Template:Vaccinated

Vaccinated vs unvaccinated

Are the unvaccinated endangering the vaccinated? Or does the science say something different?

There is one study the media uses to say unvaccinated are testing positive more than the vaccinated. It is not peer reviewed so we normally would not post it but it is so misleading and deceptive it is a good example of the dishonest data being foisted on the people to perpetuate a false narrative which is doing real harm we link to it so you may read it for yourself.

In the study they admit they use 37 CT for unvaccinated and 27 CT for vaccinated. That will produce false numbers for comparison and make people think the unvaccinated are getting sicker than the vaccinated which other studies say is not true. It appears the opposite may be the truth.

We need reporters and investigators searching out that truth. That is the kind of fake science that people are following in the modern media.

The study states that, "The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection continues to drive rates of illness and hospitalisations despite high levels of vaccination, with the proportion of cases caused by the Delta lineage increasing in many populations. As vaccination programs roll out globally and social distancing is relaxed, future SARS-CoV-2 trends are uncertain."

The media suggest that this is because of the unvaccinated and this new strain being identified as the Delta variant. We will see from other studies and scientific experts that the Delta variant is coming from the vaccinated.

Their Methods included "samples of the population ages 5 years and over in England." Because they are swabbing young people who cannot be vaccinated with these experimental injections they could be testing larger numbers of unvaccinated people. They draw a conclusion expressed within the statement that it "appears to have been driven by complete replacement of Alpha variant by Delta, and by the high prevalence in younger less-vaccinated age groups." They did limit their "analyses to those aged 18 to 64 years" which they say "permitted direct contrast of infection rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups."

While they show that vaccine effectiveness consistently dropped between round 12 and 13 because of their CT variations they believed the "vaccinated individuals were at substantially lower risk of passing on infection". The more recent and detailed studies referenced below agree and explain why vaccine efficiency is dropping. The media euphemistically refer to this steady decline in efficiency as breakthrough cases rather than simply stating that this was vaccine failure.

But in truth this may mean something more than mere failure as the process is generating new strains among the vaccinated. As mutations occur in the vaccinated population the young may become more vulnerable to the new variants even though they were relatively unaffected by the original COVID-19.

We will also see in subsequent studies included below at the same time these mutations are taking place in the vaccinated populations there is substantial evidence that the nasal viral load of the vaccinated can reach 200 times more than that of the unvaccinated.

They stated that they "tested two gene targets (E gene and N gene) with cycle threshold (Ct) values" which varied for reasons of calibration.

They admitted that their "estimate of effectiveness was based on self-reported vaccine status" but we were surprised to see in the study that many of the samples and tests were self administered at home and picked up later.

There were lots of problems with this study but hopefully peers will address them in their review. We cite it here because it is a glimpse of the period time in which mutations of the original virus were taking place among the vaccinated and because it was misused by the media to coerce people into getting vaccinated. With the studies we will see the false and even contradictory suggestion that these injections are the salvation of society.

You can read it for yourselves:
https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/10044/1/90800/2/react1_r13_final_preprint_final.pdf

How we got here

The new normal is always the offspring of the old normal.

In the beginning the media made outlandish prediction which had to roll back but created panic and shutdown the people and their lives. Then they started counting every death that might have Covid based on a bogus PCR test despite other morbidities but now "The CDC stopped tracking most COVID-19 cases in vaccinated people. That makes it hard to know how dangerous Delta really is. https://www.businessinsider.com/risk-of-delta-variant-cdc-stopped-tracking-cases-vaccinated-2021-7 ⁠ CDC has stopped counting every 'breakthrough' Covid infection in fully vaccinated people: Experts warn agency's new method of only collecting data on patients who are hospitalized or die could miss patterns in who gets sick after their shots. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9566619/CDC-stopped-counting-breakthrough-Covid-infection-fully-vaccinated-people.html

"Breakthrough" cases are infact cases of "vaccine failure". Why these vaccines are failing and what that process may include is explored below as we examine a extensive Japanese study which was published in August of 2021.

CDC study shows 74% of people infected in Massachusetts Covid outbreak were fully vaccinated

"About three-fourths of people infected in a Massachusetts Covid-19 outbreak were fully vaccinated, according to new data published Friday by the CDC."

"The new data, published in the U.S. agency’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, also found that fully vaccinated people who get infected carry as much of the virus in their nose as unvaccinated people."

As we will see below more recent data revealed in August 2021, according to an article by Dr. Peter McCullough:

"While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders."

This is with vaccinated having viral loads 251 times that of unvaccinated according to an Oxford Clinical Research Group study.

This means the real danger is not from the unvaccinated individuals but from the vaccinated.

This is why one of the top scientists in the world and most cited biologist in the history of Germany, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi believes the shots will contribute to the "decimation of human population" and warns against getting the injections.

At least one reason is the injection can induce ADE producing severe cytokine storms the next time injected people are exposed to a wild virus. Is there any evidence to support this claim?

The Japanese study linked below scientifically lays out the evidence of this "enhancement" taking place world wide.

There are other studies as early as 2020 which were warning the science community of the dangers that may accompany a vaccine. We have linked to the NHI funded study produced at Georgetown University outlining "The Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines" (https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/36/htm) as early as 2020. But the media chose to push hysteria and hype rather than The Science.

We have been told by the same media that your only hope is their vaccine. But we know now that if you get the shots you can still get sick and still transmit the virus, often at a higher rate as we will see in newer studies below.

So, the only question left is can you survive their cure?

As of July 30th, Openvaers.com, an organization that monitors the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) online database, published the following adverse events (to the COVID vaccines) have been reported to the CDC:

• 12,366 deaths
• 46,036 hospitalizations
• 68,040 urgent care visits
• 4,759 cases of anaphylaxis
• 4,044 cases of Bell's palsy
• 14,251 permanently disabled

It has been accepted that only 1% to 10% of cases are actuall reported on Vaers which would mean the death and adverse injury tolls are actually much much higher.