Template:Refuse

Audio Broadcasts

Download Interview with health officer of county with fewest vaccinations in the State or press play

Download Refuse or exempt? Why do they not inform you? or press play

See also Numerous scientists Life or death information and we have links to a dozen articles that link to studies etc as this all unfolded. Of course little of this addresses phase two which is collapsing the economy through control of the banking system and food production and eventual rationing of fuel etc as explained in HB 2238. This is why you need a Network.

Letters and laws

Approval letter

The Pfizer vaccine only appears to be fully approved but were only issued a letter as an extension under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)["pursuant to Section 564(d)(2)" of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)], which grants them full liability protection from being sued if you are injured.
Read the letter from the August 23, 2021 FDA for yourself:
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download

What is the Emergency Use Authorization under the law and what does it do for and to those under the "law"?

How long and who, and of course why have so many laws have been altered over the last century and what does the laws concerned with genetically modified organisms have to do with the future of the human race?

Exemptions, Exceptions or Refuse

Concerning the pursuit of exemptions, exceptions or the right of "individuals" to exercise "an option to accept or refuse administration of a product":

The application for an exemptions or exceptions for medical, religious or any other purpose may create an estoppel as you recognize the state's power to grant permission.

Is there a right under that law for "an individual" to "accept or refuse administration of a product"?

And why were you not informed?

We will show you have a legal right to refuse but they have the right to refuse you. What will you do when they refuse to let you on their planes, trains and into their ration centers etc., etc., etc.?

Why don't you try to do what Christ commanded. Join the Network!

If they fail to inform you of your legal or natural right to refuse and appear to give you no option but to apply for an exemption or exception based on the information linked below I would think it would be good idea to tell them in your application as a matter of information and making a legal record of your position something along the lines of the following in your own words:

Letter of refusal and demand for exemption

"I hereby refuse to take these medical products in question for reasons including but not limited to my fervent religious faith, convictions, and beliefs. An exemption or exception should be issued to avoid the impairing of my natural right to the free exercise of religion..."

There are other people that are offering approaches that may be of use such as Catherine Austin Fitts at Solari. Her legal team mentions links to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System data sources and Court cases concerning rights recognized. The data is often easier to find at https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data

They also include links to explain that approval is only Under EUA and they share a link to a 50 page document the Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities which is the Guidance for Industry and Other Stakeholders https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download . They also mention Title 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 –which we have shown. They admit the situation is "fluid" and their PDF is dated July 2021. Again we are not giving legal advice but you will need to find that elsewhere.

We are only interested in that you prosper and be in health.

Refusing administration of the product

According to Title 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3,(e), (1), (A),(ii),(III) "individuals" are to be "informed" "of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks." You can read this for yourself:

Title 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3

(e) Conditions of authorization

(1) Unapproved product

(A) Required conditions

(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—

(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;

(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and

(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

(B) Authority for additional conditions...

The Product

What do they mean by "product"?

Title 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (a) In general...

(4) Definitions

(C) The term “product” means a drug, device, or biological product.

You might also want to know that Title 10 U.S. Code § 1107a - Emergency use products states that it is "designed to ensure that individuals are informed of an option to accept or refuse administration of a product".

Waiver by the President

You may also read the law for yourself according to Title 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3,(e), (1), (A),(ii),(III) an "individuals" must be "informed" "of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks." And the obligation "may be waived only by the President only if the President determines, in writing, that complying with such requirement is not in the interests of national security" according to Title 10 U.S. Code § 1107a (a).

By what reasoning could a waiver of an ethical obligation to keep the people informed be justified and from where and how is the "interests of national security" established?

The answer to these questions or the lack of an answer may establish, not only a violation of ethics, but actual evidence of a crime against humanity because of the scope of the consequences that occur.

Title 10 U.S. Code § 1107a (a) Waiver by the President.—

(1) In the case of the administration of a product authorized for emergency use under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to members of the armed forces, the condition described in section 564(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of such Act and required under paragraph (1)(A) or (2)(A) of such section 564(e), designed to ensure that individuals are informed of an option to accept or refuse administration of a product, may be waived only by the President only if the President determines, in writing, that complying with such requirement is not in the interests of national security.(Emphases added)

(2) The waiver authority provided in paragraph (1) shall not be construed to apply to any case other than a case in which an individual is required to be informed of an option to accept or refuse administration of a particular product by reason of a determination by the Secretary of Health and Human Services that emergency use of such product is authorized under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Military Death by product

Worthy of note and prayer anyone with family or friends in the military or actually in the military may want to closely study the following section of Title 10 U.S. Code § 1107a Emergency use products.—

(b) Provision of Information.—

If the President, under subsection (a), waives the condition described in section 564(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and if the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, makes a determination that it is not feasible based on time limitations for the information described in section 564(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) or (II) of such Act and required under paragraph (1)(A) or (2)(A) of such section 564(e), to be provided to a member of the armed forces prior to the administration of the product, such information shall be provided to such member of the armed forces (or next-of-kin in the case of the death of a member) to whom the product was administered as soon as possible, but not later than 30 days, after such administration. The authority provided for in this subsection may not be delegated. Information concerning the administration of the product shall be recorded in the medical record of the member.

