Social justice: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:36, 20 November 2017

“Social justice may be broadly understood as the fair and compassionate distribution of the fruits of economic growth. Social justice is not possible without strong and coherent redistributive policies conceived and implemented by public agencies.”

"The UN report goes on to insist that: “Present-day believers in an absolute truth identified with virtue and justice are neither willing nor desirable companions for the defenders of social justice.” Translation: if you believe truth and justice are concepts independent of the agenda of the forces of progress as defined by the left, you are an enemy of social justice." JONAH GOLDBERG https://www.prageru.com/courses/political-science/what-social-justice

"Social Justice" is a term you hear almost every day. But did you ever hear anybody define what it actually means? Jonah Goldberg of the American Enterprise Institute tries to pin this catchall phrase to the wall. In doing so, he exposes the not-so-hidden agenda of those who use it. What sounds so caring and noble turns out to be something very different.__Time 5:31

Capitalism does not need to lead to a "few rich oligarchs" if the people remain generally moral. Among a basically moral people who do not covet their neighbors' good and actively care about their neighbor as much as themselves there is no threat of an oligarchy taking control. Socialism requires the same general moral people who care about others but such people would have no need for socialism because they would already be sharing what they produce through systems of charity without the exercising authority as a collective. Without a moral people who care about their neighbor rights to their own production a socialist system become a nation of tyrants where the mob takes away the rights of others and the people become weaker, lazy and self indulgence. http://www.preparingyou.com/wiki/Socialism

Social justice supposedly assigns rights and duties in the institutions of society, which enables people to receive the basic benefits and burdens of cooperation but in the kingdom of God the distribution is based on a moral criteria in order to produce a fruitful outcome. This is a duty of Religion and to make it Pure Religion you must distribute the true needs of the individual by the individual for the intrinsic benefit for the individual while attending to the weightier matters including the use of good judgment and mercy with diligent and persistent faith.

But a more selfish and arrogant "social warrior" imagine the relevant institutions created often include taxation, compelled social insurance, public health, public school, public services financed by that taxation and debt. They imagine that these covetous practices used to ensure fair distribution of wealth, and equal opportunity are their salvation. Polybius makes it clear that such patterns in society corrupts society. Peter says it will make you merchandise and curse children.

In the review of the book "Human Rights versus Legal Rights: why the church must separate from the state" two of the four part series deals with social cost and social justice.

Comments
"Social costs"^[1] can be examined in economics but aso in society itself. Society is often "An association or company of persons united together by mutual consent..." but may be merely "the people in general".
"Social costs" in the kingdom model are easier to calculate. Since the economy is substantive and real time without usury there is little dependence on debt and therefore less "market failure". Secondly, because the power of governing remains divided within the hands of the individual under basic property rights the ideas of government intervention to regulate is already on the head of every individual people must make "rational" choices for their actions since they will pay the consequences of their action. There can be unaccounted social cost, externalities, and some market failure but they become more irrelevant because responsibility is both in the hands of the individual and spread among them. What needs to be accomplished in the case of "externalities" were done through private investment or Administered through the Church in the wilderness and the early Church by freewill offerings to the minister of choice within the network of tens. This competitive choice compelled a servant government to provide the most for the least cost. It also allowed titular representation as a pure Republic without the compromise of personal rights.
This was not done through an invented currency which would be in violation of the warnings about the Golden calf and One purse. The monetary system of the original Common Law and the law of nature and nature's God always depends on present value or some form of Commodity money. To create an unlicensed exchange is a crime in most States.
Then there is the matter of Social Justice which is often defined as: Social justice is a concept of fair and just relations between the individual and society. The terms "fair and just" are relative terms often determined by cultural morality and private virtue. Social justice is also defined or characterized in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society. The question may and needs to be asked "distribution" by whom? In the Kingdom model the distribution is first by the individual producer in a substantive economy not by benefactors who exercise authority one over the other. In the Kingdom model the sacrifices or the Corban of the people is the result of freewill offerings] in charity an not the result of taxation or force because such systems would make the word of God to none effect. The power of distribution is "within you" the individual in the kingdom model.
Early Israel and the early Church were also pure Republics, what Tacitus called Libera Res Publica, where the people were free from things public and the leaders were not rulers because they were titular.
They organized themselves in a network of free assemblies by Tens which was the purpose of feast gatherings like Pentecost.
The Temples and Altars had a purpose.
People covet those benefits provided by the Fathers of earth and are entangled in the yoke of bondage.
The love of The Way of Christ, Moses sets men free.
* What did Rome have in common with the world today?
: To learn more about the metamorphoses of governments like the United States read Contracts, covenants and constitutions.
* What is the perfect law of liberty, and do you live by faith, hope, and charity?
* What are the two types of government welfare?
* Were the Levites the church in the wilderness?
* What did the Levites and the early Church have in common?

