Gnosticism: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A modern definition of Gnosticism is "a prominent heretical movement of the 2nd-century Christian Church, partly of pre-Christian origin. Gnostic doctrine taught that the world was created and ruled by a lesser divinity, the demiurge, and that Christ was an emissary of the remote supreme divine being, esoteric knowledge (gnosis) of whom enabled the redemption of the human spirit."
A modern definition of Gnosticism is "a prominent heretical movement of the 2nd-century Christian Church, partly of pre-Christian origin. Gnostic doctrine taught that the world was created and ruled by a lesser divinity, the demiurge, and that Christ was an emissary of the remote supreme divine being, esoteric knowledge (gnosis) of whom enabled the redemption of the human spirit."


But we know that the modern definition [[Religion]] has changed so I imagine that all that was labeled Gnostic are not the same.
But we know that the modern definition [[Religion]] has changed so I imagine that all that was labeled Gnostic was not the same. The truth is that Gnosticism has resulted in numerous  debates and countless interpretation for 2000 years. The complex nature of Gnostic teachings only complex  but often cryptic, even secretive.
 
Couple that with the fact that much of what we know about  Gnosticism has commonly come from critiques. so the question inevitably remains what was the  early sectarian gnostic systems all about.
 
In the "Adversus Haereses" by Irenaeus we here that there were different sects of  philosophy in the 2nd-century disparaging and even ridiculing gnosticism. Scholars have had to depend heavily on  heresiologists and their hierarchical prejudices because of a lack of alternative sources.
 
Finding manuscripts near Nag Hammadi in 1945, however, gave us  a cache of 4th-century Gnostic writing that allowed another round of ''debates and interpretation''filtered through the prejudices both pros and cons of our modern view of ancient religions.
 
The  texts would be translated of  from the ancient Coptic language  into English  in 1977 did not relieve the  difficulties.
 
One way to promote ones own view is to accuse others of something that is generally not understood but is accepted off hand as incorrect. In doing away with the dualist Marcion it was common to label him a Gnostic. We see the same practice with the ''Founding Fathers'' who are often accused of being [[Deism|Deists]].
 
 
----

Revision as of 00:57, 1 August 2015

A modern definition of Gnosticism is "a prominent heretical movement of the 2nd-century Christian Church, partly of pre-Christian origin. Gnostic doctrine taught that the world was created and ruled by a lesser divinity, the demiurge, and that Christ was an emissary of the remote supreme divine being, esoteric knowledge (gnosis) of whom enabled the redemption of the human spirit."

But we know that the modern definition Religion has changed so I imagine that all that was labeled Gnostic was not the same. The truth is that Gnosticism has resulted in numerous debates and countless interpretation for 2000 years. The complex nature of Gnostic teachings only complex but often cryptic, even secretive.

Couple that with the fact that much of what we know about Gnosticism has commonly come from critiques. so the question inevitably remains what was the early sectarian gnostic systems all about.

In the "Adversus Haereses" by Irenaeus we here that there were different sects of philosophy in the 2nd-century disparaging and even ridiculing gnosticism. Scholars have had to depend heavily on heresiologists and their hierarchical prejudices because of a lack of alternative sources.

Finding manuscripts near Nag Hammadi in 1945, however, gave us a cache of 4th-century Gnostic writing that allowed another round of debates and interpretationfiltered through the prejudices both pros and cons of our modern view of ancient religions.

The texts would be translated of from the ancient Coptic language into English in 1977 did not relieve the difficulties.

One way to promote ones own view is to accuse others of something that is generally not understood but is accepted off hand as incorrect. In doing away with the dualist Marcion it was common to label him a Gnostic. We see the same practice with the Founding Fathers who are often accused of being Deists.