Face masks: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Articles ==
== Articles ==


* CDC Study:[https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures] "Although mechanistic studies [*] support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. We similarly found limited evidence on the effectiveness of improved hygiene and environmental cleaning."
* [https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data Center for Infectious Disease and Research Policy - COMMENTARY: Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data]
* [https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data Center for Infectious Disease and Research Policy - COMMENTARY: Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data]
* [https://www.redstate.com/michael_thau/2020/07/13/many-medical-experts-were-against-lockdowns-the-media-just-didnt-want-us-know/ Literally Thousands of Doctors and Scientists Have Come Out Against Fauci’s Lockdowns Including a Nobel Prize-Winning Biophysicist. The Media Just Doesn’t Want You to Know]
* [https://www.redstate.com/michael_thau/2020/07/13/many-medical-experts-were-against-lockdowns-the-media-just-didnt-want-us-know/ Literally Thousands of Doctors and Scientists Have Come Out Against Fauci’s Lockdowns Including a Nobel Prize-Winning Biophysicist. The Media Just Doesn’t Want You to Know]

Revision as of 10:25, 22 July 2020

Articles

"Until recently, the overwhelming percentage of doctors recommended against masks for anyone who wasn’t sick or caring for someone who was." Daniel Bobinski -July 15, 2020
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” New England Journal of Medicine stated, May 21, 2020.
“If you look at those [studies], and there have been many of them over the last decade(see link), none of them show a statistically significant advantage to wearing a mask compared to not wearing a mask.” Denis G. Rancourt, PhD

Videos

Freedom To Breath Agency

ftbagency.com - (website currently down) - Good resource for opposition to central government tyranny against personal freedoms.

Face Mask Exemption Card



What the inside of your face mask is like.


The New England Journal of Medicine: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era

"We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic."

"The first is during the care of a patient with unrecognized Covid-19. A mask alone in this setting will reduce risk only slightly, however, since it does not provide protection from droplets that may enter the eyes or from fomites on the patient or in the environment that providers may pick up on their hands and carry to their mucous membranes (particularly given the concern that mask wearers may have an increased tendency to touch their faces)."

Lawsuits/Legal

Utah meeting on masks is canceled when residents without masks pack room]



Coronavirus | Exozomes | Face masks