Fact checkers: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Fact checkers are often misleading and deceptive in their presentations and | Fact-checkers are often misleading and deceptive in their presentations, and they are often not independent but are paid by those spreading false narratives. | ||
I tried to share this short post on Facebook of an expert and had "False Information" tag slapped on it. But if you want to hear the whole truth, I am sharing the whole video here where he goes into some history, crimes, and solutions. | |||
<html><iframe align="right" width="320" height="180" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://rumble.com/embed/v4emamr/?pub=jidyb"></iframe></html> | <html><iframe align="right" width="320" height="180" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://rumble.com/embed/v4emamr/?pub=jidyb"></iframe></html> | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
You can hear more of his testimony on a | You can hear more of his testimony on a '''Return to reason''' with Leighton Grey at Grey Matter where the expert Dr. Roger Hodkinson talks about how the regulatory bodies overstepped their position during recent events. See also [[Numerous scientists]]. | ||
'''On Rumble''' https://rumble.com/v4h7jti-steering-medical-profits-and-research-dr.-roger-hodkinson.html | '''On Rumble''' https://rumble.com/v4h7jti-steering-medical-profits-and-research-dr.-roger-hodkinson.html | ||
=== YouTube === | |||
The '''YouTube''' video below does not actually have the video of the interview but only the sound file. | The '''YouTube''' video below does not actually have the video of the interview but only the sound file. | ||
Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
Here is one that is shameless in their efforts to press forward with their propaganda. | Here is one that is shameless in their efforts to press forward with their propaganda. | ||
The factcheck below was | The factcheck below was Published on: 22 Jan 2022 | Editor: Flora Teoh | ||
[[File:facebookfc.jpg|right|300px]] | [[File:facebookfc.jpg|right|300px]] | ||
Line 58: | Line 59: | ||
"An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States is an authorization granted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under sections of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as added to and amended by various Acts of Congress, including by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 (PAHPRA), as codified by 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3, to allow the use of a drug prior to approval.[1] It does not constitute approval of the drug in the full statutory meaning of the term, but instead authorizes the FDA to facilitate availability of an unapproved product, or an unapproved use of an approved product, during a declared state of emergency from one of several agencies or of a "material threat" by the Secretary of Homeland Security." | "An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States is an authorization granted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under sections of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as added to and amended by various Acts of Congress, including by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 (PAHPRA), as codified by 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3, to allow the use of a drug prior to approval.[1] It does not constitute approval of the drug in the full statutory meaning of the term, but instead authorizes the FDA to facilitate availability of an unapproved product, or an unapproved use of an approved product, during a declared state of emergency from one of several agencies or of a "material threat" by the Secretary of Homeland Security." | ||
[[Category:Articles]] | |||
[[Category:Topics]] |
Latest revision as of 12:38, 27 March 2024
Fact checkers
Fact-checkers are often misleading and deceptive in their presentations, and they are often not independent but are paid by those spreading false narratives.
I tried to share this short post on Facebook of an expert and had "False Information" tag slapped on it. But if you want to hear the whole truth, I am sharing the whole video here where he goes into some history, crimes, and solutions.
Dr. Roger Hodkinson
You can hear more of his testimony on a Return to reason with Leighton Grey at Grey Matter where the expert Dr. Roger Hodkinson talks about how the regulatory bodies overstepped their position during recent events. See also Numerous scientists.
On Rumble https://rumble.com/v4h7jti-steering-medical-profits-and-research-dr.-roger-hodkinson.html
YouTube
The YouTube video below does not actually have the video of the interview but only the sound file.
I found the video, Steering Medical Profits and Research | Dr. Roger Hodkinson on March 11:
144 views Mar 4, 2024 Return to Reason
"Host Leighton Grey speaks with medical expert Dr. Roger Hodkinson about how the regulatory bodies overstepped during the pandemic and why he thinks the vaccines were the biggest human experiment ever. You don't want to miss this engaging episode on the need for truth in medicine and research."
Flora Teoh
Here is one that is shameless in their efforts to press forward with their propaganda.
The factcheck below was Published on: 22 Jan 2022 | Editor: Flora Teoh
You be the judge:
Hundreds of millions of people worldwide have received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine; their safety and effectiveness are established; the vaccines aren’t experimental
"Claims that the COVID-19 vaccines are experimental and/or that vaccinated people are guinea pigs aren’t new. They circulated early in 2020, as this previous Health Feedback review reported. At that time, three COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson) were authorized for use under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization program. Since then, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine received FDA approval. Nevertheless, the claim that the vaccines are experimental proves to be popular, as multiple Health Feedback reviews about the same claim in viral social media posts by personalities such as another political commentator Candace Owens and chiropractor Benjamin Benulis, show.
The safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines were established in clinical trials before receiving EUA
The FDA describes the concept of an EUA as follows:
- “Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”
Wikipedia
"An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States is an authorization granted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under sections of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as added to and amended by various Acts of Congress, including by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 (PAHPRA), as codified by 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3, to allow the use of a drug prior to approval.[1] It does not constitute approval of the drug in the full statutory meaning of the term, but instead authorizes the FDA to facilitate availability of an unapproved product, or an unapproved use of an approved product, during a declared state of emergency from one of several agencies or of a "material threat" by the Secretary of Homeland Security."