Voluntary society

From PreparingYou
Jump to: navigation, search

Voluntary society

Society is people living together so that they are fruitful and not destroyed. A question is what and how is a community ordered. How is a free society bound together to make it strong enough to overcome the dangers and disasters of the world without jeopardizing the liberty of personal choice? Should society be formed from the bottom up by acts of service, love and mutual respect or top down through those who exercise authority through contracts, covenants and compacts?
Is the communion of a free society through charity or force?
Jesus was "another king" of a Society and community that made it possible for the people to survive and thrive during the decline and fall of the Imperial Cult of Rome.
History repeats itself but we have to understand its truths.
Abraham's society of friends and their Lively Stones of a Living Altar, before the witness of Melchizedek the righteous king of peace, were able to stop and defeat overnight an army from other societies that was ravaging local city states like perfect savages. They had formed an intentional community according to the perfect law of liberty. There are many mysteries revealed if we will have the patience to look and the courage to open our eyes and our hearts and our minds.

A voluntary society is one in which the right of the individual to make choices remains intact and un-infringed as long as they do not injure the rights of another.

The power to choose resides in every individual within the social structure of a family through which rights may be inherent.

All righteous government is by the consent of the individual. There are many forms and means whereby that consent may occur through the Nature Law.

In society there are standards, customs, and common practices established to protect those rights including prohibitions against stealing, killing or doing anything that may directly and or indirectly deprive other members of society of their right to pursue their own liberty to choose.

"Freedom is the Right to Choose, the Right to create for oneself the alternatives of Choice. Without the possibility of Choice, and the exercise of Choice, a man is not a man but a member, an instrument, a thing.” Archibald MacLeish.

People living close to nature may be more aware of the cause and effect written in Nature itself which may be recognized as Natural Law.

They may also perceive because of this natural cause and effect that certain behaviors are more desirable to maintain a stable society that is capable of defending its members from threats both foreign and domestic. Those behaviors may be described as social virtues.

Such societies must reward virtue and discourage negative or non-virtuous behavior that may be called social vices. Lack of the practice of unselfish virtue may weaken individuals, breaking down the family, from which society is born, and undermine the social bonds and thereby degenerate society as a whole. When there is a degeneration of social bonds that should make society strong and viable against the forces of nature, usurpers or tyrants, the whole of society is threatened.

Any system, culture, custom, or practice which may restrict, relieve, reduces the responsibility of the individual may, and often does degenerate the life and viability of the spirit of liberty living in that individual and eventually even their perception of truth.

While a voluntary society is concerned with protection of the rights, health, and prosperity of all, they must also be aware of the need of morals, education(the accumulation of knowledge and skill), and the promotion of the general character of their fellow neighbor, both near and far.

They also know that they must express with some consistency concern for the well being of the poor amongst them, foreigner or sojourner who comes into contact with them, and even to the point of extending justice and mercy at times to their enemy.

While the needs of the many may seem to outweigh the needs of the one the sacredness of individual and that right to choose should outweigh the desires of the many or the rights of all will soon fall into condemnation and peril.

Social forces

Some societies where people care about themselves more than their neighbor will be tempted to insure what had been social bonds through contractual bonds including oaths of fealty, national allegiance, and systems of one purse. The Golden calf of the Bible was an example of consolidating the control of the wealth of society in the hands of a few.

Such systems do create the bands of a society but also produces fealty and with that power may become centralized and in the hands of the few, or in a democracy in the hands of the many at the peril of individual choice and liberty.

In a voluntary society there would be no taxation or tribute, no mandatory service nor systems of corvee. There would be no king to exercise authority and therefore no legal charity nor Corban provided by forced compliance.

All societies and members of society may have needs as individuals or families. It is the means by which society attends to these social needs which determines the nature and strength of its social bonds and therefore the health and liberty within society. It has been long understood that there is a human responsibility in every individual to attend to the honest needs of their fellow man.

