Difference between revisions of "Anarchism"

From PreparingYou
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Anarchismhearttree.jpg|right|thumb| An anarchist is not against authority just against man ruling over man.]]According to Wikipedia, “Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society.”
+
[[File:Anarchismhearttree.jpg|right|thumb| A true [[anarchist]] is not so much against authority just against man ruling over man.]]According to Wikipedia, “Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society.”
  
 
So if we look at some of the terms used to define ''"anarchism"'' we may refine our understanding of the word. One of the key words in this definition is the word ''"state"''. Man in the state of nature before [[social compacts]] might be said to be in a sovereign state of personal freedom with certain inalienable right.
 
So if we look at some of the terms used to define ''"anarchism"'' we may refine our understanding of the word. One of the key words in this definition is the word ''"state"''. Man in the state of nature before [[social compacts]] might be said to be in a sovereign state of personal freedom with certain inalienable right.
Line 5: Line 5:
 
But what man or woman could say he or she is or has been born in such a state?  
 
But what man or woman could say he or she is or has been born in such a state?  
  
All mankind is born under the power and authority of their parents who we depend upon and indebted to for our life. Your parents may depend upon others in ways that relinquishes their own natural sovereignty over their children by creating corporate, political or legal obligations. A common way this is done is by relinquishing the responsibilities of [[Pater Patriae]] to others where the obtain a right and authority.
+
All mankind is born under the power and authority of their parents who they depend upon and are indebted to for their life. Your parents may depend upon others in ways that relinquishes their own natural sovereignty over their children by creating corporate, political or legal obligations to others. A common way this is done is by relinquishing the responsibilities of the pater Familias (natural father of the family) to the [[Pater Patriae]] the [[Father]] of the country. By turning over our natural responsibilities to others we grant a right and authority through [[consent]]. That "[[Legal title|legal right]]" grants an entitlement of state managed parental authority by default through [[Natural Law]] through [[consent]] and may become binding by terms of the [[social contracts]] and those bonds may become [[bondage]] under systems of debt.
  
“Anarchism is from Greek word ''anarkhos'' ‘without a chief’ or ‘without a ruler’ later influenced by French ''anarchisme''.
+
: ''The student of anarchism may explore this premise here and at the links on these pages along with the different variations of anarchism expressed or imagined by others. We will assist this process by defining and modifying words to identify different theories or opinions and by asking a series of questions and offering an answer.''
 +
 
 +
* [[Anarchism]] is from Greek word ''anarkhos'' ‘without a chief’ or ‘without a ruler’ later influenced by French ''anarchisme''.
  
 
Does having no ruler in a state of nature mean having no government?
 
Does having no ruler in a state of nature mean having no government?
Line 19: Line 21:
 
* A government is the system by which a state or community is controlled.
 
* A government is the system by which a state or community is controlled.
  
When we say terms like government we think of a form o government where the power of control is in the hands of a few people who control the actions of everyone else. Those few people who exercise control are the "arche" or rulers of society.
+
When we say terms like government we think of a form of government where the power of control is in the hands of a few people who control the actions of everyone else. Those few people who exercise control are the "arche" or rulers of society.
 +
 
 +
An anarchist is not really against control but in fact desires the original control of his or her own life in a ''state of nature''. In the beginning man was endowed by natural right of dominion over himself and the world in which he lived but not the dominion or right to rule his fellowman.
  
An anarchist is not really against control but in fact desires the original control of his or her own life in a state of nature. In the beginning man was endowed by natural right of dominion over himself and the world in which he lived but not the dominion or right to rule his fellowman.
+
? Are their [[Forms of government|forms of government]] that accept and even promote the ''right of the people''(sometimes called the ''power of choice'' or ''liberty'') to control or to rule or "to govern" themselves?
  
Are their [[Forms of government|forms of government]] that accept and even promote the right of the people to control or rule themselves?
+
If there is such a unique form of government then anarchism is not without government or even without the power of the state. It would be any form of government that does not centralize nor grant the rights of the people choose into the hands of a body of the people whether it was a small group of rulers or lawmakers  or 51% of the people as we see in indirect or direct [[Democracy|democracies]] respectively.
  
 
According to Wikipedia:<Br>
 
According to Wikipedia:<Br>
 
*  Forms of government, or forms of state governance, refers to the set of political systems and institutions that make up the organisation of a specific government.
 
*  Forms of government, or forms of state governance, refers to the set of political systems and institutions that make up the organisation of a specific government.
 