Social costs

"Open rebuke is better than secret love." Proverbs 27:5

<mp3player width="300">http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/171111social.mp3</mp3player> Play #3 in new window or download

Social Justice

"As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent." Revelation 3:19

<mp3player width="300">http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/171111social103.mp3</mp3player> Play #4 in new window or download

Part 1 and 2 of the series.

If you need help:

Or want to help others:

Footnotes

↑ Social cost in economics may be distinguished from "private cost". ... Social cost is also considered to be the private cost plus externalities. Rational choice theory often assumes that individuals consider only the costs they themselves bear when making decisions, not the costs that may be borne by others.

About the author

Brother Gregory
White Rock

Subscribe

HELP US at His Holy Church spread the word by SUBSCRIBING to many of our CHANNELS and the Network.
The more subscribers will give us more opportunity to reach out to others and build the network as Christ commanded.

Join the network.
Most important is to become a part of the Living Network which is not dependent upon the internet but seeks to form The bands of a free society.
You can do this by joining the local email group on the network and helping one another in a network of Tens.

His Holy Church - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/user/hisholychurch

Bitchute channel will often include material that would be censored.
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/o6xa17ZTh2KG/

Rumble Channel gregory144
https://rumble.com/user/gregory144

To read more go to "His Holy Church" (HHC) https://www.hisholychurch.org/

Brother Gregory in the wilderness.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJSw6O7_-vA4dweVpMPEXRA

About the author, Brother Gregory
https://hisholychurch.org/author.php

PreparingU - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9hTUK8R89ElcXVgUjWoOXQ

Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/HisHolyChurch

[1] Social cost in economics may be distinguished from "private cost". ... Social cost is also considered to be the private cost plus externalities. Rational choice theory often assumes that individuals consider only the costs they themselves bear when making decisions, not the costs that may be borne by others.