We see this cause and effect expressed in the golden rule, in the sayings of wise social reformers like Moses and Jesus and others we think of the promoters of religion[1] who said "love thy neighbor as thy self".

Religion in ancient times was often expressed in symbols and personalities through stories and myths but in essence it was defined as how you love the character of the Creator of life and how you cared and loved your neighbor as yourself. Pure Religion in the Bible was how you fulfilled that duty to your fellow man of justice and mercy without the use of force, or oaths of fealty the the governments of the world.

We are warned in the New Testament that we must not engage in covetous practices or we will become merchandise and curse children, our own and our neighbors. "Judge not" lest ye be judged suggests that if you judge it is okay to take from your neighbor then it must also be okay to take from you.[2] Both early Israel and the early Church understood that desiring benefits at the expense of others was desiring the reward of unrighteousness and would lead us back into the bondage of Egypt.

It would seem that the Modern Church is ignorant of the truth of the Gospel of the Kingdom which can set the living free in real ways today.

The religions of the world are suffering from their own Mass Formation Psychosis. It would seem that before "fake news" there was the "fake good news" that has caused false religion to justify the covetous practices of public religion and the welfare state.

Christ was clear that we were not to go to the governments and rulers who "exercise authority" one over the other even though they called themselves "benefactors".

It is the means of social welfare that will predetermine the out come of liberty in society through cause and effect built into Natural Law of the universe.

Proverbs tells us to put a "knife" to our throat before we eat at the table of rulers. Christians would not eat at that table of Rome because they knew if they bite one another they would be devoured. The early Christians would not eat the free bread of welfare state which was the Christian conflict with Rome. They knew it was a snare and a trap.

Polybius even told us before Christ that the masses would become perfect savages if they did not curb our appetite for benefits at the expense of our neighbor and the future of their children.

Whatever actions taken, as a society or nation, is the result first of individual choice of the exercise of charity and sacrifice rather than any form of collective or legal charity.


Comments
2nd Structure audio Download Recording
Can a society be just if it does not recognize some Intellectual property?
Is a fiction of law validly enforceable by consent?
Wickard v. Filburn = Roscoe Filburn grew wheat to feed animals on his own farm. The government regulated him supposedly because of the commerce clause of the constitution. He said that because his wheat was not sold, it could not be regulated as commerce, let alone "interstate" commerce.
The Supreme Court disagreed: "Whether the subject of the regulation in question was 'production', 'consumption', or 'marketing' is, therefore, not material for purposes of deciding the question of federal power before us.... But even if appellee's activity be local and though it may not be regarded as commerce, it may still, whatever its nature, be reached by Congress if it exerts a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce and this irrespective of whether such effect is what might at some earlier time have been defined as 'direct' or 'indirect.'" Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942)
Should the state determine the meaning of the Constitution if the states created it?
James Madison, a Democratic Republican,[3] was an anti-federalist who knew the States created the federal government and tried to limit it with phrases like 'necessary and proper' in Article 1, Section 8. But John Marshall said the Supreme Court shall decide what the constitution means, not the states and the state allowed him to redefined terms within it.[4]
They concluded that 'necessary and proper' did not mean 'necessary and proper' but rather 'beneficial and convenient'.[5]
Hamilton argued the same quoting from the Federalist Papers.[6]
Does a contract make all signers in an Intentional community responsible for the actions of a few like an unincorporated association.
Contracts, Covenants and Constitutions Curing Constitutionalists
legal and civil law is not Natural law although you need Natural law to create a legal system.
3rd Structure audio Download Recording
Family rights are inherent property rights. Generational rights[7] and responsibilities?
Was Abraham, Moses and Christ anarchist? One purpose of these ministers of the people was to proclaim liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants and return every man unto his possession, and return every man unto his family.[8]
What "Laws, rules, regulations, and pronunciations" are expressable against the will of another. "The codification of law at Ur replaced the Ana Ittishu, which was the ancient equivalent of modern “words and phrases”, and was a part of an ancient system, preserving the “Sumerian Family Laws”." Thy Kingdom Comes
Governance series Audios :
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/190413governance.mp3
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/190413governance02.mp3
Liberalism
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/190420liberalism.mp3
Textual examination of Romans 13
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/190427romans13text.mp3
Structure audio 1 - 5
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/190427structure.mp3
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/190504structure02.mp3
http://www.hisholychurch.net/audio/190504structure03.mp3

This copy of The Voluntaryist Constitution (original 10/24/2017) is not included to advocate its use. It is here for educational purposes and explained in the audio files and side panel.