** In the Commonwealth of Nations, the word government is also used more narrowly to refer to the collective group of people that exercises executive authority in a state.
 
** In the Commonwealth of Nations, the word government is also used more narrowly to refer to the collective group of people that exercises executive authority in a state.
 +
:: ''It may be important to note here that "executive authority" may be over the people and their '''right to choose''' or only over things the people have [[Freewill offerings|freely chose to grant]] the otherwise [[titular]] government.''
  
 
In a pure [[republic]] the people rule over themselves individually and their leaders are not rulers or lawmakers but merely [[titular]] representatives.
 
In a pure [[republic]] the people rule over themselves individually and their leaders are not rulers or lawmakers but merely [[titular]] representatives.
  
In a [[democracy]], direct or indirect, the people as a collective may rule over each other by some form of majority. A democracy with in a republic may grow in power giving elected leaders more and more control by giving them more and more responsibility.
+
In a [[democracy]], direct or indirect, the people as a collective may rule over each other by some form of majority. A democracy with in a republic may grow in power giving elected leaders more and more control by giving them more and more responsibility. When leaders promise the people liberty from their natural responsibilities within the family or within society they will soo become rulers of the people and the people will be unable to retain their natural liberties.<Ref>[[2 Peter 2]]:3 ¶ And through [[covet]]ousness shall they with feigned words make [[merchandise]] of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.
 +
: 2 Peter 2:12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption; 13  And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you; 14  Having eyes full of [[adultery]], and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:
 +
15  Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of [[Balaam]] the son of Bosor, who loved the [[Benefits|wages of unrighteousness]];
 +
: Luke 12:15 And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth. </Ref>
  
This pattern often repeats itself in history nd we find many like [[Plutarch]] and [[Polybius]] who write about how society and the people are corrupted by different [[Welfare types|forms of welfare]].
+
This pattern often repeats itself in history and we find many like [[Plutarch]] and [[Polybius]] and even Paul and King David<Ref>Psalms 69:22  Let their table become a [[snare]] before them: and that which should have been for their [[welfare]], let it become a trap.
 +
: Romans 11:9  And David saith, Let their table be made a [[snare]], and a trap, and a [[Nicolatian|stumblingblock]], and a recompence unto them:</Ref> who write about how society and the people are corrupted by different [[Welfare types|forms of welfare]].
  
 
According to Wikipedia:
 
According to Wikipedia:
 
* Sovereignty is understood in jurisprudence as the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies.
 
* Sovereignty is understood in jurisprudence as the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies.
  
In that pure republic the people would be sovereign over themselves but not over their neighbor. Since the outside sources or bodies including the elected government are separate and titular the government and whatever administration it was empowered with would be separate  from the people.
+
In that pure [[republic]] the people would be sovereign over themselves but not over their neighbor. Since the outside sources or bodies including the elected government are separate and titular the government and whatever administration it was empowered with would be separate  from the people.
  
 
In other words what the people chose to give the government the government would have power over but the people themselves and their liberty to choose would remain intact and they would not relinquish any of their personal liberty.  
 
In other words what the people chose to give the government the government would have power over but the people themselves and their liberty to choose would remain intact and they would not relinquish any of their personal liberty.  

Revision as of 09:22, 7 September 2016

A true anarchist is not so much against authority just against man ruling over man.
According to Wikipedia, “Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society.”

So if we look at some of the terms used to define "anarchism" we may refine our understanding of the word. One of the key words in this definition is the word "state". Man in the state of nature before social compacts might be said to be in a sovereign state of personal freedom with certain inalienable right.

But what man or woman could say he or she is or has been born in such a state?

All mankind is born under the power and authority of their parents who they depend upon and are indebted to for their life. Your parents may depend upon others in ways that relinquishes their own natural sovereignty over their children by creating corporate, political or legal obligations to others. A common way this is done is by relinquishing the responsibilities of the pater Familias (natural father of the family) to the Pater Patriae the Father of the country. By turning over our natural responsibilities to others we grant a right and authority through consent. That "legal right" grants an entitlement of state managed parental authority by default through Natural Law through consent and may become binding by terms of the social contracts and those bonds may become bondage under systems of debt.

The student of anarchism may explore this premise here and at the links on these pages along with the different variations of anarchism expressed or imagined by others. We will assist this process by defining and modifying words to identify different theories or opinions and by asking a series of questions and offering an answer.
  • Anarchism is from Greek word anarkhos ‘without a chief’ or ‘without a ruler’ later influenced by French anarchisme.

