Difference between revisions of "Bishop"

From PreparingYou
Jump to: navigation, search
(Replaced content with "{{Bishop}}")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
+
{{Bishop}}
== The Poor Overseers of a Free Church ==
+
 
+
 
+
In the [[Bible]] we see the Greek word ‘episkopos’ meaning overseer.<Ref>Episkopos. a man charged with the duty of seeing that things to be done by others are done rightly, a bishop.  </Ref> It is often translated as bishop. In the early Church, an archbishop was merely an overseer of overseers. This was a part of the network of the Church ordering itself in groups of tens. Ten families and one minister, ten ministers and their minister or overseer. The early Church used this pattern. But the church of [[Constantine]] did not.
+
 
+
On the 30th of April, 311, the emperor Galerius had posted an Edict of Tolerance at Nicomedia making provisions for the Christians, who had “followed such a caprice and had fallen into such a folly that they would not obey the institutes of antiquity” which had been established for the welfare of the people. The Edict of Milan<Ref>The Edict of Milan was the February 313 AD. Western Roman Emperor Constantine I, and Licinius, who controlled the Balkans, met in Milan and agreed to change policies towards [[Christians]] following the Edict of Toleration in Serdica.</Ref> commanded that the “places where they were previously accustomed to assemble” “the same shall be restored to the Christians” including restitution of the value of property taken from the Christians, “without payment or any claim of recompense and without any kind of fraud or deception.”
+
 
+
[[Constantine]] was not the first to grant tolerance or restitution, but he was the first to grant favor. His instant converts were often required to get baptized, but not to repent. In 325, a small portion of the Church<Ref>Constantine invited all 1800 bishops (about 1000 in the east and 800 in the west), but like. Eusebius of Caesarea counted more than 250. Many walked out.  </Ref> was about to take a big turn down a new path, from which they have not yet returned.
+
 
+
The First Council of Nicaea endorsed the new Christianity of Constantine, the “Bishop of Bishops.” The vast majority of Christians opposed many of his precepts, but he did end violent persecution. However, a new threat loomed in the complacency of his Pax Romana. The Emperor bestowed gifts from the spoils of war and heavy taxation, winning favor with some, bringing in a seed of corruption until finally, Theodosius I made Christianity the “state religion” or could call the state religion Christianity.
+
 
+
These new Christians came to believe without repentance. They were enticed by the favor and grace of emperors, not Christ. These bribes for their faith included millions of dollars in land, gold, and silver, given out of the treasury of Rome. These royal grants were given to bishops who came to his councils and remained, or to those who were appointed by his own permission and authority. These new bishops were soon issuing edicts and commands, even calling for the persecution of pagans or Christians who did not bow down to the thinking of this new church.
+
 
+
The citizens of Milan were truly instant Christians. They eventually elected Ambrose the Bishop of Milan. Ambrose a roman lawyer and governor had tortured prisoners and entertained prostitutes. At first he refused the election, knowing little of Christianity or the ways of Christ. But with popular support and the emperor’s encouragement he relented and within a week he was baptized with water.
+
 
+
Except for words and names there was little alteration of the spirit of these new Christians. Ambrose did take a leave of absence from his employment with the empire to study some of the basic requirements for the ministers of Christ. As bishop of the Church he knew he could own no property in his own name and apportioned his money to the poor, donating his lands, except for provision for his sister Marcellina, and committing some of his property to the care of his family by his brother.
+
 
+
All the ordained ministers of the Church gave up any personal estate or wealth to follow in the service of God. This had been true for Christ,<Ref>[[2 Corinthians 8]]:9 “For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich.”  </Ref> the apostles,<Ref>[[Matthew 13]]:44, [[Matthew 19]]:2;[[Mark 10]]:21; [[Luke 12]]:33, [[Luke 18]]:22, [[Luke 14]]:33 “So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.”  </Ref> and new ministers<Ref> [[Acts 4]]:36... [[Acts 5]]:11. “... Joses ...a Levite, Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.... But a certain man named Ananias... kept back part of the price... fell down, and gave up the ghost”  </Ref> of the Church the same as it had been for the [[Levites]]<Ref> [[Numbers 18]]:20, 24; [[Numbers 26]]:62. [[Deuteronomy 18]]:2  </Ref> called out by Moses to serve the tents of the congregations. This was necessary to maintain a government of service as was the network of small intimate congregations..
+
 