Audio interview with Libertarian Christians

Who is Trey Goff

The Voluntaryist Constitution original

Preamble

This Constitution is hereby ordained as the preeminent contract outlining the fundamental legal principles and foundational legal framework of a truly free society. This document is meant to ensure that the right to property, being the most powerful of all encouragements to the multiplication of wealth, shall absolutely not be abridged, and further, that the right to self-ownership, being inherent in the existence of human, shall likewise be respected. This document further aims to ensure the creation of a peaceful and harmonious society predicated on voluntary cooperation such that the tranquility, prosperity, and happiness of all can be ensured. This Constitution is only applicable to those who have explicitly, voluntarily, and of their own free will and accord signed it, as well as their children, guests, and visitors. This is a free society where coercion is absolutely prohibited, meaning that no individual, group of individuals, and no entity including any state, government, organization or group of people in general, under any circumstances whatsoever may exercise or invoke any rights other than common property rights specifically stipulated herein.

All terms used in this Constitution, including the Preamble, have the sense and meaning given to them in Article I of this Constitution.

Article I: Definitions

Def 1. Private property may be any discernible object or electromagnetic wavelength with the following characteristics:

It is accessible, recognizable, and discernable. It persists in the time scale of human action. It exists independently of any perception or consciousness. It is possible in practice to measure its physicochemical characteristics using the International System of Units (MKSA) or any other equivalent conceptual system.

Def 2. A previously unowned or abandoned scarce resource is one meeting all the criteria of Def. 1 that is not being actively utilized by an individual or group of individuals for the completion of a particular project, or has not been claimed to be owned, in the time scale of human action, and in compliance with adverse possession common law.

Def 3. A property right is the right to the exclusive use of and complete control over private property.

Def 4. A coercive act is any act involving the use of private property on which a cognizable property right already exists, without the free and voluntary consent of the legitimate owner.

Def. 5. Homesteading is the process by which human beings justly acquire property rights in a previously unowned or abandoned scarce resource by mixing one’s labor with the resource.

Article II: Rights

  1. Every human being has an inherent, exclusive, inviolable right to self-ownerhsip.
  2. No law shall countenance the existence of slavery, conscription, indenture, or any other form of involuntary servitude.
  3. Human beings possessing the inalienable right of self-ownership likewise have the right to justly acquire property and claim property rights over a previously unowned or abandoned scarce resource through the process of homesteading.
  4. Human beings likewise may acquire title to new property through the process of peaceful and voluntary trade, exchange, and contract.
  5. Every individual shall have the right to freedom of contract, meaning that a rightsholder’s consent is both necessary and sufficient to transfer alienable title to property.
  6. All interactions and exchanges between individuals are to be voluntary, consensual, and peaceful, and as such no individual or group of individuals shall abridge the right of any person to purchase, gift, use, control, exchange, lease, sell, transfer, bequeath, dispose of, or in any manner enjoy their property without interference until and unless the exercise of their control infringes the property right of others.
  7. The only legally or morally permissible utilization of coercion is reactive coercion in direct and proportional response to an initiation of aggressive force against a peaceful individual’s property rights as specifically defined herein.
  8. All parties of this Constitution have an absolute right to self-defense in concurrent and proportional response to an uninitiated and uninvited coercion, manifest or imminent.
  9. The only legally enforceable rights are property rights.

