Template:JPExE17: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " == Episode 17 == : "Exodus•May 3, 2023: "In the conclusion of Exodus, Jordan and the scholars recap the story of Exodus and the Israelites’ escape from tyranny to freed...") |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
In this recap of Exodus Jordan Peterson sees Jethro's advise to Moses about a peoples court as ''subsidiarity'' which "is a principle of social organization that holds that social and political issues should be dealt with at the most immediate or local level." | In this recap of Exodus Jordan Peterson sees Jethro's advise to Moses about a peoples court as ''subsidiarity'' which "is a principle of social organization that holds that social and political issues should be dealt with at the most immediate or local level." | ||
This put the administration of justice at the "micro" level of society where the people can seek to understand the weightier matters and | This idea put the administration of justice at the "micro" level of society where the people can seek to understand the [[weightier matters]] and exercise the personal responsibility to decide both the application of "fact and law". | ||
While Peterson does understands that the absolute essential element is not contractual but relational. What the panel never addresses is a key elements of this society th both establishes the [[social bonds]] and tries men's souls. | |||
Revision as of 22:01, 22 May 2023
Episode 17
- "Exodus•May 3, 2023: "In the conclusion of Exodus, Jordan and the scholars recap the story of Exodus and the Israelites’ escape from tyranny to freedom. This episode also features a summation from each of the scholars as they share what has been illuminated for them through this discussion."
In this recap of Exodus Jordan Peterson sees Jethro's advise to Moses about a peoples court as subsidiarity which "is a principle of social organization that holds that social and political issues should be dealt with at the most immediate or local level."
This idea put the administration of justice at the "micro" level of society where the people can seek to understand the weightier matters and exercise the personal responsibility to decide both the application of "fact and law".
While Peterson does understands that the absolute essential element is not contractual but relational. What the panel never addresses is a key elements of this society th both establishes the social bonds and tries men's souls.