+
The true overseers of the Church remained faithful, refusing Faith-Based initiative of the emperor not only for the Church, but for themselves. They were not masters of those they served, but servants of Christ by serving those they ministered unto. The highest overseer is servant of servants.
+
 
+
The true overseer was an ordained minister meeting the qualifications of Christ, being in the world but not of it. Their full faith and fidelity must belong totally to God. They could not apply on behalf of the Church or themselves for gifts or grace of any sovereign or government. Christ was their king and they were His bondservant alone. No minister following Christ could apply to Rome for protection because God’s kingdom is not of their “[[World|world]]”, their “apt and harmonious arrangement or constitution, order, government.” To maintain an autonomous church the same continues to be true for its ordained ministers.
+
 
+
The ministers of Israel held a similar status even before kings began to appoint them without meeting these requirements of God given to Moses concerning the called out Levites. In those days when there was no king in Israel,<Ref> [[Judges 17]]:6 “In those days [there was] no king in Israel, [but] every man did [that which was] right in his own eyes.”  </Ref> it had been the election by the courts of the people<Ref> [[1 Chronicles 9]]:22 “All these [which were] chosen to be porters in the gates [were] two hundred and twelve. These were reckoned by their genealogy in their villages, whom David and Samuel the seer did ordain in their set office. The word villages is far more often translated courts from the Hebrew word chatser and the word genealogy is from yachas which had to do with their family group.”  </Ref> that chose the ministers of God’s kingdom. They were paid according to their service<Ref> Numbers 7:5 “Take [it] of them, that they may be to do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation; and thou shalt give them unto the Levites, to every man according to his service.”  </Ref> by the offerings of the people of a free nation under God. This peculiar and separate status of the overseers and ordained ministers of the government of God might be called today a vow of poverty.
+
 
+
This is one of the more controversial subjects concerning the nature of the early Church established by Christ. Like so many things from those ancient days the meaning and purpose has been shrouded in rituals and ceremonies. Few understand the full significance of that unique status or how it applies today.
+
 
+
We ask no one to accept anything because it is written. We encourage everyone to study out the truth in other sources and their own hearts and minds, praying to the Father for guidance and understanding.
+
 
+
In [[FCR|The Free Church Report]] we have tried to shed a new light of understanding on how these ancient precepts and requirements can play an essential role in the free church and free congregations of the people. How without the implementation of these precepts upon precepts of Christ and the prophets the Church becomes vulnerable to the powers and spirit of the “world”. There are multiple concepts centering around the proper application of the biblical doctrine of “no inheritance” or a “vow of poverty” and it is important that we have a clear understanding rather than a blind faith in these matters.
+
 
+
Because words and phrases are defined in many ways according to their context and usage we will need to define terms used in this work according to the message and doctrines of Christ. Titles like [[Bishop]] or Overseer and [[Minister]] or [[Elder]] must be defined within the context of the time of Christ, limiting those positions to His instructions, and not merely accept the definition of modern churches simply because they are common in today’s thinking or religious circles and institutions.
+
 
+
{{Template:Monks}}
+
 
+
{{Template:Network}}
+
 
+
== Footnotes ==
+
 
+
<references />
+

Revision as of 19:08, 29 December 2015

A Bishop or Overseer provide a service to the Christian community by over seeing the ministers of small congregations of ten families. The head or eldest natural Father of each family group was an elder who chose their Minister. Those minister chose a minister who would be called a "bishop" and "overseer" who provided aid during dearths whicñ plaged the people during Acts. The ministers of God's form of government are truly titular leaders in righteousness and servants of the people. The kingdom of heaven is like unto a net[1] In choosing your minister for your family as you sit down in the tens you are weaving a net of righteousness through charity, not choosing a ruler nor a guru.

Bishops and Overseers

The word overseer is translated from the same word we see as bishop[2] in the New Testament.

These terms like "bishop" and "overseer" are used regularly in today's modern Church, but what did they mean at the time of the first-century Church by those early Christians?

Does the modern church do what the first-century church did?

Do "bishops" and "overseers" fulfill the same role and duties we see being done in those early days when James explained "pure Religion"?

Do Modern Christians depend on the Church for its Daily ministration of free bread - rightly divided from house to house like by the first-century Church, which was called the Eucharist?

Are modern bishops fulfilling the same purpose as the original bishops or overseers of the early Church in the practice of pure Religion, or do modern Christians pray to benefactors who exercise authority one over the other?

And are their apostles among these men?