Article III: Contracts

  1. Individuals or groups of individuals may voluntarily transfer title to any property between and amongst any other legitimate property owner.
  2. Contracts are to be enforceable through the use of any arbitration agency concurrently approved by both parties of the contract prior to contract formation and in accordance with all provisions of this Constitution.
  3. Only legitimate property as defined in this Constitution and in accordance with all provisions of this Constitution may be the subject of a title transfer.
  4. The right to freely and voluntarily contract is absolute and inviolable.

Article IV: Justice

  1. Any person's infringement of any rights stipulated herein is subject to lawful prosecution by the victim of this infringement or his agent in accordance with all relevant due process and contractual commitments, and is actionable in accordance with generally recognized common law principles of the proportionality of punishment, strict liability, and restitution.
  2. Jury trials are to be utilized in all criminal proceedings or any legal proceedings wherein an arbiter and arbitration method were not specifically stipulated contractually by all relevant parties beforehand.
  3. No person shall be convicted, sentenced, or imprisoned without due process of law, including the right to trial and habeas corpus, and there shall be no detention without trial, nor shall any person either before or after trial be held incommunicado. An accused person shall be assumed innocent until proven guilty. At every stage of criminal process, an accused shall be informed of the charges against him or her.
  4. No person shall be tried more than once for the same crime.
  5. No individual, collective, or firm shall be able to compel either jury service, discovery, or witness testimony during the proceedings of a criminal trial.
  6. Coercive detention shall not be exercised arbitrarily but only upon probable cause that the detainee (a) has committed or (b) is committing a criminal offence, or that he or she has been made, or is soon to be made, a subject of a court order regarding (c) a medical isolation on the account of a highly contagious and deadly disease, (d) an in-house care of a Minor, or (e) an institutionalization in a mental health facility.
  7. A person who has been arrested, detained, imprisoned, tried, or sentenced either illegally or in error shall receive full restitution.
  8. Restitutive compensation may be obtained coercively if necessary.
  9. The prosecution, arbitration, and enforcement of any and all disputes may be performed by any arbitration or protection agency formed and operating voluntarily under the purview of this Constitution.
  10. Any arbitration resolution binding parties to this Constitution that may be reasonably construed to be in contravention of any provision of this Constitution is null and void.
  11. This Constitution ratifies and adopts the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, as adopted by a United Nations diplomatic conference on 10 June 1958 and entered into force on 7 June 1959.
  12. Any and all Foreign Arbitral Awards recognized by the aforementioned Convention shall be binding in the jurisdiction of the parties of this Constitution and any enforcement agency operating in the jurisdiction of the parties of this Constitution shall have the authority to enforce such Awards upon request from the winning party.
  13. Parties to this Constitution agree to abide by and comply with any international agreements regarding commerce with narcotics or arms outside of the jurisdiction of the parties of this Constitution.

Article V: Prohibitions

The following laws, private covenants or practices are impermissible and unconstitutional for any entity to enforce on the property of another without prior, express, voluntary consent:

  1. Any coercive, non-voluntary transfer of money from any individual or group of individuals to any governing entity, as in compulsory taxation.
  2. Any coercive, non-voluntary transfer of any private property from an individual or group of individuals to any governing entity, as in asset forfeiture and eminent domain.
  3. Any coercive, non-voluntary limitation, stipulation, regulation, or restriction on the ownership, transfer, and usage in any way of any private property whatsoever, except in cases regarding circumstances beyond the territorial borders of the jurisdiction of this Constitution.
  4. Laws, rules, regulations, and pronunciations coercively penalizing in any way any victimless or consensual actions whatsoever.
  5. Laws, rules, regulations, and pronunciations coercively compelling any individual to act in any way whatsoever against his or her express will, except at the behest of a voluntarily signed contract.
  6. Any form of restriction, hindrance, or otherwise forceful intervention against any movement of individuals or group of individuals across the borders of the territory over which this Constitution has jurisdiction.
  7. Laws respecting or establishing a right to property in contravention of those definitions of rights to property established herein.
  8. Criminal statutes that do not specify an exact mens rea requirement for prosecution and enforcement.
  9. Laws, rules, regulations, and pronunciations respecting or concerning the establishment of a central bank.
  10. Any attempt to establish a monopoly on coercion and force within the jurisdiction of this Constitution.