(c) Applicability of Other Provisions.—

In the case of an authorization by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 564(a)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act based on a determination by the Secretary of Defense under section 564(b)(1)(B) of such Act, subsections (a) through (f) of section 1107 shall not apply to the use of a product that is the subject of such authorization, within the scope of such authorization and while such authorization is effective.

We know "Major law firm confirms FDA deceived America with its confusing ‘approval’ of Pfizer vax" https://leohohmann.com/2021/08/27/boom-major-law-firm-confirms-fda-deceived-america-with-its-confusing-approval-of-pfizer-vax/

A story entitled [ https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/24/politics/congress-letter-military-vaccine/index.html "Lawmakers ask Biden to issue waiver to make Covid-19 vaccination mandatory for members of military"] written by Ellie Kaufman of CNN as early as March 24, 2021 says, "Democratic lawmakers sent a letter to President Joe Biden requesting that he issue a "waiver of informed consent" to make getting vaccinated against Covid-19 mandatory for all US military service members."

CNN is misleading the public a "waiver of informed consent" is only waiving the obligation to inform the recipients. It does not waive the right of the "individual" to "refuse" the "product". Waiving the "requirement" to inform "the individuals" to be "informed of an option to accept or refuse administration of a product" does not remove the "option to accept or refuse administration of a particular product".

Does anyone think that is a good idea to give an experimental RNA shot to an entire military of healthy men and women who would survive the flu with little or no long term effect. Numerous scientists are concerned about the dishonesty and predict possible long term effects to heart, lung, and liver tissue etc. As reported in peer reviewed NIH studies the media also ignores. And then there is Pathogenic Priming and Antibody Dependence Enhancing which scientists say will reach peak in 3 to 5 years.

There is a ["Whiff of evil"] which doctors and scientists sense but which "will not end well". If we examine the science of Dr Suzuki at Georgetown University and his "Cell Signaling in Human Host Cells" study we can see the potential threat of the S1 protein on heart, liver and lung tissue if injected into millions, even billions of people. No one can say for sure what the long term effects will be but we can say for sure they are not doing the proper studies needed and recommended to find out. But EVIL Laughs Out Loud at those who think that Evil will share power.

With deaths reported on VAERS from the jab some predicted estimates are over a million dead already from adverse reactions from clotting to heart and lung problems. Over 6,000 heart attacks have been reported and most of them are not connected through a Vaers Report since they occur weeks or even months after the injection. Of course the real threat is suspected to manifest in the second and third years.

Everyone has a legal right to "refuse" to take the injection according to Title 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3,(e), (1), (A),(ii),(III). It is written right in the law.

People know the law just about as much as they know the science. The truth is people are not following the science and do not know the law but are following the media which is being controlled and manipulated to your detriment.

You do not even need to file for an exemption. It is possible that over a million have died from the injections and you are about to see your military decimated several times over.

Bio weapon

DR. TESTIFIES UNDER OATH OF PERJURY THAT THEY CREATED COVID AS A BIOWEAPON

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ze1Ycyy59Ibs/

Rights and Ethics

Do you have a right to refuse "any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention" without fear of an imposed "disadvantage or prejudice"?

Should it be required that you give your informed consent before anyone attempts to administer any medical, diagnostic, or preventative treatment?

Do our rights come from constitutions, contracts, covenants or charters or are we endowed by our "Creator with certain unalienable rights like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"?

Inalienable or unalienable rights or said to be incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred, nor given away or taken away.

You can create or choose not to create obligations, debts, or allegiance through constitutions, contracts, covenants or charters that bar and restrict you from the full exercise of those rights.

Inalienable or unalienable rights do not come from those constitutions, contracts, covenants or charters but obligations, debts, or allegiance often does.

Some political groups and even neighbors may disagree with those fundamental right to an informed consent. There is clear evidence they conspire to keep you uniformed and try to cause you waive consent through the coercion of "disadvantage or prejudice". That is a violation of universal ethics?

There is a real solution but it is not an instant one anymore the people's assent and the degeneration of liberty has been instant.