Does having no ruler in a state of nature mean having no government?

According to Wikipedia:

  • A state is a type of polity that is an organized political community living under a single system of government. States may or may not be sovereign.

If a state is not sovereign they may be merely constituents or members of a state which exercises authority over them. If people depart from a state of nature through social compacts they and their offspring may become less than sovereign through the elements of the world they are dependent upon.

According to Wikipedia:

  • A government is the system by which a state or community is controlled.

When we say terms like government we think of a form of government where the power of control is in the hands of a few people who control the actions of everyone else. Those few people who exercise control are the "arche" or rulers of society.

An anarchist is not really against control but in fact desires the original control of his or her own life in a state of nature. In the beginning man was endowed by natural right of dominion over himself and the world in which he lived but not the dominion or right to rule his fellowman.

? Are their forms of government that accept and even promote the right of the people(sometimes called the power of choice or liberty) to control or to rule or "to govern" themselves?

If there is such a unique form of government then anarchism is not without government or even without the power of the state. It would be any form of government that does not centralize nor grant the rights of the people choose into the hands of a body of the people whether it was a small group of rulers or lawmakers or 51% of the people as we see in indirect or direct democracies respectively.

According to Wikipedia:

  • Forms of government, or forms of state governance, refers to the set of political systems and institutions that make up the organisation of a specific government.
    • In the Commonwealth of Nations, the word government is also used more narrowly to refer to the collective group of people that exercises executive authority in a state.
It may be important to note here that "executive authority" may be over the people and their right to choose or only over things the people have freely chose to grant the otherwise titular government.

In a pure republic the people rule over themselves individually and their leaders are not rulers or lawmakers but merely titular representatives.

In a democracy, direct or indirect, the people as a collective may rule over each other by some form of majority. A democracy with in a republic may grow in power giving elected leaders more and more control by giving them more and more responsibility. When leaders promise the people liberty from their natural responsibilities within the family or within society they will soo become rulers of the people and the people will be unable to retain their natural liberties.[1]

This pattern often repeats itself in history and we find many like Plutarch and Polybius and even Paul and King David[2] who write about how society and the people are corrupted by different forms of welfare.

According to Wikipedia:

  • Sovereignty is understood in jurisprudence as the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies.

In that pure republic the people would be sovereign over themselves but not over their neighbor. Since the outside sources or bodies including the elected government are separate and titular the government and whatever administration it was empowered with would be separate from the people.

In other words what the people chose to give the government the government would have power over but the people themselves and their liberty to choose would remain intact and they would not relinquish any of their personal liberty.

The term "government" could be referring to the titular representatives on the one hand which would be separate from the people or it may include in the most general sense the people who remain the rulers of their own lives and possessions. Together they are "one form of government".

Since "A state is a type of polity" it is important to understand the term and the types entity the term may represent.

According to Wikipedia:

  • A polity is any kind of political entity. It is a group of people that are collectively united by a self-reflected cohesive force such as identity, that have a capacity to mobilize resources, and are organised by some form of institutionalized hierarchy.
    • A hierarchy (from the Greek ἱεραρχία hierarchia, "rule of a high priest", from ἱεράρχης hierarkhes, "leader of sacred rites") is an arrangement of items (objects, names, values, categories, etc.) in which the items are represented as being "above," "below," or "at the same level as" one another.
A hierarchy can link entities either directly or indirectly, and either vertically or diagonally.
  • Sovereign state, a sovereign political entity in international law, commonly referred to as a "country"
  • The Estates or the States, a national assembly of the estates, a legislature

Rechtsstaat, the legal state (constitutional state, state subordinated to law) in philosophy of law and as principle of many national constitutions

  • Constituent state, a type of political subdivision of a nation

Federated state, a constituent state that is part of a federal model and shares sovereignty with the federal government


If you need help:

Or want to help others:

Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network | Join Local group | About | Purpose | Guidelines | Network Removal
Contact Minister | Fractal Network | Audacity of Hope | Network Links

Footnotes

  1. 2 Peter 2:3 ¶ And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.
    2 Peter 2:12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption; 13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you; 14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:
    15 Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;
    Luke 12:15 And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth.
  2. Psalms 69:22 Let their table become a snare before them: and that which should have been for their welfare, let it become a trap.
    Romans 11:9 And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them: