|imagined security]] of [[Wages of unrighteousness|entitlements]]. | If we knew history and were willing to see how a socialist approach to politics can alter the mind of society and can even degenerate the [[soul]] of the individual. Repentance is changing the way we think so that we are willing to seek the [[kingdom of God]] and his righteousness through [[charity]] rather than [[taxation]], [[faith]] rather than [[force]], [[hope]] rather than the [[Not so Secure Socialism|imagined security]] of [[Wages of unrighteousness|entitlements]]. | ||
Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
<blockquote>'' "If we want better people to make a better world, then we will have to begin where people are made --- in the family."''<Ref>Braud's 2nd Enc. by J.M Braud.</Ref></blockquote> | <blockquote>'' "If we want better people to make a better world, then we will have to begin where people are made --- in the family."''<Ref>Braud's 2nd Enc. by J.M Braud.</Ref></blockquote> | ||
By the same logic if you want to control society you will need to undermine the need and dependence upon the family unit by the state taking on the role of the natural father and mother of the household. You will want to remove the dependence of parents on the care provided by their children as specified in the [[Ten Commandments]]. And you will want to remove the responsibility of the fathers and mothers to teach their children. | [[File:great society.jpg|right|thumb|250px|A family is not socialism. It is not political collectivism nor are their votes on distribution. | ||
A [[family]] is a natural unit. When governments of any kind, by policy or practice, undermine the natural authority of the [[father]] they will [[degenerate]] that natural unit from which society is generated. | |||
<Br>The cost of [[Food Stamps]], [[Public Education]] and all [[Roots of the Welfare State|government financed social programs]] is not monetary but the moral integrity of [[society]] and the people within it. The drive toward [[socialism]] of the Great Society of [[LBJ]] has [[divide]]d the Black family. Only 7% of black children were born in single parent families before 1964 yet by 2014 that percentage had risen to 73% of children were born in black single parent homes. The condition of black poverty and crime in America is not the product of slavery or even bigotry but [[socialism]].]] | |||
By the same logic if you want to control society you will need to undermine the need and dependence upon the family unit by the state taking on the role of the natural [[father]] and mother of the household. You will want to [[divide]] and remove the dependence of parents on the care provided by their children as specified in the [[Ten Commandments]]. And you will want to remove the responsibility of the fathers and mothers to teach their children. | |||
<blockquote>'' "Each class contributed its share to the common decay… The free citizens were idle, dissipated, sunken; their chief thoughts of the theater and the arena… more than two hundred thousand persons were thus maintained by the State, what of the old Roman stock remained was rapidly decaying, partly from corruption, but chiefly from the increasing cessation of marriage, and the nameless abominations of what remained of family-life.... The sanctity of marriage had ceased. Female dissipation and the general dissoluteness led at last to an almost entire cessation of [[marriage]]. Abortion, and the exposure and murder of newly-born children, were common and tolerated; unnatural vices, which even the greatest philosophers practiced, if not advocated, attained proportions which defy description.”'' “Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah” Chapter XI. by [[Alfred Edersheim]]. </blockquote> | <blockquote>'' "Each class contributed its share to the common decay… The free citizens were idle, dissipated, sunken; their chief thoughts of the theater and the arena… more than two hundred thousand persons were thus maintained by the State, what of the old Roman stock remained was rapidly decaying, partly from corruption, but chiefly from the increasing cessation of marriage, and the nameless abominations of what remained of family-life.... The sanctity of marriage had ceased. Female dissipation and the general dissoluteness led at last to an almost entire cessation of [[marriage]]. Abortion, and the exposure and murder of newly-born children, were common and tolerated; unnatural vices, which even the greatest philosophers practiced, if not advocated, attained proportions which defy description.”'' “Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah” Chapter XI. by [[Alfred Edersheim]]. </blockquote> |
Latest revision as of 10:33, 22 November 2023
The Real Destroyers
"The real destroyers of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits." —Plutarch.
These two overlapping processes brought about a vast consolidation of power, wealth and control. By the law of the Twelve Tables of Rome, which were the constitutional foundation of their government, if a freedman died intestate, without sui heredes, the patronus was the heir. This meant the property would go back to the Father or civil substitute father if they died with out an heir. This right was viewed as a right of Agnation[1] which created an ever-increasing corporation sole of power and possession within the unholy Roman empire.