[1]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 “Social justice may be broadly understood as the fair and compassionate distribution of the fruits of economic growth. Social justice is not possible without strong and coherent redistributive policies conceived and [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2414 implemented by public agencies].”
-"The UN report goes on to insist that: “Present-day believers in an absolute truth identified with virtue and justice are neither willing nor desirable companions for the defenders of social justice.” Translation: if you believe truth and justice are concepts independent of the agenda of the forces of progress as defined by the left, you are an enemy of social justice."  JONAH GOLDBERG
+"The UN report goes on to insist that: “Present-day believers in an absolute truth identified with virtue and justice are neither willing nor desirable companions for the defenders of social justice.” Translation: if you believe truth and justice are concepts independent of the agenda of the forces of progress as defined by the left, you are an enemy of social justice."  JONAH GOLDBERG  https://www.prageru.com/courses/political-science/what-social-justice
+{{#ev:youtube|rtBvQj2k6xo|300|right|"Social Justice" is a term you hear almost every day. But did you ever hear anybody define what it actually means? Jonah Goldberg of the American Enterprise Institute tries to pin this catchall phrase to the wall. In doing so, he exposes the not-so-hidden agenda of those who use it. What sounds so caring and noble turns out to be something very different.__Time 5:31}}
-https://www.prageru.com/courses/political-science/what-social-justice
-{{#ev:youtube|rtBvQj2k6xo|300|right|"Social Justice" is a term you hear almost every day. But did you ever hear anybody define what it actually means? Jonah Goldberg of the American Enterprise Institute tries to pin this catchall phrase to the wall. In doing so, he exposes the not-so-hidden agenda of those who use it. What sounds so caring and noble turns out to be something very different.__Time 5:31}}
+[[Capitalism]] does not need to lead to a  "few rich oligarchs" if the people remain generally moral. Among a basically moral people who do not covet their neighbors' good and actively care about their neighbor as much as themselves there is no threat of an oligarchy taking control. [[Socialism]] requires the same general moral people who care about others but such people would have no need for socialism because they would already be sharing what they produce through systems of charity without the exercising authority as a collective. Without a moral people who care about their neighbor rights to their own production a socialist system become a nation of tyrants where the mob takes away the rights of others and the people become weaker, lazy and self indulgence. http://www.preparingyou.com/wiki/Socialism
+Social justice supposedly assigns rights and duties in the institutions of society, which enables people to receive the basic benefits and burdens of cooperation but in the kingdom of God the distribution is based  on a moral  criteria in order to produce a fruitful outcome. This is a duty of Religion and to make it [[Pure Religion]] you must distribute the true needs of the individual by the individual for the intrinsic benefit for the individual while attending to the '''[[weightier matters]]''' including the use of good  judgment and mercy with diligent and persistent faith.
-[[Capitalism]] does not need to lead to a  "few rich oligarchs" if the people remain generally moral. Among a basically moral people who do not covet their neighbors' good and actively care about their neighbor as much as themselves there is no threat of an oligarchy taking control. [[Socialism]] requires the same general moral people who care about others but such people would have no need for socialism because they would already be sharing what they produce through systems of charity without the exercising authority as a collective. Without a moral people who care about their neighbor rights to their own production a socialist system become a nation of tyrants where the mob takes away the rights of others and the people become weaker, lazy and self indulgence. http://www.preparingyou.com/wiki/Socialism
+But a more selfish and arrogant "social warrior" imagine the relevant institutions created often include [[taxation]], compelled social insurance, public health, public school, public services financed by that taxation and debt. They imagine that these [[covetous practices]] used to ensure fair distribution of wealth, and equal opportunity are their [[salvation]]. [[Polybius]] makes it clear that such patterns in society corrupts society. Peter says it will make you [[merchandise]] and [[curse children]].
 In the review of the book "[[Robert Burk|Human Rights versus Legal Rights: why the church must separate from the state]]" two of the four part series deals with social cost and social justice.
+{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;" width="40%"
+| '''Comments'''
+|-
+| "Social costs"<ref>Social cost in economics may be distinguished from "private cost". ... Social cost is also considered to be the private cost plus externalities. Rational choice theory often assumes that individuals consider only the costs they themselves bear when making decisions, not the costs that may be borne by others.</Ref> can be examined in economics but aso in [[society]] itself. [[Society]] is often  "An association or company of persons  united together by mutual consent..."  but may be merely "the people in general".
+|-
+| "Social costs" in the kingdom model are easier to calculate. Since the economy is substantive and real time without usury there is little dependence on debt and therefore less "market failure". Secondly, because the power of governing remains divided within the hands of the individual under basic property rights the ideas of  government intervention to regulate is already on the head of every individual people must make "rational" choices for their actions since they will pay the consequences of their action.
+: There can be unaccounted ''social cost'', externalities, and some market failure but they become more irrelevant because responsibility is both in the hands of the individual and spread among them.
+: What needs to be accomplished in the case of "'''externalities'''" were done through private investment or Administered through the [[Church in the wilderness]] and the [[early Church]] by [[freewill offerings]] to the minister of choice within the [[network]] of [[tens]]. This competitive choice compelled a servant government to provide the most for the least cost. It also allowed [[titular]] representation as a pure [[Republic]] without the compromise of personal rights.
+|-
+| This was not done through an [[money|invented currency]] which would be in violation of the warnings about the [[Golden calf]] and [[One purse]]. The monetary system of the original  [[Common Law]] and the [[Natural Law|law of nature]] and nature's God always depends on present [[value]] or some form of [[Commodity money]]. To create an unlicensed exchange is a crime in most States.
+|-
+| Then there is the matter of '''[[Social justice|Social Justice]]''' which is often defined as:
+* [[Social justice]] is a concept of fair and just relations between the individual and society.
+:: The terms "fair and just" are relative terms often determined by cultural morality and private virtue.
+* Social justice is also defined or characterized in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society.
+:: The question may and needs to be asked "distribution" by whom?
+:: In the Kingdom model the ''distribution'' is first by the individual producer in a substantive economy not by [[benefactors]] who exercise authority one over the other.
+:: In the Kingdom model the sacrifices or the [[Corban]] of the people is the result of [[freewill offerings]]] in [[charity]] an not the result of [[taxation]] or force because such systems would ''make the word of God to none effect''.
+:: The power of ''distribution'' is "within you" the individual in the kingdom model.
+|-
+| [[Early Israel]] and the [[early Church]] were also pure '''[[Republic]]s''', what [[Tacitus]] called '''Libera Res Publica''', where the people were ''free from things public'' and the leaders were not rulers because they were [[titular]].
+|-
+| They organized themselves in a network of [[free assemblies]] by [[Tens]] which was the  purpose of feast gatherings like [[Pentecost]].
+|-
+| The [[Temples]] and [[Altars]] had a purpose.
+|-
+| People [[covet]] those [[benefits]] provided by the [[Fathers]] of earth and are entangled in the [[yoke]] of [[bondage]].
+|-
+| The love of [[The Way]] of [[Christ]], [[Moses]] sets men free.
+|-
+|* What did [[Rome]] have in common with the [[world]] today?
+|-
+|: To learn more about the metamorphoses of governments like the United States read [[CCC|Contracts, covenants and constitutions]].
+|-
+|* What is the  [[perfect law of liberty]], and do you live by [[faith]], [[hope]], and [[charity]]?
+|-
+|* What are the [[Welfare types|two types of government welfare]]?
+|-
+|* Were the [[Levites]] the [[church in the wilderness]]?
+|-
+| * What did the [[Levites]] and the [[early Church]] have in common?
+|}
 '''Social costs'''

Social justice: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:36, 20 November 2017

Footnotes

About the author

Subscribe

Navigation menu

Search