Abortion: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#ev:youtube|ab2efh42Esc|300|right|Description Part 5 Abortion is a symptom of a deeper error that hits at the heart of society. Time 3:29}} | {{#ev:youtube|ab2efh42Esc|300|right|Description Part 5 Abortion is a symptom of a deeper error that hits at the heart of society. Time 3:29}} | ||
== Abortion is a Symptom == | == Abortion is a Symptom == | ||
| Line 78: | Line 76: | ||
[https://abortionpillreversal.com/ Abortion Pill Reversal] | [https://abortionpillreversal.com/ Abortion Pill Reversal] | ||
People who are pro life are the ones who pro choice because they desire that the child's choice be respected while the person who claims to be pro choice wants to take away the life of the child inside them because they do not want to endure the consequences of choices they already made. What they do not want to accept is that there are also consequences for the choice to abort. | |||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Articles]] | |||
[[Category:Topics]] | |||
Latest revision as of 18:19, 10 July 2023
Abortion is a Symptom
The rate of abortion in society is a symptom of a deeper problem.
Socialism historically breeds a lower birth rate. The data is predicting both an economic and population collapse.
Almost every person who is pro choice is willing to force other people to pay for their welfare and abortion and about everything else they want. They are not pro choice if they are pro Socialism.
There are many ways in which a legal system increases its limited authority, but it is most complete through the consent of the individual. The most common way of obtaining consent is to spread amongst the people "treats and gratuities" [1]
In truth it is the best way to destroy liberty[2] and degenerate the masses.
Every one should have the power of choice but no one should imagine that they are free from the consequences of choice. Every women who shortens the life in her womb is undoubtedly statistically shortening her own life based on the available data
In China, they have “the one child contract”. If you sign it, you will become eligible for many of the benefits offered by the government, such as free medical care, schooling, and better paying jobs. If later the mother becomes pregnant and refuses to abort the child, the family becomes responsible for paying back all the benefits they received for the first child, and often suffer the loss of their present employed position and pay scale. In America, the pressure to abort a child is often much more subtle.
“The same dealt subtly with our kindred, and evil entreated our fathers, so that they cast out their young children [fetus],[3] to the end they might not live.”[4] (Acts 7:19)
If children survive the financial and social pressure to be aborted, they must still overcome the strain of the mental and spiritual pressures society shall place upon them. Unfortunately, society as a whole is continuously degrading the family as a unit, even though the family is the foundation from which the society is built.
“If we want better people to make a better world, then we will have to begin where people are made in the family.”[5]
Economic pressures may burden and exhaust the parents. Social Security often removes the grandparents from the family unit. School systems distance the parents from the mental development of the children as they are molded outside the family unit. The media and socially applied peer pressures add their own unique and varied distortions to the child’s development.
“When the foundation fails all fails.”[6]
The few parents who feel a sense of responsibility to raise their children directly, often find their way blocked by a legal system that seems to be usurping the authority of the parents by assuming custody of children in the name of “The Law”. Yet, is it usurpation or have we unwittingly waived custody of our children by some previous legal contract or consensual agreement?
The Right to choose
The Right to choose should include the right to decide whose abortion you want to pay for. People who say they are Pro choice almost always believe that they have the right to force others to pay for the abortion they want for themselves or others which is not really Pro choice at all.
To say that you are Pro choice and then be in favor of government supported abortion makes you a hypocrite if not a liar since the idea of government supported abortion takes away the choice of everyone that believes that abortion is wrong. It makes people work in order to to pay for other people's abortion.
People who claim to be Pro choice should be actively campaigning to make all abortionist depend on fees and charity to finance the abortions they wish to perform. If they did that then they might be considered truly Pro choice.
Of course none of that addresses the choice of the child in the womb of the mother who is given no choice either.
Pro their choice
- Pro choice will say that "A fetus can’t survive on its own. It is fully dependent on its mother’s body, unlike born human beings."