The manumitted slave was cleverly called Libertus and he owed more than respect and gratitude to his patron. The patron might punish him with a summary judgment for neglecting his duties. He appeared to be free but was in fact a subject citizen under his substitute father.
During the process of manumission of a son or daughter the patron could gain a sovereign position of influence and power and even become the heir to the corporeal and incorporeal hereditaments of the son or daughter being manumitted.
"While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage." (2 Peter 2:19)
If an individual being emancipated required a tutor or curator, the rights which would have belonged to the father, if he had not emancipated the child, were secured to the patron as a kind of patronal right and the status of sui juris is not completed. It was upon these precepts of law that the Emperator/Apotheos of Rome forged its greatest power over the people.
"When thou sittest to eat with a ruler, consider diligently what [is] before thee: And put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite. Be not desirous of his dainties: for they are deceitful meat." (Proverbs 23:1, 3)
"And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them:" (Romans 11:9)
The rise of the welfare state long before the first Emperor in the world was undermining the character and minds of the people of Rome according to Polybius. Polybius saw the downfall of the republic a 150 years before the first Emperor of Rome and 175 years before the birth of Jesus Christ and John the Baptist.
"The masses continue with an appetite for benefits and the habit of receiving them by way of a rule of force and violence. The people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others... institute the rule of violence; [2] and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder,[3] until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch."[4]
If we knew history and were willing to see how a socialist approach to politics can alter the mind of society and can even degenerate the soul of the individual. Repentance is changing the way we think so that we are willing to seek the kingdom of God and his righteousness through charity rather than taxation, faith rather than force, hope rather than the imagined security of entitlements.
"If we want better people to make a better world, then we will have to begin where people are made --- in the family."[5]
By the same logic if you want to control society you will need to undermine the need and dependence upon the family unit by the state taking on the role of the natural father and mother of the household. You will want to divide and remove the dependence of parents on the care provided by their children as specified in the Ten Commandments. And you will want to remove the responsibility of the fathers and mothers to teach their children.
"Each class contributed its share to the common decay… The free citizens were idle, dissipated, sunken; their chief thoughts of the theater and the arena… more than two hundred thousand persons were thus maintained by the State, what of the old Roman stock remained was rapidly decaying, partly from corruption, but chiefly from the increasing cessation of marriage, and the nameless abominations of what remained of family-life.... The sanctity of marriage had ceased. Female dissipation and the general dissoluteness led at last to an almost entire cessation of marriage. Abortion, and the exposure and murder of newly-born children, were common and tolerated; unnatural vices, which even the greatest philosophers practiced, if not advocated, attained proportions which defy description.” “Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah” Chapter XI. by Alfred Edersheim.
Many of the same patterns of society that contributed to the downfall of Rome are repeated today not only because their view of modern history but a clear understanding of the ancient history of society is none existence.
“Even amongst women there were symptoms of revolt against the older order, which showed itself in a growing freedom of manners and impatience of control, the marriage tie was relaxed…"[6]
Other nations who did not succumb to the temptation of Nimrods and Caesars maintained healthy family units at the core of their society.
"This is in the sense that the matrimonial bond was strictly observed by the Germanic peoples, this being compared favorably against licentiousness in Rome. Tacitus appears to hold the fairly strict monogamy (with some exceptions among nobles who marry again) between Germanic husbands and wives, and the chastity among the unmarried to be worthy of the highest praise." Publius Tacitus, The Agricola and The Germania (Ch. 18).
Benefits within in society that come because of forced offering rather than charity degenerate society which may result in drug and alcohol abuse, sloth and wantonness, which often debilitates the community bonds and dividing the people. It also erodes the family.
- ↑ Consanguinity by a line of males only, as distinguished from cognation. --Bouvier. cognation. Relationship by blood; descent from the same original; kindred. (Law) That tie of consanguinity which exists between persons descended from the same mother;
- ↑ Matthew 11:12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
- ↑ Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets [were] until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
- ↑ "But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren of its founders, they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them, and begin to aim at pre-eminence; and it is chiefly those of ample fortune who fall into this error. 6 So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. 7 And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. 8 For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; 9 and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch" Polybius: The Histories (composed at Rome around 130 BC)Fragments of Book VI, p289
- ↑ Braud's 2nd Enc. by J.M Braud.
- ↑ Encyclopedia Britannica ‘57 Vol. 19 p 490.