If you need help:

Or want to help others:

Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network | Join Local group | About | Purpose | Guidelines | Network Removal
Contact Minister | Fractal Network | Audacity of Hope | Network Links

The Constitution of the United States - Contracts, Covenants and Constitutions -
The constitution applies - Voluntaryist Constitution - Social contract -
The Matrix and the U.S. Constitution - Act of 1871 - Guru theories - Constitutionalists -
Declaration of Independence - We the People - Sovereign - Not a party -
Mayflower Compact - Strangers and pilgrims - Thanksgiving - Eucharist - Social bonds |
Consent - Consent not - Contract - Swear not - Native American Confederacy -
Propaganda - Sophistry - Deception - Measured - Article II Section 22 - Numerous scientists -
Oath of Naturalization - Spiritual Contract - The Journey - Withdraw consent -
Titular - Benefactors - Republic - Democracy - Adhocracy - Righteousness -
1 Samuel 8 - David Crockett - Self Defense - Network - CORE Solution -

Community | Intentional Community | Sense of Community |
Community Types | Community Ethics | Community Law |
Voluntary society | Voluntaryist Constitution | Volunteer |
Society | Individualism | Liberalism |
Classical liberalism | Transcendentalist | Communities Ancient |
Communitarian | Collectivism | Identity politics |
Socialism | Communism | Primitive Communism |
Communion | Eucharist | Social Virtues | Daily ministration |
Tens | FEMA | Burning Bush Festival | Burning Bush Festival |
Feasts | Feasts and festivals | Pentecost | Celebrate |
Law | Rights | Economy | Education | Welfare types |
Stimulus | Building back | The Greatest Reset |
Agorism | Permaculture | Guru theories | Perfect law of liberty |
Benefactors | Covetous practices | Christian conflict |
Pure Religion | Public religion | Imperial Cult of Rome |
gods | Covet | First to do List | Fundamental orders | Network |


Footnotes

  1. In the Tao Te Ching, Lao-Tzu wrote, "The world can be turned over to the man who loves all people as he loves himself." Buddha too said "If you truly loved yourself, you could never hurt another." and "Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." and finally echoing John 3:16, "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." Buddha stated, “Love the whole world as a mother loves her only child.” The Hindu says, "Do naught unto others which would cause pain unto you." (Mahabharata 5, 1517.) Even Islam says "None of you truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself." (Sunnah Hadith.) But then men who do not love their fellow man the same as their tribe come and change the meaning of "brother" and Religion.
  2. Matthew 7:1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
    Luke 6:37 Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:
  3. The Democratic-Republican Party (formally called the Republican Party) was an American political party formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison around 1792 to oppose the centralizing policies of the new Federalist Party run by Alexander Hamilton, who was Secretary of the Treasury and chief architect of George Washington's administration.
  4. The court ruled against Maryland in McCulloch v. Maryland, and Chief Justice John Marshall, Hamilton's longtime Federalist ally, wrote the opinion, which stated that while the Constitution did not explicitly give permission to create a federal bank, it conferred upon Congress an implied power to do so.
  5. Marshall wrote: We admit, as all must admit, that the powers of the Government are limited, and that its limits are not to be transcended. But we think the sound construction of the Constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into execution which will enable that body to perform the high duties assigned to it in the manner most beneficial to the people. Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the Constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution, are constitutional.
  6. "No axiom is more clearly established in law or in reason than wherever the end is required, the means are authorized; wherever a general power to do a thing is given, every particular power for doing it is included."
  7. “To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies… It systematically undermines the solidarity of the family…” On Doublethink in Book Two Section IX of 1984 by George Orwell
  8. Leviticus 25:10 And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout [all] the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubile unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.