Ann Davis: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


People like:  
People like:  
=== John Searle ===


John Searle who believes any "value judgment" is epistemically subjective which another way of saing there is no standard or universal vale.
John Searle who believes any "value judgment" is epistemically subjective which another way of saing there is no standard or universal vale.
=== Alan Ryan ===


Alan Ryan, who is an advocate of Modern liberals which generally believe that national prosperity requires government management of the macroeconomy in order to keep unemployment low, inflation in check and growth high. They also value institutions that defend against economic inequality.
Alan Ryan, who is an advocate of Modern liberals which generally believe that national prosperity requires government management of the macroeconomy in order to keep unemployment low, inflation in check and growth high. They also value institutions that defend against economic inequality.
=== Mary Poovey ===


Mary Poovey whose recent books include The Evolution of the Property Relation: Understanding Paradigms, Debates, and Prospects, Palgrave MacMillan, 2015, and Money as a Social Institution, Routledge, 2017.  
Mary Poovey whose recent books include The Evolution of the Property Relation: Understanding Paradigms, Debates, and Prospects, Palgrave MacMillan, 2015, and Money as a Social Institution, Routledge, 2017.  
She seems to also feel inclined to venture into the world of economics attempting to make sense of its description  or explanation. They may willing proclaim they are out of their element or do not understand or even see a solutional but may seek to blaim that lack of comprehention on the fact that economics have become defined by the ''language'' of mathamatics.


three observations about models in general
She seems to also feel inclined to venture into the world of ''economics'' attempting to make sense of its description  or explanation.
52:52
and about how our reliance on them constitute what counts as knowledge


of my examples make clear models abstract from immediate experience and observed particulars in
These scholars and achedemics may be willing proclaim they are out of their element or do not understand or even see a solution in all they share but may seek to blaim that lack of comprehension on the fact that economics have become defined by the ''language'' of mathamatics.


53:06
Mary Poovey makes [52:52] "three observations about models in general and about how our reliance on them constitute what counts as knowledge of my examples make clear models abstract from immediate experience and observed particulars in order to generate simplified manipulable simulations of actual conditions. In doing so they alter not only one's relation to  relation to the real but also what could count as knowledge about the real because models are both performative and recursive  moreover because models are both performative and recursive moreover extensive reliance on them increases the likelihood that models
n doing so they alter not only one's relation to the real but also what could count as knowledge about the real
53:20ⁿ


order to generate
because models are both performative and recursive moreover
simplified manipulable simulations of actual conditions


53:12


in doing so they alter not only one's relation to the
in doing so they alter not only one's relation to the real but also what could count as knowledge about the real
in doing so they alter not only one's relation to the real but also what could count as knowledge about the real
will beget a reality that takes its form from the models or even that models will
beget more models second as models incorporate and are organized by mathematical principles the
mathematical form which they call the syntax increasingly dictates the way that the





Revision as of 03:26, 3 February 2024

Ann E. Davis is an Associate Professor of Economics.

https://youtu.be/nLWIxjmvlJI


Prof. Davis regularly teaches Environmental Economics and International Economics, as well as the Institute "Meanings of Property."

During the last two decades she has met with those who are labeled as leading scholars of our times but whom seem to be blending what they call the humanities and economics to determine what they believe to be the ultimate solution for what they percieve as the problems with or within the world today.

People like:

John Searle

John Searle who believes any "value judgment" is epistemically subjective which another way of saing there is no standard or universal vale.

Alan Ryan

Alan Ryan, who is an advocate of Modern liberals which generally believe that national prosperity requires government management of the macroeconomy in order to keep unemployment low, inflation in check and growth high. They also value institutions that defend against economic inequality.

Mary Poovey

Mary Poovey whose recent books include The Evolution of the Property Relation: Understanding Paradigms, Debates, and Prospects, Palgrave MacMillan, 2015, and Money as a Social Institution, Routledge, 2017.

She seems to also feel inclined to venture into the world of economics attempting to make sense of its description or explanation.

These scholars and achedemics may be willing proclaim they are out of their element or do not understand or even see a solution in all they share but may seek to blaim that lack of comprehension on the fact that economics have become defined by the language of mathamatics.

Mary Poovey makes [52:52] "three observations about models in general and about how our reliance on them constitute what counts as knowledge of my examples make clear models abstract from immediate experience and observed particulars in order to generate simplified manipulable simulations of actual conditions. In doing so they alter not only one's relation to relation to the real but also what could count as knowledge about the real because models are both performative and recursive moreover because models are both performative and recursive moreover extensive reliance on them increases the likelihood that models n doing so they alter not only one's relation to the real but also what could count as knowledge about the real 53:20ⁿ

because models are both performative and recursive moreover


in doing so they alter not only one's relation to the real but also what could count as knowledge about the real

will beget a reality that takes its form from the models or even that models will beget more models second as models incorporate and are organized by mathematical principles the

mathematical form which they call the syntax increasingly dictates the way that the



https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://scholarworks.smith.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D2286%26context%3Dtheses&ved=2ahUKEwjR7c-xpYyEAxWGJDQIHWpaBPcQFnoECBEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2uKiuCQC16O5nDOjRCrDMt

Ann E. Davis" "WEF"

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/WuX7R5KoKDCdVeNX/

Externalities are a side effect or consequence of an industrial or commercial activity that affects other parties without this being reflected in the cost of the goods or services involved. But she is identifying and connecting the dots or side effects or consequences that do not exist and imagining a solution without taking into consideration the natural side effect or consequence of human nature. Clearly she is suffering from a delusion of the mass psychosis coming out of modern universities.

Wealth redistribution is Capital allocation or Capital reallocation

CAPITAL ALLOCATION IS THE POWER OF CHOICE OR SLAVERY