Face masks: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 39: Line 39:


== Videos ==
== Videos ==
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-3ZZl-1iIA Using aerosol spray to simulate sneeze through face mask]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy_7a8GNN4Q Ben Swann: New CDC and WHO Study Proves "No Evidence" Face Masks Prevent Virus]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy_7a8GNN4Q Ben Swann: New CDC and WHO Study Proves "No Evidence" Face Masks Prevent Virus]
* [https://questioningcovid.com/ Questioning Covid - Collection of video presentations doing critical thinking around COVID-19]
* [https://questioningcovid.com/ Questioning Covid - Collection of video presentations doing critical thinking around COVID-19]

Revision as of 10:53, 29 July 2020

Masks

Masks cannot stop the Coronavirus.

They may slow the spread in some limited situations.

At best a vaccine may only produce 70% immunity and there will be side effects and injuries from a vaccine.

The best hope is herd immunity which should not be delayed because it has stopped far more lethal flu outbreaks and diseases in the past.

The longer it takes to reach herd immunity the more risk for the elderly and immune compromised people eventually being exposed.

The quicker the virus spread to the healthy members of society the safer the weaker people will be.

Back in February researchers estimated that 85 to 90% would show little or no symptom because the natural immune system will protect most people. Less than 5% will develop severe symptoms from which most will recover.

Where testing for antibodies have been done far more people are already immune and did not even know. Doctors have been using antibodies from immune people who have already had COVID and recovered.

To make the people who are producing antibodies ware masks is foolish because they are literally shedding the cure.

If you know someone who had it already and recovered you should not make them ware a mask because they can save society.

Articles

"Until recently, the overwhelming percentage of doctors recommended against masks for anyone who wasn’t sick or caring for someone who was." Daniel Bobinski -July 15, 2020
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” New England Journal of Medicine stated, May 21, 2020.
“If you look at those [studies], and there have been many of them over the last decade(see link), none of them show a statistically significant advantage to wearing a mask compared to not wearing a mask.” Denis G. Rancourt, PhD

Videos

Freedom To Breath Agency

ftbagency.com - (website currently down) - Good resource for opposition to central government tyranny against personal freedoms.

Face Mask Exemption Card



What the inside of your face mask is like.


The New England Journal of Medicine: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era

"We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic."

"The first is during the care of a patient with unrecognized Covid-19. A mask alone in this setting will reduce risk only slightly, however, since it does not provide protection from droplets that may enter the eyes or from fomites on the patient or in the environment that providers may pick up on their hands and carry to their mucous membranes (particularly given the concern that mask wearers may have an increased tendency to touch their faces)."

Lawsuits/Legal

Utah meeting on masks is canceled when residents without masks pack room]



Coronavirus | Exozomes | Face masks