And are they Apostles of Christ or someone else?

Titular ministers

The Church is defined as one form of government. For any government to function, there must be participation by the people in the supply and demand of services within and to participants of society.

The titular leaders of a free government cannot be given power to exercise authority over how much or when the people entrust their ministers with their freewill offering. Christ commanded that His appointed ministers not “exercise authority”.

When people lose their daily right to choose, they are made subjects of those who have a right to choose for them.

Servants of sacrifice

What is given to a minister or bishop of the Church is given freely and completely, like a burnt offering or bread cast upon the water, but the free will choice to give must remain with the people. The choice and manner of service provided by that gift must remain entirely with the minister, who is a servant of God.

In essence, this form of sacred purpose trust, with the minister as the steward (a kind of trustee), is at the foundation of His Church and the Daily ministration of Pure Religion.

It has been customary that another group oversees the ministers in a network of service. But again, not as rulers one over the other.

Of course, in truth, the actual overseer of the Church is the Holy Spirit or what is sometimes called the Comforter.[3]

The Apostles met the requirements laid down by Christ. They were prepared to represent the Holy Spirit, and when they had received the power to do so from that Spirit, they were able to go out and preach the Kingdom as the physical representatives of that Comforter. They exercised no authority by their own hand over the people but relied entirely upon the power of that Holy Spirit.

The definition of overseership today might be called "the office or status of an overseer." Since a deacon was a minister to groups of Tens in a network of Christians. A Bishop was a minister of ten ministers. He might be called an Archdeacon or Archbishop, not because he ruled over the minister but over the responsibility of an office of service. While, these terms are still used today they originally came down to us from the early Church which provided all social welfare for Christians through Pure Religion dependent on a daily ministration of charity.

"An Archdeacon pre-eminently a priest with pastoral gifts and spiritual maturity, able to relate to, encourage and support both clergy and laity in the archdeaconry in their fulfillment of the church's mission". THE DIOCESE OF NEWCASTLE

Preaching the gospel of the kingdom does not isolate congregations under an exclusive pastoral leader or divide the "body of Christ" by denominations. The common denominator for all Christians is Christ who said we were not to be like the governments of the Gentiles who call themselves benefactors but exercise authority one over the other, nor pray to the Fathers of the earth who provide benefits like free bread or the Corban of the Pharisees.

The overseership of the Church established by Jesus does not divide people into isolated groups but is desiring to connect all families in a network of charity and love.

Christ preached the kingdom of God at hand and if we repent and seek it and the righteousness of God it will lead us away from despotism[4] and back to liberty under God.

The modern Church is often making the word of God to none effect like the Pharisees with their state run Corban because it fails to teach the people The Way of Pure Religion and depend heavily on what was called public religion and the covetous practices of the world. These two systems were at the core of the Christian conflict.



  1. Matthew 13:47 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind:
  2. 1985 ~ἐπίσκοπος~ episkopos \@ep-is’-kop-os\@ from 1909 and 4649 (in the sense of 1983); n m AV-bishop 6, overseer 1; 7
    1) an overseer
    1a) a man charged with the duty of seeing that things to be done by others are done rightly, any curator, guardian or superintendent
    1b) the superintendent, elder, pastor, or overseer of a Christian church; the NT uses the term bishop, overseers, 1985 pastors, 4166 elders, and presbyters 4245 interchangeably { Acts 20:17,28; Ephesian 4:11; Titus 1:5,7; 1 Peter 5:1-4 etc.}
  3. Parakletos translated comforter 4, advocate 1. 1) summoned, called to one’s side, esp. called to one’s aid. 1a) one who pleads another’s cause before a judge, a pleader, counsel for defense, legal assistant, an advocate.
  4. : “Despotism, suspicious by its very nature, views the separation of men as the best guarantee of its own permanence and usually does all it can to keep them in isolation. No defect of the human heart suits it better than egoism; a tyrant is relaxed enough to forgive his subjects for failing to love him, provided they do not love one another. He does not ask them to help him to govern the state; it is enough that they have no intention of managing it themselves. He calls those who claim to unite their efforts to create general prosperity “turbulent and restless spirits” and, twisting the normally accepted meaning of the words, he gives the name of “good citizens” to those who retreat into themselves.”
    “Thus the vices fostered by tyranny are exactly those supported by equality. These two things are complementary and mutually supportive, with fatal results.” Democracy in America: And Two Essays on America, by Alexis de Tocqueville