There is no way a baby will survive without other people assisting it. So if this is a rational argument then setting your baby outside along the side of the road would be justified.
- So called Pro choice people also say, "Even if a fetus was alive, the "right to life" doesn’t imply a right to use somebody else’s body. People have the right to refuse to donate their organs, for example, even if doing so would save somebody else’s life."
This argument is also contradicted by the policies of Pro choice people which are socialist policies. Socialism policies and principles are fundamentally based on the accepted premises that taking the labor and production of other people for the support of others is okay. So if that Pro choice reasoning is valid then all socialism and socialist programs should be outlawed including Public Education.
- The Pro choice people also argue that "The 'right to life' also doesn’t imply a right to live by threatening somebody else's life. Bearing children is always a threat the life of the mother." continuing with statements like "A 'right to life' is, at the end of the day, a right to not have somebody else’s will imposed upon your body. Do women not have this right as well?"
First off most of the babies aborted in the world today are women.
That being said if this argument is valid then almost all taxes including income tax and property tax should be illegal and void and certainly there could be no draft even in time of war. In the final analysis the Pro choice people are often the least Pro choice people in society. When they say they are Pro choice they are really saying they are pro their choice and clearly want to impose their will "upon your body". [7]
Europe vs. America
Are abortion laws more conservative in America or in Western Europe? Would a pregnant woman seeking an abortion have an easier time getting one in Texas or in...Germany? The answers, as talk show host Elisha Krauss explains, may just change how you think about America's abortion laws.
Nearly a third of pregnancies in Europe end in abortion so that the birth rate in Europe is so low they cannot sustain their society. Their government has since started an open door policy to bring in immigrants to replace the portion of their population they chose to abort.
This policy is changing the thinking of society even more than Public Education. It is also allowing large numbers of violent abusive criminal elements to enter their society. Many of these immigrants are now changing the culture of Europe. Europeans are now in as much danger as the children in their daughter's wombs.
The division is also going to create a civil war in society that will eventually bring violent chaos to Europe from which it will not easily recover.
So that makes me wonder what is coming to America?
The abortion rate in America has not been 30% of the live births since 1994 but there is still 210 abortions for every 1000 births. This may not be the result of anything more than better contraception and pregnancy prevention, or possibly in part due to lower sperm count which has become increasingly apparent.
Again abortion, like socialism, is a symptom. To find a cure you do not treat the symptom but you need to address the cause.
Abortion Pill Reversal
People who are pro life are the ones who pro choice because they desire that the child's choice be respected while the person who claims to be pro choice wants to take away the life of the child inside them because they do not want to endure the consequences of choices they already made. What they do not want to accept is that there are also consequences for the choice to abort.
If you need help:
- Or want to help others:
Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network |
Join Local group |
About |
Purpose |
Guidelines |
Network Removal
Contact Minister |
Fractal Network |
Audacity of Hope |
Network Links
Footnotes
- ↑ "That the man who first ruined the Roman people twas he who first gave them treats and gratuities" Plutarch's Life of Coriolanus (c. 100 AD.)
- ↑ “The real destroyers of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations, and benefits.” Plutarch
- ↑ Strong’s No. 1025 brephos {bref’-os}of uncertain affin.; n n AV - babe (5) - child (1) - infant (1) - young child (1) [8]1a) an unborn child, embryo, a fetus 1b) a new-born child, an infant, a babe
- ↑ Strong’s No. 2225 zoogoneo {dzo-og-on-eh’-o}from the same as 2226 and a derivative of 1096; vb AV - preserve (1) - live (1) [2]1) to bring forth alive 2) to give life 3) to preserve alive
- ↑ Speakers Encyclopedia of Stories, by J.M Braude.
- ↑ Maxims of Law from 1856 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary
- ↑ Quotes from How To Argue Pro Choice: 11 Arguments Against Abortion Access, Debunked by SETH MILLSTEIN