Persons: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Acts 10:34 God is not one to show partiality, prosōpolēmptēs Romans 2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God. prosōpolēmpsia Ephesians 6:9 And, ye masters, do t...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
An “incumbent” is defined as, “A person who is in present possession of an office; one who is legally authorized to discharge the duties of an office.”<Ref>State v McCollister, 11 Ohio, 50; State v. Blackmore, 104 Mo. 340, 15 S.W. 960. Black’s 3rd Ed. p.947.</Ref>
The words “person” and “individual” are not synonymous. “Person” being defined as, “a man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes.”<Ref>Black’s 3rd. Ed. p. 1355.</Ref> The word “individual” in the book “Language,” found in the Volume Library, is treated as a word “frequently misused” and clarifies its meaning with the statement, “The word (individual) should not be used in the mere sense of person. The word is correctly used in ‘Changes both in individuals and communities.’”
“Every person is a man, but not every man a person,”<Ref>Omnis persona est homo, sed non vicissim.</Ref>
“Man is a term of nature; person, of the civil law”<Ref>Homo vocabulum est; persona juris civilitis. Calvinus, Lex.</Ref>
== Biblically ==
Acts 10:34
Acts 10:34
God is not one to show partiality,
God is not one to show partiality,

Revision as of 09:21, 24 October 2022

An “incumbent” is defined as, “A person who is in present possession of an office; one who is legally authorized to discharge the duties of an office.”[1]

The words “person” and “individual” are not synonymous. “Person” being defined as, “a man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes.”[2] The word “individual” in the book “Language,” found in the Volume Library, is treated as a word “frequently misused” and clarifies its meaning with the statement, “The word (individual) should not be used in the mere sense of person. The word is correctly used in ‘Changes both in individuals and communities.’”

“Every person is a man, but not every man a person,”[3]

“Man is a term of nature; person, of the civil law”[4]

Biblically

Acts 10:34 God is not one to show partiality, prosōpolēmptēs

Romans 2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God. prosōpolēmpsia

Ephesians 6:9 And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.

Colossians 3:25 But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons.


James 2:3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:


James 2:9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.


1 Peter 1:17 And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear:

  1. State v McCollister, 11 Ohio, 50; State v. Blackmore, 104 Mo. 340, 15 S.W. 960. Black’s 3rd Ed. p.947.
  2. Black’s 3rd. Ed. p. 1355.
  3. Omnis persona est homo, sed non vicissim.
  4. Homo vocabulum est; persona juris civilitis. Calvinus, Lex.